1.gif (1892 bytes)

Letters to the Editor

Indian Pediatrics 2001; 38: 309-311  

Recurrent Abdominal Pain – A Reappraisal?


Balani et al.’s uncontrolled study(1) of a very small number of children with recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) gives insufficient information and raises many questions.

1. Selection of patients: Were the thirty-five children with RAP consecutively taken? What was their age distribution? Were they referred to the Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic? Did they constitute all patients with RAP seen at the hospital in one year? What is the daily attendance of children at this hospital?

2. Clinical Features: Was any attempt made to grade the severity of abdominal pain? Were the intensity of pain, its duration and frequency and medications taken to relieve the pain taken into account? Children with RAP usually seek hospital advice after several months or years of having the symptom (Apley’s definition of RAP may need a fresh look).

3. Etiology:(i) Isolated urinary tract infection does not cause RAP, unless there is an associated underlying anomaly such as urinary tract obstruction (pelviureteric junction obstruction is an occasional cause of RAP); (ii) Chronic gastritis: What was the cause of chronic gastritis and eso-phagitis in patients who did not have H. pylori infection (presumably responsible for RAP in 5 cases)? What is the pre-valence rate of H. pylori infection in children in different parts in India and (iii) Amebiasis, giardiasis and worm infesta-tions are often detected in asymptomatic children.

4. Treatement: In most cases the authors have assumed the ‘cause and effect’ relation-ship. How were children with chronic gastritis treated? How many had complete cure and how many had reduction of RAP? "Appropriate treatment" of the underlying organic cause should result in complete and permanent cure. The 3-month follow-up period is too small to be meaningful. Spontaneous recovery in children with RAP is not uncommon.

5. Discussion: Psychological problems are frequent in the child and the family when the child has RAP or indeed any other chronic or recurrent disorder. The role of such factors may vary in different socio-economic and cultural settings and the views of workers in developed countries may not be equally applicable in our patients. The authors may be correct in proposing that organic causes may be detected in a majority of children with RAP. It is, however, not unlikely that giardiasis, amebiasis, UTI were mere associations and not necessarily res-ponsible for RAP in their patients. One should be aware of the placebo effect of treatment particularly when the follow-up period is very short.

The authors recommend that "thorough investigation is a must " in children with RAP. Are there any guidelines? Does one take the severity and duration of RAP into account? Most pediatricians would not consider endoscopy in all patients with RAP. Only a large, well-designed, controlled study can provide reliable and significant information. Pediatricians and pediatric gastroenterologists in the country should take a serious look at this common and often distressing problem of childhood.

R.N. Srivastava,
Consultant Pediatric Nephrologist,
Apollo Indraprastha Hospital,
New Delhi 110 019, India.
E-mail: [email protected]

 Reference
  1. Balani B, Patwari AK, Bajaj P, Diwan N, Anand VK. Recurrent abdominal pain – A reappraisal. Indian Pediatr 2000; 37: 876-881.

 Reply

We thank Dr. Srivastava for the interest shown in our article and have the following clarifications to offer:

1. Children attending the Out Patient Department with complaints of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) who fulfilled Apley’s criteria were consecutively referred to Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic where they were investigated and followed up. Age distribution is clearly mentioned in the text and patients were between 5-12 years of age. These patients don’t constitute all the patients with RAP attending Kalawati Saran Children’s Hospital because children presenting with RAP were seen by different category of residents/senior doctors and referral of all such cases could not be assured. The daily attendance of patients at our hospital is approximately 1000.

2. For inclusion of patients, Apley’s criteria was used which includes at least three episodes of abdominal pain severe enough to affect routine activities over a period longer than three months. No attempt was made to further grade the severity of abdo-minal pain based on intensity, duration, frequency or medication taken to relieve pain. Authors do agree that Apley’s definition of RAP may need a fresh look especially for children younger than 5 years of age. However, for the purpose of the study this criteria was used and duration of symptoms before seeking hospital advise does not form an important constituent of Apley’s criteria except that it should be more than three months.

3 (i) Regarding the etiology of RAP there have been reports linking urinary tract infection (UTI) with RAP(1,2). Authors agree that underlying anomaly such as urinary tract obstruction may be more important in causing RAP. In none of our cases, however, ultrasonographic examina-tion revealed any such abnormality. But we still believe that it is helpful to investigate patients of RAP for UTI. Four (11.4%) of our cases with RAP were found to have UTI while being investigated.

(ii) Apart from H. pylori infection there are other causes of chronic gastritis such as peptic ulcer disease, drugs, and chronic infections such as tuberculosis. Within the limitations of the study, apart from docu-menting endoscopic and histological evi-dence of chronic gastritis and esophagitis, no further investigation could be per-formed to know the cause. The reported prevalence of H. pylori in Indian children between 4-15 years from various Pediatric Gastroenterology centers ranges from 18-36% in hospitalized patients(3).

(iii) We agree that amebiasis, giardiasis and worm infestation can even be detected in asymptomatic children but at the same time, some children, particularly those with physiological maladjustment, can have pain because of these etiologies. Moreover relief of symptoms following therapy for at least three months justifies the rationale for associating these conditions with RAP.

4. Patients with chronic gastritis received H2 blocker therapy. Those with associated H. pylori infection were also given metro-nidazole, bismuth and amoxicillin. Overall amongst patients with organic cause of RAP, 67% were pain free and 28% had pain of reduced intensity and severity. Of patients with chronic gastritis. 50% were pain free and 50% had pain of reduced intensity and severity over the period of three months of follow up. There is no disagreement that literally speaking, appro-priate treatment should result in complete and permanent cure but as practicing pediatricians we also realize that there are conditions, particularly those with psycho-somatic component, which may take a longer time to resolve. In such cases reduction in symptoms is quite a rewarding experience. Spontaneous recovery in children with RAP is not uncommon. However, one would not expect long standing organic causes to resolve on their own.

5. We agree that some of these conditions may be mere associations, rather than being underlying etiology and the drugs may have had placebo effects, particularly in the presence of psychological factors. However, as is clear from the "Key Messages", we would still like to highlight that these children need to be investigated for these etiological factors (or asso-ciations) so that they can be treated for these conditions. We would like to reiterate that in our study only children who fulfilled Apley’s criteria were included. Abdominal pain (including recurrent episodes) in children is quite common but the article discusses only a smaller proportion of children who fulfil Apley’s criteria and these definitely deserve to be thoroughly investigated. However, it is not necessary to subject all of them to endoscopy if the baseline investigations are helpful in reaching a diagnosis. In a tertiary care center like ours with all the facilities for endoscopy, out of 35 cases of RAP only 17 were subjected to endoscopy since we were able to make a diagnosis without performing endoscopy.

Bharat Balani,
A.K. Patwari,

Department of Pediatrics,
Kalawati Saran Childrens’ Hospital,
New Delhi 110 001, India.

  References
  1. Du JN. Colic as the sole symptom of urinary tract infection in infants. Can Med Assoc J 1976; 115: 334-337.

  2. Soeparto P. Endoscopic examinations in children with recurrent abdominal pain. Pediatr Indones 1989; 29: 221-227.

  3. Patwari A.K. Helicobacter pylori infection in Indian children. Indian J Pediatr 1999; 66: S63-S70.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription