1.gif (1892 bytes)

Original Articles

Indian Pediatrics 2000;37: 1321-1327

Impact of the Integrated Child Development Services (icds) on Maternal 
Nutrition and Birth Weight in Rural Varanasi


K.N. Agarwal, 
D.K. Agarwal, 
A. Agarwal, 
S. Rai, 
R. Prasad, 
S. Agarwal, 
T.B. Singh

From the Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi 221 005 and University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi 110 095, India.

Correspondence to: Prof. K.N. Agarwal, D-115/Sector 36, NOIDA 201 301, Gautam Buddha Nagar, India. E-Mail: [email protected]

Manuscript received: December 3, 1998; Initial review completed: February 22, 1999,
Revision accepted: July 10, 2000

Objective: To evaluate the impact of ICDS on maternal nutrition and birth weight. Setting: 28 ICDS and 21 non-ICDS villages in two adjoining blocks of Varanasi. Methods: 5289 pregnancies were registered during 1987-1993 in these two blocks. In the ICDS block 916 and 1453 nutrition supplemented and unsupplemented, respectively and 1748 of the non-ICDS live births with weight recorded within 48 h formed the study subjects. Results: The ICDS supplemented mothers gained 100g more in pregnancy and birth weight was higher by 58 g (p <0.05) as compared to unsupplemented ICDS mothers. Birth weight in unsupplemented ICDS areas was 25g higher as compared to non ICDS area. ICDS supplemented women had a significantly smaller proportion of low birth weight babies (14.4%) compared to ICDS unsupplemented (20.4%) and non-ICDS women (26.3%). The corresponding prevalence of preterm births was 2.0, 2.4 and 4.3%, respectively (P <0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that increased wight gain in pregnancy, length of gestation, caloric intake and term hemoglobin were significantly associated with birth weight. However, the length of gestation was not influenced by factors improving the birth weight. Conclusion: Undernourished pregnant women are benefitted by late pregnancy nutrition supplement.

Key words : Birth weight, Gestation, Integrated Child Development Services, Nutrition supplement.

THE Government of India in 1975 launched the Integrated Child Develop-ment Services (ICDS) in a planned manner to cover all the blocks. These services were also planned to cover urban slums. This is the largest direct nutrition and health input program in the world for children and pregnant and lactating women. Inspite of several implementation and regular food supply problems, ICDS has succeeded in reaching over 80% of rural India, particularly in poor and difficult areas.

In earlier reports from the same study area, it was documented that still births and perinatal, early neonatal and infant mortalities were significantly lower for mothers in supplemented area of the ICDS block(1,2). The present report had the objectives of investigating the impact of ICDS services on maternal weight gain in pregnancy, birth weight, period of gestation and caloric intake.

 Subjects and Methods

Profile of Selected Study Area in District Varanasi

The present study was undertaken in a rural ICDS block (Harahua - 28 villages; population 33770) and the adjoining non-ICDS (Kashi Vidhyapeth block - 21 villages; population 32307). For evaluating the impact of supplementation, the supplemented women of block Harahua were compared against those who did not receive the supple-mentation during pregnancy, as other ICDS inputs were similar in both the groups. The study however had some weaknesses: (a) quality, composition and required amount for supplement could not be controlled, (b) the criteria for selection of women was based on socio-economic status and caste (4-5% more from the scheduled caste group and lower socio-economic families in nutrition supple-mentation group), and (c) sharing of supple-mented food in these families could not be checked personally except by verbal enquiry.

After considerable persuasion, Govern-ment of Uttar Pradesh agreed to provide nutrition supplement to all pregnant women in the ICDS study area. The supplementation however reached only 34.4% pregnant women in the ICDS area, was irregular, was of poor quality, and inadequate in amount. Besides the nutrition supplement to pregnant women, preschool children received non-formal education and nutrition supple-mentation in the ICDS block. The women in addition received education on health and diet and were provided antenatal check up.

The data for the study were collected from 1987 to 1993. The details for method of registration, data collection are given in earlier reports(1-3). The iron-folate supple-mentation was negligible in both the blocks.

Data Collection

(a) Anthropometeric measurements: Maternal height, weight and mid-arm circumference were measured as per standard techniques using Chattilon weighing scale (USA), anthropometeric rod and fibre glass tape, respectively. Birth weight was recorded on a modified Tansi scale(1-3). Abdominal girth was measured by fibre glass tape at the level of umblicus by crossover technique. Pre-pregnancy weight, mid-arm circumference and height measurements were available for these study women.

(b) Hemoglobin estimation and dietary assessment: Hemoglobin was estimated by cyanmethemoglobin method. Dietary survey was done by 24 h recall method using standard utensils. These estimations were undertaken in all pregnant women.

During pregnancy women were examined at 16±2, 28±2 and 36±2 weeks of gestation and also within 48 h of delivery for estimation of gestational age at term and birth weight.

Statistical Methods

Means, standard deviation, ANOVA and multiple regression analysis were performed using SPSS package.

 Results

Sociodemographic and Biological Characteristics

A comparison of age, education, gravidity, parity, interpregnancy interval and number of living children in the ICDS and non-ICDS blocks is depicted in Table I.

Table I - Socio-demographic and Biological pre-pregnancy Characterstics of Women in ICDS and Non-ICDS Areas (Mean ± SD)

Characteristics ICDS  
Supplemented
(n = 982)
(A)
Unsupplemented
(n = 1826)
(B)
Non-ICDS
(n=1748)
(C)
p value
Tukey test
Significance
between
 1. Age (years) 26.1 ± 5.6 26.1 ± 6.0 24.9 ± 5.8 <0.0001 C vs A & B
 2. Education (years)          
       Females 1.7 ± 2.3 2.0 ± 3.0 2.2 ± 3.07 <0.0001 A vs B & C;
B vs C
       Males 5.5 ± 4.9 5.7 ± 4.8 7.0 ± 5.0 <0.0001 C vs A & B
 3. Gravida  3.7 + 2.2 3.7 ± 2.3 3.6 ± 2.3 0.13  
 4. Parity 3.1 ± 1.9 3.1 ± 2.7 2.9 ± 1.9 0.01 B vs C
 5. Living children 2.6 ± 1.5 2.6 ± 1.5 2.6 ± 1.4 - -
 6. Inter pregnancy
       interval months
21.4 ± 14.9 20.8 ± 14.7 23.1 ± 10.7 <0.001 B vs C
 7. Pre-pregnancy          
       Weight (kg)
       Height (cm)
       MAC (cm)
42.5 ± 3.9
149.6 ± 4.1
22.0 ± 1.6
42.6 ± 4.2
149.4 ± 4.1
22.1 ± 1.7
41.5 ± 4.9
148.9 ± 5.0
21.9 ± 1.8
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.002
C vs A & B
C vs A & B
B vs C

Anthropometry During Pregnancy

The mean weight gain during pregnancy was 6.4 ± 1.0, 6.3 ± 0.9 and 6.3 ± 1.1 kg for the supplemented and unsupplemented women of ICDS area and non-ICDS area, respectively (Table II). Gain in weight of >6.0 kg was observed in 72.3%, 69.5% and 62.3%, women respectively in the three groups. Even in the third trimester of pregnancy, 27.4% women remained <45.0 kg in the non-ICDS area as compared to 13.8% and 12.7% in the supplemented and the unsupplemented groups of ICDS area, respectively (p <0.05).

Table II - Details of Maternal Anthropometry During Pregnancy

Maternal
Anthropometry

ICDS  
Supplemented
(A)
Unsupplemented
(B)
Non-ICDS
(C)
p value Significance
between
    16 Weeks(1)      
1. (a) Weight (kg)
    (b) MAC (cm)
    (c) Abdominal 
         girth (cm)
    (d) Hemoglobin 
         (g/dl)
42.9 ± 4.1
22.2 ± 1.6
69.1 ± 19.7

9.9 ± 1.0
42.9 ± 4.1
22.2 ± 1.7
68.5 ± 3.7

10.1 ± 2.8
42.5 ± 4.9
22.8 ± 1.8
70.4 ± 4.4 

10.1 ± 0.9
<0.01

<0.0001

0.02
B vs C

C vs A & B

A vs B & C
    28 Weeks(2)      
2. (a) Weight (kg)
    (b) MAC (cm)
    (c) Abdominal 
         girth (cm)
    (d) Hemoglobin 
        (g/dl)
45.7 ± 4.0
22.4 ± 1.6
78.4 ± 3.5

9.4 ± 1.0
45.8 ± 4.5
22.3 ± 1.7
78.6 ± 4.3

9.7 ± 1.2
45.3 ± 5.1
22.6 ± 1.8 
78.2 ± 5.0

9.9 ± 1.0
0.004
<0.0001
<0.03

<0.0001
B vs C
C vs A & B
B vs C

A vs B & C; B vs C
    36 weeks(3)      
3. (a) Weight (kg)
    (b) MAC (cm)
    (c) Abdominal 
        girth (cm)
    (d) Hemoglobin 
         (g/dl)
49.0 ± 4.4
22.5 ± 1.7
89.4 ± 4.5

9.3 ± 1.0
48.9 ± 4.5
22.6 ± 2.0
89.3 ± 4.6

9.3 ± 1.0
47.9 ± 5.2
22.7 ± 1.8
85.2 ± 5.2

10.0 ± 1.1
<0.0001
<0.02
<0.0001
 
<0.0001
C vs A & B
A vs C
C vs A & B

C vs A & B
4. Wt. gain in 
    pregnancy (kg)
6.4 ± 1.0  6.3 ± 0.9  6.34 ± 1.1 0.04 B vs A & C

The total increase in abdominal girth was about 21 cm in the ICDS and 15 cm in the non-ICDS areas. These differences were significant (p <0.001). The change in midarm cirumference during pregnancy was not significant in all the three groups.

Hemoglobin and Dietary Intake

At 28 weeks, the mean hemoglobin decreased by 0.5 and 0.4 g/dl amongst the ICDS (supplemented and unsupplemented, respectively) and 0.2 g/dl in non-ICDS women. At 36 weeks there was further fall of 0.1 and 0.4 g/dl in the supplemented and the unsupplemented groups of ICDS area, whereas the non-ICDS women showed no fall. These hemoglobin changes were signi-ficantly (p <0.001) different (Table II).

The dietary intake between 16-28 weeks did not change in any of the groups. The average caloric intake was 1650 kcal per day and protein intake around 52 g per day. By about 36 weeks of pregnancy, ICDS supple-mented women received 1676 ± 200 kcal/day as compared to 1654 ± 198 kcal/day for the unsupplemented ICDS group.

Effect on Birth Weight and Gestation

In the ICDS block birth weight for supplemented women was significantly higher by 58 g as compared to unsupple-mented women. The birth weight in unsupplemented ICDS area was 25 g higher as compared to non ICDS area. ICDS supple-mented group of women had a significantly smaller proportion of low birth weight babies (14.4%) compared to ICDS unsupplemented (20.4%) and non-ICDS women (26.3%). The prevalence of preterm births was 2.0, 2.4 and 4.3% in the supplemented and unsupple-mented ICDS area and non-ICDS area respectively (p <0.001).

Determinants of Birth Weight

Multiple regression analysis revealed that weight gain in pregnancy, length of gestation and caloric intake in the third trimester made significant contribution to birth weight in both the blocks ICDS and non-ICDS (Table III). In addition pre-pregnancy height and hemoglo-bin at 36 weeks made significant contribution to birth weight in ICDS block only.

Table III - Multivariate Analysis of Determinants of Birth Weight in ICDS and non-ICDS Areas
Variables ICDS Non-ICDS
Coefficient SE p Coefficient SE p
Constant –865.28084 478.29463   –129.838883 489.685419  
Calories 0.16645  0.04546 0.0003 0.226384 0.054686 0.0000
Gestation 24.98118 8.30030 0.0027 27.16507 7.625302 0.0004
Third hemoglobin 18.53742 8.77162 0.0349 4.238330 9.995086 0.6717
Weight gain 155.90639 11.35094 0.0000 83.521083 10.446403 0.0000
Pre-pregnancy:            
Height 6.35163 2.481886 0.0107 1.934464 2.582162 0.4541
Weight –0.44979  2.88339 0.8761 10.682159 3.408719 0.0018
Mid arm circumference 9.139508 6.71613 0.1740 2.152766 8.693745 0.8045
 Discussion

The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of interventions provided by the Government of India in the Integrated Child Development Services on maternal nutrition and pregnancy outcome during the years 1987-93. This is an important research question as these services have already being extended to cover all the blocks and urban slum areas without any improvement in quality of nutrition supplement and in the delivery system. Furthermore, the nutritional status of women in various parts of India is similarly poor, with lower weight gain in pregnancy(4,5). In several other studies low weight gain during pregnancy has been observed in undernourished women, e.g 6.4 kg in Gambia(6), 7.6 kg in Taiwan(7,8) and 5.5 kg in East Java(9). In Bangla Desh(10) urban high class gained 6.7 kg and low social class gained 5.5 kg. Nutrition intervention in most of these studies improved weight gain in pregnancy and marginally improved the birth weight(11).

The pregnant women of rural Varanasi in this study showed only marginal increase in energy intake and poor weight gain. Hemo-globin concentration between the 16 and 36 weeks reduced by 6% in the supplemented, 6.9% in unsupplemented area, with negligible change in the non-ICDS group. Paintain et al.(12) reported hemoglobin decrease by 1.7%, 12.5% and 10% by 5, 8 and 9 month of gestation, respectively. These findings suggest that the ICDS group women could increase blood volume only to around 1/3 of the expected and the non-ICDS group had negligible expansion. The fall in hemoglobin in second half of pregnancy is important for reducing preterm and low birth weight deliveries(13).

As per the ICDS guidelines women should receive 450-500 kcal with 20 g protein in the later half of pregnancy; this should provide around 45,000-50,000 kcal extra supplement in pregnancy. This is neither reflected in their dietary intake nor in weight gain during pregnancy. The possibility of food sharing in these poor families remains an important possibility for these observations. Inspite of very low level of supplementation as compared to the unsupplemented group, the positive achievements were: (a) lower percentage of low birth weight deliveries (14.4% vs 20.4%); (b) more newborns weighed >3000g (16.2% vs 11.0%); (c) 100 g extra gain in maternal weight; and (d) the gestational age increased by 0.3 week (p <0.001). A comparison of unsupplemented ICDS group with non-ICDS women showed 44.2% reduction in preterm births and 23.1% reduction in low birth weights. These achievements were due to other inputs in the ICDS. The ICDS to a large extent can be compared to the Women-Infant-Child (WIC) supplementation program of the USA(14,15) providing milk, cheese, eggs, iron fortified cereal, beans, butter and 100% fruit juice (900 kcal/day). In WIC supplemented group (pregnancies = 1154673; during 1972-80) there was increase in birth weight by 23.9 g and gestational age by 0.2 day; reduction in pregnancy wastage (fetal mortality reduced by 2.3/1000), small for gestational age births (reduced by 1.1%) and maternal weight increased by 70g. Among women receiving nutrition supplement during second preg-nancy, birth weight increased by 136 g. In contrast, the present study on rural women had several well known factors predisposing for a small size baby: short stature, under-weight mothers and low mid-arm circum-ference (early as well as current under-nutrition). The normal pregnancy contributes 20% extra weight over the pre-pregnancy weight. For the mean height of the present study women, the expected weight should have been around 49 kg, which at term with 20% increase would be 59 kg. The study women however had a mean weight of 42.5 kg (around 86.7% of the expected). To approach the desired weight of 59 kg the gain should be 16.5 kg (deficit + required pregnancy gain). This will require 460-490 kcal/day extra from 12th week of gestation or before for ideal pregnancy outcome. The present study women gained an average weight of 6.3 kg (baby = 2.7 kg + placenta 0.4 kg + uterus + blood 3-4 kg) thus maintaining a deficit balance(16,17). Earlier studies in the same area revealed that treatment of anemia in pregnant women had also resulted in better birth weight(18).

To conclude the present study demons-trated that nutrition supplement to pregnant women in ICDS area improved weight gain in pregnancy and birth weight with reduction in pre-term and low birth weight deliveries. To lesser extent such effect was also observed in unsupplemented ICDS, possibly contributed by the other inputs.

 Acknowledgements

The USAID consultant Prof. D. Rush Jean Mayer, USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging 711 Washington St. Boston U.S.A. provided critical guidance. The study could not have been possible without the administrative and scientific contribution from Dr. Badri Saxena, former Additional Director General (ADG) ICMR, New Delhi. Thanks are due to Dr. Padam Singh, ADG, ICMR for statistical discussions. We were grateful to Shri A.K. Bansal, Biostatistics Division University College Medical Sciences, Delhi for help in statistical analysis. The infrastructural facilities were provided by the Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.

Contributors: KNA coordinated the study (interpretation/monitoring). DKA supervised and monitored field work. She also undertook preliminary analysis. AA and SA did examina-tion of women and paper writing. SR. RP and TBS were responsible for field data entry.

Funding: Indian Council of Medical Research and United States Agency for International Development Delhi.
Competing interests:
None stated.

Key Messages

  • Undernourished rural pregnant women were benefitted by nutrition supplement in ICDS as evident by better weight gain.

  • Supplementation improved birth weight by 58 g in the ICDS area.

  • Supplemented mothers had lower rate for preterm and low birth weight deliveries.

  References
  1. Agarwal DK, Agarwal KN, Satya K, Agarwal S. Weight gain during pregnancy - A key factor in perinatal and infant mortality. Indian Pediatr 1998; 35: 733-743.

  2. Agarwal DK, Agarwal A, Singh M, Satya K, Agarwal S, Agarwal KN. Pregnancy wastage in rural Varanasi: Relationship with maternal nutrition and sociodemographic characteris-tics. Indian Pediatr 1998; 35: 1071-1079.

  3. Srivastava M, Agarwal DK, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Agarwal KN. Nutritional status of rual non-pregnant non-lactating women in reproductive age. Indian Pediatr 1998; 35: 975-983.

  4. Tripathi AM, Agarwal DK, Agarwal KN, Devi RR, Cherian S. Nutritional status of rural pregnant women and fetal outcome. Indian Pediatr 1987; 24: 703-712.

  5. National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau. Report of Repeat Surveys (1988-90). National Institute Nutrition 1991, Hyderabad.

  6. Prentice AM, Whitehead RG, Watinson M, Lamb WH, Cole TJ. Prenatal dietary supple-mentation of African women and birth weight. Lancet 1983; 1: 489-491.

  7. McDonald EC, Pollit, Mueller W, Hsuch AM, Shervig R. The Bacon Chow study: Maternal nutrition supplementation and birth weight of offspring. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 2133-2144.

  8. Adair LS, Pollit E. Outcome of maternal nutritional supplementation: A comphrehen-sive review of the Bacon Chow study. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 41: 948-978.

  9. Kardjati S, Kusin JA, Schofield WM. Energy supplementation in the last trimester of pregnancy in East Java Indonesia: Effect on maternal anthropometry. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 52: 987-994.

  10. Canosa CA. Intrauterine growth retardation in India and Bagla Desh. In: Intrauterine growth Retardation. Ed. Senterre J, Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series, New York, Raven Press, 1989; pp 183-204.

  11. Kramer MS. Effects of energy protein intakes on pregnancy outcome. An overview of the research evidence from contolled clinical trials. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 58: 627-635.

  12. Paintin DB. Thomson AM, Hytten FE. Iron and the hemoglobin level in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynec Brit Cmm Wlth 1966; 73: 181-186.

  13. Steer P, Alam MA, Wadsworth J, Welch A. Relation between maternal hemoglobin concentration and birth weight in different ethnic groups. Brit Med J 1995; 310: 489- 491.

  14. Rush D. The national WIC-evaluation: Evaluation of the special supplement food program for women infants and children. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 48:(Suppl) 389-519.

  15. Kennedy ET, Kotelchuck M. The effect of WIC supplemental feeding on birth weight: A case control analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1984; 40: 579-585.

  16. Poppitt SD, Prentice AM, Goldberg GR, Whitehead RG. Energy sparing strategies to protect human fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 118-125.

  17. Murthy LS, Agarwal KN, Khann S. Placental morphometeric and morphological alterations in maternal undernutrition. Am J Obstet Gynec 1976; 124: 641-645.

  18. Agarwal KN, Agarwal DK, Mishra KP. Impact of anemia prophylaxis in pregnancy on maternal hemoglobin, serum ferritin and birth weight. Indian J Med Res (B) 1991; 94: 277-280.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription