|
Indian Pediatr 2021;58:850-852 |
 |
Antiseizure Drug Levels in Children Aged
2-12 Years Presenting With Breakthrough Seizures: A Single
Center Cross-sectional Study
|
Rajan Garg, 1 Anju
Aggarwal,1 Sangeeta Sharma,2
Manish Narang,1 Rajeev
Malhotra3
From 1Department of Pediatrics, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi;
2Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, Institute of Human Behaviour and
Allied Sciences, Delhi; and 3Department of Statistics, Delhi Cancer
Registry, Dr. BRAIRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi.
Correspondence to: Dr. Rajan Garg, Department of Pediatrics,
University College of Medical Science and GTB Hospital, Delhi110095.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: September 22, 2020;
Initial review: November 14, 2020;
Accepted: June 19, 2021.
Published online: June 28, 2021;
PII:S097475591600346
|
Objective: To study the antiseizure drug levels
and associated factors in children with breakthrough seizures.
Methods: This cross-sectional study conducted at a public
hospital from November, 2017 to April, 2019, included 145
children with epilepsy aged 2 to 12 years presenting with breakthrough
seizure. Antiseizure drug levels were measured, and the levels were
categorized as within, below, and above the reference range. Results:
Children with epilepsy receiving sodium valproate, phenytoin and
carbamazepine were 111 (73%), 31 (20.4%) and 10 (6.6%), respectively, of
which 7 were receiving multiple antiseizure drugs. Drug levels below the
reference range were found in 64 (44.1%), within the reference range in
70 (48.3%), and the above reference range in 11 (7.6%) children.
Conclusion: Nearly half the children with breakthrough seizures had
sub-therapeutic levels, especially those on phenytoin therapy. Drug
levels in below therapeutic range were not associated with occurrence of
breakthrough seizures.
Keywords: Precipitating factors, Reference range, Therapeutic
drug monitoring.
|
I n children with
well-controlled epilepsy, a
breakthrough seizure may occur in up to 40% [1].
International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE)
recommends that plasma levels of antiseizure drugs should be
interpreted as within, below, and above the reference range [2].
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) helps in dosage
individualization based on clinical response [3]. Therefore,
a therapeutic range is introduced, which defines drug
concentration associated with the best achievable response in a
given person. The benefits of TDM are in case of status
epilepticus, polypharmacy, change in drug dose/formulation, and
clinical toxicity. It also helps to assess compliance, and guide
dosage adjustment in children with associated liver and kidney
diseases [2,4,5]. Well-delineated precipitating factors precede
epileptic attack and commonly include fever, sleep deprivation,
and stress [1,6,7]. Non-compliance to the treatment is another
common cause [6,7].
There is a relative lack of literature on an
antiseizure drug levels in children with a breakthrough seizure.
Therefore, this study was planned to describe the association
between the occurrence of a breakthrough seizure and
anti-seizure drug levels.
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted at the
pediatrics department of a public tertiary care hospital from
November, 2017 to April, 2019, after obtaining clearance from
the institutional ethics committee. A written informed consent
was obtained from the parents/guardians/caregivers.
Children aged 2 to 12 years either having an
active breakthrough seizure or those who had a breakthrough
seizure within the last 24 hours and receiving either one or two
anti-seizure drug (phenytoin, carbamazepine, sodium valproate)
were enrolled from the emergency room or the outpatient
department. Patient’s demographic, clinical, and investigation
details (serum sodium and potassium, blood glucose, and total
leukocyte count) were recorded in a pre-designed case record
form. Compliance with the drugs was ensured after taking a
detailed history. For this study, a breakthrough seizure was
defined as seizures in a child with epilepsy on one or two
anti-seizure drugs, who did not have any seizure activity in the
last one month. Generic form of anti-seizure drugs were
available free of cost to the patients from the hospital
formulary. The dose of antiseizure drug and treatment for
epilepsy was given as per the guidelines followed in the
hospital. Children who had received a loading dose of any
antiseizure drug before presentation, those with deranged blood
glucose/serum electrolyte levels, history of myoclonic or
absence seizure, and known patients of chronic liver
disease/chronic renal disease, meningitis, syndromic epilepsies,
and known non-compliance (missed >3 doses of anti-seizure drug)
were excluded.
A venous blood sample (3 mL) was collected
aseptically in serum vial before the loading dose of the
antiseizure drug. Serum was separated within 30 min and stored
at 0-8 ºC. Drug level estimation was done using CEDIA II kits
(Thermofisher Scientific/2018) based on recombinant DNA
technology to create a homogenous immunoassay system. The
minimum detectable concen-tration of CEDIA Phenytoin II,
Carbamazepine II, and Valproic acid II assays was 0.6 mg/L, 0.5
mg/L and 3.0 mg/L. The reference range for serum levels of
phenytoin, carbamazepine, and sodium valproate was considered
between 10-20 mg/L, 4-12 mg/L, and 50 to 100 mg/L, respectively,
as per laboratory and kit specifications.
According to a previous study [8], serum
levels of first-line antiseizure drug were in the below
reference range in 40% of cases with breakthrough seizures.
Using the formula for hospital-based population proportion with
confidence interval 95%, estimated prevalence of 40%, power of
80%, a error of 5%, and acceptable absolute precision of ±8%
(acceptable relative precision of 20%), the sample size was
calculated as 144. Thus, 145 children were planned to be
enrolled.
Statistical analysis: Analysis was
performed using SPSS version 20 software. Pearson
Chi-square / Fisher exact test was used to assess the
association between demographic and clinical variables with
below and normal reference range of antiseizure drug; the above
range subjects were not included in the comparison. The 95%
confidence level of below reference range proportion was
determined using the binomial Wald method. P value of
<0.05 was taken as significant.
RESULTS
A total of 145 children (97 males) were
enrolled with a mean (SD) age of 6.9 (3.0) years. Generalized
seizures were seen in 93 (64.1%) children, and normal
development was seen in 90 (62.1%) children. Microcephaly was
found in 26 (17.9%) children. All children had baseline
laboratory parameters within the normal range. A single drug was
being used by 138 children (sodium valproate-104, phenytoin-26,
and carbamazepine-8). Two drugs were prescribed in 7 children
(5-phenytoin/sodium valproate and 2-carbamazepine/sodium
valproate).
Drug levels in the below reference range were
found in 64 (44.1%), within the reference range in 70 (48.3%),
and above reference range in 11 (7.6%) children. Children with
polytherapy had drug levels in below reference range in five
children on phenytoin, one on carbamazepine and three on sodium
valproate therapy. The proportion of children and the serum
level of different drugs is shown in Table I. The
associated clinical and demographic variables were comparable
across the various drug levels of different anti-seizure drugs (Table
II). Children with focal seizures had twice the number of
children in the reference range group as compared with the below
reference range group (P<0.05). Precipitating factors
were fever in 19 (13.1%) and sleep deprivation in 4 (2.8%)
children. Precipitating factors were not significantly
associated with anti-seizure drug levels (Table II).
Table I Antiseizure Drug levels in Children With Breakthrough Seizures
Anti-seizure |
Below reference |
Within reference |
Above |
druga |
range, n=64 |
range, n=70 |
reference range, n=11 |
Valproate |
38 (34.2) |
62 (55.9) |
11 (09.9) |
Phenytoin |
29 (93.6) |
1 (3.2) |
1 (3.2) |
Carbamazepine |
3 (30.0) |
7 (70.0) |
0 |
Data in no. (% of row total).aSingle drug was received
by 138 children, and two drugs were prescribed in 7
children. |
Table II Demographic and Clinical Characteristics and Serum Drug Levels in Children With Breakthrough Seizures
Characteristics |
Below |
In the |
Above
|
|
reference |
reference |
reference |
|
range |
range |
range |
|
n=64 |
n=70 |
n=11 |
Mother’s education |
|
|
|
Iliterate |
22 (15.2) |
21 (14.5) |
3 (2.1) |
Primary |
35 (24.1) |
31 (21.4) |
7 (4.8) |
Secondary |
5 (3.4) |
8 (5.5) |
1 (0.7) |
Graduate and beyond |
2 (1.4) |
10 (6.9) |
0 |
Socioeconomic status |
|
|
|
Upper lower |
39 (26.9) |
39 (26.9) |
4 (2.8) |
Lower middle |
23 (15.9) |
25 (17.2) |
7 (4.8) |
Upper middle |
2 (1.4) |
6 (4.1) |
0 |
Normal development |
41 (28.3) |
43 (29.7) |
6 (4.1) |
Seizure typea |
|
|
|
Generalized |
48 (33.1) |
39 (26.9) |
6 (4.1) |
Focal |
16 (11.0) |
31 (21.4) |
5 (3.4) |
Precipitating factor present |
10 (6.9) |
12 (8.3) |
1 (0.7) |
Data in no. (%). For comparison between below reference
vs reference range groups, all P>0.05 except aP=0.02. |
DISCUSSION
The antiseizure drug levels were comparable
among the children on monotherapy or polytherapy with sodium
valproate, phenytoin and carbamazepine who presented with
breakthrough seizures. Of the total children receiving sodium
valproate and carbamazepine, 34.2% and 30% of children had
levels below the reference range. However, on phenytoin therapy,
93.6% of children had serum levels below the reference range.
The results of the valproate and
carbamazepine group were comparable with two previous Indian
studies [8,9]. While in case of phenytoin, previous Indian
studies [8,10] reported 43% and 68% patients had drug levels
below the reference range, which was quite high as compared to
the other antiseizure drugs. The difference in the phenytoin
group could be due to narrow therapeutic index, suspension form
of syrup, and variable pharmacokinetics in different individuals
and age groups [9]. Kumar, et al. [1] reported precipitating
factors in 37% of children; though many factors reported by them
were not elicited in our study.
Limitations of our study include a
cross-sectional study design with no longitudinal follow-up. It
is a hospital-based study with only single-center results and a
mixed population of children with varied diagnosis. Comparison
with a group of children with a well-controlled epilepsy would
have increased the validity of the study. The strength of this
study includes a large sample size, with breakthrough seizure as
the sole indication for TDM, which was done in an accredited
lab.
Drug levels within reference range are more
important in controlling generalized seizures than focal
seizures where other factors may have a greater role. A greater
number of children compliant on phenytoin drug had levels below
reference range in both groups of with and without precipitating
factors. Antiseizure drug levels should not be blindly followed
for seizure control in children with breakthrough seizures, and
specific indication should be kept in mind before obtaining the
drug levels. The concept of therapeutic range should be
considered [2]. There is a need for study in a larger sample and
a homogenous population to determine critical levels at which
breakthrough seizures are likely to occur.
Ethics clearance: Institutional ethics
committee of University College of Medical Sciences; No.
IEC-HR/2017/32/93, dated October 17, 2017.
Contributors: AA: conception and design;
RG: collection and assembly of data; RG,AA,SS,MN: manuscript
writing, review of literature, intellectual inputs: RM,RG,AA:
data analysis and interpretation. All authors approved the final
version of the manuscript, and are accountable for all aspects
of the study.
Funding: None; Competing interest:
None stated.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS?
•
No association was found
between serum antiseizure drug levels and breakthrough
seizures in children compliant to antiseizure drugs.
|
REFERENCES
1. Kumar S. Factors precipitating
breakthrough seizures in well-controlled epilepsy. Indian
Pediatr. 2005;42:182-3.
2. Patsalos PN, Berry DJ, Bourgeois BF,
et al. Antiepileptic Drugs-Best Practice Guidelines for
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Position Paper by the
Subcommission on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, ILAE
Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia.
2008;49:1239-76.
3. Perucca E. Is there a role for
therapeutic drug monitoring of new anticonvulsants? Clin
Pharmacokinet. 2000;38: 191-204.
4. Johannessen SI, Landmark CJ. Value of
therapeutic drug monitoring in epilepsy. Expert Rev
Neurother. 2008;8: 929-39.
5. Stepanova D, Beran RG. The benefits of
antiepileptic drug (AED) blood level monitoring to
complement clinical management of people with epilepsy.
Epilepsy Behav. 2015;42:7-9.
6. Al-Kattan M, Afifi L, Shamloul R, et
al. Assessment of precipitating factors of breakthrough
seizures in epileptic patients. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry
Neurosurg. 2015;52: 165-71.
7. Kaddumukasa M, Kaddumukasa M, Matovu
Katabira E. The frequency and precipitating factors for
breakthrough seizures among patients with epilepsy in
Uganda. BMC Neurology. 2013;13:182.
8. Harivenkatesh N, Haribalaji N, David
DC, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-seizure drugs
in a tertiary care hospital in India. Clin Neuropharmacol.
2015; 38:1-5.
9. Sharma S, Joshi S, Mukherji S, et al.
Therapeutic drug monitoring: Appropriateness and clinical
utility in neuropsychiatry practice. Am J Ther.
2009;16:11-6.
10. Taur SR, Kulkarni NB, Gogtay NJ, et al. An audit of
therapeutic drug monitoring services of anticonvulsants at a
tertiary care hospital in India. Ther Drug Monit.
2013;35:183-87.
|
|
 |
|