|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57: 869-870 |
|
Pediatric Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19): Meta-analyzing
Literature Versus Natural History
|
P Ramesh Menon
CardioThoracic Sciences Center, All India
Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
We read with interest the recent systematic review on
clinical features and outcome of severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children [1]. However, a major
deficiency in the strategy seems to be the omission of Pediatric
multisystem inflammatory syndrome (PMIS) [2]. Thus, the natural history
of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) in children seems innocuous. An
early narrative review in the journal [3] observed that the mortality
due to COVID-19 in children is rare, with majority being asymptomatic or
having mild respiratory and gastrointestinal manifestations. The present
systematic review [1] also substantiates that most children with
COVID-19 were asymptomatic; amongst symptomatic children, only 0.7%
required mechanical ventilation. The unique delayed cardiovascular
manifestations in children have been omitted altogether from the
suggested screening strategy for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
In these circumstances, the elucidation of clinical
features and outcome using a strategy of systematic review and
meta-analysis is premature. The average time for the process of a
systematic review is about 17 months [4]. On the other hand, a living
systematic review methodology allows minimal loss to methodological
rigor. It preserves and improves the currency, relevance, and usefulness
of a systematic review. Technology is often applied for arduous data
extraction processes. These facilitate efficient extraction of relevant
data, and fast and maintained synthesis of evidence. The benefit for
researchers and policy makers is also immense [4].
The included studies in this review [1] were small
and retrospective, with lot of heterogeneity and publication bias, the
overall evidence generated is very low quality. Meta-analysis should be
conducted with a group of homogeneous studies in terms of interventions
involved and outcomes so as, to provide a meaningful summary [5].
Acknowledgement: Dr SK Vijesh for help in editing
the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Meena J, Yadav J, Saini L, Yadav A, Kumar J.
Clinical features and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pediatr. 2020; 57:820-6.
2. Kuttiatt VS, Abraham PR, Menon PR, Vaidya PC, Rahi
M. COVID-19 children: Clinical and epidemiological implications. IJMR
[E-pub ahead of print June 6, 2020].
3. Balasubramanian S, Rao NM, Goenka A, Roderick M,
Ramanan AV. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children - What we
know so far and what we do not. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57:435-42.
4. Schmidt L, Olorisade BK, McGuinness LA, et al.
Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi) automation: A
living review protocol [version 1; peer review: Awaiting peer review].
F1000 Research. 2020;9:210.
5. Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia.
2010;14:29-37.
|
|
|
|