|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57:
864-865 |
|
Rescue Treatment with Terlipressin for
Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension and Refractory Shock in a
Preterm Infant
|
Ignacio Oulego-Erroz,1,2 Sandra
Terroba-Seara,3* Leticia Castanon-Lopez3 And
Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez4
1Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care
Unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon;
2IBIOMED (Biomedicine Institute of Leon, University of Leon, Leon;3
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit,Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon;
and
4Pediatric Intensive, Intermediate and Palliative Care
Section,ComplejoHospitalarioUniversitario de Santiago, Santiago de
Compostela; Spain.
Email:
[email protected]
|
Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) affects about
2/1000 newborn. The mainstay of therapy is supportive high frequency
oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and inhaled nitric oxide (NO), which have
decreased the need for Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in
these patients [1].However, still there is significant mortality and
affected infants are at risk of long-term neurological impairment. We
present the case of a preterm infant with severe PPHN and shock that
failed all available therapies and was successfully rescued with the
administration of terlipressin.
A 33-week male preterm baby (birthweight 2010 g) was
admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit. Soon after birth he
developed respiratory distress and hypoxemia. He was intubated and a
surfactant dose was administered but without significant improvement. An
echocardiogram showed a structurally normal heart and a near-systemic
pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) of 55-60 mmHg. HFOV and
inhaled NO (20 ppm) were then initiated. The infant was hypotensive
(Mean arterial pressure, MAP <5th percentile) requiring inotropic
support with dopamine and dobutamine. At 36 hours of life, the infant
remained hypotensive and with oxygenation failure (oxygenation index
31). Sequential echocardiograms showed supra-systemic PASP (80-100mmHg),
right heart failure and pure right-to-left shunts. Sildenafil was added
and continuous prostaglandin E1 infusion was started to keep the ductus
open and support cardiac output. Adequate MAP could not be maintained
despite escalating inotropic support: norepinephrine (up to 0.8
µg/kg/min), epinephrine (up to 0.8 µg/kg/min) and hydrocortisone
(1mg/kg/6h). In this context, bosentan (2mg/kg/12h) was added but
neither improvement in pulmonary hypertension nor oxygenation was
observed. Continuous epoprostenol infusion was initiated at 40 hours of
life because of persistent right heart failure and shock. Pulmonary
hypertension partially responded to this therapy with improved
oxygenation (OI change from 40 to 24) but it was impossible to maintain
systemic MAP at maximal inotropic support (vasoactive-inotropic score:
131). A contact with two ECMO transport teams was made at 2nd day of
life but ECMO was considered not indicated because of prematurity and a
poor expected survival. At 4th day of life, the child was in profound
shock and it was decided, in agreement with parents, to use
compassionate rescue treatment with terlipressin. A 5 µg/kg bolus dose
was administered followed by 10 µg/kg/h continuous infusion.
Terlipressin rapidly raised MAP to 60 mmHg, allowing escalation of
epoprostenol up to 60 ng/kg/min. PASP decreased from 85 to 40 mmHg with
improvement in oxygenation (OI from 38 to 15). In the next 24 hours, he
developed left to right ductal shunt and he was progressively weaned
from pulmonary vasodilators. Terlipressin was maintained for 48 hours
and then tapered gradually (1 µg/kg/h) allowing the infant to be weaned
from catecholamines (7th day of life) and finally extubated at 12th day
of life. The child was discharged home without any clinically
significant sequelae. At 2 years follow up, the child has
age-appropriate developmental status.
With terlipressin we observed a rapid raise in MAP
with a marked improvement in pulmonary hypertension and oxygenation,
allowing tapering of catecholamines. Terlipressin has been used to treat
catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock in adults, showing
restoration of arterial blood pressure. Terlipressin has also been used
in pediatric and neonatal refractory shock with unclear clinical
benefits [2,3]. Unlike adults, pure vasodilatory shock is uncommon in
the pediatric and neonatal population and in consequence excessive
vasoconstriction can induce tissue ischemia and worsen heart function
and is not generally recommended.
Terlipressin is a vasopressin analogue with long
half-life that exerts effects via V1 and V2 receptors.The main clinical
effect is mediated by V1-receptor that causes smooth muscle contraction
and induces a potent increase in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and
blood pressure.Terlipressin is reported to increase SVR without a
concomitant increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) [4]. In fact
terlipressin may induce direct pulmonary vasodilatation via NO-release
and lower pulmonary arterial pressure. Terlipressin-induced increase in
SVR also improves coronary perfusion and right heart function
contributing to increased pulmonary blood flow and oxygenation; which is
newborn infants may be further facilitated by reversal of right to left
intra-cardiac shunts as a consequence of increased MAP/PAP ratio [5].
Successful use of terlipressin in term infants with
different causes of PPHN such as congenital diaphragmatic hernia has
been reported [6]. However, its use has not been reported in preterm
infants, in whom refractory PPHN is uncommon. In our patient, given the
potentially reversible nature of idiopathic PPHN we decided to exhaust
all therapeutic measures and try rescue treatment with terlipressin. We
observed improved blood pressure, heart function, and oxygenation.
During the infusion, cardio-respiratory monitoring, NIRS, ion control,
echocardiography, troponin and serial clinical evaluations were used to
monitor side effects. We only observed transient skin vasoconstriction
and discoloration without development of skin necrosis or evidence of
new-organ failure.
In conclusion we believe that terlipressin may be
considered as a salvage therapy in severe PPHN and refractory
hypotension when ECMO is not available or it is considered
contraindicated.
REFERENCES
1. Fuloria M, Aschner JL. Persistent pulmonary
hypertension of the newborn.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22:220-6.
2. Masarwa R, Paret G, Perlman A, Reif S, Raccah BH,
Matok I. Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock
compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric
population: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential
analysis. Crit Care. 2017;21:1.
3. Rodríguez-Núńez A, López-Herce J, Gil-Antón J,
Hernández A, Rey C, RETSPED Working Group of the Spanish Society of
Pediatric Intensive Care. Rescue treatment with terlipressin in children
with refractory septic shock: A clinical study. Crit Care. 2006;10:R20.
4. Radicioni M, Troiani S, Camerini PG. Effects of
terlipressin on pulmonary artery pressure in a septic cooled infant: an
echocardiographic assessment. J Perinatol. 2012;32:89-5.
5. Evora PR, Pearson PJ, Schaff HV. Arginine
vasopressin induces endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of the
pulmonary artery. V1-receptor-mediated production of nitric oxide.Chest.
1993;103:1241-5.
6. Stathopoulos L, Nicaise C, Michel F, Thomachot L, Merrot T, Lagier
P, et al. Terlipressin as rescue therapy for refractory pulmonary
hypertension in a neonate with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J
Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:e19-21.
|
|
|
|