There has been a sea change in the management of
Hepatitis C infection, and the WHO has released new guidelines for its
treatment.The story of development of effective antivirals for hepatitis
C is important as the discovery of antivirals has been agonizingly slow
in comparison to antibacterial agents.
Why are antivirals so difficult to develop? The big
stumbling block is that viruses exist intracellularly, and one needs an
in vitro system of virus propagation to study them. For 26 years
after Hepatitis C was discovered, chimpanzees were the only animals
capable of being infected with the Hepatitis C virus. But not only were
chimpanzees too big, the ethical issues in their use were bigger. Then
the human hepatoma cell line (Huh 7) was developed that can propagate
endlessly in vitro. Subsequently the subgenomic replicon cell
culture system that grows in the Huh 7 allowed scientists to learn key
steps in hepatitis C infection and potential antiviral drugs.
In another stroke of brilliance, immunodeficient mice
with severe combined immunodeficiency were grafted with human
hepatocytes to produce mouse-human chimera. This provided a small animal
model to study immune response and drug responses.
In the 1980’s and 1990’s, interferon alpha, ribavarin
and subsequently pegylated interferon became available for the treatment
of hepatis C. However, the response rates were mere 50% with high
chances of relapse and adverse effects. In 2011, the discovery of
specific, direct-acting antivirals (DAA) changed the landscape of
therapy of Hepatitis C.The WHO has now recommended that all persons
above 18 years with any genotype of Hepatitis C may be treated with DAA
(e.g., Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir for 12 weeks). Between 12-17 years,
the DAA regimens depend on the genotype. Children below 12 years are
recommended to wait till 12 years of age before starting treatment.
About 55-85% of people infected with hepatitis C
develop chronic infection and about 15-20% of them develop cirrhosis
after 20 years. Each year 1-3% of them will progress to hepatocellular
carcinoma. Therapy with DAA have shown sustained virological response in
more than 90% of patients with chronic hepatitis C and a 75% reduction
in all-cause mortality. (The Lancet 28 July 2018)
Genome Editing: To do or not to do
Isaac Asimov is famous for the Laws of Robotics,
which anteceded the development of robots by several decades. On similar
lines, the two principles of genome editing have recently been
propounded by the UK Nuffield Council of Bioethics. Principle 1 states
that genome editing technology may be used only to secure the welfare of
the person who is to be born. Principle 2 states that the use of the
technology must not exacerbate social division.
The advent of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology has placed
in our hands a tool too powerful to imagine. This technology allows
precise gene editing and will relieve the enormous burden on families
with single gene defects. But it throws up larger questions of safety,
ethics and long-term societal consequences.
The UK Nuffield Council of Bioethics has published a
detailed report in July 2018 about the ethics of gene editing
technologies and recommendations related to policy and practice. Overall
the report suggests that ethically there is no reason not to use these
technologies in certain well studied areas. They state that it is likely
that CRISPR-Cas9 technologies will be clinically safe in the foreseeable
future. There are moral reasons to continue with the research into these
genome editing technologies in view of the enormous change they will
bring into the lives of many people.
(The Lancet 28 July 2018)
Gaming De-addiction Centers
Internet gaming disorder is now included in the
appendix of the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Model for Mental
Disorders).Within the ‘Internet Addiction Phenomenon’, there are five
categories: cybersexual addiction, cyber-relational addiction (excessive
formation of online relationships), net compulsions (gambling/shopping),
information overload (excessive web surfing), and computer addiction
(gaming etc).
Diagnostic criteria for internet addiction include
preoccupation, mood change on attempting to stop, need to use internet
for increasing amounts of time, lying about internet usage, jeopardizing
relationships and opportunities, and unsuccessful attempts to stop using
the internet.
NIMHANS in Bangalore started an internet de-addiction
centre called SHUT (Services for Healthy Use of Technology). They now
see almost 6 personsaged between 14-20 years per week. Clinics have also
sprung up in Delhi and Vadodara. Early exposure to the internet is a
significant risk factor for internet addiction.
The word addict is derived from the latin root
meaning slave. The nebulous world of cyber space is enslaving mankind in
its tentacles and we need to sit up and take notice. (The Times of
India 21 June 2018)