|
Indian Pediatr 2017;54: 729-734 |
 |
Tachypnea and Other Danger Signs vs
Pulse Oximetry for Prediction of Hypoxia in Severe
Pneumonia/Very Severe Disease
|
Varun Alwadhi, Pooja Dewan, *Rajeev Kumar Malhotra,
Dheeraj Shah and Piyush Gupta
From Departments of Pediatrics, and *Biostatistics
and Medical Informatics, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB
Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Piyush Gupta, Professor of
Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical
Sciences, Delhi 110 095, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: August 12, 2016;
Initial review: December 09, 2016;
Accepted: May 27, 2017.
Published online:
June 04, 2017.
PII:S097475591600063
|
Objectives: To compare the performance of respiratory rate and other
clinical signs against pulse oximetry for predicting hypoxia in children
with Severe pneumonia/Very severe disease as per Integrated Management
of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI) classification.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Pediatric emergency
department of a tertiary-care hospital in Delhi, India.
Subjects: 112 hospitalized
children (2 mo - 5 y) with Severe pneumonia/Very severe disease as per
IMNCI classification.
Methods: Respiratory rate was
recorded at enrolment, along with other clinical signs and symptoms.
Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured by a pulse oximeter. Clinical
predictors of hypoxia (SpO2 <90%) and their combinations (index test)
were evaluated for their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive
value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of hypoxia, against
pulse oximetry (reference test).
Results: Hypoxia was present in
57 (50.9%) children. Presence of tachypnea, head nodding, irritability,
inability to drink/breastfeed, vomiting, and altered sensorium was
significantly associated with hypoxia (P<0.05). Multiple logistic
regression revealed that age-specific tachypnea (RR ³70/min
for 2-12 mo, and RR ³60/min
for ³12
mo), head nodding, and inability to drink/breastfeed were independent
predictors for hypoxia with sensitivity of 70.2%, 50.9% and 75.4%,
respectively; and specificity of 88.9%, 96.4%, and 90.9%, respectively.
When all three predictors were used in conjunction, the sensitivity
increased to 91.2% and specificity was 81.8%.
Conclusions: No single clinical
sign can perform as well as pulse oximetry for predicting hypoxia in
children with severe pneumonia. In settings where pulse oximetry is not
available, combination of signs, age-specific tachypnea, head nodding,
and inability to drink/breastfeeding has acceptable sensitivity and
specificity.
Keywords: Acute respiratory infection,
Integrated Management of Neonatal and childhood illness, Monitoring
Oxygen Therapy.
|
P neumonia continues to be the
leading cause of
childhood mortality, accounting for 15% of all
under-five deaths, worldwide [1-5]. To reduce
child mortality, it is pertinent to reduce the mortality due to
pneumonia. In a recent systematic review, hypoxia (oxygen saturation
<90%) was identified as one of the most important risk factors for death
in lower respiratory tract infections [6]. Hypoxia can be easily
identified by pulse oximetry. According to a recent estimate, pulse
oximetry has the potential to avert up to 1,48,000 deaths if implemented
across selected countries [7]. However, non-availability of pulse
oximetry in resource-poor settings is a major impediment in the early
diagnosis of hypoxia and most health workers use clinical algorithms as
proposed by Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood (IMNCI) to
identify children with severe pneumonia. The limited utility of clinical
features alone to identify hypoxia in children with acute lower
respiratory tract infection has been demonstrated in a few studies
[8,9]. We conducted this study to ascertain whether clinical signs can
compare with pulse oximetry to identify hypoxia amongst under-five
children with severe pneumonia/Very severe disease, diagnosed as per the
IMNCI algorithm adapted from WHO guidelines [10,11]. The primary
objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of clinical
signs and symptoms and their combinations against pulse oximetry for
predicting hypoxia in children aged 2 months to 5 years.
Methods
This study was carried out from December 2013 to
January 2015 in the Pediatric emergency department of Guru Teg Bahadur
Hospital, a tertiary-care Public hospital. All consecutive children,
aged 2 months to 5 years, with cough or difficult breathing and with any
of the following signs – any general danger sign (convulsions,
lethargy/unconsciousness, inability to drink/breastfeed, or vomiting),
chest indrawing, or stridor in a calm child – were classified as having
Severe Pneumonia or Very Severe Disease as per IMNCI guidelines [10,11]
and enrolled. Children with history of recurrent nebulization ( ³3
episodes), congenital heart disease, severe palmar pallor, cold skin
with capillary refill time (CRT) longer than 3 seconds and weak and fast
pulse, axillary temperature <36ºC, meningitis, severe dehydration,
severe anemia (hemoglobin <7g/dL), and those needing ventilatory support
were excluded. A child, once enrolled in the study, was not included
again if presenting with another episode in subsequent days/months.
A detailed clinical history was obtained at enrolment
including the sociodemographic profile and sympto-matology.
Socioeconomic status was determined by using modified Kuppuswami scale
[12]. Anthropometry including weight, length/height and mid upper arm
circumference was recorded using standard techniques [13].
Weight-for-height and height-for-age Z-scores were derived using WHO
Anthro software [14]. This software uses WHO reference standards for
growth in under-5 children [15]. Stunting and severe stunting were
defined as height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) <-2SD and HAZ <-3SD,
respectively. A child was considered to have severe acute malnutrition
in presence of weight for height/length <-3SD or mid upper arm
circumference <115 mm [16]. Physical examination included recording of
vital signs (temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood
pressure), assessment of chest indrawing, stridor, wheezing and other
signs of respiratory distress (e.g. head nodding, nasal flaring,
grunting, and cyanosis), and chest auscultation for crepitation/wheezing.
Respiratory rate was counted for a full minute. The counting was done
when the child was quiet. Fast breathing/tachypnea was defined as per
WHO cut-offs [17]. Oxygen saturation was measured at admission using a
pulse oximeter (OhmedaBiox 3700e pulse oximeter, BOC Health Care), with
an appropriate-sized probe on a finger or toe, in room air. Hypoxia was
defined as oxygen saturation <90% in room air determined using pulse
oximetry [10]. Participants were categorized as having hypoxia or not
having hypoxia. Children presenting with wheeze and fast breathing or
chest indrawing were given a trial of rapid acting inhaled
bronchodilator for up to three times 15-20 minutes apart, in accordance
with the WHO recommendations and unpublished IMNCI algorithm being
revised in the country [Revised IMNCI Chart book (2016); Personal
communication from Norway India Partnership Initiative (NIPI)]. The
child was assessed again for fast breathing and chest indrawing, and was
then classified accordingly.
Children were managed as per Indian Academy of
Pediatrics (IAP) Guidelines for treating Severe Pneumonia [18]. Children
with oxygen saturation <90% were administered oxygen [10]. Outcome was
recorded as survived/died.
Prior data indicated that the prevalence of hypoxia
in Indian under-five children with cough and rapid respiration or
difficulty in breathing was 25.7% and respiratory rate as predictor of
hypoxia had sensitivity and specificity of 82.1%, and 51.8%,
respectively [8]. Using sensitivity of 82.1% with ±15% relative
precision on either side and a
error of 5%, the sample size was estimated to be 98.
Statistical methods: All data were entered in the
SPSS 20 software (IBM corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences in proportion
were compared by Chi square test and Fisher’s exact test. Differences
between means were compared by unpaired Student’s t-test where data was
normally distributed and Mann-Whitney U test for non normally
distributed data. A probability below 0.05 was regarded as statistically
significant. The strength of association of clinical risk factors with
hypoxia was determined by calculating odds ratio (OR) with their 95%
confidence intervals (CIs). A uni-variate logistic regression analysis
was used to identify the clinical predictors of hypoxia in children with
pneumonia. Thereafter, independent predictors were identified using
multivariable logistic regression (MLR) and co-variates significant at
P<0.15 level in univariate analysis were included in the MLR. The
sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values for
different symptoms and signs were determined taking presence of hypoxia
and non-hypoxia as gold standard. The 95% confidence intervals of these
diagnostic indices were calculated using the exact binomial method (Clopper
and Pearson method).
Results
One hundred twelve children (median (7-21) age 7
months; IQR 7-21 months; 77 boys) with diagnosis of Severe
pneumonia/Very severe disease were enrolled. Most of the children (99,
88.4%) were from the semi-urban slums, and all of them belonged to lower
socioeconomic strata. Only 72 (64.3%) children received exclusive
breastfeeding, and 62 (55.4%) were fully immunized for age. Wasting and
stunting were present in 75 (67%) and 66 (58.9%) children, respectively.
TABLE I Characteristics of the Under-five Children with Pneumonia
‡Characteristic |
Hypoxic (n=57),
|
Non-hypoxic (n=55),
|
P value |
OR (95% CI)
|
|
No. (%) |
No. % |
|
(unadjusted) |
Gender |
40 (71.2) |
37 (67.3) |
0.74 |
1.15 (0.52, 2.55) |
Age (mo)‡ |
7.0 (3.0 to 21.5) |
7.0 (4.0 to 18.0) |
0.77 |
1.00 (0.98, 1.03) |
*Age-specific tachypnea |
57 (100) |
46 (87.3) |
0.006 |
# |
$Age-specific tachypnea
|
51 (89.5) |
29 (52.7) |
<0.001 |
7.62 (2.81, 20.67) |
†Age-specific tachypnea
|
40 (70.2) |
5 (9.1) |
<0.001 |
23.53 (7.99, 69.31) |
Grunt |
4 (7.3) |
0 |
0.12 |
# |
Chest indrawing |
57 (100%) |
54 (98.2) |
0.49 |
# |
Head nodding |
29 (50.9) |
2 (3.6) |
<0.001 |
27.45 (6.10, 123.53) |
Nasal flaring |
36 (63.2) |
29 (52.7) |
0.26 |
1.54 (0.72, 3.27) |
Bronchial breathing |
7(12.3) |
4 (7.3) |
0.37 |
1.79 (0.49, 6.48) |
Crackles in chest |
57 (100) |
55 (100) |
1.00 |
# |
Rhonchi |
47 (82.5) |
43 (78.2) |
0.57 |
1.31 (0.51, 3.34) |
Irritability |
19 (33.3) |
30 (54.5) |
0.02 |
0.42 (0.19, 0.89) |
Inability to drink |
43 (75.4) |
5 (9.1) |
<0.001 |
30.71 (10.23, 92.22) |
Vomit everything |
27 (47.4) |
9 (16.4) |
<0.001 |
4.60 (1.90, 11.13) |
Altered sensorium |
28 (49.1) |
2 (3.6) |
<0.001 |
25.59 (5.69, 115.62) |
Convulsions |
0 |
1 (1.8) |
0.49 |
# |
@Radiological pneumonia |
50 (90.9) |
43 (78.2) |
0.18 |
1.99 (0.72, 5.51) |
Outcome (Died) |
4 (7.1) |
0 |
0.12 |
# |
*Respiratory rate ≥50/min
and ≥40/min in
children aged 2-12 months and ≥12
months, respectively; $respiratory
rate ≥60/min and
≥50/min in
children aged 2-12 months and ≥12
months, respectively; †respiratory rate
≥70/min and
≥60/min in children
aged 2-12 months and ≥12
months, respectively; ‡Median
(IQR); #Odds ratio cannot be
computed; @radiological pneumonia
data were not available for two hypoxic subjects and for one
non-hypoxic subject.
|
Fifty-seven (50.9%) children were detected to have
hypoxia. The sex and age distribution among the hypoxic and non-hypoxic
children were comparable (Table I). The prevalence of fast
breathing, head-nodding, inability to drink/breastfeed, vomiting
everything, and altered sensorium was significantly higher among the
hypoxic children. The prevalence of abnormalities on chest radiograph
was similar in both groups. Overall, 29 children (25.9%) had severe
acute malnutrition as defined by WHO. The prevalence of SAM in the
hypoxic group was 36.45 (20/55) against 15.8% (9/57) in the non-hypoxic
group. Four children had a fatal outcome (3.6%), all of them had hypoxia
at presentation, and two of them had severe acute malnutrition.
TABLE II Results of Logistic Regression to Identify Independent Predictors of Hypoxia in
Under-five Children with Pneumonia
Predictor |
Adjusted OR
|
P value |
|
(95% CI) |
|
*Age-specific tachypnea |
9.2 (2.3, 35.9) |
0.001 |
Head nodding |
7.5 (1.3,44.3) |
0.025 |
Inability to drink |
17.8 (4.9,64.1) |
<0.001 |
*Respiratory rate ≥70/min and
≥60/min in children aged 2-12
months and ≥12 months,
respectively. |
After logistic analysis, head-nodding, age-specific
tachypnea (respiratory rate ³70/min
and ³60/min in
children aged 2-12 months and ³12
months, respectively) and inability to drink/breastfeed were found to be
significant independent risk factors for hypoxia (Table II).
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative
predictive value of the different signs and symptoms to predict hypoxia
is shown in Table III. Overall, combination of the three
independent predictors had the best sensitivity of 91.2% for predicting
hypoxia, and the specificity was 81.8%.
TABLE III Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Value of Clinical Markers for Predicting
Hypoxia in Under-five Children with Severe Pneumonia
Characteristics |
Sensitivity (%)
|
Specificity (%) |
PPV (%) |
NPV (%) |
*Age-specific tachypnea |
100 |
12.7 |
54.3 |
100 |
$Age-specific tachypnea |
89.5 |
47.3 |
63.7 |
81.2 |
†Age-specific tachypnea |
70.2 |
88.9 |
88.9 |
74.6 |
Grunt |
7.0 |
100 |
100 |
50.9 |
Chest indrawing |
100 |
1.8 |
51.4 |
100 |
Head nodding |
50.9 |
96.4 |
93.5 |
65.4 |
Nasal flaring |
63.2 |
|
|
|
Bronchial breathing |
12.3 |
92.7 |
63.6 |
50.5 |
Accessory muscle use |
10.5 |
100 |
100 |
51.9 |
Rhonchi |
82.5 |
21.8 |
52.2 |
54.5 |
Inability to drink |
75.4 |
90.9 |
89.6 |
78.1 |
Vomit everything |
47.4 |
83.6 |
75.00 |
60.5 |
Altered sensorium |
49.1 |
96.4 |
93.3 |
64.6 |
Irritability |
33.3 |
45.5 |
38.8 |
39.7 |
†Age-specific tachypnea + Inability to drink |
89.5 |
81.8 |
83.6 |
88.2 |
†Age-specific tachypnea + Head Nodding |
82.5 |
90.9 |
90.4 |
83.3 |
†Age-specific tachypnea Head nodding +Inability to
drink |
91.2 |
81.8 |
83.9 |
90.0 |
Radiological evidence of pneumonia |
90.9 |
20.4 |
53.8 |
68.8. |
NPV: Negative predictive value, CI: Confidence interval, OR:
Odds ratio, PPV: Positive predictive value; *respiratory rate
≥50/min and
≥40/min in children
aged 2-12 months and ≥12
months respectively; $respiratory
rate ≥60/min and
≥50/min in
children aged 2-12 months and ≥12
months respectively; †respiratory
rate ≥70/min and
≥60/min in
children aged 2-12 months and ≥12
months respectively. |
Discussion
We found that hypoxic under-five children with severe
pneumonia had significantly higher chances of having age-specific
fast-breathing, head nodding, irritability, inability to
drink/breastfeed, vomiting and altered sensorium; all of which are also
recognized by the IMNCI for identifying a child with severe pneumonia.
Head nodding, age-specific tachypnea (respiratory rate
³70/min and
³60/min in children
aged 2-12 months and ³12
months, respectively) and inability to drink/breastfeed were found to be
significant independent risk factors for hypoxia.
The limitations of our study include its
hospital-based design and that hypoxia was determined based on pulse
oximeter readings and not on arterial blood gas analysis. In addition,
our study population included only children with severe pneumonia and
very severe disease; children with acute lower respiratory tract
infection managed on ambulatory basis in the community were not
evaluated. There were only 10 children of less than 3 months age and
only 29 cases of severe acute malnutrition. In a study in Nepalese
children with pneumonia [9], the clinical predictors significantly
associated with hypoxia were lethargy, grunting, nasal flaring,
cyanosis, and inability to breastfeed/drink; chest indrawing was found
to be the best clinical predictor of hypoxia in children aged 2 months
to 5 years presenting with pneumonia with 68.9% sensitivity and 82.6%
specificity. The variance in results as compared to our study may be due
to a difference in the altitude of the two study places. Another reason
could be that we enrolled children with IMNCI classification of severe
pneumonia.
Our study had severe acute malnutrition in only about
25% participants which may account for lack of significant association
between chest indrawing and hypoxia. Malnourished children tend to have
reduced serum potassium, magnesium and calcium levels, which may
contribute to the reduced strength of accessory respiratory muscles and
have generalized muscle wasting and hypotonia [19,20]. Thus,
malnourished children may be unable to exhibit chest indrawing, a
clinical sign often regarded as ominous in children with pneumonia.
However, Chisti, et al. [21] found chest indrawing to be a good
clinical predictor for hypoxia in malnourished Bangladeshi children with
pneumonia. They explained that the rapid breathing and lower chest wall
indrawing observed in malnourished children was due to hyperventilation
in an effort to eliminate the excess CO 2 from
the pulmonary circulation in children with severe pneumonia. The present
study had only 29 malnourished cases making it difficult to draw a
reasonable conclusion.
We observed that hypoxia was present in 50.9% of
children with severe pneumonia, which is much higher than 25.6% reported
from another study from Delhi among under-five children severe pneumonia
[8]. The difference stems from the fact that the definition of severe
pneumonia used in our study is based on IMNCI guidelines, which uses a
syndromic approach to identify sick children unlike the WHO algorithm
used by Lodha, et al. [8].
We found that the conventional WHO cut-offs to define
tachypnea had a 100% sensitivity but an unacceptable specificity of
12.7% to predict hypoxia in children with IMNCI classification of severe
pneumonia/very severe disease. However, increasing the WHO cut-offs for
fast breathing by 20 (defined as "respiratory rate
³70/min and
³60/min in children
aged 2-12 months and ³12
months, respectively) increased the specificity to 88.9% while
sensitivity was 70.2%. We also found that inability to drink/breastfeed
and head-nodding were independent predictors of hypoxia in these
children. When all the three clinical signs were combined, the
sensitivity was 91.2% and specificity was 81.8%, which seems acceptable
to diagnose hypoxia in children with severe pneumonia in resource-poor
settings. However, using a combination of clinical signs to identify
sick children may be more cumbersome and would require training of
health workers. In addition, none of the three signs (tachypnea,
inability to drink/breastfeed, and head nodding) is specific for
hypoxia, and may be seen in a variety of clinical conditions like
metabolic acidosis due to renal failure, dehydration and neurological
illnesses.
Pulse oximetry was able to correctly identify hypoxia
in 10-20% more children with severe pneumonia than with clinical signs
alone. Pulse oximetry has the potential to delineate severe from
non-severe pneumonia with greater precision and will help optimize the
usage of antibiotics and oxygen in children with pneumonia. While,
age-specific fast breathing cut-offs and presence of danger signs
continue to be acceptable as surrogate markers for severe pneumonia, use
of pulse oximetry in the standard care of children presenting with
pneumonia will help us accelerate our efforts to improve child survival.
In settings where pulse oximetry cannot be performed for any reason
combination of signs, age-specific tachypnea (respiratory cut-offs of
³70/min and
³60/min in
children aged 2-12 months and ³12
months respectively), head nodding, and inability to drink/breastfeed
can be used for admission and oxygen therapy.
Contributors: The study was conceived by
VA and PG; VA: Data collection and manuscript writing. PD, RKM, DS and
PG: Study design and critical inputs into manuscript writing. The final
version manuscript was seen and approved by all authors.
Funding: None; Competing interests: None
stated.
What is Already Known?
•
Clinical signs are surrogate markers to predict hypoxia in
children with pneumonia ³2
months of age.
What This Study Adds?
•
No single clinical sign is appropriate to predict hypoxia in
children presenting with pneumonia; combination of clinical
signs improves the ability to predict hypoxia.
|
References
1. Mohan P, Kishore B, Singh S, Bahl R, Puri A, Kumar
R. Assessment of implementation of integrated management of neonatal and
childhood illness in India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011;29:629-38.
2. Nath A. India’s progress toward achieving the
Millennium development goals. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36: 85-92.
3. World Health Organization and UNICEF. Ending
Preventable Child Deaths from Pneumonia and Diarrhea by 2025. The
Integrated Global Action Plan for Pneumonia and Diarrhea (GAPPD).
Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013.
4. World Health Organization and UNICEF. Countdown to
2015. Maternal, Newborn & Child Survival: Building a Future for Women
and Children. The 2012 report. Washington DC: WHO; 2012.
5. Farooqui H, Jit M, Heymann DL, Zodpey S. Burden of
severe pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia and pneumonia deaths in Indian
states: modelling based estimates. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129191.
6. Lazzerini M, Sonego M, Pellegrin MC. Hypoxaemia as
a mortality risk factor in acute lower respiratory infections in
children in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and
meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136166.
7. Floyd J, Wu L, Hay Burgess D, Izadnegahdar R,
Mukanga D, Ghani AC. Evaluating the impact of pulse oximetry on
childhood pneumonia mortality in resource-poor settings. Nature.
2015;528:S53-9.
8. Lodha R, Bhadauria PS, Kuttikat AV, Puranik M,
Gupta S, Pandey RM, et al. Can clinical symptoms or signs
accurately predict hypoxemia in children with acute lower respiratory
tract infections? Indian Pediatr. 2004;41: 129-35.
9. Basnet S, Adhikari RK, Gurung CK. Hypoxemia in
children with pneumonia and its clinical predictors. Indian J Pediatr.
2006;73:777-81
10. World Health Organization. Pocket book of
Hospital Care for Children. Guidelines for the management of common
illnesses with limited resources. 2nd Edition. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
11. National Rural Health mission Integrated
Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses. Available from:
http://nrhm.gov.in/nrhm-components/rmnch-a/child-health-immunization/child-health/guidelines.html.
Accessed June 23, 2016.
12. Kumar N, Gupta N, Kishore J. Kuppuswamy’s
socioeconomic scale: Updating income ranges for the year 2012. Indian J
Public Health. 2012;56:103-4.
13. Physical status: the use and interpretation of
anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech
Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452.
14. WHO Anthro for personal computers, version 3.2.2,
2011: Software for assessing growth and development of the world’s
children. Geneva: WHO, 2010. Available from: http://www. who.int/childgrowth/software/en/.
Accessed June 29, 2016.
15. World Health Organization, Multicentre Growth
Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards:
Length/height-for-age, Weight-for-age, Weight-for-length,
Weight-for-height and Body Mass Index-for-age: Methods and Development.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
16. World Health Organization Child Growth Standards
and the Identification of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and
Children: A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the
United Nations Children’s Fund. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
17. World Health Organization. Acute Respiratory
Infections in Children: Case Management in Small Hospitals in Developing
Countries. Geneva: (WHO/ARI/90.5) WHO; 1990.
18. Agarwal R, Singh V, Yewale V. RTI Facts. Indian
Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) Consensus Guidelines on Rational Management
of Respiratory Tract Infections in Children. Mumbai: Indian Academy of
Pediatrics; 2006.
19. Morgan G. What, if any, is the effect of
malnutrition on immunological competence? Lancet. 1997;349:1693-5.
20. Nair RH, Kesavachandran C, Shashidhar S.
Spirometric impairments in undernourished children. Indian J Physiol
Pharmacol. 1999;43:467-73.
21. Chisti MJ, Salam MA, Ashraf H, Faruque AS,
Bardhan PK, Shahid AS, et al. Predictors and outcome of hypoxemia
in severely malnourished children under five with pneumonia: A case
control design. PLoS One. 2013;8:e51376.
|
|
 |
|