Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
editorial

Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 829-830

How Cost-Effective is Facility-Based Newborn Care in India?


Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi

Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot number 34, Sector 44, 
Gurgaon -122 002, India.
Email: [email protected]
 
 


F
acility-based newborn care is a key strategy to improve neonatal health. Investment in neonatal care units is a resource-intensive exercise. Besides the one-time establishment cost, the operational costs of equipment, personnel, ancillary services, drugs, consumables, investigations, and care with or without ventilators, are huge investments. It, however, varies with the setting and type of unit (level II vs level III) and so do the benefits for neonates with different needs. In India, the establishment cost of a 12-bedded level II unit (Special Newborn Care unit - SNCU) in a district hospital is around 41,00,000 INR. This does not include the cost of training. The running cost (excluding salaries of staff) comes to 10,00,000 INR (20,000 USD) per year [1]. This is much less compared to what is incurred in developed nations.

The annual health system cost of operating SNCU at the district level is INR 6.3 million. The average cost of treatment per neonate is INR 4581, while per bed-day treatment is INR 818, as reported from a study of four SNCUs [2]. However, there needs to be a careful cost estimation before generalization, as both the capital and recurrent cost will vary according to Gross Domestic State Product of states. The analysis suggests that the overall costs of neonatal intensive care for all those who require level II care would be around INR 20.4 billion. This comprises 0.8% of India’s health care spending [2]. While cost has important implications at the national level, its effectiveness on the outcome of admission emerges as the key indicator to promote SNCUs at the district level. To improve the cost effectiveness, the outcome of admissions needs to be analyzed. The outcome depends heavily on the input costs and profile of babies admitted [3]. The bulk of admissions in India are because of birth asphyxia, low birth weight and sepsis. Birth asphyxia can very well be prevented by strengthening Newborn Care Corners (NBCC) at every delivery point. Regionalization of neonatal care is known to be an effective way to reduce costs and improve effectiveness [4]. Unfortunately, in India, the emphasis on setting up of SNCUs at district level has not been translated into development of an integrated system of facility based newborn care [5]. Strengthening of an integrated model with SNCU at the district hospital and having a good linkage with Neonatal Stabilization Units (NSU) at 24x7 Primary Health centers and Community Health centresand NBCCs at each delivery point has not been accorded an importance.

As the definition of a viable fetus has been changed to include babies with lower gestational age, the cost of care of such neonates has increased drastically [6]. But in a situation where most of the neonates admitted to SNCUs have normal birth weight, these vulnerable newborns are likely to suffer the most. Laxity of admission and discharge criteria resulting in over admissions and high bed occupancy rates often results in lack of attention and care of this category of neonates [2,5]. This may affect the performance of such units in an adverse way.

To benefit the families, due consideration should be given for inclusion of neonatal care at SNCUs under the benefit package of "Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY)", the cashless health insurance scheme for informal and below poverty line households in India. The estimates given by Prinja, et al. [2] can be used as a base to set up the payment rates. High cost of neonatal care may increase the overall ceiling of benefit package and should be a point of discourse under RSBY. National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) should focus on interventions that yield the maximum levels of health gain across population with judicious use of resources. Previous studies from India have either analyzed the outcomes or have given an estimate of approximate costs [4,5]. Cost effectiveness studies are reported from other countries [6]. There is a paucity of data on cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis for facility based care in India including regionalization. Such evaluations along with cost minimization analysis should be undertaken before further scaling up SNCUs in the country.

Acknowledgment: The author acknowledges the contribution of Mr. Maulik Chokshi and Prof Sanjay Zodpey (IIPHS) towards finalization of the draft.

Competing interest: None stated; Funding: Nil.

References

1. UNICEF. Setting up a special care newborn unit in a district hospital. In: Toolkit for setting up of special care newborn units, stabilization units and newborn corners. New Delhi: UNICEF, 2008. p. 29. Available from: http://www.unicef. org/india/SCNU_book1_April_6.pdf. Accessed on 20 August 2009.

2. Prinja S, Manchada N, Mohan P, Gupta G, Sethy G, Sen A, et al. Cost of neonatal intensive care delivered through district level public hospitals in India. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:839-46.

3. Schmitt SK, Sneed L, Phibbs CS. Costs of newborn care in California: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:154-60.

4. Narang A, Kiran PS, Kumar P. Cost of neonatal intensive care in a tertiary care centre. Indian Pediatr. 2005;42: 989-97.

5. Neogi S, Malhotra S, Zodpey S, Mohan P. Challenges in scaling up of Special Care Newborn Units- Lessons from India. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:931-5.

6. Profit J, Lee D, Zupancic JA, Papile L, Gutierrez C, Goldie SJ, et al. Clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of neonatal intensive care in Mexico. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000379.   

 

Copyright © 1999-2012 Indian Pediatrics