Reminiscences from Indian pediatrics: A Tale
of 50 years |
|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55:903-904 |
|
Bacterial Meningitis:
Bugs’ Story
|
Swati Dublish *and Preeti
Singh
Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Kalawati
Saran Children’s Hospital, New Delhi, India. Email:
[email protected]
|
T he October 1968 issue of Indian Pediatrics
included three original research articles: ocular manifestations in
tuberculous meningitis, evaluation of diagnostic methods for iron
deficiency anemia, and changing patterns of purulent meningitis. Through
this write-up, we highlight the changing pattern of acute bacterial
meningitis in children over the past five decades.
The Past
The study by Vashi, et al. [1] described
details of 69 children diagnosed as purulent meningitis admitted at JJ
Hospital (Bombay, India) from January 1963 to June 1966. They obtained a
detailed history regarding current and past symptoms, and conducted a
detailed physical examination, especially of the central nervous system.
This was followed by investigations such as complete blood count,
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination, tuberculin test, blood culture,
throat swab, and X-rays of the chest, mastoid and sinuses.
Special investigations like gastric lavage for acid-fast bacillus (AFB)
stain, subdural tapping, pneumoencephalogram, and animal inoculation of
CSF were performed in selected cases.
Acute bacterial meningitis contributed to 8% of total
hospital admissions (1 case of purulent meningitis per 120 admissions in
hospital). Majority (58%) of patients were below one year of age. The
number of patients was more during the winter seasons closely
paralleling the incidence of respiratory diseases. The mortality was
quite high but showed a sequential decline over the study period – 59%
in 1963, 33% in 1965, and 17% in first half of 1966. They attributed
this trend to quicker diagnosis and quicker treatment. The mortality in
neonates was to the tune of 62%. The presenting features were fever,
vomiting, refusal to feed, headache, seizures and altered sensorium in
form of irritability and delirium. The signs of meningeal irritation
were present in 60-80% patients above 3 years of age, while cranial
nerve palsies and hemiparesis were reported in 6-10% cases. The children
<2 years of age showed bulging fontanelle (90% patients with open
fontanelle). CSF findings showed increased pressure, pleocytosis, high
protein content with low sugar content. A causative organism could be
detected in 50% of cases; 20% grew menigococci on culture while
pneumococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Hemophilus influenzae,
Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas and E. coli were also
seen. Three patients showed a picture suggestive of partially treated
pyogenic meningitis, later turning out to be tuberculous meningitis.
Longer duration of treatment was required in patients with pneumococcal
infection. In some cases, CSF had not cleared at discharge and on
follow-up, the CSF normalized about one month after discharge. About
one-thirds of patients could be followed-up for 6 months to 1 year.
Neonates with subdural effusion seemed to be doing well. Hemiparesis was
seen in five cases during the course of illness, out of which three had
a complete remission within 3 weeks of follow up, while two had an
improvement in 6-8 months. Two children with hydrocephalus succumbed to
the illness. No complication of mental retardation or epilepsy was seen.
Historical background and past knowledge:
Writers in the 17th and 18th centuries frequently referred to brain
fever, phrensy, and cephalitis for patients who would today be
classified as meningitis or encephalitis. Earliest described patients
with ‘phrensy’ were defined as "those with continual raving, or a
depravation of the chief faculties of the brain, arising from an
inflammation of the meninges with a continual fever" by Thomas Willis in
1685 [2]. Meningococcal meningitis was first described by Gaspard
Vieusseux on a small outbreak in Geneva in 1805. The symptoms of
meningitis were described by Russian physician Vladimir Kernig in 1882
and by Polish physician Jozef Brudzinski in 1909. The Kernig’s sign and
Brudzinski sign were described in 1882 and 1909, respectively [3]. Louis
Pasteur identified the pneumococcus in 1881 while Anton Weichselbaum
identified Neisseria meningitidis in 1887. In 1892-1893, Richard
Pfeiffer reported on the isolation of what would later be called
Haemophilus influenzae, and in 1882 Robert Koch identified
Mycobacterium tuberculosis in tuberculous lesions from infected
human tissues. The treatment with antiserum therapy for meningococcal
meningitis began in 1906, but the introduction of penicillin therapy in
1944 provided the first effective treatment for meningitis. The
introduction of a vaccine for H. influenzae type b (Hib) in the
1990s provided a marked reduction in the incidence of Hib meningitis.
The Present
In recent times, the advent of newer vaccines against
Hib and Pneumococcus has changed the epidemiology of the disease as
compared to the pre-vaccine era where both morbidity and mortality were
quite high [4]. Highly effective antimicrobial therapy, when started
early, results in good outcome. However, emerging problem of antibiotic
resistance is of growing concern [5]. The phenomenon of indiscriminate
antibiotic usage and frequent pre-treatment with antibiotics makes
isolation of causative organism difficult and limits the choice of
antibiotics. Hence, there is an increasing reliance on newer techniques
like antigen detection by latex agglutination technique or DNA-based
polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Regarding changing trends in etiology of acute
bacterial meningitis in children, H. influenzae type b was the
leading cause of bacterial meningitis with high mortality among
confirmed cases prior to the introduction of the pentavalent vaccine in
India [6]. A recent hospital-based study from India documented that
82.9% of confirmed cases of childhood meningitis were positive for S.
pneumoniae, 14.4% for H. influenzae type b, and remaining
2.7% cases were due to N. Meningitides [7].
Over the years, most countries have introduced
vaccines against the common pathogens into their immunization schedules,
which are also effective in preventing bacterial meningitis. The
introduction of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the US led to a
decrease in the rate of infection by nearly 60% in children <5 years of
age [8]. Hib vaccine introduction was followed by a dramatic decrease in
the incidence of all invasive Hib disease, including meningitis. In a
population-based observational study in England, annual incidence of
H. influenzae meningitis, meningococcal disease and invasive
pneumococcal disease showed a sharp decrease after the introduction of
respective vaccines [9].
The Government of India has launched a program
Mission Indradhanush on December 25, 2014 with an objective of
increasing immunization coverage and to provide life-saving vaccines
under Universal Immuni-zation Program (UIP) to all children across the
country free of cost. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was launched on May
13, 2017 and its introduction in the UIP is likely to have a great
impact in further reducing child deaths from meningitis.
References
1. Vashi N, Joshi A. The changing pattern of purulent
meningitis. Indian Pediatr. 1968; 5:444-5.
2. Tyler KL. Chapter 28: a history of bacterial
meningitis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2010;95:417-33.
3. Ward MA, Greenwood TM, Kumar DR, Mazza JJ, Yale
SH. Brudzinski J, et al. Signs for diagnosing meningitis. Clin
Med Res. 2010;8:13-7.
4. Raoot A, Dewan DK, Dubey AP, Seth S. Introduction
of new vaccines in State Immunization Schedule – Delhi’s experience.
Indian Pediatr. 2017;;54:271-4.
5. Bedi N, Gupta P. Antimicrobial stewardship in
pediatrics: An Indian perspective. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:293-8.
6. Ramachandran P, Fitzwater SP, Aneja S, Verghese
VP, Kumar V, Nedunchelian K, et al. Prospective multi-centre
sentinel surveillance for Haemophilus influenzae type b & other
bacterial meningitis in Indian children. Indian J Med Res.
2013;137:712-20.
7. Jayaraman Y, Veeraraghavan B, Chethrapilly
Purushothaman GK, Sukumar B, Kangusamy B, Nair Kapoor A, et al.
Hospital Based Sentinel Surveillance of Bacterial Meningitis (HBSSBM)
Network Team. Burden of bacterial meningitis in India: Preliminary data
from a hospital based sentinel surveillance network. PLoS One.
2018;16:13:e0197198.
8. Makwana N, Riordan FA. Bacterial meningitis: the
impact of vaccination. CNS Drugs. 2007;2:355-66.
9. Martin NG, Sadarangani M, Pollard AJ, Goldacre
MJ. Hospital admission rates for meningitis and septicaemia caused by
Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Streptococcus
pneumoniae in children in England over five decades: a population-based
observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:397-405.
|
|
|
|