|
Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 845-848 |
|
Blood Lead Levels in Children with
Encephalopathy |
Archana Patel and Ambarish Athawale
From the Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India,
Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit,
Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Archana B Patel, 125, Raj Nagar,
Opposite Tidke Vidyalaya, Katrol Road, Nagpur 440 013, India.
Manuscript received: July 25, 2007;
Initial review completed: January 11, 2008;
Revision accepted: November 6, 2008.
|
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence of
elevated blood lead levels (EBLL i.e blood lead
ł10µg/dL, Centers Disease Control
criteria) in children with encephalopathy.
Setting: Hospital.
Design: Case control study.
Participants: 100 children, 49 with
encephalopathy and 51 consecutive hospital controls.
Outcome measures: Blood lead levels,
demographics, clinical, environmental correlates and residual
neurological sequel or death at discharge.
Results: 42 (encephalopathy) and 49
(hospital controls) children were available for analysis. The overall (n=91)
mean blood lead was 7.88±10.44 µg/dL (range 0.07-67.68 µg/dL). The
predictors of EBLL were presence of wasting (P<0.03), anemia (P<0.04),
use of surma (P< 0.02), recent removal of house paint (P<0.01) or
recently repainted (P<0.01). The mean blood lead levels were
significantly higher (P<0.01) in patients of encephalopathy
(12.18±13.90 µg/dL) than in controls (4.19±2.84 µg/dL). EBLL was present
in 3/17 (17.6%) patients with infective encephalopathy and in 18/25
(72%) with non-infective encephalopathy. The proportion of children with
residual neurological sequelae, or death increased when associated with
EBLL (0 to 21%, and 69% to 100% respectively).
Conclusion: Children hospitalized with
encephalopathy have elevated blood lead levels.
Keywords: Blood lead, encephalopathy, EBLL, lead poisoning.
|
L ead is a common environmental
pollutant recognized as an etiologic factor for subtle cognitive and
neurological deficits,
hypertension, congenital malformations, immunotoxicity, and deficits in
growth and development(1). Children are particularly at risk of
neurotoxicity, because of increased sensitivity of the developing brain to
the pernicious effects of lead(2). Underlying coexisting disease pathology
can also enhance the detrimental effect of lead on the neural system(2).
Inspite of these known deleterious effects, there is no universal
screening program, and public health regulations to prevent its exposure
in children remain in abeyance in India(3). Even children admitted to
hospitals with neurological symptoms are seldom, if at all, evaluated for
blood lead levels. In this study we evaluated the prevalence of elevated
blood lead levels (EBLL) in children admitted to the hospital with and
without clinical diagnosis of encephalopathy, the determinants of EBLL,
and its correlation with the clinical manifestations and neurological
outcomes.
Methods
The study was conducted at Indira Gandhi Government
Medical College, Nagpur, India over a period of 6 months from October 2000
to April 2001, to determine in hospitalized children presenting with
encephalopathy (irritability with altered conscious-ness or behavioral
abnormality, seizures and focal deficits) and the next consecutive patient
without encephalopathy, the prevalence of EBLL(Blood lead
ł10
µg/dL by Centers Disease Control criteria)(4). It was approved by the
ethics committee and consent from parents was taken. Their clinical
diagnosis, demographics (age, sex, caste, family per capita income,
qualification of father and mother, and occupational exposure of father or
mother to lead), and previously reported environmental risk factors (pica,
use of alternative forms of medicine i.e. ayurvedic or homeopathic for a
week or more in the past month, eye cosmetics application i.e. ‘surma’ in
the child, sindur (vermilion) use, whether the house was painted, and
paint removal done in the past 12 months or repainted in the past 12
months) were recorded. The nutritional status was assessed as stunted
(height for age <5th percentile) and wasted (weight for height <5th
percentile) using the National Center for Health Statistics standards(5).
Presence of symptoms of encephalopathy, the clinical
etiology of encephalopathy namely infectious or non infectious, the
modified Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score on admission, the worst GCS score
during the illness, and the outcome of the illness i.e. complete
recovery, death or recovery with some neurological sequel (presence of
speech, behavior or mood disorders, reduction in intellectual performance,
motor deficits, movement disorders at discharge) were recorded.
Cerebrospinal fluid studies, serum electrolytes, blood sugar and
computerized tomographic scans of head were done for clinical etiology of
encephalopathy. Baseline hemoglobin and lead was estimated in venous blood
obtained in lead free EDTA vacutainers (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed by
flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry (HitachiZ-8000) in parts per
billion at a wavelength of 283.3 nm with a slit width of 1.3 nm using the
method described by Lagesson, et al.(6). The detection rate of lead
for the instrument was 1 µg/L, with an average error rate of 5% for
reproducibility of results. Result of lead levels was obtained two weeks
after the admissions, so none of the children were offered lead chelation.
Data analysis: We estimated the overall prevalence
of elevated blood lead levels (EBLL) and the proportion of children in
each Center for Disease Control (CDC) risk classes I [(10-14 µg/dL),
IIA(15-19µg/dL), IIB(20-44 µg/dL), III(45-69 µg/dL) and IV(>70 µg/dL)]
in all participants(4). EBLL as a predictor of residual neurological
sequel or death, after adjusting for other baseline variables was assessed
using logistic regression. Using student’s t test for continuous
variables, chi-squared test for categorical variables and multivariate
linear regression, we assessed predictors of EBLL.
Results
Of the 100 patients studied (49 with encephalopathy and
51 with no encephalopathy) blood lead levels were available for 42 and 49,
respectively. Their baseline characteristics are presented in Table
I. The overall mean blood lead was 7.9±10.4 µg/dL (range 0.07 to 67.7
µg/dL). EBLL was observed in 19 children (20.9%) of whom 8 were in class I
(8.8%), 3 in class IIA (3.3%) and 8 children were in class IIB (8.8%).
Mean blood lead levels were significantly higher in patients of
encephalopathy (12.2±13.9 µg/dL) than in controls (4.2±2.8 µg/dL) (P<0.01).
Of 42 children with encephalopathy, 17 had blood lead levels more than 10
µg/dL as compared to only 2 amongst the controls (P<0.01). Patients
with encephalopathy were more likely (P<0.01) to be in higher CDC
class.
Table I
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population
Variable |
Encephalopathy |
No encephalopathy |
|
(n=42) |
Controls (n=49) |
Age (mean ± SD) |
4.59±3.04 yrs |
7.46±3.16 yrs |
Income (mean ± SD) |
326.90±315.97 |
182.35±92.1 |
Fathers occupational
exposure present |
2 (4.7%) |
6 (12.2%) |
House paint present |
15 (35.7%) |
22 (44.9%) |
House paint removal |
7 (16.7%) |
2 (4.1%) |
House repainted |
7 (16.7%) |
1 (2.0%) |
Use of ayurvedic/homeopathic medicine |
7 (16.7%) |
0 |
Use of surma |
31 (73.8%) |
9 (18.4%) |
Use of sindhur |
20 (47.6%) |
16 (32.7%) |
Pica |
20 (47.6%) |
16 (32.7%) |
Wasting |
19 (45.2%) |
9 (18.4%) |
Stunting |
18 (42.9%) |
33 (67.3%) |
Mean blood
lead levels (µg/dL) |
12.18±13.90 |
4.19±2.84 |
Hemoglobin |
10.00±0.98 |
9.56±0.99 |
CDC category |
Class I |
25 (59.5%) |
47 (95.9%) |
Class IIA |
7 (16.7%) |
1 (2.0%) |
Class IIB |
2 (4.8%) |
1 (2.0%) |
Class III |
8 (19.0%) |
0 |
On admission, 16 patients had infectious encephalopathy
(8 of acute pyogenic, 4 of tuberculosis, 3 of viral encepholpathy and 1 of
cerebral abscess) and 26 were of non infectious etiology (1 of Reye, 8 of
anoxic, 7 of febrile and 10 of metabolic encephalopathy). EBLL was present
in 3/17 (17.6%) patients with infective encephalopathy as compared to
18/25 (72%) patients with non-infective encephalopathy. Among patients of
encephalopathy, 10/49 (23.8%) children had residual neurological sequel
and 5 (11.9%) children died; rest 26(61.9%) children recovered completely
on discharge. The mean blood lead levels were higher in children with
residual neurologic sequel or death (13.61±14.72 µg/dL) as compared to
those who recovered completely (11.69±13.83 µg/dL), but this difference
was not statistically significant. Infective encephalopathy (OR 33.3; 95%
CI 2.8, 100) was most predictive of poor recovery, after adjusting for
age, wasting, the worst GCS and BLL. Residual neurological sequel and
death in patients with infective encephalopathy was 9/13(69%) and rose to
100% (all three children died) when associated EBLL. In non infective
encephalopathy residual neurological sequel or death was absent without
EBLL and rose to 3/14 (21%) with EBLL.
The predictors of EBLL were presence of wasting (P=0.03),
anemia (P=0.04), recent removal of house-pain (P=0.009),
recent repainting (P= 0.003) and use of surma (P=0.02).
There was no association of EBLL with the use of ayurvedic or homeopathic
medicines, sindur (vermilion), pica, fathers’ occupational exposure, caste
or income.
Discussion
The overall prevalence of EBLL was 20.9% in
hospitlalized children, 40.5% in children who presented with
encephalopathy as compared to 4.1% in controls. Of the patients with
encephalopathy, those with non-infective encephalo-pathy were more likely
to have EBLL than those with infective encephalopathy. In children with
non-infective as well as with infective encephalopathy, the proportion of
children with residual neurological sequel or death increased when
associated with EBLL (0 to 21%, and 69% to 100%, respectively). The lead
levels most likely to result in neurotoxicity are still debated and has
been observed at lower levels(7). This study is only the third in India to
report BLL in children with encephalopathy. The mean blood lead level in
children with encephalopathy (12.18±13.90 mg/dL) was significantly higher
as compared to controls and consistent to the observations made in the
previous two studies(8,9). So EBLL (even Class II or III poisoning) may
exacerbate the neurological damage of coexisting non infective or
infective pathology of the nervous system. Oxidative stress and free
radical generation was reported to be the mode of neurological lead
toxicity. Studies done in animals suggest that EBLL predisposes and
aggravates infections by enhancing B cell activities and Th2
proliferation, and inhibits Th1 prolife-ration(10). In rodents, it
enhanced susceptibility to endotoxin shock and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
lethality in gram-negative infections by increasing the secretion and
uptake of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and increasing other
proinflam-matory cytokines(11). This increased concentration of
proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha IL-6) in the
cerebrospinal fluid correlates well with presence of neurologic sequel or
death in patients of infectious meningoencephalitis(12,13). The limitation
of this study is that we did not assess levels of proinflammatory
cytokines and markers of oxidative stress predictive of poor outcome.
Children with EBLL would not only have an increased susceptibility to
infections but also be at a greater risk of encephalopathy at lower levels
of blood lead during infective and febrile episodes. However this causal
relationship could not be studied in this cross-section of patients.
Predictors of EBLL were nutritional wasting, anemia and
environmental exposures such as use of surma and recent removal of house
paint or repainting, which were similar to those reported previously and
indicate the need for implementing guidelines for preventing the use of
lead based paints and eye cosmetics like surma(5).
In conclusion, developing countries like India where
malnutrition, anemia and the incidence of infections is high, universal
screening and early chelation especially in co-morbid neurological illness
could prevent morbidity and mortality. The therapeutic benefits of
investigating for EBLL and lead chelation in children of any
encephalopathy, even in lower CDC classes, need further exploration.
Additionally, public health regulations are also needed to reduce
environmental exposures through paint and cosmetics.
Acknowledgment
We are thankful to INCLEN for funding and NEERI for
analyzing the blood lead samples. We thank Dr H R Belsare for assisting in
data collection and Smita Puppulwar for secretarial help.
Contributors: ABP designed the study, collected and
analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. AA assisted in data analysis,
reviewing literature and manuscript writing.
Competing interests: None.
Funding: INCLEN Grant Number 1004-94-6305.
What is Already Known
• Children are particularly at risk of
neurotoxicity, because of increased sensitivity of the developing
brain to elevated blood lead levels.
What this Study Adds
• In hospitalized children, those with
encephalopathy had higher mean lead levels had and poorer outcome
when associated with elevated blood lead levels.
|
References
1. Goyer RA. Lead toxicity: from overt to sub clinical
to subtle health effects. Environ Health Perspect 1990; 86:177-181.
2. Lidsky TI, Schneider JS. Lead neurotoxicity in
children: basic mechanisms and clinical correlates. Brain 2003; 126: 5-19.
3. Patel AB, Williams SV, Frumkin H, Kondawar VK, Glick
H, Ganju AK. Blood lead in children and its determinants in Nagpur, India.
Int J Occup Environ Health 2001; 7: 119-126.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Managing
Elevated Blood Lead Levels Among Young Children: Recommendations From the
Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. Atlanta, GA:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002.
5. Hyattsvile MD. US Department of Health and Human
Services. National Center for Health Statistics. Phase 2, Third National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. 1991-1993: Machine readable
public–use data tapes, 1996.
6. Lagesson V, Andrasko L. Direct determination
of lead and cadmium in blood and urine by flameless atomic absorption
spectrophotometry. Clin Chem 1979; 25: 1948-1953.
7. Winneke G, Krämer U. Neurobehavioral aspects of lead
neurotoxicity in children. Cent Eur J Public Health 1997; 5: 65-69.
8. Kumar A, Dey PK, Singla PN, Ambasht RS, Upadhyay SK.
Blood lead levels in children with neurological disorders. J Trop Pediatr
1998; 44: 320-322.
9. Ahamed M, Fareed M, Kumar A, Siddiqui WA, Siddiqui
MK. Oxidative stress and neurological disorders in relation to blood lead
levels in children. Redox Rep 2008; 13: 117-122.
10. Heo Y, Parsons PJ, Lawrence DA. Lead differentially
modifies cytokine production in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
1996; 138:149-157.
11. Flohe SB, Bruggemann J, Herder C, Goebel C, Kolb H.
Enhanced proinflammatory response to endotoxin after priming of
macrophages with lead ions. J Leukoc Biol 2002; 71: 417-424.
12. Jain M, Aneja S. CSF interleukin-1 beta, tumor
necrosis factor-alpha and free radicals production in relation to clinical
outcome in acute bacterial meningitis. Indian Pediatr 2000; 37: 608-614.
13. Aiba H, Mochizuki M, Kimura M, Hojo H. Predictive value of serum
interleukin-6 level in influenza virus-associated encephalopathy.
Neurology 2001; 57: 295-299.
|
|
|
|