|
Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 835-840 |
|
Home-Based Newborn Care: How Effective and
Feasible? |
Ashok K Dutta
From the Department of Pediatrics, B P Koirala Institute
of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Correspondence to: Prof A K Dutta, Director, Professor
and Head, Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College and
associated Kalawati Saran Children Hospital, New Delhi, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
|
Abstract
Neonatal mortality in developing countries is one of
the most important problems that need immediate attention in order to
achieve Millennium Development Goals. About 4 million newborns die in
the world every year, 90% of them in the developing world. Most of these
deaths are preventable by simple interventions in the community.
However, in most of the target countries, the implementation of
essential newborn care has been very poor. The home based or community
care packages include maternal care, essential newborn care, improving
the behavior change communication of the community, resuscitation of
newborn babies at the time of home delivery, and management of sick
newborns with antibiotics at home. Studies have reported one-third to
two-third reduction of mortality among newborns after home based care
interventions. However, when translated into scaling up of home based
newborn care in the worst affected districts of the country, the results
are not very rewarding. Identification of limiting factors and effective
up scaling of the home-based packages will prove to be of enormous
benefit in reducing neonatal mortality.
Keywords: Community care, Home-based care,
Neonate.
|
Every year, four million newborn deaths
occur in the world out of which nearly one-fourth are contributed by
India. Approximately 98% of this neonatal mortality takes place in
developing countries of the world. The primary causes of neonatal
mortality are believed to be complications of prematurity (21%), birth
asphyxia and injury (23%), neonatal tetanus (7%), congenital anomalies
(7%) and diarrhea (3%) with low birth weight contributing to a large
proportion of deaths(1). Most of these newborns die at home while being
cared by mothers, relatives and traditional birth attendants(1-3). Despite
proven cost-effective solutions such as promoting antenatal tetanus toxoid
immunization, skilled attendance during delivery, immediate and exclusive
breast-feeding, and clean cord care, there has been relatively little
change in neonatal mortality rate (NMR), especially in developing
countries(4). To achieve Millennium Development Goals, it is expected to
reduce the Neonatal mortality by two-third of the present rate, which is
not an easy task by any standard of neonatal care(5,6).
Every newborn requires basic care which has to be
provided by the mother at home. This includes warmth, feeding, basic
hygiene and identification of danger signs, and seeking help from health
personnel whenever required. Therefore, all newborns get home based
newborn care as per the perception and sociocultural behavior of the
society. However, it has been observed by various studies on the newborn
care in the communities that the knowledge and the practices of simple
care e.g. prevention of hypothermia, feeding of colostrum and
exclusive breastfeeding, are lacking(7-10). The knowledge regarding
identification of danger signs and care seeking behavior of the families
has been found to be variable, and in general, poor(11).
Situation Analysis of Newborn Care in Countries With
High NMR
The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for
essential newborn care include clean delivery, keeping the newborn warm,
early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, care of the
eyes, care during illness, immunization and care of low birth-weight
newborns(12). Therefore it is necessary for the mother and family to
understand these aspects of childbirth and newborn care, and be prepared
to react for the potential dangers. Baqui, et al.(13) in a recent
study from Uttar Pradesh, India, reported very poor knowledge regarding
newborn care practices among pregnant mothers, especially in rural areas.
Only 7% pregnant women received any information regarding clean cord care
from health professionals. Similarly, 5% women received information on
thermal care and breastfeeding. The study also revealed that only 17%
pregnant women received at least one antenatal check up during their
entire period of pregnancy. Most of the deliveries were conducted at home
and by family members or relatives. Initiation of breastfeeding within six
hours of birth was practiced in only 6% cases but later on exclusive
breastfeeding in the first month was given to 82% cases. Another study
from rural areas of Makawanpur district, Nepal, reported that a very large
proportion (>90%) of deliveries took place at home. The study also
reported that only six percent of home deliveries were attended by skilled
government health workers and newborn care practices were unhygienic and
high-risk(14).
In India, 65.4% of all births and 75.3% of births in
rural areas occur at home(7). According to National Family Health
Survey-III (NFHS-III), the highest neonatal mortality rates are from the
states of Chattisgarh, Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh (Table I).
As most of these deaths occur at home, unattended by skilled health
worker, designing and prioritizing the interventions about the newborn
care practices at home is essential to reduce mortality and morbidity.
Implementation of an effective program for pro-motion of childbirth and
newborn care practices requires understanding of the community and
household traditional newborn care practices. Such information will enable
the development of programs to promote culturally sensitive and acceptable
change in practices. Information about reasons for delivering at home,
home delivery and newborn care practices in many parts of the country is
lacking. Identification of simple clinical signs by the health worker and
timely intervention for these sick babies would be a key factor in
reduction of neonatal mortality(15).
Table I
Child Mortality Rates (Per Thousand Live Births) in India (NFHS - III)
State |
Neonatal |
Infant |
Under-5 |
|
mortality |
mortality |
mortality |
|
rate |
rate |
rate |
Andhra Pradesh |
40.3 |
53.5 |
63.2 |
Arunachal Pradesh |
34.0 |
60.7 |
87.7 |
Assam |
45.5 |
66.1 |
85.0 |
Bihar |
39.8 |
61.7 |
84.8 |
Chattisgarh |
51.1 |
70.8 |
90.3 |
Delhi |
29.3 |
39.8 |
46.7 |
Goa |
8.8 |
15.3 |
20.3 |
Gujarat |
33.5 |
49.7 |
60.9 |
Haryana |
23.6 |
41.7 |
52.3 |
Himachal Pradesh |
27.3 |
36.1 |
41.5 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
29.8 |
44.7 |
51.2 |
Jharkhand |
48.6 |
68.7 |
93.0 |
Karnataka |
28.9 |
43.2 |
54.7 |
Kerala |
11.5 |
15.3 |
16.3 |
Madhya Pradesh |
44.9 |
69.5 |
94.2 |
Maharashtra |
31.8 |
37.5 |
46.7 |
Manipur |
18.7 |
29.7 |
41.9 |
Meghalaya |
23.6 |
44.6 |
70.5 |
Mizoram |
16.3 |
34.1 |
52.9 |
Nagaland |
19.8 |
38.3 |
64.7 |
Orissa |
45.4 |
64.7 |
90.6 |
Punjab |
28.0 |
41.7 |
52.0 |
Rajasthan |
43.9 |
65.3 |
85.4 |
Sikkim |
19.4 |
33.7 |
40.1 |
Tamil Nadu |
19.1 |
30.4 |
35.5 |
Tripura |
33.1 |
51.5 |
59.2 |
Uttar Pradesh |
47.6 |
72.7 |
96.4 |
Uttaranchal |
27.6 |
41.9 |
56.8 |
West Bengal |
37.6 |
48.0 |
59.6 |
India |
39.0 |
57.0 |
74.3 |
Components of Home-Based Newborn Care
There is no uniformity on the exact definition of home
based care. Damstadt, et al.(16) defined it as family oriented and
community oriented services that support self care, including the adoption
of improved care practices and appropriate care seeking for illness. It
also involves community mobilization and the empowerment of individuals
and communities to demand quality services that respond to their needs.
The main emphasis of home based newborn care lies in preventive, promotive
and curative services to the newborn as well as their mothers at home.
Example of family oriented care include behavior change communications,
community mobilization, antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care
practices, care seeking for illness, and in some settings, community based
case management of illness e.g. management of sepsis or pneumonia
by community health workers.
Bhutta, et al.(17) in a review of the evidence
based, cost effective interventions for reduction of neonatal mortality,
identified 16 possible interventions which have proven efficacy. The
intrapartum and postnatal packages with 90% coverage have similar effects
which are two to three fold greater than that of only antenatal care.
Their analysis also reveals that a combination of universal i.e. for all
settings-outreach and home based newborn care at 90% coverage can avert
18-37% neonatal deaths. It is interesting to note that the most beneficial
effect is observed with family and community care in settings with high
neonatal mortality.
Some of the postnatal interventions which have been
studied with primary purpose of reduction of neonatal morbidity and
mortality are summarized in the Box 1.
Box 1
Postnatal Interventions for Improving Neonatal Health
Newborn resuscitation Delayed umbilical cord
clamping
Umbilical cord antisepsis
Hypothermia prevention and management
Hypoglycemia prevention and management
Breastfeeding
Prevention and treatment of ophthalmia neonatorum
Vitamin K prophylaxis
Hepatitis B vaccination
Neonatal vitamin A supplementation
Kangaroo mother care (KMC)
Topical emollient therapy
Hyperbilirubinemia screening
Traditional birth attendant (TBA) training
Pneumonia case management
Sepsis case management |
Evidence Supporting Home-based Care for Neonates
Several workers and groups have evaluated the efficacy
of the home or community-based interventions for improving neonatal
health. In rural India, Daga, et al.(18)
emphasized resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns, prevention of
hypothermia, and referral of sick newborns; and achieved 41% and 62%
reductions in NMR and perinatal mortality rate (PMR), respectively,
compared with baseline data over a 3-year period. Pratinidhi, et al.(19)
used village health workers to identify and manage high-risk neonates at
home. Interventions included management of birth asphyxia, hypothermia
prevention, clean cord care, breastfeeding promotion, postnatal visits,
and identification and referral of sick newborns and those with feeding
problems. Newborn mortality declined by 25% during the intervention year,
compared with the year before implementation of the program.
Table II summarizes the results of some
more robust studies on home-based care for newborns. Bang, et al.(20),
from Gadchiroli in Maharashtra, India, showed 62% reduction of NMR in
their study areas at the end of three years of intervention of home-based
newborn care. In their study, community based neonatal interventions were
implemented through village health workers who were chosen among the
residents of the same village. They served a population of 1000 people and
were trained by a team of doctors in practices of essential newborn care
including resuscitation and identification of danger signs. They were also
trained in giving antibiotic (gentamicin) injections and oral
cotrimoxazole to newborn babies. Workers made 8-12 postnatal visits to
examine the newborn babies regarding weight, temperature, and identified
any problem or sickness. The investigators also trained TBAs regarding
safe delivery methods and basic newborn resuscitation, and provided them
with disposable delivery kits. There was a close coordination between
village health workers and the TBAs. The study team had an excellent
rapport with the community as well as district and sub-district Government
health functionaries, making it an ideal set up for the experimental
intervention.
Table II
Summary of the Studies on Community-Based Interventions for Improving Newborn Health
Authors (Ref.) |
Location |
Intervention |
Neonatal outcome |
Bang, et al.(20) |
India |
Home based newborn care package |
62% reduction in |
|
|
implemented through community health |
neonatal mortality |
|
|
volunteers |
|
Manandhar, et al.(14) |
Nepal |
Community based health care package |
30% reduction |
|
|
delivered through community health |
in infant mortality |
|
|
workers |
rate |
Jokhio, et al.(21) |
Pakistan |
Improving clean delivery practices by traditional |
29% reduction |
|
|
birth attendants |
in neonatal mortality |
Baqui, et al.(22) |
Bangladesh |
Community based health care package through |
34% reduction in |
|
|
community health worker and treatment of sepsis |
neonatal mortality |
Bartlett, et al.(23) |
Guatemala |
Community based health care package in which |
Mortality rate in first |
|
|
every newborn baby was seen at home weekly |
three months reduced |
|
|
in first month and biweekly in 2nd and 3rd month |
by 85% |
|
|
and treated by physician if there was any problem |
|
Manandhar, et al.(14) conducted a
cluster-randomized trial at Makwanpur, Nepal to evaluate a community-based
participatory intervention to improve essential newborn care. In this
study, mothers’ groups were identified in the villages and were trained to
identify perinatal health problems. Common goals of the action plan
included community surveillance of births and birth outcomes, improved
caregiver recognition of danger signs, proper care seeking, improved
knowledge and skills of health workers, clean delivery practices,
increased rates of early breastfeeding and improved referral patterns.
Infant mortality was reduced by 30% and maternal mortality was reduced by
78%.
In another community based interventional study from
Sylhet district of Bangladesh, Baqui, et al.(22) reported a
reduction of neonatal mortality by 34% in the home care group. In this
study, female health workers were trained in home based newborn care
according to an adapted version of WHO integrated management of childhood
illness (IMCI). A newborn with very severe disease was either referred to
a health facility or if not willing, then treated with single daily dose
of injections procaine penicillin and gentamicin once a day for ten days.
However, in their study of 478 sick newborn babies with very severe
disease, the health worker could motivate only 162 families to seek advice
from qualified care, 112 families refused treatment or any advice from the
health workers, and 207 families wanted care at home by the village health
workers. This shows resistance from the community regarding the advice
from the community health workers who were exclusively meant for this
study.
Feasibility of Implementation
Community based newborn care strategies in resource
poor countries with high neonatal mortality show significant reduction in
neonatal mortality as evidenced by the above studies. However, all these
studies were done by excellent researchers with good resources and
dedicated workers supervised by trained researchers. However, there are
innumerable problems in actual implementation of these strategies. It will
be a challenging task to upscale the home care newborn package to the most
vulnerable districts in certain states in India such as UP, Chattisgarh,
Jharkhand and Bihar where NMR is alarmingly high. A pilot project was
undertaken by Government of India with the help of Indian Council of
Medical Research to implement home-based newborn care package developed by
Bang, et al. but the study results (unpublished) are not reported
to be very encouraging. Government of India is trying to upscale the
maternal and newborn care services by a group of female community health
volunteers who are known as ‘accredited social health activist’ (ASHA).
They would identify all pregnant women in the village and also identify
high risk pregnancy with timely referral to first referral units. After
delivery, each newborn will be visited by them within 24 hours of birth,
on 3-4th day and on 7th-10th day of life. Each low birth weight baby will
receive three additional visits on 14th, 21st and 28th day. All babies
with danger signs would be referred by them to the nearest first referral
center. The referral and survival of the babies will be incentive linked.
A large number of ASHA workers are already recruited in India and the
training component is complete. However, the impact of the program is yet
to be known.
What Needs to be Done?
In order to achieve the millennium development goal of
reduction in neonatal mortality in resource poor countries with weak
primary care health system, it is important to establish a good outreach
and home based newborn care by improving home care practices and demand
for skilled care at birth. There is an urgent need for improvement of care
seeking behavior of the community by behavior change communication so that
people accept the services provided by the Government. Mother and baby
pair should be considered as a single unit to formulate strategies for
improvement of neonatal care. Simultaneous expansion of clinical care for
mother and newborn at all levels needs immediate attention. Although all
systematic reviews as well as individual studies on home based newborn
care have shown promising results, there are limitations when implementing
at the country level as it should fit into the logistics of the available
health care system in terms of manpower, infrastructure and policy. There
has to be parallel development of adequate numbers of functional first
referral units all over the country and especially in districts where the
neonatal mortality is very high, so that the newborns requiring secondary
or level II care get attention and proper treatment. The millennium
development goal can only be achieved by improving all available services
and not only by home based newborn care. The long term solutions can only
be achieved by improving the literacy rate and empowerment of mothers,
which has been clearly shown to be effective by reduction of neonatal
mortality in Indian states of Goa, Kerala and Mizoram where female
literacy and empowerment is at a high level. Building the capacity of
mothers through basic education is a key long term strategy to improve
perinatal and neonatal care.
References
1. Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibiya K, Black RL. WHO
estimates of causes of death in children. Lancet 2005; 365: 1147-1152.
2. Lawn J, Cousens S, Zufan J. 4 million neonatal
deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 2005; 365: 891-900.
3. Lawn J, Cousens S, Bhutta Z, Darmstadt G, Martines
J, Paul V, et al. Why are 4 million babies dying each year? Lancet
2004; 364: 399-401.
4. WHO. World Health Statistics 2006. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2006.
5. WHO. World Health Report 2005: make every mother and
child count. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
6. Ahmad OB, Lopez AD, Inoue M. The decline in child
mortality: a reappraisal. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78: 1175-1191.
7. National Family Health Survey III. Mumbai:
International Institute for Population Sciences and ORC Macro; 2006.
8. de Zoysa I, Bhandari N, Akhtari N, Bhan MK.
Careseeking for illness in young infants in an urban slum in India. Soc
Sci Med 1998; 47: 2101-2111.
9. Bang AT, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD, Baitule SB, Bang RA.
Neonatal and infant mortality in ten years (1993-2003) of the Gadchiroli
field area trial: effect of home based newborn care. J Perinatol 2005; 259
(suppl.) : S92-S107.
10. Awasthi S, Verma T, Agarwal M. Danger signs of
neonatal illnesses: perception of caregivers and health workers in
Northern India. Bull World Health Organ 2006; 84: 819-826.
11. Bang AT, Bang RA, Reddy MH. Simple clinical
criteria to identify sepsis or pneumonia in a community needing treatment
or referral. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005; 24: 335-341.
12. WHO. Essential Newborn Care: A Report of Technical
Working Group. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.
13. Baqui AH, Williams EK, Darmstadt GL, Kumar V, Kiran
TU, Panwar D, et al. Newborn care in rural Uttar Pradesh. Indian J
Pediatr 2007; 74: 241-247.
14. Manandhar D, Osrin D, Shrestha B, Mesko N, Morrison
J, Tunbhahanghpe K. Effect of participatory intervention with women groups
on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet
2004; 364: 979-979.
15. Young Infant Clinical Signs Study Group. Clinical
signs that predict severe illness in children under two months: a
multicentric study. Lancet 2008; 371: 135-142.
16. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker
N, de Bernes L. Evidence based cost effective interventions: how many
newborn babies can we save? Lancet 2005; 365: 977-988.
17. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Hasan B, Haws R. Community
based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes
in developing countries. Pediatrics 2005; 115 (2 suppl) : 519-617.
18. Daga SR, Daga AS. Reduction of neonatal mortality
with simple interventions. J Trop Pediatr 1989; 35: 191-196.
19. Pratinidhi A, Shah U, Shratri A, Bodhani N. Risk
approach strategy in neonatal care. Bull World Health Organ 1986; 64:
291-297.
20. Bang AT, Bang R, Baitule S, Reddy M, Deshmukh H.
Effect of home based newborn care and management of sepsis on neonatal
mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet 1999: 354: 1955-1961.
21. Jokhio AH, Winter HR, Cheng KK. An intervention
involving traditional birth attendants and perinatal and maternal
mortality in Pakistan. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2091-2099.
22. Baqui AH, Arifeen SE, Damstadt GL, Ahmed SA,
Williams EK, Seraji HR, et al. Effect of community based newborn
care intervention package implemented through two service delivery
strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a randomized controlled trial.
Lancet 2008; 371: 1936-1944.
23. Bartlett AV, Paz de Bocaletti ME, Bocaletti MA.
Neonatal and early postneonatal morbidity and mortality in a rural
Guatemalan community: the importance of infectious diseases and their
management. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10: 752-757.
|
|
|
|