Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
research letter

Indian Pediatr 2019;56: 965-967

Pediatric Hepatic Venous Outflow Tract Obstruction: Experience from a Transplant Center

 

Ishaq Malik1, Vidyut Bhatia2, Karunesh Kumar2*, Anupam Sibal2 and N Goyal3

1Department of Pediatrics, GMC Srinagar; and Departments of 2Pediatric Gastroenterology and 3Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi; India.

Email: [email protected]

   


We performed a review of case records of children diagnosed with hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction at our center in last 10 years. Out of 11 cases identified, 6 had variable blocks in the hepatic venous system and 4 had combined hepatic venous and inferior vena cava (IVC) block. One child with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) had isolated IVC involvement. Angioplasty was attempted in 3 patients; among them 2 had successful outcome. Seven children with advanced liver disease underwent transplantation, which was successful in six. With availability of modalities like interventional radiology and transplantation, the overall prognosis of hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction seems to be good when managed in a well-equipped center.

Keywords: Anticoagulation, Liver transplantation, Management, Outcome.



H
epatic venous outflow tract obstruction (HVOTO), also known as Budd-Chiari syndrome, has been defined as the obstruction to the venous outflow of the liver beginning from small hepatic veins right up to the entrance of the inferior vena cava (IVC) into the right atrium [1]. It is an uncommon disorder in children with a wide variety of predisposing causes. Uncorrected HVOTO progresses to irreversible cirrhosis unless good collateral venous circulation develops spontaneously or the blockage is corrected medically. We present our experience with management of 11 children with HVOTO highlighting the gamut of therapeutic options available for this condition.

A retrospective search of our inpatient records of last ten years was performed to identify patients with HVOTO. A complete history, examination, basic hematological and liver function tests, prothrombotic work up, and results of radiological studies were extracted. Prothrombotic panel including anti-phospholipid antibody (APLA), protein C and S, antithrombin III, factor V leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene mutation, serum homocysteine level, lupus anticoagulant, JAK 2 mutation and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) profile were done whenever indicated and feasible. Radiological features (morphology, level of block) were noted. Treatment, outcome and follow-up were also recorded.

Case records of 11 children (6 boys) with HVOTO during study period were extracted and reviewed. Mean age of presentation was 10.2 years (range 3-16 years). Duration of symptoms ranged from 8-36 months. Ascites and dilated abdominal veins were the most common findings at presentation in 7 (63.6%) patients followed by hepatosplenomegaly in 6 (54.5%) patients and icterus in 4 (36%). The mean (range) bilirubin, albumin, SGOT, SGPT and PT/INR were 2.63 (1,5.2), 3.4 (2.6,4.1), 49 (33,72), 29 (31,66) and 1.07, respectively.

USG abdomen with Doppler was diagnostic in 8 (89%) cases. CT angiography of liver was performed in all cases, and it was helpful in localizing the block in all the 11 children (Table I). Etiological work-up was suggestive of thrombophilia in 4 (36.4%) patients, among them two were positive for APLA and one each was positive for JAK2 mutation and PNH (Table I).

TABLE I Management, Outcome, Post-operative Complications and Follow-up of Eleven Children with HVOTO
No. Age (y)/Sex Presenting features Site of obstruction Treatment and outcomes Post-operative complications
1 9/M A, DV, HSM, I HV+IVC LRLT, successful Pleural effusion
2 3/M A, HSM, I HV LRLT, successful None
3 16/F A, DV, HSM, I HV+IVC LRLT, successful None
4 4/F A, DV, HSM, I HV+IVC LRLT, successful IVH, sepsis, hypertension
5 5/M A, DV HV LRLT, successful Pneumonia
6 5/F A, DV HV LRLT, successful Ascites
7 16/M A, DV, HSM HV HV stenting, failed -
8 16/F A IVC+HV IVC+HV stenting Hematoma at puncture site
9 12/M A IVC Heparin and warfarin SBP, pneumonia
10 16/F A HV HV stenting, successful None
11 14/M HSM, DV,I HV Warfarin  LRLT, died Sepsis, ascites
HVOTO: Hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction; A: ascites, DV: dilated veins, HSM: hepatosplenomegaly, I: icterus, LRLT: living related liver transplantation, IVH: intraventricular hemorrhage, HV: hepatic vein, IVC: inferior vena cava, SBP: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, JAK: Janus kinase, PNH: paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

Radiological intervention could be considered only in three patients. It was successful in two, and both had only ascites and hepatomegaly at presentation. It was unsuccessful in one child who had ascites along with other features of chronic liver disease. One patient with PNH, who had IVC block, was managed with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by warfarin. Percutaneous intervention was not attempted, as he had underlying hemolysis. He was readmitted for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and again managed by heparin. He recovered over two weeks and was discharged on warfarin. Seven patients were offered and underwent living related liver transplantation for decompensated chronic liver disease (CLD), and they did not undergo angioplasty. One patient died after liver transplantation because of sepsis and related complications. One patient had intraventricular hemorrhage on postoperative day 2. Another patient developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura on day 15 postoperatively and was managed conservatively.

Most common presentation of HVOTO in our study was abdominal distension followed by hepato-splenomegaly and jaundice, which was comparable to an earlier study by Sharma, et al. [2]. In another study, hepatomegaly was the most common mode of presentation (84.8%), followed by ascites (82.6%), spider angiomas and dilated veins over abdomen (69.9%) [3].

Etiologies of HVOTO may include thrombotic states, inflammatory conditions, or neoplastic processes of the liver [4]. Three (33.3%) patients in our series had prothrombotic state, which is comparable to the proportion observed by Alam, et al. [5], but lower than 75% reported in another pediatric series from India [3].

Varying success rates (20-86%) of anti-coagulation combined with angioplasty have been reported in different series [6-8]. Approximately one-third of patients have short-length stenosis and are candidates for angioplasty. In the remaining 10-20% of patients whom anti-coagulation and intervention radiology procedures fail, liver transplantation remains the only option [6]. Most of the patients in our series had clinical, radiological and biochemical evidence of advanced liver disease. Radiological intervention could successfully be performed in only two patients and both these patients did not have features of advanced liver disease. Reports on the long-term outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for HVOTO in children are limited to a few sporadic case reports and series [9,10]. With proper case selection, long-term survival rates for pediatric OLT are in excess of 90%.

To conclude, a diagnosis of pediatric HVOTO is often made late. Early referral of such patients to an equipped center has the best possible outcome by giving the opportunity of re-establishing physiological hepatic venous outflow without the need for a surgery. Transplantation in children with advanced stages of liver failure due to HVOTO has helped in improving overall survival.

Contributors: IM: analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; VB: conceptualized the study; KK: collected the data; AS: reviewed the manuscript for final submission; NG: contributed the data and reviewed the manuscript for final submission. All authors approved the final version of manuscript, and are accountable for all aspects related to the study.

Funding: None; Competing interest: None stated.

References

1. Janssen HLA, Garcia-Pagan J-C, Elias E, Mentha G, Hadengue A, VALLA DC, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: A review by an expert panel. J Hepatol. 2003;38:364-71.

2. Sharma VK, Ranade PR, Marar S, Nabi F, Nagral A. Long-term clinical outcome of Budd-Chiari syndrome in children after radiological intervention. 2016;28:567-75.

3. Kathuria R, Srivastava A, Yachha SK, Poddar U, Baijal SS. Budd–Chiari syndrome in children: Clinical features, percutaneous radiological intervention, and outcome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26:1030-8.

4. Plessier A, Valla DC. Budd-Chiari syndrome. Semin. Liver Dis. 2008;28:259-69.

5. Alam S, Khanna R, Mukund A. Clinical and prothrombotic profile of hepatic vein outflow tract obstruction. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81:434-40.

6. Hidaka M, Eguchi S. Budd–Chiari syndrome: Focus on surgical treatment. Hepatology Research. 2017;47:142-8.

7. Han G, Qi X, Zhang W, He C, Yin Z, Wang J, et al. Percutaneous recanalization for Budd–Chiari syndrome: An 11-year retrospective study on patency and survival in 177 Chinese patients from a single center. Radiology. 2013;266:657-67.

8. Darwish Murad S, Plessier A, Hernandez-Guerra M, Fabris F, Eapen CE, Bahr MJ, et al. Etiology, management, and outcome of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:167-75.

9. Gomes AC, Rubino G, Pinto C, Cipriano A, Furtado E, Gonçalves I. Budd-Chiari syndrome in children and outcome after liver transplant. Pediatr Transplant. 2012;16:E338-41.

10. Redkar R, Bangar A, Hathiramani V, Raj V, Swathi C. Pediatric Budd-Chiari syndrome: A case series. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55:871-3.

 

Copyright © 1999-2019 Indian Pediatrics