|
Indian Pediatr 2019;56:
965-967 |
|
Pediatric Hepatic Venous Outflow Tract Obstruction:
Experience from a Transplant Center
|
Ishaq Malik 1,
Vidyut Bhatia2,
Karunesh Kumar2*,
Anupam Sibal2
and N Goyal3
1Department of Pediatrics, GMC Srinagar; and
Departments of 2Pediatric Gastroenterology and 3Liver
Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo
Hospitals, New Delhi; India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
We performed a review of case records
of children diagnosed with hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction at
our center in last 10 years. Out of 11 cases identified, 6 had variable
blocks in the hepatic venous system and 4 had combined hepatic venous
and inferior vena cava (IVC) block. One child with paroxysmal nocturnal
hemoglobinuria (PNH) had isolated IVC involvement. Angioplasty was
attempted in 3 patients; among them 2 had successful outcome. Seven
children with advanced liver disease underwent transplantation, which
was successful in six. With availability of modalities like
interventional radiology and transplantation, the overall prognosis of
hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction seems to be good when managed
in a well-equipped center.
Keywords: Anticoagulation, Liver
transplantation, Management, Outcome.
|
H epatic venous outflow tract obstruction (HVOTO),
also known as Budd-Chiari syndrome, has been defined as the obstruction
to the venous outflow of the liver beginning from small hepatic veins
right up to the entrance of the inferior vena cava (IVC) into the right
atrium [1]. It is an uncommon disorder in children with a wide variety
of predisposing causes. Uncorrected HVOTO progresses to irreversible
cirrhosis unless good collateral venous circulation develops
spontaneously or the blockage is corrected medically. We present our
experience with management of 11 children with HVOTO highlighting the
gamut of therapeutic options available for this condition.
A retrospective search of our inpatient records of
last ten years was performed to identify patients with HVOTO. A complete
history, examination, basic hematological and liver function tests,
prothrombotic work up, and results of radiological studies were
extracted. Prothrombotic panel including anti-phospholipid antibody
(APLA), protein C and S, antithrombin III, factor V leiden mutation,
prothrombin gene mutation, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR)
gene mutation, serum homocysteine level, lupus anticoagulant, JAK 2
mutation and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) profile were done
whenever indicated and feasible. Radiological features (morphology,
level of block) were noted. Treatment, outcome and follow-up were also
recorded.
Case records of 11 children (6 boys) with HVOTO
during study period were extracted and reviewed. Mean age of
presentation was 10.2 years (range 3-16 years). Duration of symptoms
ranged from 8-36 months. Ascites and dilated abdominal veins were the
most common findings at presentation in 7 (63.6%) patients followed by
hepatosplenomegaly in 6 (54.5%) patients and icterus in 4 (36%). The
mean (range) bilirubin, albumin, SGOT, SGPT and PT/INR were 2.63
(1,5.2), 3.4 (2.6,4.1), 49 (33,72), 29 (31,66) and 1.07, respectively.
USG abdomen with Doppler was diagnostic in 8 (89%)
cases. CT angiography of liver was performed in all cases, and it was
helpful in localizing the block in all the 11 children (Table
I). Etiological work-up was suggestive of thrombophilia in 4 (36.4%)
patients, among them two were positive for APLA and one each was
positive for JAK2 mutation and PNH (Table I).
TABLE I Management, Outcome, Post-operative Complications and Follow-up of Eleven Children with HVOTO
No.
|
Age (y)/Sex |
Presenting features |
Site of obstruction |
Treatment and outcomes
|
Post-operative complications |
1 |
9/M |
A, DV, HSM, I |
HV+IVC |
LRLT, successful |
Pleural effusion |
2 |
3/M |
A, HSM, I |
HV |
LRLT, successful |
None
|
3 |
16/F |
A, DV, HSM, I |
HV+IVC |
LRLT, successful |
None
|
4 |
4/F |
A, DV, HSM, I |
HV+IVC |
LRLT, successful |
IVH, sepsis, hypertension |
5 |
5/M |
A, DV |
HV |
LRLT, successful |
Pneumonia |
6 |
5/F |
A, DV |
HV |
LRLT, successful |
Ascites
|
7 |
16/M |
A, DV, HSM |
HV |
HV stenting, failed |
- |
8 |
16/F |
A |
IVC+HV |
IVC+HV stenting |
Hematoma at puncture site |
9 |
12/M |
A |
IVC |
Heparin and warfarin |
SBP, pneumonia |
10 |
16/F |
A |
HV |
HV stenting, successful |
None
|
11 |
14/M |
HSM, DV,I |
HV |
Warfarin LRLT, died |
Sepsis, ascites |
HVOTO: Hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction; A: ascites,
DV: dilated veins, HSM: hepatosplenomegaly, I: icterus, LRLT:
living related liver transplantation, IVH: intraventricular
hemorrhage, HV: hepatic vein, IVC: inferior vena cava, SBP:
spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, JAK: Janus kinase, PNH:
paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. |
Radiological intervention could be considered only in
three patients. It was successful in two, and both had only ascites and
hepatomegaly at presentation. It was unsuccessful in one child who had
ascites along with other features of chronic liver disease. One patient
with PNH, who had IVC block, was managed with low molecular weight
heparin (LMWH) followed by warfarin. Percutaneous intervention was not
attempted, as he had underlying hemolysis. He was readmitted for portal
vein thrombosis (PVT) and again managed by heparin. He recovered over
two weeks and was discharged on warfarin. Seven patients were offered
and underwent living related liver transplantation for decompensated
chronic liver disease (CLD), and they did not undergo angioplasty. One
patient died after liver transplantation because of sepsis and related
complications. One patient had intraventricular hemorrhage on
postoperative day 2. Another patient developed thrombotic
thrombocytopenic purpura on day 15 postoperatively and was managed
conservatively.
Most common presentation of HVOTO in our study was
abdominal distension followed by hepato-splenomegaly and jaundice, which
was comparable to an earlier study by Sharma, et al. [2]. In
another study, hepatomegaly was the most common mode of presentation
(84.8%), followed by ascites (82.6%), spider angiomas and dilated veins
over abdomen (69.9%) [3].
Etiologies of HVOTO may include thrombotic states,
inflammatory conditions, or neoplastic processes of the liver [4]. Three
(33.3%) patients in our series had prothrombotic state, which is
comparable to the proportion observed by Alam, et al. [5], but
lower than 75% reported in another pediatric series from India [3].
Varying success rates (20-86%) of anti-coagulation
combined with angioplasty have been reported in different series [6-8].
Approximately one-third of patients have short-length stenosis and are
candidates for angioplasty. In the remaining 10-20% of patients whom
anti-coagulation and intervention radiology procedures fail, liver
transplantation remains the only option [6]. Most of the patients in our
series had clinical, radiological and biochemical evidence of advanced
liver disease. Radiological intervention could successfully be performed
in only two patients and both these patients did not have features of
advanced liver disease. Reports on the long-term outcomes for orthotopic
liver transplantation (OLT) for HVOTO in children are limited to a few
sporadic case reports and series [9,10]. With proper case selection,
long-term survival rates for pediatric OLT are in excess of 90%.
To conclude, a diagnosis of pediatric HVOTO is often
made late. Early referral of such patients to an equipped center has the
best possible outcome by giving the opportunity of re-establishing
physiological hepatic venous outflow without the need for a surgery.
Transplantation in children with advanced stages of liver failure due to
HVOTO has helped in improving overall survival.
Contributors: IM: analyzed the data and drafted
the manuscript; VB: conceptualized the study; KK: collected the data;
AS: reviewed the manuscript for final submission; NG: contributed the
data and reviewed the manuscript for final submission. All authors
approved the final version of manuscript, and are accountable for all
aspects related to the study.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
References
1. Janssen HLA, Garcia-Pagan J-C, Elias E, Mentha G,
Hadengue A, VALLA DC, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: A review by an
expert panel. J Hepatol. 2003;38:364-71.
2. Sharma VK, Ranade PR, Marar S, Nabi F, Nagral A.
Long-term clinical outcome of Budd-Chiari syndrome in children after
radiological intervention. 2016;28:567-75.
3. Kathuria R, Srivastava A, Yachha SK, Poddar U,
Baijal SS. Budd–Chiari syndrome in children: Clinical features,
percutaneous radiological intervention, and outcome. Eur J Gastroenterol
Hepatol. 2014;26:1030-8.
4. Plessier A, Valla DC. Budd-Chiari syndrome. Semin.
Liver Dis. 2008;28:259-69.
5. Alam S, Khanna R, Mukund A. Clinical and
prothrombotic profile of hepatic vein outflow tract obstruction. Indian
J Pediatr. 2014;81:434-40.
6. Hidaka M, Eguchi S. Budd–Chiari syndrome: Focus on
surgical treatment. Hepatology Research. 2017;47:142-8.
7. Han G, Qi X, Zhang W, He C, Yin Z, Wang J, et
al. Percutaneous recanalization for Budd–Chiari syndrome: An 11-year
retrospective study on patency and survival in 177 Chinese patients from
a single center. Radiology. 2013;266:657-67.
8. Darwish Murad S, Plessier A, Hernandez-Guerra M,
Fabris F, Eapen CE, Bahr MJ, et al. Etiology, management, and
outcome of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:167-75.
9. Gomes AC, Rubino G, Pinto C, Cipriano A, Furtado
E, Gonçalves I. Budd-Chiari syndrome in children and outcome after liver
transplant. Pediatr Transplant. 2012;16:E338-41.
10. Redkar R, Bangar A, Hathiramani V, Raj V, Swathi
C. Pediatric Budd-Chiari syndrome: A case series. Indian Pediatr.
2018;55:871-3.
|
|
|
|