|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 957-961 |
|
Association of Fluid Overload with Mortality
in Critically-ill Mechanically Ventilated Children
|
Sukla Samaddar, Jhuma Sankar, Sushil Kumar Kabra and
Rakesh Lodha
From Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of
Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Rakesh Lodha, Professor,
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: May 08, 2017;
Initial review: June 21, 2017;
Accepted: July 31, 2018.
|
Objectives: To study the
association of fluid overload with mortality and morbidity in
critically-ill mechanically ventilated children.
Design: Prospective observational
study.
Setting: Pediatric Intensive Care
Unit (PICU) of a tertiary care hospital, New Delhi, India.
Participants: 118 children (age 1
mo - 15 y) requiring mechanical ventilation.
Outcome measures: Primary:
Association of fluid overload with mortality. Secondary:
Association of fluid overload with oxygenation, organ dysfunction,
duration of mechanical ventilation and PICU stay.
Results: Cumulative fluid
overload of ³15%
was observed in 74 (62.7%) children. About 50% of these children reached
cumulative fluid overload of ³15%
within the first 5 days of PICU stay. The mortality was 40.5% in those
with ³15%
cumulative fluid compared to 34% in the rest [OR (95% CI): 1.02 (0.97,
1.07)]. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders,
cumulative fluid overload ³15%
was associated with higher maximum PELOD (pediatric logistic organ
dysfunction) score (Median: 21 vs. 12; P = 0.03), longer
median duration of mechanical ventilation (10 vs. 4 d; P
<0.0001) and PICU stay (13.5 vs. 6 d; P <0.0001). There
was no significant association of fluid overload with oxygenation index
(P=0.32).
Conclusion: There is no
association of fluid overload with mortality. However, it is associated
with poor organ function, longer duration of mechanical ventilation and
PICU stay in critically-ill, mechanically ventilated children.
Keywords: Intensive Care, Mechanical
Ventilation, Outcome.
|
F luid balance is one of the most challenging
aspects of critically-ill children requiring pediatric intensive care.
While early and aggressive fluid resuscitation is lifesaving and widely
practiced, excess fluid may be detrimental. Mechanically ventilated
children may be more prone to fluid overload as they have lesser
evaporative losses due to warmed, humidified gases and thermocontrolled
environment [1]. Presence of non-osmotic stimuli, in addition to osmotic
stimuli, for anti-diuretic hormone (ADH) release may contribute to fluid
retention [2,3]. In addition, overestimation of fluid requirement occurs
if traditional methods designed primarily for healthy children are used
[4].
The Fluids and Catheters Treatment Trial (FACTT) in
adults concluded that, patients managed with fluid restriction had
lesser duration of intensive care unit stay and mechanical ventilation
than patients who received liberal fluids [5]. The observations from few
retrospective studies in children suggest adverse effects of positive
fluid balance on respiratory morbidity and mortality [6]. We conducted
this study to evaluate the association of fluid overload with survival
and morbidities in critically-ill mechanically ventilated children in a
PICU setting. Our primary objective was to study the association of
fluid overload (both at 48 hours and total duration of PICU stay) and
mortality. Secondary objectives were to study the association of fluid
overload with peak oxygenation index (OI), organ dysfunction using
Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction or PELOD score [7], duration of
mechanical ventilation and length of PICU stay.
Methods
This prospective observational study was conducted in
an eight-bedded PICU of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New
Delhi from July 2013 to March 2015. Children aged >1 month to
£15 years requiring
mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours were enrolled and
followed-up for a maximum of 14 days and for final outcome during PICU
stay. Children with congenital heart disease, acute or chronic renal
failure, renal tubular defects, post renal transplant, those receiving
peritoneal or hemodialysis, and those with advanced malignancies were
excluded. Children who were mechanically ventilated
³24 hours prior to
admission in PICU were also excluded due to uncertainty of previous
course and fluid received. Only the first admission was considered for
every patient, and readmissions were excluded. The study was approved by
the Institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent was
obtained from either of the parents or legal guardian.
In our unit, twice daily documentation of ventilatory
parameters and arterial blood gas values of patients is performed.
Detailed documentation of patient’s fluid input and output is a part of
the daily nursing schedule. All enrolled children after initial fluid
resuscitation (if required), received maintenance fluid therapy using
isotonic fluids (dextrose normal saline) in most cases. The Holliday
Segar formula [8] was used for initial calculation which was adjusted
depending on the disease condition (children with CNS/hepatic diseases
received approximately two-thirds of the calculated volume if
hemodynamically stable), the input-output balance, need for correction
for excessive or reduced insensible losses, and the further hemodynamic
status of the child.
Fluid overload percent (FO%) was defined as = [Total
fluid input in 24 hours (mL) – total fluid output in 24 hours (mL)/weight
at admission (g)] × 100. Cumulative fluid balance on any particular day
was defined as the sum total of daily fluid balances till that
particular day (minimum of 24 hours to maximum of 2 weeks). Significant
fluid overload was defined as a cumulative fluid balance of
³15% attained at any
time point during the 14 day study period and peak fluid overload was
defined as the maximum percentage cumulative fluid overload on any day
during the study period. Baseline demographic characteristics including
weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and percentage predictive
mortality at admission using Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 (PIM2) score
[9] were recorded. At admission to PICU, infants were weighed using an
infant weighing scale, while older children were weighed using a
weighing chair scale. We were able to weigh all the intubated children
taking precautions to avoid extubation. Subsequently, daily input was
calculated as the sum of the total parenteral [intravenous (IV) fluids,
medications, boluses, fluid replacements and blood products] and enteral
fluids (oral, nasogastric or orogastric) received. Fluid output was
calculated as sum of daily urine output and other body fluid output (nasogastric
aspirate/ drain, drain from intercostals, or other surgical drains);
these were recorded using the nursing charts on a daily basis.
Insensible losses and fecal fluid losses were not included. From these
data, daily fluid balance was calculated and cumulative figures
generated for the total duration of mechanical ventilation.
If any child had overt clinical features of fluid
overload like pulmonary edema or increase in liver size, appropriate
measures were taken depending on the perfusion status of the child.
Example, in a normo- or hypertensive child with these clinical features,
diuretics like furosemide was used and fluid infusion was restricted. On
the other hand, if the child was in shock and developed these signs (may
occur in children with septic shock and myocardial dysfunction), the
primary goal was to maintain the perfusion, using inotropes and
modifying the ventilator settings to ensure adequate oxygenation as
well. On the other hand, there are no well-accepted management
guidelines for children who have a positive fluid balance in absence of
overt signs of fluid overload.
Daily documentation of ventilator parameters
[respiratory rate, inspiratory time (Ti), peak inspiratory pressure
(PIP), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), FiO 2,
mean airway pressure] was done. Ventilatory settings were standardized
for all children as per PICU protocol at our institute; these were
influenced by the lung conditions and modified based on clinical
condition and arterial blood gas reports. Arterial blood gas analysis
was performed using ABL Flex (Radiometer Copen-hagen, Denmark) and
required parameters (pH, PCO2,
PO2) were documented. Also
parameters required for determining PELOD score were recorded daily for
an objective scoring of organ dysfunction .
Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 11.2 (Stata
Corp, College Station, TX, USA). The relationship between the fluid
overload and the outcome variables was examined using bivariate
(chi-square tests for categorical data and t-tests for continuous
variables) and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) for
mortality, controlling for confounders such as age, gender, nutritional
status, and severity of illness at admission (PIM2 score).
Results
During the study period, 278 children required
mechanical ventilation, out of whom 118 (58.5% boys) were enrolled (Fig.
1). The median (IQR) age of the study participants was 14.5 (4, 72)
months. Table I show the baseline characteristics. The
most common indications for mechanical ventilation in patient management
were septic shock (49.1%), impending respiratory failure secondary to
pulmonary causes (24.6%) and CNS causes (11.1%) followed by hepatic
encephalopathy (3.4 %). At admission, children had a mean (SD) predicted
mortality using PIM2 score of 15.1 (18.7).
|
Fig. 1 Flow of participants in the
study.
|
TABLE I Baseline Characteristics of Study Children (N=118)
Variables |
Values (n = 118) |
Age (mo), median (IQR) |
14.5 (4, 72) |
Male gender, n (%) |
69 (58.5) |
Weight Z score, median (IQR) |
-2.65 (-4.85, -1.42) |
Height Z score, median (IQR) |
-1.32 (-3.87, - 0.07) |
BMI Z score, median (IQR) |
-2.78 (-4.66, -1.28) |
PIM2 score, mean (SD) |
15.08 (18.65) |
Admission diagnosis, n (%) |
Sepsis |
58 (49.2) |
Pulmonary |
29 (24.6) |
CNS |
13 (11.0) |
Hepatic |
4 (3.4) |
Non pulmonary infections without sepsis
|
4 (3.4)
|
Miscellaneous |
10 (8.5) |
Cumulative fluid overload of
³15% was observed in
74 (62.7%) children. Around 50% of children reached cumulative fluid
balance of ³15%
within the first 5 days of PICU stay (Web Fig.
1). The median cumulative fluid overload percentage (IQR) was 19.6%
(10.5%, 30.8%). The median (IQR) cumulative fluid overload at 48 hours
was 7.9% (3.1%, 11.8%).
Of the enrolled children 38.1% (45/118) died. Among
74 children who had ³15%
cumulative fluid overload, mortality rate was 40.5% (30/74) as compared
to 34% (15/44) in those with <15% cumulative fluid overload (P=0.49)
(Table II). The median (IQR) peak fluid overload in
survivors was 10.2% (3.3%, 17.4%) as compared to 24.6% (13.6%, 35.5%) in
non-survivors (P=0.11). This was not significant on multivariate
analysis (P=0.50) (Web Table I).
TABLE II Fluid Overload and Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Children (N=118)
Fluid overload |
Survivors (n=73) |
Non-survivors (n=45) |
P value |
Cumulative maximum percentage fluid overload |
≥15%, n (%) |
44 (60) |
30 (67) |
0.48 |
<15%, n (%) |
29 (40) |
15 (33) |
|
Peak cumulative fluid overload %; median (IQR) |
10.2 (3.3, 17.4) |
24.6 (13.6, 35.5) |
0.18 |
Cumulative fluid overload % at 48 h; median (IQR) |
6.6 (3.1, 10.3) |
9 (6.1, 12.7) |
0.04 |
At 48 hours, the median (IQR) peak fluid overload in
survivors was 6.6% (3.1%, 10.3%) compared to 9% (6.1%, 12.7%) in
non-survivors (P=0.04). However, on multivariate logistic
regression analysis, there was no such association after adjusting for
confounding factors (P=0.12) (Web Table I).
Only the PIM2 score at admission, PELOD score and diagnosis of sepsis
showed significant association with mortality (Web Table
I).
The maximum OI values were similar in children with
³15%
cumulative fluid overload [median (IQR): 10.3 (5.4, 18.0)] as compared
to those with <15% cumulative fluid overload [median (IQR): 11.1 (5.9,
21.4)] (P=0.38).
Higher organ dysfunction as calculated using PELOD
score was seen in those with ³15%
cumulative fluid overload [median (IQR): 21 (11, 31)] as compared to
children with <15% cumulative fluid overload [median (IQR): 12 (3.25,
21.75)] (P=0.03). On multivariate analysis, the association
between fluid overload and PELOD score remained significant (P=0.02)
(Web Table II). Cumulative fluid overload at 48 showed no
association with organ dysfunction (P=0.31).
The duration of mechanical ventilation was
significantly higher among children with
³15% cumulative fluid
overload [median (IQR): 10 (6, 16.2) days] compared to that in children
with <15% cumulative fluid overload [median (IQR): 4 (2.25, 8) days (P<0.001)].
On multivariate analysis, association remained significant (P<0.001)
after adjusting for confounding factors (Web Table II).
Cumulative fluid overload at 48 hours was also associated with longer
duration of mechanical ventilation (P=0.001).
The duration of PICU stay was significantly higher
among children with ³15%
cumulative maximum fluid overload [median (IQR): 13.5 (7.75, 22) days]
as compared to that in children with <15% cumulative maximum fluid
overload [median (IQR): 6 (4, 10.75) days] on univariate as well as
multivariate analysis (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001,
respectively) (Web Table II). Cumulative fluid
overload at 48 hours was also significantly associated with longer
duration of PICU stay (P <0.0001).
Discussion
In this prospective observational study, we observed
that there was no significant association of fluid overload with
mortality or peak oxygenation index. However, the total duration of
mechanical ventilation and duration of PICU stay was significantly
higher in those with fluid overload
³15%. These children also had significant organ
dysfunction as calculated using PELOD score.
We could not perform daily weight-based assessment of
positive balance, which is considered to be a more objective method and
better predictor of fluid balance; the severity of illness prevented
daily weight measure-ments. In addition, the additional effect of the
type of fluid used in such children was not measured though isotonic
saline is used in management of children in our PICU uniformly. The
other limitation was the sample size. On post hoc analysis to evaluate
the association between cumulative maximum fluid overload percentage and
mortality after adjusting for other independent factors, the power was
estimated to be less than 40%. Assuming similar cumulative maximum fluid
overload and its effect on mortality with 80% power, the sample size
required would be 862. While we used diuretics for children with overt
clinical features of fluid overload, we did not use renal replacement
therapy solely for this purpose.
Unlike previous studies in children, we carried out a
prospective study with a longer duration of follow up for outcomes. Also
majority of previous studies were conducted in a restricted group of
patients with acute lung injury [6,10] acute kidney injury [11,12]
children on CRRT and hemodialysis [13-15]. We were able to study
children commonly seen in a medical PICU with varied conditions to
demonstrate the actual incidence and severity of fluid overload. We did
not observe a relation between fluid overload and mortality which is
similar to what has been reported previously [16,17]. However, few
studies have shown association of fluid overload with mortality [18,19].
Previous studies have demonstrated significant effect of fluid overload
on lung function and weaning and thereby the oxygenation index, duration
of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in both children and adults.
Studies by Arikan, et al. [17] and Sinitsky, et al. [16]
showed that peak fluid overload percent and fluid overload at 48 hours,
respectively were associated with higher peak oxygenation index.
Although we did not observe similar association of peak cumulative fluid
overload percent of ³15%
with OI, the duration of ventilation as well as the ICU stay was
significantly longer in this group. These findings are also similar to
previous studies [18,19].
Higher PELOD scores were observed in those with
cumulative peak fluid overload of ³15%.
However, it did not translate to a difference in mortality between the
groups as other factors like increased severity of illness at
presentation in both groups might have ultimately influenced the
outcomes.
Possible mechanisms for an influence of fluid
overload on morbidity are still not clear, though many studies claim it
may be related to multiple organ dysfunction caused by increased
interstitial edema and hypoperfusion especially in organs like lung and
kidney [20,21]. Increased interstitial edema in the lungs leads to
increased requirement of PEEP which would have adverse effects on the
cardiac output and thereby the other organ systems [20,22,23]. In
addition, excessive fluid resuscitation in critically-ill children
contributes to the pathophysiology. Excessive ‘leakiness’ in such
children which manifests as tissue edema, non-hydrostatic pulmonary
edema (ARDS), and micro-albuminuria are other contributing factors [24].
We conclude that fluid overload seems to be
associated with significant morbidity, which includes increased organ
dysfunction, longer duration of ventilation and ICU stay, in
critically-ill mechanically ventilated children. Therefore, we recommend
meticulous fluid management with daily and cumulative fluid balances
which would help in early recognition of fluid overload in an intensive
care setting. Larger adequately powered studies are needed to further
address association of fluid overload with mortality.
Contributors: RL, SKK, JS: were
involved in study design, analysis and writing of manuscript; SS:
collected the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and
approved the final manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
What is Already Known?
•
Fluid overload leads to respiratory morbidity in children with
acute lung injury.
What This Study Adds?
• Fluid overload in mechanically
ventilated children is associated with increased organ
dysfunction, longer duration of ventilation and ICU stay.
• Peak cumulative fluid overload occurs
within first 5 days of admission requiring early identification.
|
References
1. Duke T, Molyneux EM. Intravenous fluids for
seriously ill children: Time to reconsider. Lancet. 2003;362:1320-3.
2. Schrier RW, Berl T, Anderson RJ. Osmotic and
nonosmotic control of vasopressin release. Am J Physiol.
1979;236:F32132.
3. Schrier RW, Goldberg JP. The physiology of
vasopressin release and the pathogenesis of impaired water excretion in
adrenal, thyroid, and edematous disorders. Yale J Biol Med.
1980;53:525-41.
4. Briassoulis G, Venkataraman S, Thompson AE. Energy
expenditure in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1166-72.
5. Wiedemann HP. A perspective on the fluids and
catheters treatment trial (FACTT). Fluid restriction is superior in
acute lung injury and ARDS. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75:42-8.
6. Valentine SL, Sapru A, Higgerson RA, Spinella PC,
Flori HR, Graham DA, et al. Fluid balance in critically ill
children with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2883-9.
7. Leteurtre S, Duhamel A, Grandbastien B, Lacroix J,
Leclerc F. Paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score. Lancet.
2006;367:897.
8. Holliday MA, Segar WE. The maintenance need for
water in parenteral fluid therapy. Pediatrics. 1957;19:823-32.
9. Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G, Paediatric index of
mortality (PIM) study group. PIM2: A revised version of the paediatric
index of mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:278-85.
10. Flori HR, Church G, Liu KD, Gildengorin G,
Matthay MA. Positive fluid balance is associated with higher mortality
and prolonged mechanical ventilation in pediatric patients with acute
lung injury. Crit Care Res Pract. 2011;2011:854142.
11. Michael M, Kuehnle I, Goldstein SL. Fluid
overload and acute renal failure in pediatric stem cell transplant
patients. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;19:91-5.
12. Kennedy CE, Akcan Arikan A. Fluid overload and
kidney injury score (FOKIS). Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:132.
13. Gillespie RS, Seidel K, Symons JM. Effect of
fluid overload and dose of replacement fluid on survival in
hemofiltration. Pediatr Nephrol Berl Ger. 2004;19:1394-9.
14. Sutherland SM, Zappitelli M, Alexander SR, Chua
AN, Brophy PD, Bunchman TE, et al. Fluid overload and mortality
in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: The
prospective pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy registry. Am
J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:316-25.
15. Foland JA, Fortenberry JD, Warshaw BL, Pettignano
R, Merritt RK, Heard ML, et al. Fluid overload before continuous
hemofiltration and survival in critically ill children: A retrospective
analysis: Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1771-6.
16. Sinitsky L, Walls D, Nadel S, Inwald DP. Fluid
overload at 48 hours is associated with respiratory morbidity but not
mortality in a general PICU: Retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Crit
Care Med. 2015;16:205-9.
17. Arikan AA, Zappitelli M, Goldstein SL, Naipaul A,
Jefferson LS, Loftis LL. Fluid overload is associated with impaired
oxygenation and morbidity in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care
Med. 2012;13:253-8.
18. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, Engoru C,
Olupot-Olupot P, Akech SO, et al. Mortality after fluid bolus in
African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2483-95.
19. Benakatti G, Singhi S, Jayshree M, Bansal A.
Conventional vs. restrictive maintenence fluid regimen in children with
septic shock after initial resusitation. Pediatr Crit Care Med.
2014;15:30.
20. Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A.
Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients.
Chest. 2002;122:2080-6.
21. Malbrain MLNG, Marik PE, Witters I, Cordemans C,
Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, et al. Fluid overload,
de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: A
systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anestezjol
Intensywna Ter. 2014;46:361-80.
22. Schuller D, Mitchell JP, Calandrino FS, Schuster
DP. Fluid balance during pulmonary edema. Is fluid gain a marker or a
cause of poor outcome? Chest. 1991;100:1068-75.
23. Kuzkov VV, Kirov MY, Sovershaev MA, Kuklin VN,
Suborov EV, Waerhaug K, et al. Extravascular lung water
determined with single transpulmonary thermodilution correlates with the
severity of sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care Med.
2006;34:1647-53.
24. Morris C, Plumb J. Mobilising oedema in the oedematous critically
ill patient with ARDS: Do we seek natriuresis not diuresis? J Intensive
Care Soc. 2011;12:92-7.
|
|
|
|