reminiscences from Indian Pediatrics: A tale
of 50 years |
|
Indian Pediatr 2015;52:
973-974 |
 |
Leukemoid Reaction – A Tale
of 50 Years
|
Piali Mandal and *Sharmila B Mukherjee
Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi,
India.
Email: * [email protected]
|
In
1965, the 34-paged November issue of Indian Pediatrics published
three original articles (case series of Familial tuberous sclerosis,
Leukemoid reaction and Phenylketonuria, respectively) besides four case
reports and the usual current literature, notes and news. Keeping the
present day readers in mind, we selected the paper on leukemoid reaction
as despite advances in diagnostics, this entity still causes
considerable diagnostic dilemma to both clinician and hematologist, and
undue parental anxiety in case of misdiagnosis.
The Past
This Case series by Chandra and Bhakoo
[1] comprised of clinical details of 18 cases of
leucoerythroblastic (leukemoid) reaction. There were 12 boys and 6 girls
ranging from 3 days to 10 years of age. The diagnosis of leukemoid
reaction was mainly based on the peripheral smear (presence of
myelocytes, myeloblasts, lymphoblasts and normoblasts); a total
leukocyte count (TLC) above 50,000/mm3
was found in only 3 cases: thalassemia (68,000/mm3),
pertussis (56,000/mm3), and
cirrhosis (68,400/mm3). In
the rest, counts ranged from 7900 to 32,000/mm3.
The etiology included 11 infectious, 2 cirrhotic, and 5 other
hematological disorders.
In the discussion, the authors focused on the
probable etiopathogenesis. They cited the Hill and Duncan classification
that attributed leukemoid reaction to three mechanisms; (i) bone
marrow irritation or stimulation by physical, chemical or allergic
agents; (ii) response of the bone marrow to an overwhelming
demand for leukocytes; and (iii) ectopic hematopoesis due to
destruction of or encroachment of the marrow space [2]. This was
followed by possible illnesses attributable to each; (i)
infections with bacteria like S. aureus, H. Influenzae,
M. tuberculosis, S typhi and much less commonly viruses; (ii)
hemolytic conditions or hemorrhage, increased bone marrow regeneration
after hematinics or post bone marrow suppression; and (iii)
lymphoma or neuroblastoma. The authors stated that leukemia should not
be diagnosed merely by peripheral blood smear findings, and concluded by
suggesting that the term leukemoid reaction be replaced by ‘Leuco-erythroblastic
reaction’ as it had less ominous implications.
Historical background and past knowledge: The
term ‘leukemoid reaction’ was coined by Krumbhaar, in 1926, to describe
the leukemia-like blood picture that was found in several non-leukemic
conditions [3]. The diagnostic criteria included a total leukocyte count
(TLC) of more than 50000/mm 3
and/or the presence of immature leukocytes (mostly myelocytes or their
equivalents) in the peripheral blood smear. These would usually be
granulocytic or lymphoid, according to the predominant cell lineage. It
was recognized that leukemoid reaction could be mistaken for chronic
myeloid leukemia (CML). However, in those days CML was differentiated
from leukemoid reaction based on clinical manifestations (rareness in
children, slow progression, pallor, bleeding, bone tenderness,
lymphadenopathy and massive splenomegaly), hematological smear (mostly
immature leukocytes and blasts with abnormal nuclei and cytoplasm with
additional thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia and basophilia) and leukocyte
alkaline phosphatase (LAP) levels (low or even absent in CML in contrast
to increased in leukemoid reaction).
The Present
Till date the term ‘Leukemoid reaction’ still hold
good. The definition, however has become more elaborate, and now reads
as ‘a hematological disorder, characterized by a leukocyte count >50,000
cells/µL, significant increase in mature neutrophil counts in the
peripheral blood, accompanied by a differential count showing marked
left shift, signs of neutrophil activation in the absence of basophilia
and dysplastic changes’. Over the last fifty years, most advances have
been in terms of expanding the number of underlying causes as well as
the use of alternative diagnostic modalities when standard hematological
methods fail to establish the diagnosis.
It is well known that most cases are due to reactive
causes operating outside the bone marrow [4,5]. Infective causes are
still the commonest, especially bacteria like B. pertussis, C.
difficile, Shigella, Mycoplasma and M. tuberculosis.
Others include viruses (EBV, CMV, HIV and parvovirus B19), parasitic
illnesses (trichinosis, visceral larva migrans, and malaria) and even
fungal infections (mucormycosis, Tinea capitis), and scabies. An
association of neonatal leukemoid reaction in low birth weight babies
has been observed with maternal chorioamnionitis. When an infectious
cause is not evident, it is essential to exclude hematological
malignancies like CML and chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), a rare
myeloproliferative syndrome with poor prognosis. There is a long list of
other malignancies associated with leukemoid reaction, which also
secrete haematopoeitic stimulating cytokines. These include carcinomas
(lung, oropharyngeal, gastro-intestinal, genitourinary, and
nasopharyngeal), Hodgkin lymphoma, melanomas and sarcomas. Apart from
severe hemorrhage and acute hemolysis (that was recognized earlier),
drugs like corticosteroids, minocycline, recombinant hematopoietic
growth factors and ethylene glycol intoxication are also known to cause
leukemoid reaction.
Usually a good history (including exposure to toxins
or drugs), clinical examination and standard investigations (total and
differential blood counts, peripheral smear, LAP score, bone marrow
aspiration/biopsy) can determine the underlying etiology. However, there
may be instances where more targeted testing by advanced diagnostic
modalities is required for exclusion. These include cytogenetic testing
(chromosome 20 abnormalities seen in some cases of CNL) and molecular
analysis (t 9:22 translocation in CML). Immuno-phenotyping is useful in
detecting surface antigens like CD13 and CD15 (found in mature
neutrophils in leukemoid reaction) and CD34 (in acute leukemia or
myelodysplastic syndromes). It may also rule out CML in blast crisis by
the presence of HLA-DR [6]. Serum vitamin B 12
and vitamin B12-binding
capacity may be elevated in CML due to increased leukocyte
derived B12 binding protein
levels resulting from the increased leukocyte mass. Clonality studies
demonstrate monoclonal cells in myeloproliferative syndromes and
polyclonal neutrophils in leukemoid reaction [7]. Imaging studies and
biopsies are useful when solid tumors are suspected. This may be
substantiated by elevated serum levels G-CSF, GM-CSF and IL-6,
indicating the presence of cytokine-producing tumors [8,9].
To conclude, leukemoid reaction is a rare but
challenging condition that may require a careful diagnostic work-up. The
diagnosis is usually made by a combination of raised TLC, marked mature
neutrophilia (but with a left shift), high LAP score and hypercellular
bone marrow with intact maturation and morphology of all elements.
Rarely, it may require demonstration of absence of cytogenetic
abnormalities, mature granulocyte pattern by immunophenotyping and
polyclonal neutrophils, or the absence of high levels of hemopoietic
growth factors.
References
1. Chandra RK, Bhakoo ON. Leuco-erythroblastic (leukemoid)
reaction in infants and children. Indian Pediatr. 1965;2:411-6.
2. Hill JM, Duncan CN. Am J Med Sci. 1941;201:847.
3. Krumbhaar EB. Am J Med Sci. 1926;172:519.
4. Nimieri HS, Makoni SN, Madziwa FH, Nemiary DS.
Leukemoid reaction response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in a
patient with cervical carcinoma. Ann Hematol. 2003;82:316-7.
5. Curnutte JT, Coates TD. Disorders of phagocyte
function and number. In: Hoffman R, Benz Jr EJ, Shattil SJ,
editors. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. 3rd ed.
Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 740.
6. Chianese R, Brando B, Gratama JW. European Working
Group on Clinical Cell Analysis. Diagnostic and prognostic value of flow
cytometric immunophenotyping in malignant hematological diseases. J Biol
Regul Homeost Agents. 2002;16:259-69.
7. Bohm J, Kock S, Schaefer HE, Fisch P. Evidence of
clonality in chronic neutrophilic leukaemia. J Clin Pathol.
2003;56:292-5.
8. Kasuga I, Makino S, Kiyokawa H, Katoh H, Ebihara
Y, Ohyashiki K. Tumor-related leukocytosis is linked with poor prognosis
in patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:2399-405.
9. Endo K, Kohnoe S, Okamura T, Haraguchi M, Adachi
E, Toh Y, et al. Gastric adenosquamous carcinoma producing
granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Gastric Cancer. 2005;8:173-7.
|
|
 |
|