|
Indian Pediatr 2013;50:
1058-1059 |
 |
Failure of Secondary Prophylaxis with
Erythromycin in Rheumatic Heart Disease
|
Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Puneet Anand and Eden Bhutia
From Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of
Pediatrics, PGIMER and Associated Dr RML Hospital,
New Delhi, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Abhay Khand-
I, H No. 169, Indirapuram Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: July 20, 2013;
Initial Review: August 12, 2013;
Accepted: August 22, 2013.
|
Background: Erythromycin is recommended for secondary prophylaxis in
children with rheumatic heart disease, who are allergic to penicillin.
Case Characteristics: A 9-year-old girl, with rheumatic heart
disease, on secondary prophylaxis with erythromycin 250 mg BD, presented
with acute rheumatic fever. Outcome: Responded to steroids and
started on a higher dose (250 mg TDS) of erythromycin for secondary
prophylaxis. Message: There is need to document the resistance of
group A streptococci to erythromycin.
Key words: Erythromycin, Rheumatic heart
disease, Prophylaxis, Resistance.
|
Case Report
A 9-yr-old girl, known case of rheumatic heart
disease presented with complaints of progressive breathlessness for 2
years with recent worsening (NYHA grade II to III), fever and migratory
joint pain (bilateral knee) for 10 days. There was history of orthopnea,
palpitations and chest pain. There was no history of sore throat, skin
rash, abnormal body movements, emotional lability and hemoptysis. She
was diagnosed in 2011 with acute rheumatic fever with severe mitral
regurgitation, moderate aortic regurgitation and mild tricuspid
regurgitation. Supportive treatment was started and she was put on
secondary erythromycin (250 mg BD) prophylaxis as she was allergic to
benzathine penicillin. During follow-up, good compliance to erythromycin
was noted.
On examination, child was febrile with a pulse of
110/min, respiratory rate 48/min, BP- 130/50 and raised JVP. There was
no pedal edema, clubbing, lymphadenopathy, cyanosis, rash, subcutaneous
nodules and features suggestive of infective endocarditis.
Cardiovascular examination revealed downward and outward hyperdynamic
apex beat and a grade IV pansystolic murmur in the mitral area radiating
to the axilla and grade III early diastolic descrescendo murmur in the
aortic area. Respiratory system revealed bilateral basal crepitations
while hepatomegaly was noted on abdominal examination.On musculoskeletal
examination there was no evidence of arthritis. Central nervous system
was normal.
Investigations revealed hemoglobin of 12.1 g%, total
leucocyte count- 10,800 mm 3
(with 70% polymorphs), ESR of 50 mm/h, positive ASO (>400U/dL), CRP
(6.89 mg/dL), anti DNAse B (471U/mL). ECG showed prolongation of PR
interval (0.18sec) and left axis deviation. Throat swab and blood
culture showed no growth. Cardiomegaly was evident on Chest X-ray
while ECHO revealed dilated LV, pathological severe mitral
regurgitation, moderate aortic regurgitation and mild tricuspid
regurgitation. Anterior mitral laflet tip was thick (5 mm) with elbow
deformity and restricted leaflet motion. There was no pericardial
effusion and EF was 65%.
A diagnosis of recurrent acute rheumatic fever with
congestive heart failure was made. Oral prednisolone was started and
tapered after 4 weeks while aspirin was added. She responded and her ESR
levels gradually decreased. Since recurrence occurred despite good
compliance and adequate dose of erythromycin, serum erythromycin levels
was planned but was not available. MIC levels could not be ascertained
as the throat culture was negative. Patient was started on secondary
prophylaxis of erythromycin albeit at a higher dose (40mg/kg i.e.
250 mg tds).
Discussion
Children with RHD have a high risk of recurrence of
acute rheumatic fever subsequent to Group A Streptococcus (GAS)
pharyngitis. Primary prevention is achieved by intramuscular repository
preparation of penicillin and its derivatives and/or oral penicillin
until penicillin allergy is documented wherein oral macrolides,
cephalosporins and clindamycin are recommended [4]. GAS resistant to
penicillin have not been reported though there are reports of rising MIC
levels [5]. While administering primary prophylaxis repeated course of
antibiotics are not needed in asymptomatic patients who continue to
harbor GAS after appropriate therapy, however a second course of
antibiotics should be started in patients with previous history of
rheumatic fever in themselves or in their family members. Failure to
eradicate GAS from the throat usually occurs while using oral penicillin
than intramuscular preparation and in children who are chronic carriers
with prolonged oral colonization of the bacteria [6].
Both asymptomatic and optimally treated acute
symptomatic pharyngeal GAS infection can trigger recurrence. Therefore
continuous antimicrobial prophylaxis (secondary prevention), the
duration of which is guided by several risk factors including the age,
socioeconomic strata of the patient and most importantly the severity of
cardiac injury at the time of initial ARF provides the most effective
protection from recurrence. Intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin every
3-to-4 weekly is recommended [4]. Diminished susceptibility of
Streptococcus pyogenes to penicillin has been reported
globally, but the literature on this is sparse
from India [7,8]. Those who are allergic to penicillin are started on
alternate antibiotics like oral macrolides (erythromycin/ azithromycin)
or sulfadiazine. There have been reports worldwide of rising MIC level
to macrolides too over the past decade [8].
The three major resistance genes found in Group A B
hemolytic streptococcus are erm (A), erm (B), and mef
(A). Macrolide resistance has been conferred to mef (A) gene
[9]. Brahmadathan, et al. [10] studied the susceptibility of
Group A B hemolytic streptococcus to penicillin and erythromycin over a
period from 1986-2002 and concluded that there was a significant rise in
erythromycin resistance. Erythromycin resistance was 2% in 1987, 2.7% in
1994, 5.8% in 1999 and 13.8% in 2002 [10]. Similar results were reported
(17.6%) and by Ray, et al. (4%) [5,7].
Latania, et al. [8] reported a case of ARF
which was treated with 10 days of azithromycin with no response. Throat
culture revealed macrolide resistant GAS.
In our case the diagnosis of recurrence was based on
modified Jones criteria but in absence of a positive throat culture and
susceptibility reports the resistance pattern could not be adequately
addressed. However the report highlights the importance of continuous
monitoring of susceptibility pattern in order to observe the development
of resistance over a period of time. Pediatricians must be aware of GAS
resistance while treating patients with initial episode or recurrence of
ARF so as to prevent the development of severe RHD which is usually a
result of recurrent ARF.
Contributors: All the authors have contributed,
designed and approved the study.
Funding: None; Competing interests: None
stated.
References
1. Rammelkamp CH, Wannamaker LW, Denny FW. The
epidemiology and prevention of rheumatic fever. Bull NY Acad Med.
1952;28:321–3.
2. Bland EF, Duckett Jones T. Rheumatic fever and
rheumatic heart disease: a twenty year report on 1000 patients followed
since childhood. Circulation. 1951;4:836–43.
3. Taranta A, Kleinberg E, Feinstein AR, Wood HF,
Tursky E, Simpson R. Rheumatic fever in children and adolescents: a
long-termepidemiologic study of subsequent prophylaxis, streptococcal
infections, and clinical sequelae, V: relation of the rheumatic fever
recurrence rate per streptococcal infection to pre-existing clinical
features of the patients. Ann Intern Med. 1964;60:58–67.
4. Gerber MA, Baltimore RS, Eaton CB, Gewit M, Rowley
AH, Shulman ST, et al. Prevention of Rheumatic Fever and
Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Streptococcal Pharyngitis. A Scientific
Statement From the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever,
Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on
Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, and the Interdisciplinary
Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation.
2009;119:1541-51.
5. Capoor MR, Nair D, Deb M. Resistance to
erythromycin and rising penicillin MIC in streptococcus pyogenes in
India. Jpn J Infectious Disease. 2006;59:334-6.
6. Feinstein AR, Wood HF, Epstein JA, Taranta A,
Simpson R, Tursky E. A controlled study of three methods of prophylaxis
against streptococcal infection in a population of rheumatic children,
II: results of the first three years of the study, including methods for
evaluating the maintenance of oral prophylaxis. N Engl J Med.
1959;260:697–702.
7. Ray D, Sinha S, Saha S, et al. A
preliminary sentinel surveillance report on antibiotics resistance trend
of Streptococcus pyogenes in Kolkata Region, India. Al Ameen J
Med Sci. 2010;3:146-51.
8. Logan LK, McAuley JB, Shulman ST. Macrolide
treatment failure in streptococcal pharyngitis resulting in acute
rheumatic fever. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e798.
9. Ergin A, Koseog U, Eser O, Ascelik G. Erythromycin
and penicillin resistance mechanisms among viridans group streptococci
isolated from blood cultures of adult patients with underlying diseases.
New Microbiologica. 2011;34: 187-93.
10. Brahmadathan KN, Anitha P, Gladstone P.
Increasing erythromycin resistance among group A streptococci causing
tonsillitis in a tertiary care hospital in southern India. Clin
Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:335-7.
|
|
 |
|