|
Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 1033-1040 |
 |
Newer Anti-epileptic Drugs
|
Satinder Aneja and Suvasini Sharma
From Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge
Medical College and associated Kalawati
Saran Children’s Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Satinder Aneja, Director
Professor and Head, Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge
Medical College and associated Kalawati Saran Children’s
Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Email: [email protected]
|
Need and Purpose of review: A number of newer anti-epileptic drugs
have been developed in the last few years to improve the treatment
outcomes in epilepsy. In this review, we discuss the use of newer
anti-epileptic drugs in children.
Methods used for locating, selecting, extracting and
synthesizing data: MEDLINE search (1966-2013) was performed using
terms "newer anti-epileptic drugs", "Oxcarbazepine", vigabatrin",
topiramate", "zonisamide", "levetiracetam", "lacosamide", "rufinamide",
"stiripentol", "retigabine", "eslicarbazepine", "brivaracetam", "ganaxolone"
and "perampanel" for reports on use in children. Review articles,
practice parameters, guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses,
randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series were
included. The main data extracted included indications, efficacy and
adverse effects in children.
Main conclusions: Oxcarbazepine is established as
effective initial monotherapy for children with partial-onset seizures.
Vigabatrin is the drug of choice for infantile spasms associated with
tuberous sclerosis. Lamotrigine , levetiracetam and lacosamide are good
add-on drugs for patients with partial seizures. Lamotrigine may be
considered as monotherapy in adolescent females with idiopathic
generalized epilepsy. Levetiracetam is a good option as monotherapy for
females with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Topiramate is a good add-on
drug in patients with epileptic encephalopathies such as Lennox-Gastaut
syndrome and myoclonic astatic epilepsy.
Keywords: Refractory epilepsy; Epileptic encephalopathies;
Oxcarbazepine; Vigabatrin; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam.
|
About 65% of children with
newly diagnosed epilepsy achieve sustained
freedom from seizures with the initially
prescribed antiepileptic drug (AED). An
additional 15-20% become seizure free with
subsequently prescribed AEDs, while the
remainder cannot achieve seizure control with
available medications. There is an unmet need
for efficacious AED with good safety profile in
this group, and there is a continued research in
this field for an ideal AED. After the
introduction of sodium valproate in 1967, there
was hiatus of two decades after which ten new
AEDs were launched during the so called "decade
of Brains". These expanded the armamentarium
of therapeutics for intractable epilepsy.
These newer AEDs are used as
an adjunct to conventional AEDs in children with
intractable epilepsy. However, more studies are
required to evaluate their use as first line AED
for children with epilepsy. These newer drugs
are more efficacious and have a better safety as
compared to conventional AED. However, caution
must be exercised for possible drug interactions
with conventional AEDs before using them as an
adjunct. Moreover, many of these newer AEDs have
been recently launched in Indian market and cost
of some them are largely prohibitive.
Intractable epilepsy
refractory to appropriate conventional AED is an
indication for the newer drugs. Among children
presenting with refractory epilepsy, one must
always look for causes of psuedointractability
including possibility of non epileptic event,
misdiagnosis of seizure type, and wrong choice
of conventional AEDs. These causes must always
be thought before using newer AEDs as an
adjunct.
These medications should be
prescribed by pediatricians with an in-depth
knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of the drug,
its indications, dosage, side effects and
possible drug interactions. The present review
intends to provide an insight to these aspects
of use of antiepileptic drugs. We discuss the
pediatric use of newer anti-epileptic drugs,
both the ones which are already in the market (lamotrigine,
topiramate, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine,
zonisamide, vigabatrin, lacosamide,
eslicarbazepine), and the newer ones in
development and which are likely to be available
soon (rufinamide, stiripentol, retigabine,
brivaracetam, ganaxolone, and perampanel). The
use of gabapentin and pregabalin will not be
discussed in this review as these are used
predominantly for the management of neuropathic
pain, and not epilepsy.
The Newer Anti-Epileptic
Drugs
Vigabatrin
Vigabatrin is a structural
analogue of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA),
which irreversibly inhibits the enzyme GABA
transaminase.
Indications: It is used
as a first line drug for treatment of infantile
spasms in children with tuberous sclerosis [1].
As there is insufficient evidence for the use of
other AEDs in infantile spasms [2], it may be
considered as a first line treatment in other
patients with infantile spasms in whom the use
of hormonal treatment (corticosteroids, ACTH) is
contraindicated.
Efficacy: Clinical trials
have shown that spasm cessation is greatest in
patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (74%)
compared with other symptomatic etiologies (50%)
[3]. In a large randomized controlled trial, it
was shown that hormonal treatment (ACTH and
prednisolone) was associated with better outcome
at 2 weeks (73%) when compared to vigabatrin
(54%) [4].
Advantages: It has good
oral bioavailablity and the drug is excreted
unchanged by kidney. Drug interactions are
minimal with conventional AEDs.
Side effects: The major
concern with the use of vigabatrin is the
development of bilateral concentric peripheral
visual field constriction, which has been seen
in one third of adults and 20% of children
treated with vigabatrin [5]. Because of the
difficulties and inconsistencies with formal
visual field testing in young infants and
children, visual fields in children have been
tested using highly sensitive
electroretinograms. The earliest finding of the
first abnormal field examination in adults was
after 9 months of treatment; in children, the
earliest sustained onset of the vigabatrin
induced retinal defect in infants was 3.1 months
[6]. Most patients with abnormalities received
treatment for at least 6 months, and even those
treated for more than 2 years have been reported
to have stable visual fields [7]. As infantile
spasms comprise a severe epileptic
encephalopathy with poor develop-mental outcome
if uncontrolled, the risks and benefits should
be weighed before starting vigabatrin treatment.
Myoclonic seizures and abscence seizures are
known to be precipitated by vigabatrin.
Dosage: Pediatric doses
range from 50 mg/kg/day to 150 mg/ kg/day [8].
The dose may be increased by 30-40 mg/kg/day
every 4-5 days till the maximum dose is reached.
The time to response with vigabatrin is quite
short, usually within 2 weeks. If the infant has
not shown improvement in spasms within 2 weeks,
vigabatrin should be discontinued [9]. In
infants with good response consider stopping the
drug after 6 months.
Levetiracetam
Levetiracetam is a broad
spectrum AED which selectively inhibits
high-voltage-activated calcium channels and
reduces calcium release from intraneuronal
stores [10]. It also binds to a specific target
in the brain, the synaptic vesicle protein 2A
(SV2A), an integral membrane glycoprotein, which
is involved in the control of vesicle fusion and
exocytosis.
Indications:
Levetiracetam is effective as adjunctive therapy
in pediatric patients with partial onset
seizures and in primary generalized tonic-clonic
seizures [11]. Intravenous preparation has
recently shown efficacy in neonatal seizures
[12] and status epilepticus [13].
Efficacy: In a
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
multicenter trial in 101 children with
refractory partial seizures, >50% seizure
reductions was seen in 44.6% receiving
levetiracetam and 19.6% in patients receiving
placebo [14]. Levetiracetam has been evaluated
in childhood epilepsy syndromes including
rolandic epilepsy [15], electrical status
epilepticus in slow sleep, myoclonic and tonic
clonic seizures of Lennox Gastaut syndrome [16]
and as an alternative to valproate in juvenile
myoclonic epilepsy in adolescent girls [17].
Beneficial effects on language development have
been reported [18].
Advantages: Levetiracetam
has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile in
terms of safety in patients with liver disease
and minimal drug interaction with other AEDs.
Side effect:
Levetiracetam is well tolerated in children with
minor adverse events like headache, anorexia,
and somnolence. However, there are concerns of
behavioural side effects like aggression,
emotional lability, oppositional behavior, and
psychosis in children [19].
Dosage: Pediatric dose
start from 10 mg/kg/day (divided tweice daily)
to be hiked by 10-20 mg/kg every two weeks to a
maximum dose of 40-60 mg/kg/day.
Topiramate
Topiramate is a sulphamate
substituted monosaccharide, a broad spectrum AED
acting on voltage dependent sodium channels,
enhancement of GABA, decrease in glutamate and
inhibition of carbonic anhydrase.
Indications: Topiramate
is a useful adjunct in refractory partial or
generalized epilepsy and other epileptic
syndromes.
Efficacy: Topiramate has
demonstrated efficacy as an adjuctive therapy in
partial epilepsy [20], intractable epilepsy
[21], Lennox Gastaut syndrome [22], infantile
spasms [23], generalized epilepsy of infancy and
myoclonic–astatic epilepsy [24]. Pooled data
from two randomized, double-blind studies found
that topiramate adjunctive therapy may be
efficacious for juvenile myoclonic seizures in
adults and children [25].
Side effects: Topiramate
has good safety with no evidence of life
threatening adverse effects or organ toxicity.
The most frequently reported side effects are
dizziness, mental slowing, somnolence, ataxia,
impaired concentration and confusion [24]. Most
of these are transient and observed during the
initial weeks of therapy and can be reduced by
slow titration of the dose. Anorexia and mild
weight loss has been observed during the
therapy. Other reported side effects include
metabolic acidosis, nephrolithiasis, decreased
sweating and resultant hyperthermia [26].
Children on combination of topiramate and
valproate should be monitored for signs of
encephalopathy resulting from hyperammonemia
[27].
Dosage: Pediatric dosage
is 1-3 mg/kg/day (divided twice daily) hiked
bi-weekly to 3-8 mg/kg/day.
Lamotrigine
Lamotrigine is another broad
spectrum AED which acts by blocking the voltage
dependent sodium channels and thus blocks the
release of glutamate through stabilization of
presynaptic membrane. Enzyme inducing drugs like
phenytoin and carbamazepine may shorten the half
life of Lamotrigine.
Indications and efficacy:
It is an effective adjunct to refractory partial
and generalized epilepsy [28]. It is
particularly useful in typical and atypical
absence seizure in Lennox Gastaut syndrome and
in children with myoclonic-astatic epilepsy [22,
29]. It is also useful as a first line agent in
children with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.
Side effects: Common dose
related side effectsinclude somnolence, sleep
disturbances, dizziness, diplopia, ataxia,
nausea and vomiting. Serious side effects of
lamotrigine which often require drug withdrawls
include skin rash and rarely Steven Johnson
syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis [30].
The neurotoxicity and skin rash is more often
seen when lamotrigine is administered with
valproate or when the dose is titrated rapidly.
Lamotrigine may exacerbate myoclonic seizures in
patients with Dravet syndrome [31].
Dosage: Lamotrgine is
started at 1-2 mg/kg followed by slow hiking
biweekly to 3-8 mg/kg/day. The drug dosage is
reduced to half when used in combination with
valproate as the latter prolongs the half life
of lamotrigine.
Oxcarbazepine
Oxcarbazepine is the 10-keto
analogue of carbamazepine which blocks high
frequency voltage dependent repetitive firing of
sodium channels.
Indications and efficacy:
Oxcarbazepine is used as first line drug for
partial and secondarily generalized seizures
[32]. Amongst the newer AED, oxcarbazepine is
established as evidence-based effective initial
monotherapy for children with partial-onset
seizures and focal epilepsy.
Side effects: Unlike
carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine is not metabolized
to epoxide derivative thus minimizing side
effects like skin rash encountered with
carbamazepine. Reported side effects of
oxcarbazepine include hyponatremia, headache,
dizziness, and ataxia [33]. The advantage of
oxcarbazepine over carbamazepine is that it does
not cause hepatic induction nor does it undergo
auto-induction [33].
Dosage: Oxcarbazepine can
be started with initial dose of 5 to 8 mg/kg/day
in 2 divided doses increasing by 5 to 8 mg/kg
after 5 to 7 days up to a maximum of 30 mg/kg.
The usual effective dose ranges from 10 to 30
mg/kg/day.
Zonisamide
Zonisamide is a sulphonamide
derivative, a broad spectrum AED that acts
through multiple actions: facilitation of
dopaminergic and serotoninergic
neurotransmission through the blockade of T-type
calcium channels, prolongation of sodium channel
inactivation and as a weak inhibitor of carbonic
anhydrase.
Indications: Zonisamide
has also been found useful in progressive
myoclonic epilepsy syndromes such as
Unverricht-Lundborg disease and Lafora body
disease [36]. Useful as a second-line agent for
infantile spasms, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and
juvenile myoclonic epilepsy [35].
Side effects: Somnolence,
poor appetite, weight loss, headache, pruritus,
and skin rash are commonly observed adverse
effects [37]. Other rare side effects include
kidney stones, oligohydrosis and hyperthermia
[38]. Higher doses (6-8 mg/kg) has been
associated with problems of language development
like vocabulary acquisition [39].
Dosage: The usual
starting dose is 2–4 mg/kg/day, and the
maintenance dose is 4–8 mg/kg/day;divided once
or twice daily.
Lacosamide
Lacosamide is a
functionalized amino acid that selectively
enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated
sodium channels, increasing the proportion of
sodium channels unavailable for depolarization.
Indication: Lacosamide is
used in children with refractory epilepsy with
30-50% of children having more than 50%
reduction in seizure frequency [40].
Efficacy: Lacosamide is
available in both oral and as an injection for
intravenous preparation, which may have a role
in status epilepticus. Pediatric experience with
lacosamide has been limited [40]. Most of the
available literature are retrospective data on
small number of patients with an efficacy rate
of 30-50% [41-43].
Side effect: Lacosamide
is generally well tolerated with reports of
irritability, oral tics, and prolonged crying as
adverse effects in children [40].
Rufinamide
Rufinamide is a triazole
derivative that was approved by FDA in 2008 for
adjunctive use in the treatment of seizures
associated with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome in
children aged above 4 years [44]. Its mechanism
of action is not completely understood but it is
believed to work by prolonging the inactive
state of sodium channels and therefore limiting
excessive firing of sodium-dependent action
potentials.
Indication: The only
approved indication in children (>4 yrs) is with
refractory Lennox Gastaut syndrome].
Efficacy: In
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, rufinamide was studied
in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group,
placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in
patients aged 4 to 37 years with multiple
seizure types [45]. At the end of 12 weeks of
therapy, median total seizure frequency was
decreased by 32.7% in the rufinamide group
compared to 11.7% in the placebo group.
Rufinamide has demonstrated efficacy in partial
onset seizures in older adolescents and adults
[46]. Rufinamide has also been evaluated in a
prospective study for the treatment of
refractory partial onset seizure and childhood
onset refractory epileptic encephalopathy [47,
48].
Side effect: The most
commonly observed adverse are headache,
dizziness, fatigue, somnolence, and nausea.
Stiripentol
Stiripentol is an AED used as
an adjunctive to clobazam and valproate in the
treatment of refractory generalized tonic-clonic
seizures in patients with severe myoclonic
epilepsy in infancy i.e., Dravet syndrome
[49]. It enhances central gamma-aminobutyric
acid transmission and inhibits the metabolism of
concurrently administered anticonvulsants that
are substrates for various cytochrome P450
isoenzymes, such as clobazam [50]. In a
randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled
trial conducted in France, stiripentol was used
as an adjunctive therapy in children with Dravet
syndrome who failed to respond to valproate and
clobazam and was shown to have better response
rate (71%) as compared to placebo (5%) [51].
Other Newer AEDs
Retigabine (ezogabine) is
a novel investigational AED developed as an
adjunctive treatment for partial epilepsy.
Retigabine opens voltage-gated KCNQ2/3 and
KCNQ3/5 potassium channels leading to cellular
membrane hyperpolarization (52). In a pooled
analysis of three randomized controlled trials,
1240 patients were included, with 813 patients
randomized to retigabine and 427 to placebo
(53). Responder rates (>50% reduction in seizure
frequency) were 35% and 45% for retigabine dose
at 600 and 900 mg/day, respectively. There is no
pediatric experience so far, but retigabine may
potentially be a useful agent in the treatment
of benign familial neonatal convulsions which is
caused by loss of function mutations involving
the KCNQ2/3 genes [54].
Brivaracetam is an
analogue of levetiracetam, which has been found
useful in adults with photosensitive epilepsy,
and as an adjunctive treatment in refractory
partial-onset epilepsy. There is no pediatric
experience till now.
Ganaxolone is a synthetic
analogue of allopregnenolone, a neurosteroid,
which is an allosteric modulator of the GABA-A
receptor complex. In a 3-month pediatric add-on
study, 20 subjects aged 6 months to 7 years with
refractory infantile spasms, or with continuing
seizures after a prior history of infantile
spasms were titrated up to 12 mg/kg. Sixteen
patients completed the study; 25% showed a > 50%
reduction in seizures, and one patient was
seizure free (55). Ganaxolone may also have
efficacy for catamenial seizures.
Eslicarbazepine actetate
is structurally related to carbamazepine and
oxcarbazepine and has been used as adjunctive
therapy for adults with partial seizures. There
is no pediatric experience so far.
Perampanel is a
selective, non-competitive antagonist of
a-amino-3-hydroxy
5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) -type
glutamate receptors, currently in clinical
development as adjunctive therapy for the
treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures
[56]. Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive
perampanel in patients aged >12 years with
refractory partial-onset seizures has been
demonstrated in three phase III, randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
Current Status of the Newer
AEDs
The dosages and adverse
effects of the newer AED currently available in
India are summarized in Table I.
Amongst the newer AED, oxcarbazepine is
established as effective as initial monotherapy
for children with partial-onset seizures.
Vigabatrin is the drug of choice for infantile
spasms associated with Tuberous sclerosis.
Lamotrigine may be considered as monotherapy in
adolescent females with idiopathic generalized
epilepsy. Certain newer AEDs such as lamotrigine
and vigabatrin are known to worsen myoclonic
seizures. There is paucity of data on the use of
newer AEDs in children from India. Indian
Guidelines for diagnosis and management of
childhood epilepsy were recently published [57].
As per these guidelines, the only newer AED
which are recommended for use as monotherapy in
new-onset epilepsy are lamotrigine in partial
and generalized seizures, and oxcarbazepine in
partial seizures. The others are recommended as
adjunctive treatment in children who have failed
conventional AED.
TABLE I Characteristics of the New Antiepileptic Drugs
Drug |
Initial dose
|
Maintenance |
Daily |
Side effects |
Formulation
|
|
(mg/kg/day) |
(mg/kg/day) |
doses no |
|
|
Lamotrigine |
|
|
|
|
|
Monotherapy |
0.5 |
2-10 |
2 |
Skin rash, somnolence, dizziness, |
Tab 5 mg; 25 mg, 50 mg |
|
|
|
|
nausea, diplopia |
|
With enzyme |
|
|
|
|
|
inducing AEDs |
2 |
5-15 |
2 |
|
|
With valproate |
0.2 |
1-5 |
1-2 |
|
|
Vigabatrin |
20-50 |
50-150 |
2 |
Hyperkinesia, weight gain, |
Tab 500 mg |
|
|
|
|
insomnia, visual field defects |
|
Oxcarbazepine |
5-8 |
10-30 |
2 |
Dizziness, ataxia, somnolence |
Tab 150 mg, 300 mg, |
|
|
|
|
hyponatremia |
Syrup 300 mg/5 mL |
Topiramate |
1 |
6-9 |
2 |
Wt. loss, lethargy, anorexia,
|
Tab 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg |
|
|
|
|
hyperpyrexia, renal calculi |
|
Zonisamide |
1-2 |
8-12 |
2 |
Ataxia, renal |
Cap 25mg, 50 mg, 100 mg |
|
|
|
|
calculi hyperpyrexia |
|
Levetiracetam |
10 |
20-60 |
2 |
Headache, anorexia, somnolence, |
Tab 250 mg, 500 mg, |
|
|
|
|
behavioral problems |
Syrup 500 mg/5 mL |
Lacosamide |
1-2 |
6-9 |
2 |
Dizziness, headache, diplopia, nausea
|
Tab 50 mg, 100 mg |
TABLE II Pharmacokinetic Properties of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs
Drug |
Oral bioavailability |
Elimination t1/2 |
Protein binding |
Metabolism |
Vigabatrin |
80-100% |
5-8 hrs |
Nil |
Renal |
Levetiracetam |
100% |
6-8 hrs |
<10% |
2/3rd renal1/3rd enzymatic hydrolysis |
Topiramate |
>80% |
21 hours |
15-40% |
30% metabolised70% excreted unchanged |
Lamotrigine |
<100% |
29 hours |
55% |
Metabolized in liver |
Oxcarbazepine |
>95% |
8-10 hours |
38% |
Metabolized in liver to active
metabolite |
Zonisamide |
100% |
60 hours |
40-60% |
Metabolized in liver |
Lacosamide |
100% |
13 hours |
<15% |
Metabolized in liver |
Rufinamide |
Dose dependent |
6-10 hours |
34% |
Metabolized in liver |
Stiripentol |
Quick absorption |
4.5 hours |
99% |
Metabolized in liver |
TABLE III Mechanism of Action, Indications and Main Adverse Effects of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs
Drug |
Principal mechanism
|
Indications in pediatric |
Main adverse effect |
Remarks
|
|
of action
|
epilepsy |
|
|
Vigabatrin |
Inhibition of GABA |
Monotherapy in infantile |
Visual field defects |
It can aggravate absence
|
|
transaminase |
spasm (tuberous sclerosis); |
|
and Myoclonic seizure |
|
|
adjuctive therapy in |
|
|
|
|
resistant partial epilepsy |
|
|
Levetiracetam |
Inhibition of N- type |
Adjunctive therapy in |
Behavioural |
No drug interaction;
|
|
calcium channel |
partial onset seizure; |
disturbances |
good safety profile; safe |
|
|
Myoclonic seizure of JME; |
|
in liver disease |
|
|
GTCS in IGE |
|
|
Topiramate |
Blockage of voltage |
Adjunctive therapy |
Behavioural and |
Slow titration mandatory; |
|
dependent Na+ |
(>2 yrs) in refractory |
cognitive problem; |
never withdraw drug |
|
channel, inhibition |
partial, generalized and |
weight loss; metabolic |
abruptly |
|
of GABA |
seizures associated with LGS |
acidosis; nephrolithiasis |
|
Lamotrigine |
Inhibition of voltage |
Adjunctive treatment for |
Allergic rash/Steven |
Slow titration; half dose
|
|
gated sodium channel |
focal or generalized seizures |
Johnson syndrome |
when used with valpraote; |
|
|
and seizures of LGS |
|
can precipitate Myoclonic seizures
|
Oxcarbazepine |
Inhibition of voltage |
Monotherapy or adjunctive |
CNS side effects, |
Can worsen absence and |
|
sensitive sodium |
therapy (>4 yr) for focal |
hyponatremia |
Myoclonic seizure, |
|
channel |
seizure with or without |
|
|
|
|
secondary generalization |
|
|
Zonisamide |
Acts on sodium and |
Adjunctive therapy in |
CNS side effects, |
Drug interactions with
|
|
voltage dependent |
refractory focal seizures |
cognitive effect, |
other AEDs |
|
calcium channel |
|
weight loss |
|
Lacosamide |
Enhances slow inacti- |
Adjunctive therapy in |
Frequent CNS effects, |
Limited experience in |
|
vation of voltgage gated sodium channel |
refractory focal and |
prolongation of PR |
children; more studies |
|
|
generalized epilepsy |
interval |
required |
Rufinamide |
Reduces recovery |
Adjunctive treatment in |
Occasional CNS side |
Avoid in patients with
|
|
capacity of sodium |
refractory seizures in LGS |
effects |
familial short QT |
|
channel inactivation |
|
|
syndrome |
Stiripentol |
Increase in GABA |
Adjunctive therapy for |
Few minor CNS effects |
Limited experience; |
level |
refractory seizures in |
dravet syndrome |
of drug interaction |
|
(GABA- Gamma amino butyric acid,
CNS-Central nervous system, IGE-
idiopathic generalized epilepsy, JME-
juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, GTCS-
generalized tonic clonic seizure, LGS-
Lennox Gastaut syndrome). |
Levetiracetam is a good
option as monotherapy for females with juvenile
myoclonic epilepsy. Topiramate and zonisamide
are good options in patients with infantile
spasms who have failed hormonal therapy and
vigabatrin. Topiramate is a good add-on drug in
patients with epileptic encephalopathies such as
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Myoclonic astatic
epilepsy. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam and
lacosamide are good add-on drugs for patients
with refractory partial seizures. Lamotrigine is
also effective in tonic seizures seen in
children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
Rare but serious side effects
must always be borne in mind while prescribing
newer AEDs: irreversible peripheral field defect
with vigabatrin, allergic rash/Steven Johnson
syndrome with lamotrigine, arrhythmias with
rufinamide (short QT interval) and lacosamide
(prolonged PR interval) and fatal hyperammonemic
encephalopathy with topiramate. Role of
monitoring serum levels of newer AEDs are
limited as the recommended levels are not well
defined.
Conclusion
Most of these newer AED have
been tested as add-on therapy in drug resistant
epilepsy and are not superior to the first
generation AEDs in efficacy. The main advantage
of some of the newer agents was their better
tolerability and pharmacokinetic profiles
compared to the earlier AED. Other than
Oxcarbazepine for partial epilepsy, there is no
evidence for the use of the newer AED as
monotherapy in new-onset epilepsy in children.
Some of the newer AEDs have proven efficacy for
some childhood epileptic syndrome e.g.
vigabatrin for infantile spasms, levetiracetam
for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, rufinamide for
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and stiripentol for
Dravet syndrome. The current choice of
available AEDs also allows for options for
children with concomitant systemic illnesses and
co-morbidities based on the pharmacokinetic
profiles of these drugs.
However, the cost of these
drugs increases the cost of therapy and limits
their use in low and middle income countries.
References
1. Mackay MT, Weiss
SK, Adams-Webber T, Ashwal S, Stephens D, Ballaban-Gill
K, et al. Practice parameter: medical
treatment of infantile spasms: report of the
American Academy of Neurology and the Child
Neurology Society. Neurology. 2004; 62:1668-81.
2. Go CY, Mackay MT, Weiss
SK, Stephens D, Adams-Webber T, Ashwal S, et
al. Evidence-based guideline update: medical
treatment of infantile spasms. Report of the
Guideline Development Subcommittee of the
American Academy of Neurology and the Practice
Committee of the Child Neurology Society.
Neurology. 2012;78:1974-80.
3. Elterman RD, Shields WD,
Mansfield KA, Nakagawa J. Randomized trial of
vigabatrin in patients with infantile spasms.
Neurology. 2001;57:1416-21.
4. Lux AL, Edwards SW,
Hancock E, Johnson AL, Kennedy CR, Newton RW,
et al. The United Kingdom Infantile Spasms
Study (UKISS) comparing hormone treatment with
vigabatrin on developmental and epilepsy
outcomes to age 14 months: a multicentre
randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:712-7.
5. Plant GT, Sergott RC.
Understanding and interpreting vision safety
issues with vigabatrin therapy. Acta Neurol
Scand Suppl. 2011:57-71.
6. Willmore LJ, Abelson MB,
Ben-Menachem E, Pellock JM, Shields WD.
Vigabatrin: 2008 update. Epilepsia.
2009;50:163-73.
7. Krauss GL. Evaluating
risks for vigabatrin treatment. Epilepsy Curr.
2009;9:125-9.
8. Carmant L. Vigabatrin
therapy for infantile spasms: review of major
trials in Europe, Canada, and the United States;
and recommendations for dosing. Acta Neurol
Scand Suppl. 2011:36-47.
9. Pellock JM, Hrachovy R,
Shinnar S, Baram TZ, Bettis D, Dlugos DJ, et
al. Infantile spasms: a U.S. consensus
report. Epilepsia. 2010;51:2175-89.
10. Lukyanetz EA, Shkryl VM,
Kostyuk PG. Selective blockade of N-type calcium
channels by levetiracetam. Epilepsia.
2002;43:9-18.
11. Verrotti A, D’Adamo E,
Parisi P, Chiarelli F, Curatolo P. Levetiracetam
in childhood epilepsy. Paediatr Drugs.
2010;12:177-86.
12. Ramantani G, Ikonomidou
C, Walter B, Rating D, Dinger J. Levetiracetam:
safety and efficacy in neonatal seizures. Eur J
Pediatr Neurol. 2011;15:1-7.
13. McTaque A, Kneen R, Kumar
R, Spinty S, Appleton R. Intravenous
levetiracetam in acute repitive seizures and
status epilepticus in children: experience from
a children’s hospital. Seizure. 2012;21:529-34.
14. Kossoff EH, Bergey GK,
Freeman JM, Vining EP. Levetiracetam psychosis
in children with epilepsy. Epilepsia.
2001;42:1611-3.
15. Verrotti A, Coppola G,
Manco R, Ciambra G, Iannetti P, Grosso S, et
al. Levetiracetam monotherapy for children
and adolescents with benign rolandic seizures.
Seizure. 2007;16:271-5.
16. De Los Reyes EC, Sharp
GB, Williams JP, Hale SE. Levetiracetam in the
treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Pediatr
Neurol. 2004;30:254-6.
17. Verrotti A, Cerminara C,
Coppola G, Franzoni E, Parisi P, Iannetti P,
et al. Levetiracetam in juvenile myoclonic
epilepsy: long-term efficacy in newly diagnosed
adolescents. Dev Med Child Neurol.
2008;50:29-32.
18. Kossoff EH, Los JG,
Boatman DF. A pilot study transitioning children
onto levetiracetam monotherapy to improve
language dysfunction associated with benign
rolandic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav.
2007;11:514-7.
19. Kossoff EH, Bergey GK,
Freeman JM, Vining EP. Levetiracetam psychosis
in children with epilepsy. Epilepsia.
2001;42:1611-3.
20. Coppola G, Caliendo G,
Terracciano MM, Buono S, Pellegrino L, Pascotto
A. Topiramate in refractory partial-onset
seizures in children, adolescents and young
adults: a multicentric open trial. Epilepsy Res.
2001;43:255-60.
21. Sreenivasan P, Kunju PA.
Efficacy of Topiramate as an add-on drug in
seizures in Indian children—an observational
study. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78:1221-4.
22. Hancock EC, Cross JH.
Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD003277.
23. Zou LP, Lin Q, Qin J, Cai
FC, Liu ZS, Mix E. Evaluation of open-label
topiramate as primary or adjunctive therapy in
infantile spasms. Clin Neuropharmacol.
2008;31:86-92.
24. Mikaeloff Y, de
Saint-Martin A, Mancini J, Peudenier S, Pedespan
JM, Vallee L, et al. Topiramate: efficacy
and tolerability in children according to
epilepsy syndromes. Epilepsy Res.
2003;53:225-32.
25. Biton V, Bourgeois BF.
Topiramate in patients with juvenile myoclonic
epilepsy. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1705-1708.
26. Ben-Zeev B, Watemberg N,
Augarten A, Brand N, Yahav Y, Efrati O, et al.
Oligohydrosis and hyperthermia: pilot study of a
novel topiramate adverse effect. J Child Neurol.
2003;18:254-7.
27. Yamamoto Y, Takahashi Y,
Imai K, Mishima N, Yazawa R, Inoue K, et al.
Risk factor for hyperammonemia in pediatric
patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013;54:
983-9.
28. Jain R, Mishra D, Juneja
M. Add-on lamotrigine in pediatric epilepsy in
India. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:55-8.
29. Doege C, May TW,
Siniatchkin M, von Spiczak S, Stephani U, Boor
R. Myoclonic astatic epilepsy (Doose syndrome) -
A lamotrigine responsive epilepsy? Eur J
Paediatr Neurol. 2013;17:29-35.
30. Ferrándiz-Pulido C, García-Fernández
D, Domínguez-Sampedro P, García-Patos V.
Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal
necrolysis in children: a review of the
experience with paediatric patients in a
university hospital. J Eur Acad Dermatol
Venereol. 2011;25:1153-9.
31. Brunklaus A, Ellis R, Reavey
E, Forbes GH, Zuberi SM. Prognostic, clinical
and demographic features in SCN1A
mutation-positive Dravet syndrome. Brain. 2012;
135: 2329-36.
32. Glauser T, Ben-Menachem
E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Guerreiro C, Kalviainen
R, et al. Updated ILAE evidence review of
antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as
initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and
syndromes. Epilepsia. 2013;54:551-563.
33. Glauser TA. Oxcarbazepine
in the treatment of epilepsy. Pharmacotherapy.
2001;21:904-919.
34. Lee YJ, Kang HC, Seo JH,
Lee JS, Kim HD. Efficacy and tolerability of
adjunctive therapy with zonisamide in childhood
intractable epilepsy. Brain Dev.
2010;32:208-212.
35. Wheless JW, Clarke DF,
Carpenter D. Treatment of pediatric epilepsy:
expert opinion, 2005. J Child Neurol. 2005;20
Suppl 1:S1-56.
36. Vossler DG, Conry JA,
Murphy JV. Zonisamide for the treatment of
myoclonic seizures in progressive myoclonic
epilepsy: an open-label study. Epileptic Disord.
2008;10:31-4.
37. Seino M, Miyazaki H, Ito
T. Zonisamide. Epilepsy Res Suppl.
1991;3:169-74.
38. Low PA, James S, Peschel
T, Leong R, Rothstein A. Zonisamide and
associated oligohidrosis and hyperthermia.
Epilepsy Res. 2004;62:27-34.
39. Eun SH, Kim HD, Eun BL,
Lee IK, Chung HG, Kim JS, et al.
Compartive trial of low- and high-dose
zonisamide as monotherapy for childhood
epilepsy. Seizure. 2011;20:558-63.
40. Buck ML, Goodkin HP. Use
of lacosamide in children with refractory
epilepsy. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther.
2012;17:211-9.
41. Heyman E, Lahat E, Levin
N, Berkovitch M, Gandelman-Marton R. Preliminary
efficacy and safety of lacosamide in children
with refractory epilepsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol.
2012;16:15-9.
42. Rastogi RG, Ng YT.
Lacosamide in refractory mixed pediatric
epilepsy: a prospective add-on study. J Child
Neurol. 2012;27:492-5.
43. Yorns WR, Jr., Khurana
DS, Carvalho KS, Hardison HH, Legido A, Valencia
I. Efficacy of Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy
in children with refractory epilepsy. J Child
Neurol. 2012. Epub ahead of print.
44. Wier HA, Cerna A, So TY.
Rufinamide for pediatric patients with Lennox-Gastaut
syndrome: a comprehensive overview. Paediatr
Drugs. 2011;13:97-106.
45. Glauser T, Kluger G,
Sachdeo R, Krauss G, Perdomo C, Arroyo S.
Rufinamide for generalized seizures associated
with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Neurology.
2008;70: 1950-8.
46. Hsieh DT, Thiele EA.
Efficacy and safety of rufinamide in pediatric
epilepsy. Ther Adv Neurol Disord.
2013;6:189-198.
47. Coppola G, Grosso S,
Franzoni E, Veggiotti P, Zamponi N, Parisi P,
et al. Rufinamide in refractory childhood
epileptic encephalopathies other than Lennox–Gastaut
syndrome. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18:246–51.
48. Moavero R, Cusmai R,
Specchio N, Fusco L, Capuano A, Curatolo P,
et al. Rufinamide efficacy and safety as
adjunctive treatment in children with focal drug
resistant epilepsy: the first Italian
prospective study. Epilepsy Res. 2012;102:94-9.
49. Plsker GL. Stiripentol:
in severe Myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (Dravet
syndrome). CNS Drugs. 2012;26:993-1001.
50. Fisher JL. The anti-convulsant
stiripentol acts directly on the GABA(A)
receptor as a positive allosteric modulator.
Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:190-7.
51. Chiron C, Marchand MC,
Tran A, Rey E, d’Athis P, Vincent J, et al.
Stiripentol in severe myoclonic epilepsy in
infancy: a randomised placebo-controlled
syndrome-dedicated trial. STICLO study group.
Lancet. 2000;356:1638-42.
52. Wickenden AD, Yu W, Zou
A, Jegla T, Wagoner PK. Retigabine, a novel
anti-convulsant, enhances activation of KCNQ2/Q3
potassium channels. Mol Pharmacol.
2000;58:591-600.
53. Porter RJ, Burdette DE,
Gil-Nagel A, Hall ST, White R, Shaikh S, et
al. Retigabine as adjunctive therapy in
adults with partial-onset seizures: integrated
analysis of three pivotal controlled trials.
Epilepsy Res. 2012;101:103-12.
54. Chu-Shore CJ, Thiele EA.
New drugs for pediatric epilepsy. Semin Pediatr
Neurol. 2010;17:214-223.
55. Kerrigan JF, Shields WD,
Nelson TY, Bluestone DL, Dodson WE, Bourgeois
BF, et al. Ganaxolone for treating
intractable infantile spasms: a multicenter,
open-label, add-on trial. Epilepsy Res
2000;42:133-139.
56. Stephen LJ, Brodie MJ.
Pharmacotherapy of epilepsy: newly approved and
developmental agents. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:89-107.
57. Expert Commitee on Pediatric Epilepsy,
Indian Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines for
diagnosis and management of childhood epilepsy.
Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:681-98.
|
|
 |
|