Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
editorial

Indian Pediatr 2012;49: 868-869

Disease Course in Childhood Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Is it Changeable?


Shuichi Ito

Division Chief, Division of Nephrology and Rheumatology, National Center for Child Health and Development,
2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535.
Email: [email protected]
 
 


The long-term prognosis of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome is relatively good. However, most patients experience relapses in their clinical course. In this issue, Sinha, et al. [1] report the prognosis of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in 1071 children, which is the largest retrospective cohort study to date. They describe that approximately one-half of the patients developed frequent-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), consistent with the rates in previous reports. FRNS and SDNS are critical issues for children, because of the severe adverse effects of steroid treatment, and psychological issues owing to long hospitalization, frequent hospital visits, and side effects of treatment. Therefore, clarification of risk factors for a frequent-relapsing course and its prevention are quite important. The authors concluded that early onset (<4 years), lack of adequate initial therapy (<8 weeks), and short duration of initial remission lasting <6 months are risk factors for a frequent-relapsing course. Among these, the only one in which we can intervene is initial therapy. Although many pediatric nephrologists think that initial steroid treatment at disease onset may influence the future clinical course, the optimal length of initial steroid therapy remains controversial. A standard basic initial steroid therapy at primary onset was proposed by the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC) more than 30 years ago. The proposal was daily steroid therapy (60 mg/m2/d) for 4 weeks followed by alternate-day treatment (40 mg/m2/2d) for 4 weeks (original was 3 days of medication followed by 4 days off in a week, but later modified). Thereafter, this protocol was revised in a variety of ways to obtain a better prognosis.

The KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline recommends that oral prednisone should be administered as a single daily dose starting at 60 mg/m2/d or 2 mg/kg/d (maximum: 60 mg/d) for 4-6 weeks followed by alternate-day medication at 40 mg/m2/2d or 1.5 mg/kg/2d (maximum: 40 mg/2d) with tapering of the dose for 2-5 months [2]. The published US guideline recommends that the initial steroid therapy should be 2 mg/kg/d for 6 weeks followed by 1.5 mg/kg/2d on alternate days for 6 weeks (maximum: 40 mg/2d) [3]. In the Cochrane systematic review, it is stated that duration of therapy up to 7 months appeared to be more effective than therapy for 2 months in achieving sustained remission. In Japan, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing daily therapy for 4 weeks followed by alternate-day therapy for 6 months with the standard 2-month therapy is ongoing. The results of this RCT will provide some suggestions regarding the optimal mode of initial steroid treatment. The duration of daily steroid therapy, i.e. 4 or 6 weeks, should also be evaluated by an RCT.

Although half of the 1071 patients progressed to FRNS, 185 children had FRNS or SDNS and 42 had late steroid resistance in long-term observation. However, 72% of FRNS patients were in remission or had infrequent relapses with immunosuppressive agents or low-dose steroid. Therefore, the long-term prognosis is relatively good. However, a certain proportion of patients showed disease transition to the adult form or a difficult clinical course resistant to existing therapy. Such patients were likely to be complicated with severe infection, resulting in high mortality in their study. Recently, rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, has become an emerging therapy for difficult nephrotic syndrome [5,6]. Rituximab allows such patients to discontinue steroid treatment and dramatically reduces the number of relapses. Rituximab can also induce remission in patients with intractable steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Although more clinical experience is needed to establish a safe and effective mode of administration, such new molecular target therapies will improve the clinical course of childhood nephrotic syndrome in the future.

References

1. Sinha A, Hari P, Sharma PK, Gulati A, Kalaivani M, Mantan M, et al. Disease Course in Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:881-7 .

2. Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis. Kidney Inter. 2012; 2: 139–274.

3. Gipson DS, Massengill SF, Yao L, Nagaraj S, Smoyer WE, Mahan JD, et al. Management of childhood onset nephrotic syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009;124: 747-57.

4. Hodson EM, Willis NS, Craig JC. Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 17:CD001533.

5. Gulati A, Sinha A, Jordan SC, Hari P, Dinda AK, Sharma S, et al. Efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab for difficult steroid-resistant and dependent nephrotic syndrome: multicentric report. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:2207-12.

6. Ito S, Kamei K, Ogura M, Sato M, Fujimaru T, Ishikawa T, et al. Maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil after rituximab in pediatric patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011; 26:1823-8.
 

 

Copyright © 1999-2012 Indian Pediatrics