We express thanks for the special interest and the questions raised
pertaining to our article. With a cross-sectional design, our study
explored the relationship between putative cause and effect i.e., backpack
weight and postural angles in conveniently selected population. The
population was stratified, excluded for larger measurement variability and
represented homo-genous postural stability for a complex functional task
(functional reach) than simple loading task measured in our study set-up.
This reduces the impact of anthropometric confounding factors such as
subcutaneous fat and height and their influence on postural angles in
present study. Moreover good precision obtained in measured postural
angles dictates good reproducibility with a valid ImageTool for the
measurements taken.
To put clearly, data only on backpack weight
and postural angles would not allow the role of duration of the
carriage, predicting morbidity, or of other causes, to be
explored.
Studies have reported that heavier backpack carriage in
school children associated with fatigue symptoms(1), dorsal and low back
pain(2), significant increase in disc compression and lumbar curvature(3),
unable to recover from backpack induced lumbar lordosis following the
removel of the backpack load(4), shoulder, neck and back pain and
combination of bodily pain(5). Contrary to above findings, studies have
also reported no independent relationship between backpack use and back
pain(6), and active form of carrying backpack may decrease the odds of
getting neck and back pain(7). Some authors have suggested regular optimal
spinal backpack loading for healthier back and they cautioned back pain in
children should be viewed from a biopsychosocial behavioral model rather
than pure mechanical model similar to adult back pain(8,9).
Various factors such as physical, mechanical,
psychological, social, environmental, ergonomic, socioeconomic,
anthropometric and demographic characteristics are need to be examined
before predicting backpack related morbidity in this population.
Although more studies are needed to explore to find a
causal link between backpack use and back and neck pain due to heavier
backpack carriage, the major unanimous concern is an urgent need to
conduct longitudinal and prospective studies so that various confounding
factors associated with nonspecific low back pain in children can be
explored.
References
1. Kellis E, Emmanouilidou M. The effects of age and
gender on the weight and use of schoolbags. Pediatr Phys Ther 2010; 22:
17-25.
2. Korovessis P, Koureas G, Papazisis Z. Correlation
between backpack weight and way of carrying, sagittal and frontal spinal
curvatures, athletic activity, and dorsal and low back pain in
schoolchildren and adolescents. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17: 33-40.
3. Neuschwander TB, Cutrone J, Macias BR, Cutrone S,
Murthy G, Chambers H, et al. The effect of backpacks on the lumbar
spine in children: a standing magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine
2010; 35: 83-88.
4. Negrini S, Negrini A. Postural effects of
symmetrical and asymmetrical loads on the spines of schoolchildren.
Scoliosis 2007; 2: 8.
5. Puckree T, Silal SP, Lin J. School bag carriage and
pain in school children. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 54-59.
6. Irene AY, Andrew JH, Karen SY. The association
between backpack weight and low back pain in children. J Back
Musculoskelet Rehabil 2006; 1: 25-33.
7. Haselgrove C, Straker L, Smith A, Sullivan OP, Perry
M, Sloan N. Perceived school bag load, duration of carriage, and method of
transport to school are associated with spinal pain in adolescents: an
observational study. Aust J Physiother 2008; 54: 193-200.
8. Reneman MF, Poels BJ, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU. Back
pain and backpacks in children: biomedical or biopsychosocial model?
Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 1293-1297.
9. Lindstrom-Hazel D. The backpack problem is evident but the solution
is less obvious. Work 2009; 32: 329-338.