|
Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 877-880 |
|
Portal Hypertension with Visceral
Leishmaniasis |
Rajniti Prasad*, Utpal Kant Singh, O P Mishra*,
BP Jaiswal and Sunil Muthusami
From Department of Pediatrics, Nalanda Medical College,
Patna, Bihar; and *Department of Pediatrics,
Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi; India.
Correspondence to: Dr Utpal Kant Singh, 8, Rajendra Nagar,
Patna 800 013, Bihar, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: January 30, 2009;
Initial review: March 12, 2009;
Accepted: December 30, 2009.
Published online 2010 March 15.
PII: S09747559090059-2
|
Abstract
We conducted this study to observe evidence of portal
hypertension in children with visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Eighty-eight
consecutive cases (50 male) of VL were subjected to ultrasonography.
Those with evidence of portal hypertension also underwent upper
gastrointestinal endoscopy and liver biopsy. Eight patients had portal
hypertension as evidenced by dilated caliber of portal and splenic
veins. Two patients had periportal, splenic and peripancreatic
collaterals and one patient had cavernous transformation of portal vein.
Out of eight patients, four patients had esophageal and gastric varices.
Liver biopsy was done in four patients and revealed hepatic sinusoidal
dilations without any evidence of fibrosis. Portal hypertension may be
an independent manifestation of VL and remain undiagnosed unless a
physician maintains a high index of suspicion.
Key words: India, Kala-azar, Portal hypertension,
Ultrasonography, Visceral leishmaniasis.
|
L. donovani
infections are associated with a wide
spectrum of clinical manifestations, commonly described in India as
visceral leishmaniasis (VL)(1-3). While the association of portal
hypertension with parasitic diseases like schistosomiasis and malaria is
well recognized, this has been only rarely reported with VL. This
prospective study on children with VL was done to look for evidence of
associated portal hypertension.
Methods
The study was conducted between July 2004 to September
2008 at a tertiary hospital in eastern India located in the endemic area
of VL. Ethics committees approved study protocol and consent form. Written
informed consent was taken from legal guardians of children. All
consecutive children aged 1 to 14 years, presenting with fever,
splenomegaly and positive LD body in bone marrow or splenic aspirates
examination were enrolled for the study.
Renal function, liver function tests, complete hemogram,
PT/APTT, general blood picture were done in all the children. Bone marrow
aspiration and microscopic examination was performed in all the children
to detect L. donovani (LD) bodies and other hematological
affections. Splenic aspiration was performed in bone marrow negative cases
after correction of any existing derangement of coagulation profile.
Children with significant lymphadenopathy also underwent lymph node
aspiration and cytology.
All patients were subjected to color doppler study of
hepatobiliary system before starting treatment. Those with significant
portal (>13 mm)/splenic vein dilation(4) were further evaluated for
gastric/esopha-geal varices by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Hepatitis
B surface antigen and anti-HAV IgM antibody were also looked for in all
these patients. Liver biopsy was performed in these cases. Patients with
esophageal varices of grade II/IV were also subjected to sclerotherapy,
particularly in those with hematemesis and malena and put on propranolol
prophylaxis (1mg/kg/day tid).
The parasitological analyses of bone marrow/ splenic
aspirates and color doppler study were performed at completion of therapy,
and after 1 month and 6 months. The density of parasites was graded from 0
(no parasite/10000 high power field) to 6 (>100 parasites/ field). The
cure was defined as an absence of parasites at the end of therapy and no
relapse during six months of follow up. Confirmed case of VL were
treated with either Sodium stibogluconate (20 mg/kg/day intramuscularly
for 30 days) or Amphotericin B at a dose of 1 mg/kg intravenously after
sensitivity testing to a total cumulative dose of 15 mg/kg. During
therapy, patients were monitored daily for vital signs, splenic size and
adverse events.
Results
We identified 88 children (38 females) in the age group
of 1 to 14 (mean: 9.2±3.7) years with microscopically and serologically
proved VL. Bone marrow aspirates were positive in 73 cases (82.9 %) and
the remaining 15 (17.1%) cases showed LD bodies in the splenic aspirate.
Significant lymphadenopathy was observed in 23 cases (26.1%), but LD
bodies could be demonstrated in five cases on lymph node aspiration
cytology. One child had concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis (sputum
positive for AFB) and another was admitted with concomitant severe
falciparum malaria (peripheral smear positive for malarial parasite). Of
88 patients, 68 had received sodium stibogluconate but 20 of them showed
relapse after one month of follow up, which was treated with amphotericin
B. Remaining children received amphotericin B as the initial therapy. None
of the patient treated with amphotericin B relapsed. Table I
depicts the clinicopathological profile of children who demonstrated
features of portal hypertension. None of the children in our study had
fulminant hepatic failure.
TABLE I
Hemato-Biochemical Characteristics of Children with Portal Hypertension
No |
Age |
Hb |
TLC |
APC |
Total |
Direct |
ALT |
AST |
Serm |
|
(y) |
(gm/dL) |
(mm3) |
(mm3) |
bilirubin |
bilirubin |
(IU/L) |
(IU/L) |
albumin |
|
|
|
|
|
(mg/dL) |
(mg/dL) |
|
|
(g/dL) |
1 |
6 |
9.9 |
5000 |
112000 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
40 |
30 |
2.8 |
2 |
5 |
1.8 |
2400 |
95000 |
0.62 |
0.21 |
12.6 |
31.1 |
2.2 |
3 |
8 |
11 |
6000 |
220000 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
42 |
76 |
3.0 |
4 |
10 |
5.1 |
2500 |
110000 |
4.3 |
0.9 |
24 |
34 |
2.6 |
5 |
11 |
9.3 |
3200 |
250000 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
64 |
44 |
2.0 |
6 |
10 |
6.3 |
3800 |
106000 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
20 |
54 |
2.6 |
7 |
11 |
6 |
10000 |
150000 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
77 |
174 |
2.4 |
8 |
10 |
8.1 |
3200 |
180000 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
16 |
29 |
2.2 |
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; TLC: total leucocyte count; APC: average parasite count.
|
Portal hypertension was present in 8 children as
evidenced by dilated caliber of the portal and splenic veins and splenic/peri-pancreatic
collaterals. Two children had evidence of periportal, splenic and
peripancreatic collaterals, and another child showed cavernous
transformation of the portal vein. Liver biopsy showed sinusoidal dilation
without hepatic fibrotic changes in four children, among whom esophageal
and gastric varices were seen in two.
At follow-up, one month and 6 months later,
ultrasonography of hepatobilliar system of eight children with portal
hypertension showed no change in calibre of portal vein, splenic veins and
splenic/ peripancreatic collaterals.
Discussion
Portal hypertension has not been previously reported in
pediatric visceral leishmaniasis. Pahwa, et al.(5) reported two
children with fulminant hepatic failure who succumbed to the illness. In
our series, although none presented with fulminant hepatitis, we detected
evidence of portal hypertension in 8 children, which had persisted on
follow up at 6 months. Datta, et al.(6) reported three adult males
with portal hypertension in VL and Prakash, et al.(8) reported an
adult with leishmanial hepatitis with portal hypertension. Thus, with the
present findings, it is evident that portal hypertension could not
conclusively be ascribed to hepatitis as suggested(6). Aggarwal, et al.(8)
in their study of sixty VL cases concluded that portal hypertension and
cirrhosis of liver do not occur as a consequence of VL.
The findings on liver biopsy in our study indicate that
in the absence of any significant hepatic cirrhotic changes in four cases,
the cause of portal hyper-tension in this population may not be secondary
but a primary involvement of the splanchnic vasculature. Cytokines and
chemokines are known to play key roles in mediating the outcome of VL(9),
but the precise sequence of events that determines the outcome of
infection has not been fully elucidated. The chronicity and low
grade persistent nature of the disease state in VL(10) lends support to
the probability that portal hypertension is a gradually evolving event in
VL.
Contributions: UKS designed the study and
supervised the management of patients. RP and OPM drafted the
manuscript. BPJ and SM had collected data, reviewed literature and done
statistical analysis.
Funding: None.
Competing interest: None stated.
References
1. Bora D. Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in
India. Natl Med J India 1999; 12: 62–68.
2. Bryceson A. Visceral leishmaniasis in India. Lancet
2000; 356: 1933.
3. Singh S, Sivakumar R. Recent advances in the
diagnosis of leishmaniasis. J Postgrad Med 2003; 49: 55-60.
4. Bolondi L, Gandolfi L, Arienti V, Caletti GC,
Corcioni E, Gasbarrini G, et al. Ultrasonography in diagnosis of
portal hypertension: diminished response to portals to respiration.
Ultrasound 1982; 14: 167-172.
5. Pahwa R, Gupta SK, Singh T, Nigam S. Acute fulminant
visceral leishmaniasis in children—a report of two cases. Indian J Pathol
Microbiol 2004; 47: 428-430.
6. Datta DV, Saha S, Grover SL, Samant A. Singh R,
Chakravarti N, et al. Portal hypertension in kala-azar. Gut 1972;
13: 147-152.
7. Prakash A, Singh NP, Sridhara G, Malhotra V, Makhija
A, Garg D, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis masquerading as chronic
liver disease. J Assoc Physicians India 2006; 54: 893-894.
8. Agrawal P, Wali JP, Chopra P. Liver in kala-azar.
Indian J Gastroenterol 1990; 9: 135-136.
9. Malla N, Mahajan RC. Pathophysiology of visceral
leishmaniasis –some recent concepts. Indian J Med Res 2006; 26: 267-274.
10. Guevara P, Ramirez JL, Rojas L, Scorza JV, Gonzales
N, Anez N. Leishmania braziliensis in blood 30 years after cure.
Lancet 1993; 341: 1341.
|
|
|
|