|
Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 921-922 |
|
School Absenteeism Among Children |
MKC Nair
Director, Child Development Centre, Medical College
Campus, Thiruvananthapuram 695 011, Kerala, India.
Email: [email protected]
|
E ducational success of children is
close to the heart of most educated parents in India. Economic success and
social upliftment in life was always closely related to jobs, whose
prerequisite was only academic achievement. But in the recent times, with
the advent of the information technology industry, there is increasing
emphasis on skill development and attitude – ability for teamwork, even
more than knowledge per se. In spite of massive governmental
impetus, the education scene in India is volatile and new initiatives are
being introduced both for secondary education and higher education. While
the "need" for inclusive primary education for all is the priority of the
government, the private sector is increasingly catering to the "want" of
parents for "sophisticated" exclusive schools and colleges for their
children.
Parliament has passed the historic "Right of Children
to Free and Compulsory Education Bill, 2008", which envisages providing
free and compulsory education to 6-14 year old children. In the list of
Education For All (EFA) Development Index, among 125 countries, India
ranks 99th, even though there have been reductions in the number of
out-of-school children since 2004. Most likely we need better
understanding of the issues involved, starting with the burden of problem,
the causative and associate factors, interventional strategies and cost
effectiveness of school based programs at national level.
School absenteeism may include specific lesson absence,
post-registration absence, parentally condoned absence, psychological
absence, school refusal and school phobia. Malcolm, et al.(1) use
three different terms to describe pupils’ non-attendance; (i)
‘Truancy’ defined as ‘absences which pupils themselves indicated would be
unacceptable to teachers, (ii)‘Unacceptable absences’ defined as
‘absences, which were unacceptable to teachers and local education
authorities (LEAs) but not recognised as such by pupils’ and (iii)
‘Parentally condoned absences’ resulting from parents or caretakers
keeping pupils away from school. Also teacher absenteeism remains a
serious problem in developing countries like India. Gender disparity in
education is also prevalent in India(2).
Main causes of truancy and disruptive behaviour among
children over 7 years of age, in rank order were; (i) the influence
of friends and peers, (ii) relations with teachers, often those
lacking in respect for pupils, (iii) the content and delivery of
the curriculum, (iv) family aspects – parents’ attitudes, domestic
problems, (v) bullying and (vi) the classroom context, for
example lack of control or pupils’ learning difficulties(3). Absenteeism
from school is a serious public health issue for mental health
professionals, physicians, and educators. The prevalence of unexcused
absences from school exceeds that of major childhood behavior disorders
and is a key risk factor for violence, injury, substance use, psychiatric
disorders, and economic deprivation(4).
Atkinson, et al.(5) provided a useful
classification of initiatives aimed at improving attendance, including; (i)
Having appropriate service-level agreements; (ii) formulating
preventive strategies, involving all pupils within a school or year group
or all teachers within a school; (iii) Having clear initial and
first-day responses for absence, targeting particular pupils, days and
lessons; (iv) implementing appropriate early intervention schemes;
(v) targeting pupils whose attendance falls below a certain level;
(vi) identifying specific attendance problems in schools; (vii)
having good strategies to deal with disaffected behaviour; and (viii)
fostering appropriate inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary links.
A review of available research on micronutrient
supplementation found that iron therapy improve cognitive performance,
whereas zinc and iodine therapy did not, and there was no evidence that
population, wide vitamin and mineral supplementation leads to improved
academic perfor-mance(6). Studies (RCTs) in both Kenya and India have
found a significant impact due to deworming on school attendance.
Absenteeism fell by one quarter in the Kenyan study(7) and one fifth in
India(8). A study done in Delhi’s resettlement colonies in 200 schools
showed that de-worming programs can be a cost-effective health
intervention in improving student participation in India(9). The Campbell
review of 18 studies including 7 RCTs on impact of school feeding,
indicated that it increase attendance, particularly in rural low-income
schools in developing countries, and improve cognitive performance at
least in the short term(10).
Longitudinal studies indicate that if left
un-addressed, school refusal behaviour can lead to serious short-term
problems such as distress, academic decline, alienation from peers, family
conflict, and financial and legal consequences. Common long-term problems
include school drop-out, delinquent behaviours, economic deprivation,
social isolation, marital problems, and difficulty maintaining employment.
We need to remember that school absenteeism may be a cry for help and only
a symptom of deep-rooted psychological or adjustment problems.
Approximately 52% of adolescents with school refusal behaviour meet
criteria for an anxiety, depressive, conduct-personality, or other
psychiatric disorder later in life(11). The pediatrician, does have the
right and responsibility to see the child smoothly through the school
years to a professional setting – skilled or unskilled, preparing them to
set up a family of their own.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None stated.
References
1. Malcolm H, Wilson V, Davidson J, Kirk S. Absence
from School: A Study of its Causes and Effects in Seven LEAs. Nottingham:
DFES Report 424; 2003.
2. Pandey V. Teacher absenteeism ails Indian education.
Mumbai. Daily News and Analysis; Thursday, Oct 26, 2006. http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_teacher-absenteeism-ails-indian-education_1060396.
Accessed 16 August, 2010.
3. Kinder K, Wakefield A, Wilkin A. Talking Back: Pupil
Views on Disaffection. Slough: NFER; 1996.
4. Kearney CA. School absenteeism and school refusal
behavior in youth – A contemporary review. Clin Psychol Rev 2008; 28:
451-471.
5. Atkinson M, Halsey K, Wilkin A, Kinder K. Raising
Attendance. Slough: NFER; 2000.
6. Taras H. Nutrition and student performance in
school. J School Health 2005; 75: 199-213.
7. Miguel E, Kremer M. Worms: identifying impacts on
education and health in the presence of treatment externalities.
Econometrica 2004; 72: 159-217.
8. Bobonis G, Miguel E, Sharma C. Iron Deficiency
Anemia and School Participation, Poverty Action Lab Paper No.7. Cambridge,
MA, J-PAL; 2004.
9. Bossuroy T, Delavallade C. Deworming improves school
attendance. http://southasia.oneworld.net/todaysheadlines/deworming-improves-school-attendance-says-report.
Accessed 18 November, 2008.
10. Kristjansson EA, Robinson V, Petticrew M, MacDonald
B, Krasevec J, Janzen L, et al. School Feeding for Improving the
Physical and Psychosocial Health of Disadvantaged Elementary School
Children. Copenhagen: Campbell Review, SFI Campbell; 2007.
11. Kearney CA. Dealing with school refusal behaviour –
A primer for family physicians. J Fam Pract. From: http://www.jfponline.com/Pages.asp?AID=
4322&UID. Accessed 15 August, 2010.
|
|
|
|