vaccination in disaster situation |
|
Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 997-1002 |
|
Measles Vaccination Response During Kosi
Floods, Bihar, India 2008 |
Sherin Varkey, Gopal Krishna*, Narottam Pradhan, Satish Kumar Gupta, Jorge
Caravotta, Henri vanden Hombergh, Edward Hoekstra, Sufia Askari and OP
Kansal
Correspondence to: Dr Sherin Varkey, Health Specialist,
Unicef Office of Bihar, 8 Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar.
Email: [email protected]
|
The Kosi floods of Bihar in 2008 led to initial rapid displacement
followed by rehabilitation of the affected population. Strategically
planned phase-wise activity of supplementary as well as primary measles
vaccination combined with a variety of other interventions proved to be
successful in preventing outbreaks and deaths due to measles. While 70%
supplementary measles vaccination coverage was achieved in relief camps,
the coverage of primary measles doses in the latter phases was dependant
on accessibility of villages and previous vaccination status of eligible
beneficiaries. The integrated diseases surveillance system, which became
operational during the floods, also complemented the vaccination efforts
by providing daily figures of cases with fever and rash. The overall
response was not only successful in terms of preventing measles
mortality, but also provided vital lessons that may be useful for
planning future vaccination responses in emergency settings.
Key words:
Bihar, Disaster, Floods, Measles, vaccination.
|
On August 18, a 800 meter breach in the
eastern embankment of Kosi river in Kusha (Indo-Nepal border) led to
sudden release of more than 1.66 lac cusec water, which resulted the Kosi
river changing its course and the inundation of 993 villages of 35 blocks
in five Bihar districts of Supaul, Saharsa, Araria, Madehpura and
Purnia, affecting more than three million people. The ensuing
destruction of 340,742 houses resulted in subsequent displacement of the
population to make-shift relief camps(1). This displaced population
remained in these relief camps till mid October, and as the flood waters
receded, many began returning to their villages. As communications to all
villages could not be restored within a few months, some villages remained
cut off till as late as early February 2009.
With the changing population profile and communication
situation following the floods, there arose a variety of related health
issues which called for strategic health planning to prevent any large
scale disease outbreak. During the initial phase of population aggregation
in camps, roadsides and embankments, the major threat was the transmission
of measles and acute respiratory infections. Later, as waters began
receding, the possibility of outbreaks of diarrheal diseases also loomed
large. Finally, during the phase of rehabilitation, when displaced persons
began returning to their homes, the challenge was to re-establish regular
health services in hitherto flooded and cut-off villages.
The Department of Health, Government of Bihar (GoB),
tackled the health situation and averted wide spread transmission of any
disease. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and a host of other civil
society organizations also contributed to an effective preventive public
health intervention through their technical support.
Vaccination Strategy
A series of vaccination activities were undertaken
during and following the unprecedented floods of Bihar in 2008. The
strategy of each of these activities differed, depending on the prevailing
ground conditions and population movements at that particular time. In the
initial relief phase, the strategy aimed at providing a supplementary
measles dose to all eligible children of 6 months to 14 years in areas of
congregation like camps, embankments and roadsides. The latter
rehabilitation and catch-up phases focused on reviving disrupted health
services in a variety of field settings and providing missed doses of
measles and other vaccines as per routine schedule. The rehabilitation
phase was divided into two sub-phases, depending upon the accessibility of
villages; initially, all accessible villages were visited though an
intensive campaign with bundled interventions, thereafter, 189 cut-off
villages were visited by a small number of medical teams repeatedly, for a
period of three months.
The duration of each of the phases varied depending on
a number of factors such as, stay of displaced populations in camps,
restoration of communication to villages, availability of manpower for
vaccination, movement of logistics to inaccessible areas, and intermediate
time taken for planning and training between phases. The combined duration
of all the four phases including intermediate preparatory activities
lasted for seven months.
Although combined with a number of outreach health
interventions during the Bihar floods, vaccination with measles containing
vaccine (MCV) was the key intervention undertaken by the Department of
Health, Government of Bihar and supported by a number of international
development and civil society organizations. The target beneficiaries for
these activities and bundling with other interventions also differed as
per the overall strategy planned for each phase. Extra effort was spent to
ensure that all beneficiaries in the age range 9 months to 59 months
receiving measles vaccine were also given vitamin A supplementation.
All vaccination activities were meticulously planned
through micro-planning at sub-district level. These microplans
incorporated information about accessibility and reach, mobility
arrangement, cold chain maintenance, names of persons in vaccination and
supervising teams from available manpower, mobilisers from the affected
community and host villages, quantities of bundled logistics such as
vaccines, diluents, injections, vitamin A bottles and spoons, ORS sachets,
zinc tablets, vaccine carriers, tally sheets and reporting formats.
Communication materials were prepared for each phase of
the activity. As each phase differed in strategy and implementation from
the other, the program managers, vaccinators and mobilisers were all given
training before each phase. Specifically, training on adverse effects
following vaccination and safe disposal of injection wastes was imparted.
Teams of supervisors and monitors were deployed to monitor logistics
distribution, the proper adminis-tration of vaccines and other medicines,
as well as effective mobilization of beneficiaries while helping in daily
report compilation.
The large-scale destruction of the road network by the
floods put a substantial burden on the logistics distribution. While
initial stocks of vaccines, diluents and injections had to be transported
by helicopter, later, as major roads and train lines were reestablished,
material was sent by road and rail to district headquarters. From there,
available means of transport, such as boats, tractors and human labor
(porters) were used for transfer of logistics. A logistics monitoring cell
took day-to-day telephonic (mobile phones proved very helpful during Bihar
floods) stock position of vaccines and related material at each ice lined
refrigerator (ILR) point. In situations where villages were cut off from
their usual headquarters, logistics and commodities were supplied from
adjacent districts and ILR points. Cold chain was maintained at all levels
despite the absence of regular power supply, diesel generators available
at all ILR points proved effective for vaccine storage, while the
requirement of large number of ice-packs for the campaigns were met by
freezing them in local ice candy factories near the ILR points (as done
during regular polio supple-mentary immunization rounds). The vaccine vial
monitors (VVM) now available in all Universal Immunization Program (UIP)
vaccines, helped in ascertaining vaccine potency at user level.
During the entire response, a monitoring cell chaired
by the health secretary and composed of the Executive Director and program
officers of State Health Society, Bihar and representatives of key
development organizations reviewed day-to-day implementation progress and
gave strategic oversight and program direction. Table I
summarizes different phases of vaccination activity during this period.
TABLE I
Description of Different Phases of Vaccination Activity During Bihar Floods 2008-09
Phase |
Phase of |
Days after the breach* |
Type of population targeted |
Interventions undertaken |
No |
activity |
(18th August 08) |
|
|
1 |
Relief phase |
day 17 to day 38 |
Displaced population in relief |
Supplementary measles vaccine |
|
|
|
camps, other areas of displaced population aggregation
|
with vitamin A supplementation and supplementary monovalent-1 oral
polio vaccine to children. Routine tetanus vaccination to pregnant
women. |
2 |
Rehabilitation phase I |
day 40 to day 80
|
Initially accessible villages in flood affected districts |
All UIP vaccines as per schedule
|
|
|
|
|
Vitamin A and albendazole to all eligible children
|
|
|
|
|
Low osmolar ORS and zinc to children with diarrhea. |
3 |
Rehabilitation
phase 2 |
day 134 to day 194 |
189 villages with access problems due to
access roads being cut-off by flood waters
|
Treatment and referral of medical ailments, vaccination, chlorination
of drinking water, zinc, ORS, antenatal and deliveryservices, health
education. |
4 |
Catch up phase |
day 179 to day 186 |
All villages and urban areas of flood affected
districts |
All UIP vaccines and vitamin A as per schedule |
Universal Immunization Program (UIP), Oral Rehydration solution (ORS);
* leading to floods |
Other Interventions
Measles vaccination remained at the center stage of the
emergency vaccination while bundling with other interventions enhanced the
overall reach and coverage with health interventions during the four
phases of the emergency: vitamin A, albendazole tablets, other UIP
vaccines were administered to specific groups of beneficiaries who met the
eligibility criteria. In Phase 1, maternity huts were constructed in large
relief camps where antenatal care and skilled attendance during delivery
as well as post natal services were provided. In Phase 2, children with
diarrhea were treated with low osmolar ORS sachets and a 10-day course of
zinc. Teams of doctors with medical supplies accompanied the vaccination
teams in Phases 1 and 3, to treat minor illnesses, identify and treat
children with severe acute malnutrition and refer serious case.
At the same time, interventions to improve drinking
water and sanitation such as distribution of chlorine tablets and
chlorination of hand pumps was initiated. A surveillance system, using the
methodology of the Integrated Diseases Surveillance Project (IDSP)(2) was
set up in the flood affected districts on 26th August, 2008 and it
remained functional till 4th November, 2008. Medical teams in relief camps
and outreach sites were instructed to classify observed conditions and
deaths observed as syndromes and report accordingly on a daily basis using
a set format. However, laboratory confirmation of specific diseases
including measles was not available. Measles was reported as a "fever with
rash" syndrome. Cases of "fever with rash" continued to be reported beyond
November through information sent by Primary Health Centers and District
Hospitals to the Routine Immunization (RI) cell in the State Health
Society, where a line list of suspected measles cases was maintained.
Results
The report of each phase of the activity was computed
on a daily basis. Information at sub district level was collected on tally
sheets initially, camp-wise and later, village-wise. These were then
compiled ILR point-wise at district and state level. The outcome could not
always be analyzed in terms of percentage achieved as targets were
difficult to determine.
Target groups for measles vaccination differed in each
Phase. In the initial phase of the disaster, 6 months to 14 years old
children were targeted for vaccination in camps, estimated to be 41% of
the population living in these relief camps and other similar settings. As
camp population changed from day-to-day and some sections of the displaced
population moved from camp-to-camp, determination of the exact target
population was difficult. However, based on an officially estimated
population size of 362,072 residing in the camps in the relief period, a
target group of 148,540 children of the set age group was calculated and
of these 111,200 were administered measles vaccine, resulting in a
coverage rate of 75% (Table II).
TABLE II
Measles Vaccination Undertaken During Phase-wise Vaccination in Flood Affected
Districts of Bihar 2008-09
Phase |
Dates |
Target age |
Reach
vaccination |
Type of measles |
Target
vaccinated |
Total
beneficiaries |
% coverage
achieved |
|
|
group |
|
beneficiaries |
|
|
|
1 |
4 Sept to 18
Oct, 2008 |
6 months to
14 years |
Displaced
children in relief camps and places of population aggregation |
Supplementary |
148,450 |
111,200 |
75 |
2 |
20 Oct to 30
Nov, 2008 |
9 months to
59 months |
Children in
initially accessible villages |
Primary* |
60,842 (<1yr) |
36,672 (9m -
<1yr) 56,432 (1yr-5 yr) |
36,672 60(< 1yr) |
3 |
1 Jan to 31
Mar, 2009 |
9 months to
59 months |
Children in
189 cut-off villages |
Primary* |
Not
determined |
8,248
(9-59m) |
– |
4 |
16 to 26
Mar, 2009 |
9 months to
59 months |
All
remaining children in flood affected districts |
Primary* |
Not
determined |
83,809
(9-59m) |
– |
*1 dose of 0.5 mL reconstituted Measles containing vaccine administered as per current UIP schedule to children
between 9 and 59 months who gave no evidence (card or history) of having been administered this dose of
vaccine before.
|
During Phase 2, all children under 1 year, who were
eligible for measles vaccination in this two month period (the duration of
disruption of regular vaccination services during the floods) were
targeted. Of the 60,842 infants targeted, 36,672 were given their primary
measles dose while the remaining 19,760 children vaccinated with measles
during this phase were of age 12 to 59 months of whom a denominator could
not be ascertained. Targets were not determined in Phases 3 and 4 due to
problems of ascertaining exact pre-flood / post phase 2 immunization
status of eligible beneficiaries. In all, 256,989 doses of MCV were
administered (Table III).
TABLE III
Reported Cases of “Fever With Rash” and Related Deaths in Flood Affected Districts of Bihar 2008-09
Month |
Cases of “fever with rash” |
Deaths in cases of “fever with rash” |
|
Madhepura |
Other flood districts** |
Madhepura |
Other flood districts** |
August
2008 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
September
2008 |
1331 |
206 |
0 |
0 |
October
2008 |
289 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
November
2008 |
8 |
37 |
0 |
2 |
December
2008* |
78 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
January
2009* |
105 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
February
2009* |
0 |
39 |
0 |
0 |
March
2009* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
*reported independently of IDSP to RI cell, State Health Society Bihar; ** Other flood affected districts are Sapaul,
Saharsa, Punia and Araria.
|
Further clinical examination of some of these cases,
particularly in Madhepura, revealed misreporting in some instances
where the presentations were more close to impetigo, heat rash and other
localized skin infections(3). However, cases clinically resembling
measles/rubella were also observed. The later reported cases of "fever
with rashes" (Table III) to the RI-cell were more suggestive
of measles infection. Ten fatal cases of fever with rash in Madhepura
and two in Supaul had a history of fever with generalized rash
followed by complications, ranging from severe diarrhea to increased
respiratary rate and indrawing of chest wall. From December 2008 to
January 2009, measles IgM antibodies were detected in the serum of 5 epi-linked
cases (epidemiologically linked to confirmed measles cases) and
investigated by a team from GoB, The National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP)
and UNICEF reported in a similar outbreak of 136 "fever with rash" cases
in district Darbhanga, which was adjacent to the flood affected
areas (personal communication).
Discussion
The WHO/UNICEF joint statement, "Reducing Measles
Mortality in Emergencies"(3), states that measles is a major killer of
children in emergencies. It stresses that "Immunization of children
against measles is probably the single most important (and cost-effective)
preventive measure in emergency - affected populations especially, those
living in camps"(4). In emergency settings, measles is a major cause of
mortality, with case fatality rates (CFR) ranging from 2-22% compared with
1-10 % in normal situations and CFR can be as high as 20-30 % (5). Factors
like overcrowding found in relief camps, brings susceptibles together to a
critical threshold for outbreaks to occur.
Another WHO/UNICEF joint release "Global Plan for
Reducing Measles Mortality 2006-2010" (6) also asserts that in conflict or
emergency areas, WHO and UNICEF have a commitment to ensure that, at a
minimum, measles vaccination and vitamin A supplementation are
administered. Comple-mentarily, children in temporary shelters can also be
given other vital health interventions such as insecticide-treated
mosquito nets to prevent malaria and anti-helminthics for deworming.
Measles emergency campaigns are usually undertaken when
there is no current outbreak of measles but an outbreak is anticipated,
thus preventing measles outbreaks and thereby reduce the risk of mortality
and morbidity due to measles infection. When an outbreak of measles does
occur, measles vaccination prevents the spread of measles infection into
other adjacent non-affected geographical areas and thus reducing the
overall case fatality rates in vulnerable or high risk populations in
these areas.
This measles vaccination campaign during a disaster
situation in Bihar succeeded in both these aspects; initial vaccination in
camps in children from 6mo- 14 year prevented large scale measles
outbreaks and death in camps, while vaccination in the later phases
contained smaller outbreaks occurring in villages. High mortality due to
measles was prevented using a phase-wise, mass measles immunization
approach coupled with vitamin A supplementation and several other
interventions.
This phase-wise vaccination intervention undertaken in
Bihar taught us a valuable lesson: strategies need to be aligned with
ground realities and population movements. It may be several months before
normal conditions are restored following disasters and therefore an
emergency vaccination response need not be limited to initial vaccination
of displaced populations in relief camps and areas of congregation. As
seen in Bihar, vaccination activity can be extended well beyond this
period. Strategic planning using a combination of health interventions
provided through a variety of feasible approaches at different post-flood
situations pays rich dividends in preventing health disasters. Vaccination
campaigns do contribute to an early restoration of disrupted health
services and enhance catch–up activities for missed vaccination doses once
communication channels have improved.
While a large scale disaster like the one witnessed in
Bihar in 2008 warrants a strong system for disease prevention and
surveillance, several constraints to achieving this end were encountered.
Timely rather than perfect response was a critical factor. With
administrative mechanisms already strained in search, rescue and
rehabilitation operations, it was solely up to the existing health
infrastructure and personnel to cater to health needs and control
widespread outbreaks. Also, building up new systems like IDSP surveillance
and new logistic distribution mechanisms in absence of regular supply
chains and roadways proved to be challenging. It is therefore pertinent to
ensure that regular surveillance systems are well oiled and operational
way before any disaster strikes.
Note: Authors are staff members of UNICEF and
Government of Bihar.* The views expressed herein are those of the authors
and not necessarily reflect the views of UNICEF or Government of Bihar.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None stated.
References
1. Brief Bihar floods- Kosi region. From: http://disastermgmt.bih.nic.in/Downloads/Koshi-Flood-2008.pdf
and Kosi Calamity- rehabilitation and reconstruction policy downloaded
from http://disastermgmt.bih.nic.in/Downloads/Kosi-Rehabilitation-Policy.pdf.
Accessed on 21 September, 2009.
2. Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP),
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Available at
http://idsp.nic.in. Accessed on 20 September, 2009.
3. WHO/ UNICEF Joint Statement – Reducing measles
mortality in emergencies, Feb 2004. http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/WHO_
UNICEF_Measles_Emergencies.pdf. Accessed on 21 September, 2009.
4. Toole M, Waldman R. The public health aspects of
complex emergencies and refugee situations, Annu. Rev Public Health 1997;
18: 283-312.
5. Moss WJ, Ramakrishnan M, Storms D, Siegle AN, Weiss
WM, Lejne IL, Muhe L, Child health in complex emergencies. Bull World
Health Organ, 2006; 84: 58-64.
6. WHO/ UNICEF Joint Statement- global plan for
reducing measles mortality 2006-2010. From: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2005/WHO_IVB_05_11_eng.pdf.
Accessed on 21 September, 2009.
|
|
|
|