1.gif (1892 bytes)                      

Correspondence

Indian Pediatrics 2008; 45:944

Reply


We are happy that the guidelines have drawn this level of interest and welcome the tradition of healthy criticism. To bring out a consensus statement on this subject was a tremendous job for the committee due to diversity in practical approach at the institutional and individual levels. First of all we are thankful for pointing out the fact that arthralgia and increase PR intervals are not included as minor criteria in presence of arthritis and carditis, respectively. We regret this inadvertent mistake. Regarding the ASLO/ Anti DNAs B levels, it must be clarified that laboratory value prevalent in the geographical area must be defined and used. We have mentioned values available in literature. Leukocytosis is still retained as a part of acute phase reactant in WHO 2001 update and in current IAP guidelines though ESR and ASLO are more important. Leukocytosis has a role when ESR values are not reliable.

Many of other concerns were discussed in detail during discussion, like weight cut-off in relation to doses of benzathine penicillin G injection and its dosing schedule, doses of cephalexin and use of sulfa drugs etc. Hopefully, Cardiology chapter of IAP would be able to address these issues in near future.

Smita Mishra
Convener,
National Consultative meeting on ARF/RHD.
Email: [email protected]

 

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription