Letters to the Editor Indian Pediatrics 2003; 40:1100-1101 |
Polio Eradication in India |
Study of AFP line list for year 2002 from Rajasthan showed that some AFP cases had been discarded as non-polio cases even without 60 days follow up because stool samples were negative for wild polioviruses. There may be similar misclassifications from other parts of the country also. Thus there is under reporting of polio cases. According to the proposed timetable, IPV is to be introduced in year 2006. Dr. Jacob John had written about the VAPP burden of India. It is really baffling that he wants this unacceptable burden to continue for some more years. VAPP can be eliminated by stopping OPV altogether and starting IPV. Switch over from OPV to IPV can not be done overnight, but incidence of VAPP can be reduced by introducing IPV right now, for those who need it specifically or for those whose parents desire administration of IPV. Can polio be eradicated by the National Polio Eradication Program in its present form? It depends on the answer to the following question. Has any child developed polio after taking age appropriate number of OPV doses? If the answer is no, then we should find means for better and vigorous implementation of the present program. But, if the answer is yes, then there is a need for re-appraisal of the present program. The Committee should take three steps to move towards the cherished goal of polio eradication: 1. Find the reasons for high incidence of vaccine failure with OPV to take appropriate remedial measures. 2. Introduce IPV on selectives basis with immediate effect to reduce the incidence of VAPP. 3. Develop some modalities or methodology so that correct case classification of AFP cases is done and correct number of polio cases are known. If these or some other similar measures are not taken soon, polio eradication will remain a distant dream and we will have to postpone the deadline for polio eradication again and again on one or other pretext. Yash Paul, |
References |
|