Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
clinical case letter

Indian Pediatr 2021;58: 487-488

Diabetes Mellitus Due to Wolfram Syndrome Type 1 (DIDMOAD)


Bhawana Aggarwal,1 Rajni Sharma,1* Venkatesan Radha2 and Vandana Jain1

From Department of 1Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi;
2Department of Molecular Genetics, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai; India.
Email: [email protected]

 


Wolfram syndrome (WFS) type 1 is a monogenic disorder with autosomal recessive inheritance caused by mutations in WFS1, a gene (location 4p16.1) associated with endoplasmic reticulum function in neuronal and endocrine cells [1]. WFS is also known as DIDMOAD syndrome and is characterised by Diabetes insidipus (DI), Diabetes mellitus (DM), Optic atrophy (OA), and Deafness (D). Here, we report 5 unrelated Indian children presenting to us over the last 2 years with a referral diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), subsequently diagnosed to have DIDMOAD syndrome. We also highlight atypical presentations and early pointers to the disease.

A 9-year-old girl was diagnosed to have T1DM 2 years back and was on insulin therapy. She presented with decreased visual acuity and polyuria (urine output 4 L/day) that persisted despite good glycemic control. On evaluation, urine osmolality was 158 mosmol/L and serum osmolality was 302 mosmol /L. Urine osmolality increased to 280 mOsm/L with intravenous vaso-pressin suggestive of central DI. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain revealed an absent pituitary bright spot. Detailed evaluation revealed hydroureteronephrosis, neurogenic bladder, bilateral optic atrophy and bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Direct sequencing of WFS1 gene by Sanger method, revealed a novel homozygous variant frame shift mutation c.2486_2489dupTGGA (p.Glu830Asp*111) in exon 8. She was managed with oral desmopressin tablets, clean intermittent urinary catherization and continued on insulin therapy.

Five patients (3 males) with WFS type 1 were identified with the mean (SD) age of 11 (2) years. There was no family history or consanguinity in the parents. All patients had DM and OA. DI was present in 4 patients and hearing impairment and urological abnormalities in 3 patients each. All cases had normal stature except one, and all were pre-pubertal except case 3. Case 3 presented at 13 years with DM since 4 years, polyuria (despite adequate glycemia) and visual problems. Eye examination revealed optic atrophy and glaucoma. She was diagnosed to have central DI and started on desmopressin. On follow-up, she had delayed puberty (absent menarche till 16 years with SMR stage 3). The baseline gonadotropin levels were LH 1.09 mIU/mL and FSH 6.37 mIU/mL, and levels post-GnRH stimulation LH 20.6 mIU/mL and FSH 28.6 mIU/mL.

Thyroid function tests were done in all children and were found to be within normal limits. Case 3 reported compound heterozygous missense/frameshift mutation in exons 4/8 c.397G>A/c.1234_1237delGTCT (p.A133T/p.V412Sfs29). Case 2 revealed a homozygous deletion Exon 8 c.1525_1539 del15 (p.V509_Y513del) on genetic analysis by Sanger method and Case 4 revealed a novel homozygous variant missense mutation Exon 8 c.1372G>A (p.A458T). No mutation was identified in Case 5.

WFS is a rare neuro-degenerative autosomal recessive disease that was first described in 1938 [2]. Its prevalence was estimated to be 1 in 68,000 to 1 in 770,000 [2,3]. Apart from these common manifestations, screening for urological and psychological abnormalities, and endocrine disorders is paramount, as they often remain unnoticed, adding to disease morbidity. The minimum diagnostic criteria of WFS are the coincidence of early-onset DM and OA [2]. There is no effective treatment for this neurodegenerative disease with reports suggesting a median life expectancy of 30 years [2]. Death usually occurs from respiratory failure as a result of brain stem atrophy.

DM is usually the first manifestation of the disease. A multicentric study conducted by Rohayem, et al. [4] described notable differences between the diabetes of WFS and TIDM including earlier median age of onset of diabetes, less incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset, a much lower insulin requirement, rare micro-vascular complications, and absence of autoantibodies in the former. The mean (SD) age of diagnosis of DM in our study was 8.2 years (2) with none of patients having diabetic ketoacidosis at presentation.

Diabetes insipidus appears at an average age of 14 years and affects approximately 70% of patients [3]. About 80% of the patients in our study had DI, which is consistent with the literature. The diagnosis is often delayed as polyuria and polydipsia are overlapping symptoms of both DI and DM.

Patients with WFS demonstrate progressive optic atrophy that usually occurs after diagnosis of DM. Other ophthalmo-logical findings reported are colour vision deficits, cataract and pigmentary retinopathy [5]. All patients in our case series had optic atrophy, whereas glaucoma and cataract were present in two and one patient, respectively.

Bladder dysfunction in children and young adults with WFS is common and easily missed (only 30% symptomatic), and can be initial presenting feature as was seen with two of our cases. Structural and functional urinary tract abnormalities are commonly seen including atonic bladder, bladder-sphincter dyssynergia, hydro-ureteronephrosis, and recurrent urinary tract infections [6].

Patients with DIDMOAD have been reported to have growth failure due to defects in hypothalamic pituitary function [6] and hypogonadism, therefore follow-up of these patients is essential. Neurological complications generally appear in later life at a median age of 30 yrs (range 5-44yrs) and include truncal ataxia, loss of gag reflex, myoclonus, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy and central apnea [1]. Psychiatric manifestations including depression, psychosis and aggression are also common and should be screened for.

In conclusion, our case series highlights a lack of awareness among physicians about this entity, culminating into under and delayed diagnosis of this disorder. There is a need to have a high index of suspicion for the diagnosis of DIDMOAD syndrome in patients with T1DM presenting with other systemic involvement. Patients with DIDMOAD should be screened for other associated problems and require multi-disciplinary care [6]. Since this is a neurodegenerative disorder with poor prognosis, it is prudent to provide appropriate genetic counselling and offer prenatal diagnosis for prevention in future pregnancies.

Funding:  Cost of sequencing was funded by Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.

REFERENCES

1. Çelmeli G, Türkkahraman D, Çürek Y,  et al. Clinical and molecular genetic analysis in three children with Wolfram syndrome: A novel WFS1 mutation (c.2534T>A). J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2017;9:80-84.

2. Wolfram DJ. Diabetes mellitus and simple optic atrophy among siblings. Mayo Clin Proc. 1938;13:715-18.

3. Barrett TG, Bundey SE, Macleod AF. Neurodegeneration and diabetes: UK nationwide study of Wolfram (DIDMOAD) syndrome. Lancet. 1995;346:1458-63.

4. Rohayem J, Ehlers C, Wiedemann B, et al. Diabetes and neurodegeneration in Wolfram syndrome: A multicenter study of phenotype and genotype. Diab Care. 2011;34:1503-10.

5. Al-Till M, Jarrah NS, Ajlouni KM. Ophthalmologic findings in fifteen patients with Wolfram syndrome. Eur J Ophthal. 2002;12:84-8.

6. Simsek E, Simsek T, Tekgu S, et al. Wolfram (DIDMOAD) syndrome: A multidisciplinary clinical study in nine Turkish patients and review of the literature. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:55-61.


 

Copyright © 1999-2021 Indian Pediatrics