|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57: 292-293 |
 |
Nephrocalcinosis: Biochemical Evaluation and
Genetic Analysis
|
Menka Yadav and Arvind Bagga*
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of
Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Email:
[email protected]
|
Nephrocalcinosis, characterized by the deposition of calcium salts in
the renal parenchyma, is detected as diffuse renal calcifications on
high-resolution ultrasono-graphy or computed tomography. Patients
usually do not have symptoms or have features related to the underlying
etiology. Rarely, the disease may be severe enough to result in
metabolic dysfunction and end-stage renal disease.
The condition
may involve either cortical or medullary locations. Cortical
nephrocalcinosis is uncommon and results from damage to the renal
parenchyma, followed by dystrophic calcification [1]. It is described in
chronic glomerulonephritis, cortical necrosis, sickle cell disease,
malignancy and trauma. Medullary nephrocalcinosis is much more common
and arises from disturbances in calcium homeostasis, mineral
reabsorption in the thick ascending limb, or abnormal acid-base
regulation in the collecting duct. Medullary nephrocalcinosis is
diagnosed in 7-40% preterm neonates. Chief risk factors include
gestation <32 weeks and birthweight <1500 g [2]. Hypercalciuria might
result from acidosis, parenteral nutrition, medications (loop diuretics,
vitamin D, corticosteroids, methylxanthines), and high calcium and low
phosphorus intake. Nephrocalcinosis resolves by early childhood, while
low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and reduced concentrating capacity
may persist [2].
Compared to adults, children often show an
underlying metabolic disorder and higher risk of progression, with poor
renal function on follow-up [3]. It is, therefore, necessary to identify
the underlying cause, initiate therapy if possible, and provide
appropriate counseling. Clinical evaluation includes information on
prematurity, concomitant diseases, prior therapies, diet, fluid intake,
and family history. Careful biochemical evaluation of urine (on two or
more occasions) and blood is done to screen for common metabolic
disorders [4].
Distal renal tubular acidosis (RTA), varied causes
of hypercalciuria, and primary hyperoxaluria (PH) account for most
patients; 12.5% failed to show an etiology [5]. Another retrospective
series on 152 German patients showed that the chief causes were
idiopathic hypercalciuria (34%), primary tubular disorders (32%) and
vitamin D toxicity (8%) [6]. Similar findings were reported from other
European countries, showing distal RTA, Bartter syndrome, vitamin D
toxicity and idiopathic hyper-calciuria in the majority [7].
In
the current issue, Ramya, et al. [8] report the etiology in 54 children
with nephrocalcinosis managed at a single tertiary care center.
Following biochemical studies, the authors report dRTA in 18 (33.3%) and
PH in 9 (16.7%) children. There was high frequency of consanguinity
(50%), and more than a quarter of the patients had positive family
history of a similar illness. Standard biochemistry-based definitions
were used to define the etiologies; genetic confirmation was sought in
only 8 children. A significant proportion had hypercalciuria secondary
to RTA, Dent syndrome, Bartter syndrome, and hypomagnesemia. A cause was
not found in a minority, suggesting that systematic metabolic evaluation
helps in diagnosing the underlying illness in most patients with
nephrocalcinosis.
The report has some limitations [8]. First,
while the diagnosis of PH (based on oxalate excretion >40 mg/1.73 m2/d)
was made in 9 patients, genetic studies were done in only four. In the
absence of genetic confirmation, the possibility of enteric or dietary
hyperoxaluria cannot be excluded [9]. Secondly, the phenotype of PH
associated with mutations in AGXT, GRHPR and HOGA1 is variable, and has
reasonable implications for management. Therefore, the diagnosis of PH
must be confirmed by enzyme studies or genetic analysis. Patients with
specific AGXT mutations, p.Gly170Arg or p.Phe152Ile, respond well to
oral pyridoxine [10]. A precise diagnosis is always necessary for
patients to be enrolled in clinical trials using silencing RNA [11].
Disorders like distal RTA, Bartter syndrome, Lowe syndrome, Dent
disease, and cystinosis have characteristic phenotypes, enabling
relatively secure diagnosis. Our understanding of the genetic basis of
these disorders has considerably improved. Three new genes have been
described for distal RTA: WDR72, FOXI1 and ATP6V1C2. Mutations in these
genes produce a phenotype similar to that for previously known genes
(ATP6V0A4, ATP6V1B1 and SLC4A1) for this disease. Similarly, mutations
in multiple genes may result in Bartter syndrome with nephrocalcinosis
(SLC12A1, KCNJ1, CLCNKB, CaSR, MAGED2), hypomagnesemia with
hypercalciuria (CLDN16, CLDN19), Dent disease (CLCN5, OCRL1) and
hypophosphatemia with hypercalciuria (SLC34A1, SLC34A3) [3]. A clinical
diagnosis is also possible for other diseases, e.g., Fanconi-Bickel
syndrome (SLC2A2), 24-hydroxylase deficiency (CYP24A1) and hypercalcemia
with hypocalciuria (CaSR, GNA11, AP2S1). However, confirmation of
diagnoses by appropriate genetic studies is recommended, before
embarking in many instances for specific therapy. A number of conditions
including variants in ADCY10, SCL34A1 and CYP24A1 might present with
hypercalciuria alone, and misclassified as idiopathic hypercalciuria
unless genetic diagnosis is obtained, as might have occurred in the
current or previous studies.
Recently, the Hildebrandt group
showed that high-throughput screening for 30 genes enables diagnosis in
~15% patients with unresolved nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis [12]. The
group also reported that in a larger cohort, whole-exome sequencing
helped diagnose ~45% patients with nephrocalcinosis [12]. Higher
diagnostic yield was present in the young (58% in those <3 years),
positive family history (41%) and consanguinity (75%). Given the
proportion of subjects with positive family history and consanguinity,
the study by Ramya, et al. [8] would have benefited from detailed
genetic studies.
Children with nephrocalcinosis should be
referred to clinical units experienced in managing such patients.
Systematic biochemical screening is recommended for evaluating the
underlying cause [4]. Additional genetic diagnosis is useful for
confirming the etiology, and counseling parents regarding the likely
course of disease and future extrarenal manifestations. It also provides
an opportunity for prenatal diagnosis in future pregnancies. While
targeted therapies are available for many monogenic disorders,
phenotype-genotype correlation will allow patient stratification for
future studies. Given the need in most patients to screen for multiple
genes, we advise high-throughput genetic testing using the clinical
exome approach. Funding: Nil; Competing interests: None stated.
REFERENCES
1. Oliveira B, Kleta R,
Bockenhauer D, Walsh SB. Genetic, pathophysiological, and clinical
aspects of nephro-calcinosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;311:
F1243-52.
2. Schell-Feith EA, Kist-van Holthe JE, van der
Heijden AJ. Nephrocalcinosis in preterm neonates. Pediatr Nephrol.
2010;25:221-30.
3. Habbig S, Beck BB, Hoppe B. Nephrocalcinosis
and urolithiasis in children. Kidney Int. 2011;80:1278-91.
4.
Bagga A, Bajpai A, Menon S. Approach to renal tubular disorders. Indian
J Pediatr. 2005;72:771-6.
5. Mantan M, Bagga A, Virdi VS, Menon
S, Hari P. Etiology of nephrocalcinosis in northern Indian children.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22:829-33.
6. Rönnefarth G, Misselwitz J.
Nephrocalcinosis in children: A retrospective survey. Members of the
Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie. Pediatr Nephrol.
2000;14:1016-21.
7. Piccoli GB, De Pascale A, Randone O, Vigotti
FN, Priola AM, Naretto C, et al. Revisiting nephrocalcinosis: A
single-centre perspective. A northern Italian experience. Nephrology
(Carlton). 2016;21:97-107.
8. Ramya K, Krishnamurthy S,
Sivamurukan P. Etiological profile of nephrocalcinosis in children from
Southern India. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57:415-9.
9. Glew RH, Sun Y,
Horowitz BL, Konstantinov KN, Barry M, Fair JR, et al. Nephropathy in
dietary hyperoxaluria: A potentially preventable acute or chronic kidney
disease. World J Nephrol. 2014;3:122-42.
10. Monico CG, Olson
JB, Milliner DS. Implications of genotype and enzyme phenotype in
pyridoxine response of patients with type I primary hyperoxaluria. Am J
Nephrol. 2005;25:183-8.
11. Liebow A, Li X, Racie T, Hettinger
J, Bettencourt BR, Najafian N, et al. An investigational RNAi
therapeutic targeting glycolate oxidase reduces oxalate production in
models of primary hyperoxaluria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:494-503.
12. Daga A, Majmundar AJ, Braun DA, Gee HY, Lawson JA, Shril S, et
al. Whole exome sequencing frequently detects a monogenic cause in early
onset nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis. Kidney Int. 2018;93:204-13.
|
|
 |
|