|
Indian Pediatr 2019;56: 432 |
|
Clippings
Theme: Immunization
|
Vipin Vashishtha
Email:
[email protected]
|
|
Interventions to improve oral vaccine performance (Lancet
Infect Dis. 2019;19:203-14)
|
Oral vaccines underperform in low- and middle-income countries in
comparison to high-income countries. This systematic review and
meta-analysis aimed to assess efficacy of interventions designed to
increase oral vaccine efficacy or immunogenicity.
Of 2843 studies identified, 87 were eligible for
qualitative synthesis and 66 for meta-analysis. Twenty-two different
interventions were assessed for oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), oral
rotavirus vaccine (RVV), oral cholera vaccine (OCV), and oral typhoid
vaccines. There was generally high heterogeneity. Seroconversion to RVV
was significantly increased by delaying the first RVV dose by 4 weeks
(RR 1·37, 95% CI 1·16 to 1·62); for OPV, the seroconversion increased
with monovalent or bivalent vaccine compared with trivalent vaccine (RR
1·51, 95% CI 1·20 to 1·91). There was some evidence that separating RVV
and OPV increased RVV seroconversion (RR 1·21, 95% CI 1·00 to 1·47), and
that higher vaccine inoculum improved OCV seroconversion (RR 1·12, 95%
CI 1·00 to 1·26). There was no evidence of effect for anti-helminthics,
antibiotics, probiotics, zinc, vitamin A, withholding breastfeeding,
extra doses, or vaccine buffering.
Comments: Delayed RVV administration and altered
OPV valence were the only effective approaches identified from the
available evidence. The mechanism for increased immunogenicity when RVV
is delayed is probably a combination of a lesser degree of interference
from maternal antibodies and maturation of immune system. Delayed RVV
administration might also mitigate the inhibitory effect of OPV. There
is a need to change administration practices of RVV, particularly the
RV1 that is a purely human strain and more susceptible to maternal
antibodies than all other available RVVs.
|
|
Maternal pertussis immunization (Tdap) as the first infant
dose (Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:392-401)
|
In this open-label, parallel, randomized, controlled trial, pregnant
women aged 18-40 years from Netherlands received Tdap vaccination either
at 30-32 weeks of pregnancy (maternal Tdap group, n=58) or within
48 h after delivery (control group, n=60). Cord blood, and infant
blood samples were collected at age 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 11
months, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was serum IgG pertussis
toxin (PT) antibody concentrations at the age of 3 months.
The GMC of PT antibodies were higher in infants in
the maternal Tdap group than in the control group infants at age of 3
months (GMC ratio 16·6, 95% CI 10·9 to 25·2) and 2 months. However,
after primary vaccination, antibody concentrations for PT, FHA, and
pertactin were significantly lower at all time points in infants of the
maternal Tdap group than in infants in the control group, suggesting
maternal antibody interference in infant after primary and booster
vaccinations with Tdap.
Comments: The trial explores the possibility of
adding maternal pertussis immunization to the vaccination schedule as a
first infant dose in order to reduce the possibility of infection before
the first dose administered to the infant. However, it also suggests
that the infant vaccination needs to be delayed beyond 3 months of age,
in order to minimize interference with maternal antibodies. Introduction
of a delayed infant pertussis immunization schedule would place neonates
of unvaccinated women in a more vulnerable situation, and maternal
coverage needs to be higher to protect all babies from pertussis from
the first day of their life. Moreover, the study only addresses
vaccination schedules using acellular pertussis vaccines in
industrialized countries. The situation is completely different in LMICs
where whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines are used in primary vaccination
schedule and maternal immunization is still not well established. The
blunting effect of maternal Tdap on wP containing primary vaccine series
may be different from the findings in the current study.
|
|
Immunogenicity and safety of monovalent acellular pertussis
vaccine at birth (JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172: 1045-52)
|
This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 4 sites in Australia to
compare IgG antibody responses to vaccine antigens at 6, 10, 24, and 32
weeks of age between newborn infants receiving the monovalent acellular
pertussis (aP) vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) or HBV alone. At 6,
16, and 24 weeks, infants received a hexavalent vaccine with IPV, as
well as the PCV-10.
A total of 440 infants were randomized to receive the
aP vaccine plus HBV (n = 221) or HBV only (control group, n=219).
At 10 weeks, 192 of 206 infants who received the aP vaccine (93.2%) had
detectable antibodies to both pertussis toxin (PT) and pertactin vs
98 of 193 infants in the control group (50.8%) (P< .001), with
the geometric mean concentration (GMT) for PT IgG 4-fold higher among
the group that received the aP vaccine. At age 32 weeks, all infants who
received the aP vaccine at birth had detectable PT IgG and significantly
lower IgG GMT for Hib, hepatitis B, diphtheria and tetanus antibodies.
Comments: The time between birth and initiation of
the primary pertussis vaccination series at 6 to 8 weeks of age is the
period of the greatest morbidity and mortality associated with pertussis
disease. This study demonstrates that monovalent aP vaccine is
immunogenic and safe in neonates, and may prove valuable for newborns
whose mothers did not receive the Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. A birth
dose of aP vaccine would significantly narrow the immunity gap between
birth and 3 months of age, marking the critical period when infants are
most vulnerable to severe pertussis infection. Thus, now we have two
approaches to provide immunity cover to very young infants against
pertussis – the maternal Tdap and aP at birth. Which one is superior?
Can we utilize both the approaches in a synergistic way? However, both
the options have undesirable impact on future infant immunization. The
blunting effect of maternal Tdap on infant pertussis vaccination
schedule even after booster dose, and the significantly reduced GMCs of
the concomitantly administered antigens at 32 weeks with birth aP, are
two main concerns. Furthermore, there is some evidence of a lower
pertussis antibody level after completion of the primary vaccine series
in infants born to mothers who had received Tdap within the 5 years
prior to delivery.
|
|
|
|