|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 444 |
|
Clippings
Theme: Immunization
|
Vipin M Vashishtha
Email:
[email protected]
|
|
Immunogenicity and safety of Takeda’s tetravalent dengue vaccine
(TDV) in healthy children in Asia and Latin America (Lancet
Infect Dis. 2018;18:162-70).
|
This study presents 18-month interim data of Takeda’s tetravalent dengue
vaccine (TDV) candidate from an ongoing phase-2, multicentre,
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at three sites in the
Dominican Republic, Panama and the Philippines to assess the
immunogenicity and safety over 48 months in healthy children aged 2-17
years. 1800 children were randomly assigned to receive either two TDV
doses 3 months apart (group 1), one TDV dose (group 2), one TDV dose and
a booster dose 1 year later (group 3), or placebo (group 4).
Antibody titers remained elevated 18 months after
vaccination in all TDV groups against all four dengue serotypes,
irrespective of baseline dengue serostatus. Limited differences were
observed between groups 1 and 2. In baseline-seronegative participants,
a 1-year booster increased antibody titers. Vaccine-related unsolicited
adverse events occurred in 14 (2%) of 562 participants, but no
vaccine-related serious adverse events were observed. Symptomatic,
virologically-confirmed dengue was recorded in 21 (1.3%) of 1596
participants vaccinated with TDV compared with 9 (4.5%) of 198 placebo
recipients.
Comments: The need for a second generation, more
refined Dengue vaccine cannot be overstated considering the huge burden
of the disease and the unsatisfactory performance of the
first-generation dengue vaccine, Dengvaxia. In the Takeda’s trial, the
serostatus at the time of vaccination was measured, but follow-up is too
short to detect risks associated with being seronegative. For licensure,
in the absence of an accepted correlate of protection or risk, the
immunogenicity study will not suffice and the efficacy will need to be
demonstrated based on clinical outcomes collected over multiple dengue
seasons that support durable benefit.
|
|
Can single dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine prevent
cervical cancer? (Vaccine. 2018 Mar 15. pii:
S0264-410X(18)30286-X).
|
In a multi-center cluster randomized trial of two vs three doses
of quadrivalent human papilloma virus (qHPV) vaccine in India,
suspension of the vaccination led to per protocol and partial
vaccination of 10-18/ year old girls leading to four study groups, two
by design and two by default. Of the 17,729 vaccinated girls, 4348 (25%)
received three doses on days 1, 60, 180 or later, 4979 (28%) received
two doses on days 1 and 180 or later, 3452 (19%) received two doses on
days 1 and 60, and 4950 (28%) received one dose. One dose recipients
demonstrated a robust and sustained immune response against HPV 16 and
18, albeit inferior to that of 3- or 2-doses, and the antibody levels
were stable over a 4-year period. The frequencies of cumulative incident
and persistent HPV 16 and 18 infections up to 7-years of follow-up were
similar and uniformly low in all the vaccinated study groups; the
frequency of HPV 16 and 18 infections were significantly higher in
unvaccinated age-matched control women than among vaccine recipients.
The researchers conclude that a single dose of HPV vaccine is
immunogenic and provides lasting protection against HPV 16 and 18
infections similar to the three- and two-dose vaccine schedules.
Comments: The single-dose schedule would
not only be more economical but would have programmatic advantages over
multiple-dose schedule. Though the above study has some limitations like
the participants were not randomized nor blinded to the number of doses
received, the distribution of the participants by the study sites was
different across the vaccinated dose groups. In fact, the trial was not
designed in the first place to prospectively assess the effectiveness of
one-dose of HPV vaccine. Nevertheless, this trial has significant number
of participants (around 5000) than other single dose trials. More trials
with longer follow-ups on HPV infection and cervical precancerous
lesions are needed before single-dose schedule replace the existing
ones.
|
|
Immunogenicity and safety of a novel liquid
hexavalent DTwP-Hib/Hep B-IPV vaccine to licensed combination
vaccines in healthy infants (Vaccine. 2018;36:2378-84).
|
Immunogenicity and safety of a newly developed liquid DTwP-Hib/HepB-IPV
hexavalent vaccine (EasySix) was evaluated and compared with
administration of licensed Pentavac SD (DTwP-HepB/Hib) and Imovax Polio
(IPV) vaccine among 284 participants, aged 6–10 weeks in an open-label,
randomized multi-centric trial.
Post-vaccination, seroprotection was achieved against
all six vaccine antigens in both vaccine groups. The seroresponse rate
and antibody titers for all vaccine components were comparable between
two groups. Both vaccines had similar reactogenicity profiles and were
well tolerated; all adverse events resolved completely without any
sequelae. Only one serious adverse event was reported that completely
resolved; it was regarded unconnected to the vaccine administered. This
study demonstrated that immunogenicity and safety profiles of this new
combination vaccine are non-inferior to the commercially available
vaccines.
Comments: This combination vaccine is the
only available hexavalent vaccine employing whole-cell pertussis (wP)
antigen in Indian market. Though the reported seroconversion rates for
the pertussis component was slightly lower (around 68% and 76% for
pertussis IgG and anti-PT, respectively) than other antigens, but was
comparable to the comparator vaccine’s figures. In an earlier trial of a
pentavalent vaccine from the same manufacturer, almost similar titers
were reported for the pertussis component (65% and 72%). However,
relying solely on immunogenicity data for pertussis efficacy/protection
would not be an ideal way since till date no known single correlate of
protection for pertussis exists, nor any established protective antibody
levels are known.
|
|
|
|