|
Indian Pediatr 2016;53: 427 -428 |
 |
Delayed Diagnosis of Dopa-responsive Dystonia
in Two Siblings
|
Rahul Jain, Bhaskar Shukla and Medha Mittal
From Department of Pediatrics, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, Geeta
Colony, Delhi, India
Correspondence to: Dr Rahul Jain, 61 A, DDA Flats, Phase 1, Qutab
Enclave, New Delhi 110 016, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: September 19, 2015;
Initial review: October 26, 2015;
Accepted: March 08, 2016,
|
Background: Dopa responsive
dystonia is characterized by progressive disabling dystonia, diurnal
variation and a dramatic response to Levodopa. Case characteristics:
Two siblings presented with regression of motor milestones and
hypertonia in lower limbs. History of diurnal variation was present in
elder sibling. Outcome: Both responded dramatically to Levodopa.
The genomic DNA analysis of elder sibling revealed a novel mutation.
Message: A trial of Levodopa should be considered in a child with
motor regression with diurnal variation, in the presence of
extrapyramidal features.
Keywords: Dystonic disorders, Extrapyramidal
features, Levodopa, Parplegia.
|
Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) or Segawa disease
is a rare inherited disease that presents with progressive disabling
dystonia at variable ages. A typical feature of this condition that
differentiates it from other primary dystonias is diurnal variation,
with worsening of symptoms as the day progresses. Dramatic response to
levodopa is another characteristic feature [1,2].
Although dystonia is a primary feature, some children
have predominant hypertonia with hyperreflexia involving lower limbs,
thus mimicking diplegic cerebral palsy, hereditary spastic paraplegia or
a neuro-degenerative disorder [3-9]. We herein present a report of two
siblings with unusual presentation and having a novel mutation.
Case Report
A 4-year-6-month-old female presented with inability
to sit straight and walk for last 3 years. She was a product of
non-consanguineous marriage with an uneventful perinatal history. She
achieved sitting balance at six month of age; however, intermittent
tremors were noted in the head while sitting and in the legs while lying
down. She achieved walking with support at the age of 10 months, but
over next two months she started having frequent falls. In another two
months she could not walk, and while sitting, she was noted to have
forwards or backwards bending of body with forward bending of head. She
continued to be the same till the time of presentation. She was able to
use her hands though the movements were slow. Her cognitive and speech
domains remained unaffected; though, speech was slow with difficulty in
initiating words. At around 3 years of age, she could walk with support,
crawl and sit upright for around 30 minutes, immediately after waking up
in the morning. She could also do the same for few minutes after a
daytime nap.
On examination, the child could sit with trunk bent
forwards and head falling forwards. She could lift her head
intermittently on command. Speech was intelligible but slow. There were
intermittent resting tremors of the head and lower limbs. Cranial nerve
examination was normal. Tone was increased bilaterally in lower limbs,
especially in tendoachilles muscles with bilaterally brisk deep tendon
reflexes and extensor planter responses.
The younger sibling, a 2-year-11-month-old female was
also noted to have tremors involving lower limbs and head at the age of
4-5 months. Sitting balance was achieved at 9 months of age but there
were frequent falls while sitting and mild forward bending of back with
neck bent backwards or sideways. She could walk with support at 12
months with back and neck bent. There was no further gain in motor
milestones. Her speech and cognition were also normal. No diurnal
variation was noted. On examination, toe walking was present with
hypertonia and brisk deep tendon reflexes in lower limbs.
Over the years, both siblings had visited many
physicians, with the diagnosis of cerebral palsy mentioned by some. A
third sibling, a 14-months-old-male was presently normal. In view of the
clinical findings, a differential diagnosis of hereditary spastic
paraplegia and white matter disease was considered and investigations
were planned. MRI brain and nerve conduction studies of both siblings
were essentially normal. Results of serum lactate levels, blood tandem
mass spectrometry, and urinary gas chromatography mass spectrometry were
also normal.
In view of lower limb lead-pipe type of rigidity,
with dystonia of neck and trunk resulting in bending, along with diurnal
variation in elder sibling, and presence of tremors, a possibility of
DOPA-responsive dystonia was considered and a trial of Levodopa 0.4
mg/kg (with Carbidopa) was given to elder sibling. Within days of
therapy, she started standing without support and walk with support;
though, some abnormal movements were noted. On a follow-up 5 days after
starting Dopa, she had generalized chorea. On same treatment the chorea
disappeared within 10 days. She subsequently showed rapid gain in motor
milestones and examination revealed only mild rigidity of tendo-achilles
with normal deep tendon reflexes. After 6 weeks, the dose of Levodopa
was increased to 0.6 mg/kg. Within next 4 weeks, the child could do all
the activities comparable to her peers. The younger sibling also showed
a similar response to levodopa though there was no chorea. At 21 months
after diagnosis, both children are attending school with age-appropriate
development.
The elder sibling’s blood sample was sent for genomic
DNA analysis for mutation in GTP Cyclohydrolase1 gene (DYT-5)
by gene sequencing. Heterozygosity for the allele P.K 160 E was
detected. This was a novel variation, predicted to be damaging by the
bioinformatics software Mutation Taster.
Discussion
This report highlights the need to consider Dopa-responsive
dystonia as a differential diagnosis and elicit a history of diurnal
variation, whenever a child presents with motor regression with
hypertonia involving lower limbs. The presence of early tremors and
neck/truncal dystonia should also alert the physician to the
extrapyramidal origin of the disease. The dramatic response of this
severely disabling condition to Levodopa makes it critical to diagnose.
DRD is an autosomal dominant disease caused by GTP
cyclohydrolase deficiency 1 (GCH1) due to heterozygous mutation of
GCH1 gene on chromosome 14q22.1 to q22.2. More than 100 mutations
have been identified in the coding region of the causative gene;
however, around 40% patients have no known mutations [1,10]. About 30
percent cases are sporadic occurring due to de novo mutations
[9]. The penetrance of this condition is low (30-40%) with a female
preponderance in the ratio of 2-3:1 [1]. This probably explains the
occurrence of this condition in only two female siblings of this family.
Rarely, some patients of DRD manifest mainly as rigidity of lower limbs
with hyperreflexia and ankle clonus mimicking spasticity. There are
reports of children presenting with tip-toe walking and a misdiagnosis
of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Other common misdiagnoses are
hereditary spastic paraparesis and neurodegenerative disorder [3-9].
To conclude, a high index of suspicion for Dopa
responsive dystonia should be there whenever one encounters a case of
"atypical" cerebral palsy. The dramatic response to Levodopa confirms
the diagnosis in all cases.
Contributors: All the authors were involved in
management of case, review of literature and drafting of the manuscript.
RJ: prepared the final draft. The final version was approved by all
authors.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
References
1. Segawa M. Autosomal dominant GTP cyclohydrolase I
(AD GCH 1) deficiency (Segawa disease, dystonia 5; DYT 5). Chang Gung
Med J. 2009;32:1-11.
2. Lee WW, Jeon BS. Clinical spectrum of dopa-responsive
dystonia and related disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014;14:461-9.
3. Nygaard TG, Waran SP, Levine RA, Naini AB,
Chutorian AM. Dopa-responsive dystonia simulating cerebral palsy.
Pediatr Neurol. 1994;11:236-40.
4. Jan MM. Misdiagnoses in children with dopa-responsive
dystonia. Pediatr Neurol. 2004;31:298-303.
5. Boyd K, Patterson V. Dopa responsive dystonia: A
treatable condition misdiagnosed as cerebral palsy. BMJ.
1989;298:1019-20.
6. Fink JK, Filling-Katz MR, Barton NW, Macrae PR,
Hallett M, Cohen WE. Treatable dystonia presenting as spastic cerebral
palsy. Pediatrics. 1988;82:137-8.
7. Lee JH, Ki CS, Kim DS, Cho JW, Park KP, Kim S.
Dopa-responsive dystonia with a novel initiation codon mutation in the
GCH1 gene misdiagnosed as cerebral palsy. J Korean Med Sci.
2011;26:1244-6.
8. Nygaard TG, Waran SP, Levine RA, Naini AB,
Chutorian AM. Dopa-responsive dystonia simulating cerebral palsy.
Pediatr Neurol. 1994;11:236-40.
9. Nygaard TG, Marsden CD, Fahn S. Dopa-responsive
dystonia: Long-term treatment response and prognosis. Neurology.
1991;41:174-81.
10. Furukawa Y, Lang AE, Trugman JM, Bird TD, Hunter
A, Sadeh M, et al. Gender-related penetrance and de novo GTP-cyclohydrolase
I gene mutations in dopa-responsive dystonia. Neurology.
1998;50:1015-20.
|
|
 |
|