|
Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 423-424 |
|
Contact Dermatitis With Henna Tattoo |
Nevin Uzuner, Duygu Olmez, Arzu Babayigit and *Ozlem
Vayvada
From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy
and *Dermatology, Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine,
Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.
Corresponence to: Nevin Uzuner, Dokuz Eylul University,
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy,
Inciralti, 35340, Izmir, Turkey. E-mail:
[email protected]
Manuscript received: July 5, 2007;
Review completed: December 11, 2007;
Accepted: May 14, 2008.
|
Abstract
Allergic and irritant reactions to henna are rare.
Para-phenylenediamine, which is sometimes added to obtain a dark,
blackish henna, causes the majority of contact dermatitis reported
related with tattoos. Allergic contact dermatitis due to temporary
paint-on tattoo with black henna is described in two adolescents.
Key words: Allergy, Contact dermatitis, Henna tattoo, Para-phenylenediamine.
|
Temporary henna tattoos are becoming
popular, especially among teenagers(1). The use of henna dye is also
traditional in Islamic countries(2). Henna is a greenish powder made from
the leaves of Lawsonia alba containing lawsone (2 hydroxyl-1,
4-naphtho-quinone) as the active substance(1). It is used alone or in
combination with other coloring agents, such as para-phenylenediamine (PPD)(2).
Allergic and irritant reactions to henna are rare(3,4). PPD, which is
sometimes added to obtain a dark, blackish henna, causes the majority of
contact dermatitis reported with tattoos(5). We describe allergic contact
dermatitis due to temporary paint-on tattoo with black henna in two
adolescents.
Case Report
Case 1: A healthy 15 year old boy was referred to
our clinic for an erythematous and edematous reaction localized on the
left arm which had appeared 20 days prior to admission. To acquire a
temporary tattoo, he applied black henna containing PPD to his left arm
using a brush and then outlined the figure with a pencil. The boy waited
until the henna was dried and after rinsing it with water, he tried to
remove the figure by brushing firmly. Within 48 hours, he developed an
acute allergic contact dermatitis reaction with pruritis, pain, edema and
erythema on the tattoo site (Fig.1). The patient had no
previous medical history of atopy or known PPD exposure. The
cutaneous examination showed a well-demarcated, indurated, erythematous
papulovesicular eruption within the borders of the tattoo on the flexural
site of the left arm. Topical treatment with methylprednisolone aseponat
0.1% cream and oral hydroxyzine 100 mg/day were administered. Parenteral
methylprednisolone 20 mg/day was also added since the symptoms persisted.
The systemic steroid was discontinued on the third day of the treatment
due to the adverse gastrointestinal effects. The lesions cleared without
residual pigmentation after three weeks of therapy. The patient was patch
tested with European standard series after the lesions were healed
completely. The results of the patch test were evaluated after 48, 72 and
96 hours. A strongly positive reaction to para-phenylenediamine (PPD)
(+++) and negative reaction to pure henna were observed.
|
Fig.1 Acute allergic contact dermatitis on
the tattoo site. |
Case 2: A 14-year old boy was referred to
our hospital for an itchy erythematous and edematous lesion, strictly
located at the side of a temporary tattoo on his left forearm. The tattoo
had been stained with a black henna powder which had PPD in its contents
and within 48 hours, he developed an acute allergic contact dermatitis
reaction with erythema, edema and vesiculation on the tattoo site (Fig.2).
He reported the appearance of slight eczema within one week after he had
had a temporary tattoo four years before. After the application of topical
steroids (methylprednisolone aceponate) and oral certirizine for 10 days,
the lesion resolved completely. Patch test was recommended but refused by
the patient.
|
Fig.2 Erythema, edema and vesiculation on
the tattoo site. |
Discussion
Decorating the skin with henna tattoos has become
popular in recent years because the tattoos are temporary and the process
is painless and cheap. However, the addition of coloring chemical agents
such as PPD and p-toluidenediamine to the traditional mixture may lead to
a risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis(6). Allergic contact
dermatitis, which is a type IV delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction,
develops in at least 7-10 days when a new antigen is introduced(7). One
possible explanation for the short incubation period in the first patient
is that the patient had been sensitized to PPD. Considering this was the
subject’s first known exposure to henna, we think that the dermatitis was
caused due to active sensitization. Very short sensitization period is
possibly due to the potency of PPD, as reported by some authors(8,9) and
also due to the enhanced penetration of the substance by brushing. In the
second case, allergic contact dermatitis was probably due to PPD but we
could not confirm it with patch test.
We recommend that the use of temporary henna tattoos
should be discouraged, especially in children. Physicians and general
public should urgently be informed about the risks of temporary tatooing
with henna and PPD.
Contributors: All authors contributed to diagnosis,
literature review and drafting the paper.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None stated.
References
1. Nigam PK, Saxena AK. Allergic contact dermatitis
from henna. Contact Derm 1988; 18: 55-56.
2. Abdulla KA, Davidson NM. A woman who collapsed after
painting her soles. Lancet 1996; 348: 658.
3. Sidbury R, Storrs FJ. Pruritic eruption at the site
of a temporary tattoo. Am J Contact Derm 2000; 11:182-183.
4. Etienne A, Piletta P, Hauser C, Pasche-Koo F.
Ectopic contact dermatitis from henna. Contact Derm 1997; 37:183.
5. Lestringant GG, Bener A, Frossard PM. Cutaneous
reactions to henna and associated additives. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141:
598-600.
6. Chung WH, Wang CM, Hong HS. Allergic contact
dermatitis to temporary tattoos with positive para-phenylenediamine
reactions: report of four cases. Int J Dermatol 2001; 40: 754-756.
7. Rietschel R, Fowler J Jr. The pathogenesis of
allergic contact hypersensitivity. In: Rietschel R, Fowler J Jr, eds.
Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p.1-10.
8. DeVos S, Van der Valk P. The risk of active
sensitization to PPD. Contact Derm 2001; 44: 273-275.
9. Wolf R, Wolf D, Matz G, Orion
E. Cutaneous reactions to temporary tattoos. Dermatol Online 2003; 9: 3.
|
|
|
|