Letters to the Editor Indian Pediatrics 2004; 41:515-516 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basal and Stimulated Growth Hormone Levels in Children with Cirrhotic Disorders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We at our center evaluated the basal and stimulated GH levels in children with cirrhosis of liver. Fifteen prepubertal children diagnosed to have cirrhosis of liver and seven children (age range of 5-l1 years) with non-GH deficient short stature as controls, were studied. The clinical and biochemical characteristics of the two groups are given in Table 1. Liver functions were marginally elevated in study group and were grouped under Childs’ class ‘A’ in terms of hepatic-functional reserve. Control group had normal GH response to provocative stimuli (bromocriptin and clonidine), GH response was significantly lower in study group than in controls. Blunted GH response (rise in level of GH <10 ng/mL) was found in 80% of patients with bromocriptin and 60% of patients with clonidine and none in control group. TABLE I Mean±SD of Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics in Study and Control Group.
* P = 0.008, † P = 0.025. Impaired liver function is known to cause decrease in somatomedin secretion and in turn lead to higher GH secretion through negative feedback mechanism. Since these patients may also be nutritionally deficient, raised GH levels might be an attempt to improve the aminoacid utilization and protein synthesis, as observed in protein calorie malnutrition(4). But the blunted GH response to provocative stimuli observed in our patients may be due to dysregulation of hypothalamo-pituitary-IGF axis to provoca-tive stimuli and also liver function derange-ment is not so severe to cause raised basal and stimulated GH levels. Finally there could be unidentified factors that affect the GH responsiveness to provocative stimuli acting through different regulatory pathways of GH secretion namely dopaminergic pathway, cholinergic pathway etc. So keeping aside, well known limitations of provocative GH testing, this blunted response of GH levels would have probably made more sense in light of serum IGF-1 estimation. Since GH resistance in liver disorders is observed with progression of liver disease, therapeutic response to GH therapy would be confounded by GH resistance in them, and this may be relevant to use of GH therapy in cirrhotic children(5,6). Our observations make it imperative to consider dysregulation of GH secretion and not the GH insensitivity in children with cirrhosis of liver at least in early stage of the disease. The standard GH therapy might be beneficial in these children. Biplab Bandhyopadhyay,
|