|
Indian Pediatr 2021;58:259-265 |
 |
Psychogenic
Nonepileptic Seizures in Children and Adolescents
|
Hema Patel, 1 Hillary Blake2 and David
Dunn3
From Department of 1Neurology, Section of Pediatric Neurology,
Children’s Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin;
2Clinical Psychiatry, Section of Child Psychology, Indiana University
School of Medicine; and 3Psychiatry and Neurology,
Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University Medical Center; USA.
Correspondence to: Dr Hema Patel, Professor, Clinical Neurology,
Department of Pediatric Neurology, 999, North 92nd Street, Suite 540,
Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Email: [email protected]
|
Context: Though psychogenic non-epileptic
seizures (PNES) are seen commonly during evaluation of children and
adolescents with epilepsy, the literature regarding developmental
changes in PNES is limited. Evidence Acquisition: Literature
search was conducted in PubMed. Key search terms included: Pseudoseizure*
OR PNES OR [(non-epileptic or nonepileptic or psychogenic or
non-epileptic attack disorder) AND (seizure*)], resulting in 3,236
articles. Filters included human, ages 1-18 years, English language and
last 15 years (2004-2019), resulting in 533 articles. We reviewed 33
articles, which included 19 articles that involved children (1-18
years), with 10 or more children with PNES in their study group. 21
articles obtained in cross references that were outside the filter
setting (including time frame and age range) were also reviewed, for a
total of 54 articles. Results: Majority of the studies were
retrospective. We detail clinical features, predisposing factors and
appropriate workup for children and adolescents with possible PNES.
There is no consensus regarding frequency of psychiatric comorbidities
in children with PNES. No controlled trials of treatment of PNES in
children are available, but cognitive behavioral therapy is the
consensus for adult PNES. Outcome appears to be better in children with
PNES. Conclusions: There is a need for be long-term prospective
studies to document various clinical features and outcome of pediatric
and adolescent PNES, and also the comorbid conditions.
Keywords: Psychogenic seizures, PNES.
|
P sychogenic nonepileptic seizures
(PNES) are a common problem in children and adolescents. They
pose difficulties to the pediatrician because of diagnostic
uncertainties. PNES are frequently difficult to distinguish from
epileptic seizures on clinical grounds. The consequences of
misdiagnosing PNES as epileptic seizures are significant.
Financial ramifications include the expense of inappropriate,
unnecessary costly treatments and needless emergency room visits
or hospitalizations. Risk for iatrogenic complications include
the adverse effects of unnecessary medications and exposure to
invasive procedures such as intubation for management of
prolonged events (nonepileptic/pseudo-status epilepticus).
Psychosocial sequelae include strain on interpersonal and family
dynamics. Most importantly, misdiagnosis results in delay in
initiating the much needed psychiatric treatment and may
contribute to a poor outcome.
PNES has been described extensively in
adults. There remains a relative paucity of literature in the
pediatric age. There has been recent progress in understanding
the etiology of PNES and in defining appropriate treatments.
Unfortunately, most of these studies have been done in adults
with PNES
Few studies have assessed the semiology of
PNES exclusively in children and even fewer more recent studies
have reported differences in the clinical features of PNES
between younger children and adolescents, with respect to the
semiology of the episodes and types of stressors [1,2]. Studies
pertaining to PNES in children reported over the past 15 years
have been listed in Web Table I.
In this review, we will discuss the clinical
manifestations, predisposing factors, and appropriate workup for
children and adolescents with possible PNES. We will review the
recent literature on semiology, etiology, and treatment,
particularly pertaining to children and adolescents.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Definitions
Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are
defined as paroxysmal events of altered movement or behavior
that resemble epileptic seizures but are not due to cerebral
neuronal dysfunction and are not associated with epileptiform
abnormalities on the electroencephalogram (EEG) [3]. They are
related to an underlying psychogenic process, thus differing
from other paroxysmal nonepileptic events that are physiologic
in origin.
A variety of terms have been used in the
literature to describe PNES. Previously used terms such as
hysteroepilepsy, pseudoseizures and pseudoepileptic or
nonphysiologic seizures are considered pejorative or
inappropriate, and have been replaced by more contemporary terms
such as nonepileptic attacks, nonepileptic attack disorder and
psychogenic nonepil-eptic seizures (PNES).
In the DSM-5 [4], they are listed in the
somatic symptoms disorder section as conversion disorder or
functional neurological symptom disorder with attacks. The term
dissociative convulsions is used in the ICD 10 [5]. The term
PNES, is non-judgmental, and is recommended as the preferred
term to be used [6].
Demographics
PNES are common and seen in all age groups.
The prevalence of PNES in the general population is estimated to
be 2-33/100,000 [7]. They represent 5-20% of outpatient adult
epilepsy clinics and 10%-20% of referrals to adult epilepsy
centers [7]. However, reported estimates of the incidence or
prevalence of PNES may represent an underestimation, as these
reports include only cases for which the diagnosis was confirmed
by video-electroencephalography (VEEG) [8].
There are no studies of prevalence or
incidence of PNES in children. 3.5-20% of children undergoing
VEEG monitoring [1,2,9] have PNES and it has been reported in
11-38% of children with all types of paroxysmal non-epileptic
events [10,11].
PNES are seen in all age groups. The average
age at diagnosis of PNES in children in India was 8 years [12]
to 12 years [13], and the average delay in diagnosis was 5
months [14] to 3 years [13]. Overall, there is no significant
difference in the demographics of age of onset and delay in
diagnosis in the reports from India versus those from the
Western world.
PNES are more common in adolescents than in
children [15,16]. There is a female preponderance more apparent
in adults and adolescents than in children [12,13,17]. Many of
these children are given a diagnosis of epilepsy and are
mistakenly placed on anti-seizure medications.
CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS
A definitive diagnosis of PNES can be secured
if the patient satisfies the ‘rule of 2s’ consisting of the
following three criteria, which yields a positive predictive
value of 85% [18,19]:
i) At least 2 PNES per week;
ii) Refractory to at least 2
antiepileptic medications; and
iii) At least 2 EEGs without
epileptiform abnormalities.
Accurate and prompt diagnosis of PNES can be
a challenging task, especially since a proportion of these
patients also have epilepsy. A detailed history is critical and
important part of the evaluation. The interview should be
customized accordingly.
PNES share some unique common features. These
include frequent attacks that have not responded to appropriate
medication, specific triggers (e.g. presence of stressors),
occurrence of events only when spectators are present and
recurrence in a particular setting. A detailed description of
the episode by an eye witness or the patient should be obtained.
The ready availability of smart phones and other digital
recording devices allow for easy acquisition of video recordings
as a useful tool in early diagnosis. Observation of the episode
at bedside, or in the clinic by the physician aids in
differentiating PNES from epileptic seizures and other
paroxysmal non-epileptic events.
History of provoking factors, triggers or
stressors of the events and associated psychiatric, neurologic
and medical disorders should be obtained. There may also be
presence of varied symptoms suggesting somatization.
Predisposing Factors (Stressors, Triggers)
A variety of risk factors have been
identified as the etiologic basis of PNES. The most common risk
factors in the pediatric age group are school related problems,
seen in 21-46% of cases [1,14], reported more frequently in the
adolescent age group [1,20] and exposure of the child to family
dysfunction including parental divorce, sibling hostility and
financial stress seen in 42-48% cases [1,14]. Interpersonal
conflicts with teachers, peers and friends [1,20] are also seen
frequently.
Physical and sexual abuse is reported less
frequently in children, ranging from 0-32%, in contrast to a
much higher frequency in adults [1,14,16,20,21]. Bereavement has
been reported more frequently in adolescents [1]. One study
reported a higher rate of suicidal attempts (13.5%) [16].
Self-related problems such as low self-esteem, body image issues
and dependency, have also been reported [1,14].
Associated Psychiatric, Neurologic and
Medical Disorders
Psychiatric comorbidity is common in
children, adolescents, and adults with PNES. In patients of all
age groups with PNES, emotional problems have been reported with
varying frequency, from 13.8% to 84% [1,12,14-16,22]. The range
may be due to differences in assessment for psychiatric
comorbidity. Only a limited number of studies used structured
interviews or standard measures.
Depression and anxiety are most common
associated psychiatric disorders.in adults with PNES. There is
controversy regarding the prevalence of these psychopathologies
in children with PNES. In children, major depression ranges from
2.5% [14] to 45% [1,16,22-24]. It is more common in the
adolescent age group [1]. Anxiety disorders have also been
reported with varying frequencies from 16% [13] to 83% [24].
Bipolar and dysthymic disorder [21], adjustment disorder (8.8%)
[14], panic disorder (2.5%) [14], post-traumatic stress disorder
[24], separation anxiety and disruptive behavioral problems such
as temper tantrums and aggressive behavior have also been
reported [1]. Overall, it appears that, in Indian literature,
the reported percentages for psychiatric disorders in children
with PNES are lower [12-14]. This may be related to cultural
differences, variability in referral patterns and limitations
related to easy accessibility of psychiatric evaluations in
children.
Concurrent epilepsy is seen commonly,
occurring with varying frequency from 15-90 % [1,13,15,16] with
higher rates noted in children younger than 12 years [1]. Family
history of epilepsy is a common finding seen in 25%-43% of
patients [1,15]. It is thought that observation of a seizure in
a family member may serve as a behavioral model for the child to
shape expression of their own conversion symptoms. Frequently,
these patients are mistakenly started on anti-seizure
medications, and a large percentage ranging from 35-79% were
reported to be unnecessarily treated. [1,13,14,25].
Pseudo-status epilepticus may occur and was
reported in one study in 13.5% children with PNES [1]. This is a
serious problem as it can be associated with iatrogenic
complications and considerable distress to the child and family.
Coexisting neurologic illness has been
reported in almost half of the children (55%), most frequently
cognitive dysfunction (39%) which was significantly more common
in the younger children (P<0.0001). Less frequent
associated conditions include attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (20.3%), headaches (19%) and past head trauma (10%)
[1].
Medical comorbidities have been reported in
7.5% of patients [14]. Children with PNES have more associated
medical illnesses than their siblings and have been noted to be
on more prescribed as well as over the counter medications than
their siblings, suggesting that chronic illness may also act as
a stressor for inducing PNES. These children are also exposed to
more lifetime adversities such as bullying and domestic or
community violence. Parents of children with PNES reported more
somatization as compared to parents of children with epilepsy
suggesting that this becomes an intergenerational family
communication model [20].
ETIOLOGY
From the preceding two sections, one can see
that PNES is a heterogeneous disorder with no uniform
predisposing factors or comorbidity. Pathways exist for
development of PNES. Some children may have significant
pre-existing stressors whereas others may have no apparent
etiology for PNES. Each child with PNES must be evaluated
individually. Nevertheless, there is new information that helps
improve understanding PNES. Reuber and Brown, et al. [26]
proposed an integrated cognitive model. The motor manifestations
of PNES are seen as an instinctual freeze or flight response or
a learned motor pattern from experiencing or witnessing a
seizure or seizure-like episode. These motor manifestations are
triggered by threat or distress. The seizure-like episodes allow
escape from the psychological distress and cause parasympathetic
activation reducing stress. The seizure-like episodes thus
become reinforcing. This neuropsychological model is supported
by recent neuroimaging data that have shown changes in the
limbic system and in the right inferior frontal cortex, a region
involved in motor inhibition [27].
EVALUATION
Clinical
Differentiating PNES from epileptic seizures
is the first and important step of the evaluation. Some of the
major differences between the clinical features of nonepileptic
and epileptic seizures has been summarized in Table I.
PNES last longer than epileptic seizures in both adults and
children [2,8]. Side to side head movements and disorganized,
asynchronous, out-of-phase extremity movements suggest PNES.
They have a gradual onset and termination, with preservation of
consciousness during and immediately after events, even with
generalized motor activity. Associated injury, tongue bite
(usually involving the tip of the tongue) and urinary
incontinence are infrequent. Negative emotions such as weeping,
crying, or fear [2,13,14], may occur during and after the event,
unlike the monotonous cry heard at the onset of some epileptic
seizures. However, negative emotional signs have also been seen
with epileptic seizures [28], and therefore does not
categorically help with differentiating the two. The PNES
episodes are often stereotypic, reported in up to 73% of the
cases, suggesting that stereotypic nature of the episodes does
not necessarily always suggest epilepsy [1,13,29].
Table I Difference in Clinical Features of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures and Epileptic Seizures
|
PNES |
Epileptic seizure |
Duration |
Prolonged (> 2 minutes) |
Briefer |
Semiology |
Fluctuating (may be stereotypic) |
Stereotypic |
Onset |
Usually gradual |
Abrupt |
Consciousness |
Preserved |
Altered (especially with
generalized seizures)a |
Onset |
Usually gradual |
Abrupt |
Head movements |
Frequently side to side |
Usually unilaterally turned |
Extremity |
Out-of-phase, bizarre |
In-phase, rhythmic movements |
Emotional signs |
Usually negative (crying) |
Cry at onset |
Eyes |
Closed, resisting eye opening |
Open |
Pelvic thrusting |
Infrequent in children, forward |
Retrograde |
Incontinence |
Rare |
May be present |
Cyanosis |
Absent |
May be present |
Related injury |
Inconsistent with fall |
Consistent with fall |
Tongue bite |
Infrequent (tip) |
More common (lateral aspect) |
Postictal |
None, even after generalized
movements |
Present (may be absent with frontal
lobe seizure) |
Other features |
Preictal pseudosleep
|
Absent |
|
Forced downward eye deviation |
Absent |
|
Postictal whispering |
Postictal headache |
Reaction |
Histrionic |
Deeply concerned |
aexception
supplementary motor seizures. |
Other features may also be seen. Commonly,
eyes remain closed during the event whereas they are open in
epileptic seizures [30], though this may not always be the case.
It has been suggested that adolescents and adults who bring
stuffed toys to the EMU, were more likely to be diagnosed with
PNES and this has been referred to as the "teddy bear sign"
[31]. However, this sign has not been found to be always
reliable. Geotropic downward eye deviation, ictal stuttering
[32], pre-ictal pseudo-sleep [13] and a postictal whispering
tone [33] have also been noted.
The semiology of PNES in children differs
from adults. Ictal eye closure, events lasting more than 2
minutes, postictal speech change, vocalization during the tonic
clonic phase and tongue bite are seen more frequently in adults
[29]. Pelvic thrusting is also more common in adults. This is
rare in children, and when seen, occurs predominantly in the
adolescent age group [13,22].
Varying descriptions of PNES in children are
reported in the literature, ranging from unresponsiveness to
disorganized motor activity. The features differ by age. Subtle
motor activity (similar to hypokinetic or dialeptic seizures),
commonly prolonged staring with unrespon-siveness, is seen more
commonly in children younger than 13 years of age. Prominent
motor activity such as generalized arrhythmic jerking or
flailing of extremities (similar to hyperkinetic seizures) is
seen more frequently in adolescents and is similar to movements
seen in adults [1,11,23,29,34]. The subtle behaviors noted in
the younger children are more likely to be mistaken for
epileptic seizures, thus contributing to a delay in diagnosis in
the younger children as compared to the more overt, disorganized
motor activity seen in adolescents.
One report further differentiates features of
PNES in adolescents based on gender. Boys were more likely to
demonstrate convulsive tonic-clonic like movements, whereas
girls were more likely to experience atonic falls. Boys reported
academic struggles significantly more frequently than girls, and
girls more commonly reported difficulties with peer
interactions. ADHD was more common in boys and major depression
was more common in girls [22].
Electroencephalography and Laboratory Studies
Prolonged VEEG remains the gold standard of
evaluation. Recording of the habitual event of clinical concern
that is not associated with epileptiform abnormalities on the
EEG, along with the appropriate historical data, points to a
diagnosis of PNES. If the initial study is normal and induction
techniques fail to elicit an event, it would be very reasonable
to consider repeating the study.
There exists a controversy regarding the use
of provocative techniques. These have included placebo induction
with intravenous saline, tuning fork and use of skin patches.
However ethical concerns have been raised, given that these
techniques involve deception, and risk compromise of
patient-physician trust. Hyperventilation, photic stimulation
and verbal suggestion were deemed more appropriate because these
techniques are also used to induce epileptic seizures [35].
Short term VEEG along with induction
techniques may be a reasonable option, especially in areas with
limited resources [14,36]. It is more cost-effective, and more
time efficient. However, interictal epileptiform abnormalities
could potentially be missed. Therefore, it is not diagnostic for
assessment of co-existing epilepsy.
The following measures have been studied but
may only be considered ancillary and are certainly not
diagnostic. Biologic markers such as serum prolactin have been
studied in adults, with mixed results. Elevated postictal serum
prolactin levels, 10-20 minutes after an event have been
reported following generalized tonic clonic seizures. However,
lack of elevation is not conclusive of PNES, as normal levels
are also seen with other seizure types such as focal seizures
and absence seizures [37,38]. Similarly, alterations in serum
lactate levels [39] and serum creatine kinase (CK) levels [40]
have also been studied but are not used routinely. Several other
biomarkers that are still being investigated including Neuron
specific enolase (NSE) and serum NT-proCNP (a fragment of C-type
natriuretic peptide) [41].
Psychological Evaluation
The psychological assessment of the child
with suspected PNES starts with a history, ideally taken form
the parent and the child or adolescent separately. Questions
about anxiety and depression are essential. Some children with
PNES may have alexithymia, an inability to recognize emotions.
Stress and trauma related disorder are covered with questions
about discord at home, bullying or academic difficulties at
school, and exposure to violence or displacement in the
community. Screening instruments for emotional and behavioral
problems such as the widely available Strengths and Difficulties
Questionnaire, a free 25-item questionnaire normed for 4 to 16
year old children and available in multiple languages including
Bengali, Hindi, Punjabi, Tamil, and Urdu, can be helpful. If
academic difficulties are found, the child may need intellectual
and achievement testing [42].
TREATMENT
Following the diagnosis of PNES, there should
be immediate involvement with a mental health professional such
as a therapist, psychologist, or psychiatrist who is familiar
with this condition. The diagnosis should be presented to the
parents by the clinician (pediatricians/ pediatric neurologist),
reassuring the family that a diagnosis has been made and that
the child has a type of disorder that will not require
anti-seizure medications but will need mental health treatment.
A similar discussion occurs next with the child. When possible,
the pediatrician should offer to continue to be involved in care
of the child.
Treatment should be multidisciplinary and
include the mental health professional, the child, parents,
school, and a pediatrician/ pediatric neurologist [19,43-45].
The first step of treatment is providing psychoeducation regar-ding
PNES to the family and school [19,44]. Many children diagnosed
with PNES have a decrease in their daily functioning. Therefore,
gradual increase in their participation in school,
extra-curricular activities, social interactions, etc. to return
to previous level of activity and functioning is recommended. In
order to increase the patient’s success in school,
accommodations should be implemented to minimize school absences
[44]. Both the school and the parents should be taught selective
attention (ignoring the episodes) and be given specific
instructions of how to react to the episodes. For example, once
the school and parents, have understood the concept that there
is no underlying organic cause for the PNES, they need not seek
emergency medical care for every subsequent episode. However,
they should make efforts to ensure the patient is safe and will
not sustain injury during a PNES. Parents and the school should
be encouraged to decrease conversations regarding the PNES and
provide positive attention to adaptive functioning [44].
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has
empirical support for treatment of adults with PNES though not
children [19,44]. A controlled trial in adults with PNES, showed
decrease in seizure number [46]. In contrast, a recent
controlled study of 368 adults found no reduction in seizure
number but improvement in quality of life and psychosocial
functioning [47]. We think that CBT may be helpful in children
and adolescents with PNES, particularly when associated with
anxiety or depression. In individual therapy, the child learns
cognitive and behavioral strategies to reduce episodes. The
patient is taught how the body and mind are connected and is
provided psychoeducation regarding how thoughts influence
emotions, behavior, and somatic symptoms. The patient learns to
identify these emotions and the associated somatic symptoms. The
patient is then taught relaxation skills and mindfulness
strategies to manage distress. The therapist teaches the patient
to identify unhelpful thoughts (automatic thoughts) and how to
label negative thinking patterns (cognitive distortions). The
patient then learns how to challenge and change these unhelpful
thoughts to positive thoughts through the use of cognitive
techniques. As the patient changes these thoughts, there is an
increase in positive emotions, thereby decreasing PNES. In
addition to challenging thoughts, patients learn problem
solving, exposure and response prevention, and activity
scheduling [44]. Through a combination of parent and school
interventions, teaching the child distress tolerance skills and
cognitive restructuring, and resuming previous levels of
functioning, the PNES should usually decrease.
OUTCOME
Though there are very few systematic studies
reporting on the treatment of PNES in children, outcomes in
children have been reported as more favorable than in adults
[48-50]. According to a recent study, 36% of 90 children (5-18
years) with PNES who were followed up till 2 years, were symptom
free at 6 months with sustained remission at 2 years. Another
33% did not achieve remission and this unfavorable outcome was
attributed to delay in establishing their diagnosis and presence
of comorbid epilepsy [50]. Chinta, et al. [49] reported that 35%
were symptom free and an additional 50% experienced more than
50% reduction in frequency of symptoms on short-term follow-up
of 3-6 months. Better outcome in these children was related to
earlier diagnosis with lack of chronicity of complaints, as well
as less severe associated psychiatric comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS
There are still unmet needs. There should be
more comprehensive assessment of comorbidity in children with
PNES. There seems to be heterogeneity in the predisposing and
precipitating factors for PNES occurrence in children. This
might dictate difference in treatments. Advanced neuro-imaging
techniques have been used to study adults with PNES and other
functional neurological disorders but there is limited
information on changes in children and adolescents. There are
currently no controlled trials of treatments for children with
PNES. Finally, outcome appears to be better in children with
PNES, but there needs to be long-term follow ups for both PNES
and the comorbid conditions. Families also need additional study
for factors that may provoke or maintain PNES in children or
assist with satisfactory resolution.
REFERENCES
1. Patel H, Scott E, Dunn D, Garg B.
Nonepileptic seizures in children. Epilepsia. 2007;48:2086-92.
2. Szabo L, Siegler Z, Zubek L, et al. A
detailed semiologic analysis of childhood psychogenic
nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia. 2012;53:565-70.
3. Lesser R. Psychogenic seizures. Neurology.
1996;46:1499-507.
4. American Psychiatric Association.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed.
American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
5. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and
Behavioral disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic
Guidelines. World Health Organization:1992.
6. Gates JR. Epidemiology and classification
of non-epileptic events. In: Gates JR, Rowan AJ, editors.
Non-epileptic seizures. 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann;
2011.p.3-14.
7. Benbadis SR, Allen Hauser W. An estimate
of the prevalence of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.
Seizure. 2000;9:280-81.
8. Reuber M. Psychogenic nonepileptic
seizures: answers and questions. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;12:622-35.
9. Holmes GL, Sackellares JC, McKiernan J,
Ragland M, Dreifuss FE. Evaluation of childhood pseudoseizures
using EEG telemetry and video tape monitoring. J Pediatr.
1980;97:554-58.
10. Kutluay E, Selwa L, Minecan D, Edwards J,
Beydoun A. Nonepileptic paroxysmal events in a pediatric
population. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17:272-75.
11. Kim SH, Kim H, Lim BC, et al. Paroxysmal
nonepileptic events in pediatric patients confirmed by long-term
video-EEG monitoring—Single tertiary center review of 143
patients. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24:336-40.
12. Bhatia MS, Sapra S. Pseudoseizures in
children: A profile of 50 cases. Clin Pediatr (Phila).
2005;44:617-21.
13. Dhiman V, Sinha S, Rawat VS, et al.
Children with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES): a
detailed semiologic analysis and modified new classification.
Brain Dev. 2014;36:287-93.
14. Madaan P, Gulati S, Chakrabarty B, et al.
Clinical spectrum of psychogenic non epileptic seizures in
children: An observational study. Seizure. 2018;59:60-66.
15. Vincentiis S, Valente KD, Thome-Souza S,
Kuczinsky E, Fiore LA, Negrao N. Risk factors for psychogenic
nonepileptic seizures in children and adolescents with epilepsy.
Epilepsy Behav. 2006;8:294-98.
16. Valente KD, Alessi R, Vincentiis S,
Santos BD, Rzezak P. risk factors for diagnostic delay in
psychogenic nonepileptic seizures among children and
adolescents. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;67:71-77.
17. Goldstein LH, Robinson EJ, Reuber M, et
al. Characteristics of 698 patients with dissociative seizures:
A UK multicenter study. Epilepsia. 2019;60:2182-93.
18. Davis BJ. Predicting nonepileptic
seizures utilizing seizure frequency, EEG, and response to
medication. Eur Neurol. 2004;51:153-56.
19. LaFrance WC, Jr., Reuber M, Goldstein LH.
Management of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia.
2013;54:53-67.
20. Plioplys S, Doss J, Siddarth P, et al. A
multisite controlled study of risk factors in pediatric
psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia. 2014;55:1739-47.
21. Wyllie E, Glazer JP, Benbadis S, Kotagal
P, Wolgamuth B. Psychiatric features of children and adolescents
with pseudoseizures. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:244-48.
22. Say GN, Tasdemir HA, Ince H. Semiological
and psychiatric characteristics of children with psychogenic
nonepileptic seizures: Gender-related differences. Seizure.
2015;31:144-48.
23. Verrotti A, Agostinelli S, Mohn A, et al.
Clinical features of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in
prepubertal and pubertal patients with idiopathic epilepsy.
Neurol Sci. 2009;30:319-23.
24. Plioplys S, Doss J, Siddarth P, et al.
Risk factors for comorbid psychopathology in youth with
psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Seizure. 2016;38:32-37.
25. Asadi-Pooya AA, AlBaradie R, Sawchuk T,
Bahrami Z, Al Amer A, Buchhalter J. Psychogenic nonepileptic
seizures in children and adolescents: An international
cross-cultural study. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;90:90-92.
26. Reuber M, Brown RJ. Understanding
psychogenic nonepileptic seizures-phenomenology, semiology and
the Integrated Cognitive Model. Seizure. 2017;44:199-205.
27. Vasta R, Cerasa A, Sarica A, et al. The
application of artificial intelligence to understand the
pathophysiological basis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.
Epilepsy Behav. 2018;87:167-172.
28. Fogarasi A, Janszky J, Tuxhorn I. Ictal
emotional expressions of children with partial epilepsy.
Epilepsia. 2007;48:120-23.
29. Alessi R, Vincentiis S, Rzezak P, Valente
KD. Semiology of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Age-related
differences. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;27:292-95.
30. Chung SS, Gerber P, Kirlin KA. Ictal eye
closure is a reliable indicator for psychogenic nonepileptic
seizures. Neurology. 2006;66:1730-31.
31. Burneo JG, Martin R, Powell T, et al.
Teddy bears: An observational finding in patients with
non-epileptic events. Neurology. 2003;61:714-15.
32. Vossler DG, Haltiner AM, Schepp SK, et
al. Ictal stuttering: A sign suggestive of psychogenic
nonepileptic seizures. Neurology. 2004;63:516-19.
33. Chabolla DR, Shih JJ. Postictal behaviors
associated with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy
Behav. 2006;9:307-11.
34. Kramer U, Carmant L, Riviello JJ, et al.
Psychogenic seizures: Video telemetry observations in 27
patients. Pediatr Neurol. 1995;12:39-41.
35. Benbadis SR, Johnson K, Anthony K, et al.
Induction of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures without placebo.
Neurology. 2000;55:1904-05.
36. Benbadis SR, Siegrist K, Tatum WO,
Heriaud L, Anthony K. Short-term outpatient EEG video with
induction in the diagnosis of psychogenic seizures. Neurology.
2004;63:1728-30.
37. Reilly C, Menlove L, Fenton V, Das KB.
Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in children: A review.
Epilepsia. 2013;54:1715-24.
38. Chen DK, So YT, Fisher RS. Use of Serum
Prolactin In Diagnosing Epileptic Seizures: Report of the
Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the
American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005;65: 668-75.
39. Dogan EA, Unal A, Unal A, Erdogan C.
Clinical utility of serum lactate levels for differential
diagnosis of generalized tonic-clonic seizures from psychogenic
nonepileptic seizures and syncope. Epilepsy Behav.
2017;75:13-17.
40. Wyllie E, Lueders H, Pippenger C,
VanLente F. Postictal serum creatine kinase in the diagnosis of
seizure disorders. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:123-26.
41. Ceylan M, Yalcin A, Bayraktutan OF,
Laloglu E. Serum NT-pro CNP levels in epileptic seizure,
psychogenic non-epileptic seizure, and healthy subjects. Neurol
Sci. 2018;39:2135-39.
42. Goodman R, Ford T, Richards H, Gatward R,
Meltzer H. The development and well-being assessment:
Description and initial validation of an integrated assessment
of child and adolescent psychopathology. J Child Psychol
Psychiatry. 2000;41:645-55.
43. Plioplys S, Asato MR, Bursch B, Salpekar
JA, Shaw R, Caplan R. Multidisciplinary management of pediatric
nonepileptic seizures. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.
2007;46:1491-95.
44. McFarlane FA, Allcott-Watson H, Hadji-Michael
M, et al. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of functional
neurological symptoms (conversion disorder) in children and
adolescents: A case series. Eur J Paediatr Neurol.
2019;23:317-28.
45. Sawchuk T, Buchhalter J, Senft B.
Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in children-prospective
validation of a clinical care pathway and risk factors for
treatment outcome. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;105:106971.
46. LaFrance WC Jr, Baird GL, Barry JJ, et
al. Multicenter pilot treatment trial for psychogenic
nonepileptic seizures: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA
Psychiatry. 2014;71:997-1005.
47. Goldstein LH, Robinson EJ, Mellers JDC,
et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with dissociative
seizures (CODES): A pragmatic, multicenter, randomized,
controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:491-505.
48. Wyllie E, Friedman D, Luders H, Morris H,
Rothner D, Turnbull J. Outcome of psychogenic seizures in
children and adolescents compared with adults. Neurology.
1991;41:742-44.
49. Chinta SS, Malhi P, Singhi P, Prabhakar
S. Clinical and psychosocial characteristics of children with
nonepileptic seizures. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2008;11:159-63.
50. Yadav A, Agarwal R, Park J. Outcome of
psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) in children: A 2-year
follow-up study. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;53:168-73.
51. Yilmaz U, Serdaroglu A, Gurkas E,
Hirfanoglu T, Cansu A. Childhood paroxysmal nonepileptic events.
Epilepsy Behav. 2013;27:124-49.
52. Salpekar JA, Plioplys S, Siddarth P, et
al. Pediatric psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a study of
assessment tools. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17:50-55.
53. Kacinski M, Leskiewicz M, Jaworska-Feil
L, et al. Pseudo-epileptic seizures in children are not
associated with enhanced plasma level of allopregnanolone.
Pharmacol Rep. 2007;59:683-90.
54. Uldall P, Alving J, Hansen LK, Kibaek M,
Buchholt J. The misdiagnosis of epilepsy in children admitted to
a tertiary epilepsy center with paroxysmal events. Arch Dis
Child. 2006;91:219-21.
|
|
 |
|