|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57: 211-212 |
|
Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus: Act
Fast, No matter With What!
|
PA Mohammed Kunju1*and
H Ahamed Subir2
1Department of Pediatric Neurology, Medical
College Trivandrum; and 2Department of Neurology, MES
Medical College, Perinthalmanna; Kerala. Email:
[email protected]
|
Convulsive status epilepticus (SE) is
associated with considerable mortality and morbidity [1], and
irreversible brain damage may occur if timely treatment is not given
[2]. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has included two
time frames in its definition of SE viz, time to intervene (T1=5min) and
time of occurrence of permanent brain damage (T2>30min) [2]. So early
and effective treatment that can achieve the above goal is searched for
by many researchers, and the last decade has witnessed many studies that
have compared various drugs and different routes. Many protocols also
have incorporated those new drugs arbitrarily [3,4].
Though for
the acute (first stage) seizure control benzodiazepines are the main
treatment, superiority of lorazepam is challenged by many studies and
current conclusion is that intramuscular midazolam and intravenous
diazepam are as effective as intravenous lorazepam [5].However, a
consensus has not yet been achieved regarding which is the best
antiepileptic in the armamentarium for the rapid control of the seizures
once the benzodiazepines fail (stage 2). Levetiracetam, sodium
valproate, phenytoin/fosphenytoin, lacosamide, and phenobarbital are
being widely used and extensively studied for this indication [4]. A
third stage is recognized as refractory SE, defined as SE persisting
despite sufficient dose of benzodiazepines and at least one
antiepileptic drug (AED), irrespective of time. Midazolam, propofol, and
thiopental are used in an ICU setting to manage this stage but with
limited support of evidence from well-controlled trials. Finally, a
fourth stage is also recognized – super refractory SE defined as SE,
that continues for 24 hours or more after the use of anesthetic therapy.
Management of this stage is still hazier, with anecdotal treatment
modalities like ketamine, IV immunoglobulin, ketogenic diet, and
surgical measures [6]. Since standardized management of second stage
can bring about realistic positive outcomes, evidence-based
recommendations are required for drug-selection. Extrapolation of
results from Western studies to the Indian context may not be
appropriate given the differences in the body constitution and the
genetic diversity, which may affect both drug dosages and drug
metabolism. In this issue of Indian Pediatrics, Vignesh, et al.[7]
report on their well-designed study comparing the efficacy of phenytoin,
valproate and levetiracetamfor the management of pediatric CSE. They
showed a better seizure control with levetiracetam (94%), phenytoin
(89%), and valproate (83%) when compared to other studies that had used
much higher dosages.Three facts are highlighted by this study
[7].Firstly, there is equal efficacy of all drugs, meaning thereby that
we need not confine ourselves to phenytoin as the sole second line drug.
Moreover, a lower dose is enough for seizure control, and such a lower
dose is associated with lesser chances of adverse reactions.
In
a randomized multicentric trial (ESSET trial), Kapur, et al. [8] found
that the same three AEDs (fosphenytoin instead of phenytoin) were
effective in approximately half the patients with
benzodiazepine-refractory convulsive SE, and they did not differ
significantly with regard to safety. However, that study used a higher
dosage of levetiracetam (60 mg/kg) and valproate (40 mg/kg) instead of
uniform 20 mg/kg used by the present study [7]. Similarly, EcLiPSE trial
[9] showed that levetiracetam had comparative efficacy to phenytoin and
suggested that former could be an appropriate alternative to phenytoin.
But, the ConSEPT trial concluded that levetiracetam is not superior to
phenytoin for second-line management of pediatric convulsive SE [10]. It
may be noted that all the three trials showed an effectiveness of only
50% in children as compared to >80% response in the present study
[7].However, the uniform infusion time (20 min) taken for blinding by
Vignesh, et al. [7] compared to 10 min and 5 min infusion by other
trials might have impacted the time for seizure control by valproate and
levetiracetam, which are safer to be infused faster. As the rapid
control of seizure will bring a better outcome, this advantage could
have been better utilized by modifying the blinding technique. Another
meta-analysis by Yaziry, et al. [11] concluded that valproate,
levetiracetam and phenobarbital can all be used as first line therapy in
benzodiazepine-resistant SE but did not support the use of phenytoin.
The fact that the dose used in this study for
levetiracetam(20mg/kg) and sodium valproate (20mg/kg) was well below the
internationally recommended dose but with better outcome suggests that
regional variation in dose will improve the outcome and reduce adverse
effects while using these options. The methodology of random sequence
generation and allocation concealment increases the power of this study
but at the same time points to the fact that the three drugs have
different infusion rates which haveimportant implications for seizure
control.Levetiracetam can be administered more rapidly (5–10min) than
phenytoin (20min), which could potentially terminate convulsive status
epilepticus faster with levetiracetam than phenytoin.This factor would
not be taken into account during allocation concealment thus affecting
the good outcome in both levetiracetam and valproate arm as they would
be infused slowly at the same rate as phenytoin.Moreover, the ease of
drug preparation and administration favours the newer antiepileptics
rather than phenytoin.This study; however, has not provided the
important epidemiological insights that could help in making the AED
choice, as the seizure control and outcome may depend more on the
etiology than the drug used.
We feel that this study has clearly
established the equal effectiveness and safety of the three drugs. We
need to generate more evidence,and experiment with dosing and act
quickly with the effective medications we have, so as to bring out
region-based guidelines taking into consideration the epidemiological
and socio-economic aspects.
Funding: Nil; Competing interest:None
stated.
REFERENCES
1. Smith DM, McGinnis
EL, Walleigh DJ, Abend NS. Management of status epilepticus in
children. J Clin Med. 2016;5:47.Available from:
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/5/4/47/htm. Accessed on February 8, 2020.
2. Trinka E, Cock H, Hesdorffer D. A definition and classification
of status epilepticus – Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification
of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2015;56:1515 23.
3. Glauser T,
Shinnar S, Gloss D, Alldredge B, Arya R, Bainbridge J,et
al.Evidence-Based Guideline: Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus
in Children and Adults: Report of the Guideline Committee of the
American Epilepsy Society.Epilepsy Curr. 2016;16:48-61.
4.
Mishra D, Sharma S, Sankhyan N, Konanki R, Kamate M, Kanhere S, et al.
Consensus Guidelines on Management of Childhood Convulsive Status
Epilepticus. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:975-90.
5. McTague A,
Martland T, Appleton R.Drug management for acute tonic-clonic
convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children.Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2018;1:CD001905.
6. Dubey D, Kalita J, Misra
UK. Status epilepticus: Refractory and super-refractory. Neurol India.
2017;65 Supp1:S12-7.
7. VigneshVM, Kumar RR, Mahadevan S.
Comparison of phenytoin and valproate and levetiracetam in pediatric
convulsive status epilepticus: A randomized double-blind controlled
clinical trial. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57:222-7.
8. Kapur J, Elm J,
Chamberlain JM, Barsan W, Cloyd J, Lowenstein D, et al. Randomized trial
of three anticonvulsant medications for status epilepticus. N Engl J
Med. 2019;381:2103-13.
9. Lyttle MD, Rainford NEA, Gamble C,
Messahel S, Humphreys A, Hickey H, et al; Paediatric Emergency Research
in the United Kingdom & Ireland (PERUKI) collaborative. Levetiracetam
versus phenytoin for second-line treatment of paediatric convulsive
status epilepticus (EcLiPSE): A multicentre, open-label, randomised
trial. Lancet. 2019;393:2125-34.
10. Silbergleit R, Elm
JJ.Levetiracetam no better than phenytoin in children with convulsive
status epilepticus. Lancet.2019;393:2101-2.
11. Yasiry Z,Shorvon
SD. The relative effectiveness of five antiepileptic drugs in treatment
of benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive status epilepticus: A
meta-analysis of published studies. Seizure. 2014;23:167-74.
|
|
|
|