5) medications, it
is called polypharmcy. About 50% of older adults in the United States
are taking five or more drugs, and at least one of them is potentially
inappropriate. Data in pediatric practice is lacking; however, it is
probably rampant especially in children with chronic disorders.
Deprescribing is the process of minimizing the number
of drugs prescribed. It has to be done carefully, especially if patients
have been on it for prolonged periods. There are now guidelines for
deprescribing. The first step is to identify potentially inappropriate
drugs. Next is to decide whether the dose can be reduced or stopped.
Third is to carefully taper. Fourth is to monitor for problems. And
fifth is to document all events.
The field of deprescribing was opened up by Mark
Beers, a geriatrician who first studied the prescriptions of 850 odd
inmates of various nursing homes. It struck him that many of them were
on polypharmacy with significant interactions and side effects. He
created a list of potentially harmful drugs for the aged, which is now
called the Beers Criteria. Some of these drugs include proton pump
inhibitors, asthma medications, nutritional supplements and
benzodiazepines.
His oft quoted remonstrance to "think three times
before picking up a pen to prescribe a drug" holds water also in
pediatric practice. (BMJ 2019;364:l570)
Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart
Disease
By the end of 2018, all states in the USA have made
it mandatory to screen/offer screening for critical congenital heart
disease (CCHD). The basis was twofold. First, incidence of CCHD in the
US is 2 in 1000 births. Second, data between 2007-2013 showed that
deaths due to CCHD reduced significantly in infants aged below 6 months
in eight states where screening had been made mandatory.
The screening algorithm includes pulse oximetry in
all neonates after 24 hours of life or just before discharge if
discharged before 24 hours. The oxygen saturation in the right hand and
either of the two legs is taken. If saturations are above 95% and
difference in upper and lower limb saturation is less than 3%, the baby
is considered to have no significant risk of CCHD. If saturations are
below 90% or the difference between upper and lower limbs is more than
3%, they need further evaluation with echocardiography. Saturations
between 90-95% need to be rescreened upto two more times.
Besides CCHD, a low saturation may also be due to
other critical illnesses, including persistent pulmonary hypertension,
sepsis, hemoglobinopathies, pulmonary disease, transient tachypnea of
the newborn and hypothermia. All these will also need emergent
treatment. The cardiac defects which are primarily targeted by the test
include disorders that typically need surgery or catheter-based
intervention in the first year of life – such as tetrology of fallot,
transposition of great arteries, coarctation of aorta, and total
anomalous pulmonary venous connection. (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6805a3.htm?s_cid=mm6805a3_w)
The Fight for Bedaquilone
Two survivors of drug resistant tuberculosis have
taken on pharmaceutical giant Johnson and Johnson (J&J). Both of them,
Nandita Venkatesan from Mumbai and Phumesa Tisile from South Africa, had
lost their hearing during therapy for drug resistant tuberculosis. Their
endeavor is to prevent J&J from extending their patent on Bedaquilone.
If they lose, J&J’s patent will be extended from 2013 to 2027. This
would mean another delay of four years for entry of generics. ‘Patent
evergreening’ is a routine strategy by many pharmaceutical corporations
by filing additional patents for unremarkable window dressing of the
original molecule, to extend their monopoly on the drug beyond the
standard 20 years. The cost of bedaquilone is currently out of bounds
for the average Indian.
An article entitled "Such a long journey" published this January in
PLoS One records the health seeking pathway of 47 patients with
drug resistant tuberculosis in Mumbai. It is a sociological analysis of
the reasons for delayed diagnosis and therapy in these patients. It
gives a poignant inside view of the human experience of illness and "why
people do what they do." It requires a great wisdom to solve the complex
social underpinnings of treatment of chronic disorders. (The Hindu 9
February 2019; PLoS One 17 January 2019).