Summary
Twenty randomized controlled studies (24 trial arms
because of more than two arms in some studies) enrolling 13,102 children
(aged between 1 to 18 years) with acute GABHS pharyngitis (diagnosis based
on a positive rapid antigen testing or positive throat swab culture) were
included in this review. The intervention antibiotics were macrolides
(azithromycin in 6, clarithromycin in 3, and erythromycin in 2 trials),
cephalosporins (cefuroxime in 3; cefixime, cefprozil, cefpodoxime,
cefdinir, ceftibuten and loracarbef in one each), other penicillins
(amoxicillin+clavulanate in 2 and amoxicillin in 1), and jasomycin (n=1).
Compared to standard duration treatment, the trial
short duration treatment had shorter periods of fever [mean difference
(MD) –0.30 days, 95% CI –0.45 to –0.14; 348 participants, 2 trials] and
throat soreness (MD-0.50 days, 95% CI –0.78 to –0.22; 188 participants, 1
trial); lower risk of early clinical treatment failure (OR 0.80, 95% CI
0.67 to 0.94; 11,713 participants, 23 trial arms); no significant
difference in early bacteriological treatment failure (OR 1.08, 95% CI
0.97 to 1.20; 11,555 participants, 23 trial arms), or late clinical
recurrence (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08; 8,068 participants, 17 trials).
However, the overall risk of late bacteriological recurrence was more in
the short duration treatment (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48; 10,249
participants, 24 trial arms). Only three studies reported long duration
complications with no statistically significant difference (OR 0.53, 95%
CI 0.17 to 1.64). The compliance was better (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.29)
with short duration therapy whereas the side effects were more.
The authors concluded that three to six days of oral
antibiotics had comparable efficacy compared to the standard duration 10
day oral penicillin in treating children with acute GABHS pharyngitis.
Commentary
Are the results valid?
The problem addressed in this review is specific and
relevant. The search of literature was extensive but only studies up to
November 2007 were searched. At least one more eligible trial(1) and one
meta-analysis(2) has been published since the data were searched last by
authors. Most included trials had methodological concerns; randomization
was not described or inappropriate in majority; none used
intention-to-treat analysis and only 3 of the 20 studies were blinded. The
heterogeneity issues in this review were related to comparison of
antibiotics with different half-lives rendering the issue of duration of
treatment less important. The strength of the review lies in its sample
size involving 24 study arms enrolling more than 13,000 children with
microbiologically proven GABHS.
The primary outcomes such as duration of fever and sore
throat are functionally important but the more important issue is the
prevention of sequelae such as rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis.
This review was, however, not powered enough to comment validly on this
outcome as only 3 of the 20 included studies addressed this issue with a
total of only 14 events (3 acute rheumatic fever and 11
glomerulonephritis/proteinuria). Lack of bacterio-logical cure can also
serve as a surrogate marker for the same.
Clinical Importance and Precision of the Results
Shortening of the duration of fever and sore throat by
one-third to half day with the use of short course antibiotics, though
statistically significant, does not appear to be clinically important in
this otherwise self limiting condition. Also, these outcomes have been
evaluated in only two and one trial, respectively. More important is the
issue of prevention of systemic sequelae by complete eradication of the
organism.
Late bacteriological recurrence was significantly more
common in the children treated with short course antibiotics whereas early
treatment failure was comparable. Azithromycin, the most common
short-course drug evaluated in this review, was associated with a markedly
increased risk of early treatment failure (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.47 to 4.27)
and late recurrence (OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.66 to 4.92) when used in the
standard dose of 10 mg/kg. When converted to absolute risk reduction,
short course therapy with 10 mg/kg of azithromycin had 20% increase in
risk of early treatment failure and 22% increase in risk of late
bacteriological recurrence in comparison to 10 day course of penicillin
(33% vs. 13% and, 38% vs. 22%, respectively). This means for every 5
children treated with short course azithromycin (10 mg/kg), one additional
child would have early treatment failure and one additionally would have
late bacteriological recurrence [Number needed to harm (NNH)=5 and 4.5,
respectively]. This difference in the outcome between azithromycin and
penicillin was largely overcome when the former was used in the daily dose
of 20 mg/kg. Incomplete eradication of the organism by use of short course
therapy might turn out be a risk factor for long term sequealae like
rheumatic fever or glomerulonephritis. It is also to be noted that all
three events of rheumatic fever occurred in children treated with short
course antibiotics.
Implications for Practice and Policy
Evidence provided in this review suggests that a short
course (2 to 6 days) of alternative antibiotics achieves satisfactory
clinical improvement with better compliance in comparison to a 10 day
course of oral penicillin. However, short course treatment especially with
azithromycin (10mg/kg) is associated with a higher risk of bacteriological
treatment failure and recurrence. Since the primary purpose of 10 day
antibiotic therapy for streptococcal pharyngitis is prevention of
long-term systemic sequelae and not just clinical improvement, short
course treatment can not be recommended based on the findings from this
review. In another recent meta-analysis comparing the same antibiotic
given for shorter duration or l0 days, it was reported that clinical
success and microbiological eradication was inferior in patients who
received short-course treatment(2). Thus, a 10 day course of oral
penicillin or any other effective antibiotic still remains the treatment
of choice for acute streptococcal sore throat.