Cervical cancer is the most common cause of
death due to cancer in women, worldwide(1). Each year there are about
500,000 new cases and 275,000 deaths due to cervical cancer globally. The
burden of cervical cancer is disproportionately high (>80%) in the
developing world(2). One fourth of affected patient population is from
India. Current estimates suggest that 132,082 women are diagnosed with
cervical cancer leading to 74118 deaths every year and it is the leading
cause of ‘years of life lost’ due to any cancer among Indian women(3). The
cumulative risk of incidence and mortality amongst Indian women is almost
double as compared to that for the world.
Unfortunately, cervical cancer affects women as young
as 35-45 yrs of age when they are in their prime and affects not just the
mother but also the entire family. Additionally, there are very few signs
and symptoms of cervical cancer in the initial stages when it is treatable
and overt symptoms become evident only in late stages of cancer, when
medical/ surgical treatment has little to offer.
What Causes Cervical Cancer?
Presence of oncogenic HPV-DNA has been demonstrated in
99.7% of all cervical cancer cases, the highest attributable fraction so
far reported for a specific cause of major human cancer. Though more than
100 types of HPV have been discovered, only 40 infect the genital tract of
which 15 genotypes are oncogenic. Worldwide, 70% of cervical cancer cases
are due to HPV type 16 and 18 (type 16 accounting for 54% and type 18
accounts for about 17% cases), and type 45,31,33 and 52 accounting for
most of the remaining cases(4-6). In India, the estimated HPV-16/18
positive fraction was 78.9% in women with invasive cervical cancer(7).
Screening
With regular population based cervical screening using
Pap smear cytology, the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in
developed countries has been drastically reduced. Cervical cancer
prevention, as practiced in high-resource regions, includes screening;
triage of equivocal results; colposcopically guided biopsy of abnormal
screening results; decision whether to treat; treatment; and
post-treatment follow-up (including eventual return to routine screening
intervals if appropriate). However, screening in the absence of a
treatment program is unethical(8). An organized screening program need to
(i) define a target population (every sexually active women), (ii)
administer screening test to the target women at a specified interval (1-5
years), (iii) achieve a high level of coverage to screening(>70%),
(iv) establish an effective call- recall system for investigation
and (v) treat screen positive women. Such an organized screening
program is non-existent in India. In recent years a momentum has been
built up to identify low cost alternative screening tests like VIA/VILI
(Visual inspection after acetic acid/lugol’s iodine application). Results
of such intervention has been found satisfactory(9). However, to implement
even a VIA-based national screening program, large investment has to be
made in terms of logistics and training of health care personnel.
Vaccination
Highly efficacious vaccines against HPV are now
available and have given new directions in cervical cancer prevention. A
health and economic impact analysis observed that with pre-adolescent
vaccination alone, the mean reduction in the lifetime risk of cervical
cancer is expected to be 44% if 70% coverage is achieved(10). A successful
vaccination program has the potential to save hundreds of thousands of
lives in our country. Worldwide, there are two HPV vaccines available. One
protects against HPV 16 and 18 and also against low risk genotypes 6 and
11 (quadrivalent vaccine) and the other vaccine protects only against HPV
16 and 18 (bivalent vaccine).
Efficacy and safety
Both the vaccines have nearly 100% efficacy to protect
against persistent infections of HPV types 16 and 18 and also against the
cervical cancer precursors caused by them(11). In India, over 75% of the
cervical cancers are attributed to these two HPV types implying that a
high level of protection can be offered by the vaccines(6). The
quadrivalent vaccine has in addition, demonstrable efficacy against
vaginal and vulvar cancers, anogenital warts and recurrent respiratory
paillomatosis attributable to HPV genotypes 6 and 11. Efficacy remained
high for at least 5 years following vaccination(12). Additionally, both
vaccines demonstrate some protection against few of the other HPV types
not included in the vaccine. Both vaccines have favorable safety profile
and data are available from large safety database(13). Adverse events
reported are generally mild and includes pain and redness at injection
site, fever, headache, myalgia, fatigue etc.
Duration of immunity
Both vaccines have demonstrated efficacy for at least 5
years. Longer-term follow-up in adolescents and adults is underway.
Quadrivalent HPV vaccine has demonstrated immune memory (hallmark of long
term protection), upon administration of a challenge dose of vaccine at
year 5 to the group that received vaccine at study onset resulted in
strong anamnestic responses(14). At present there is no data to support
use of boosters.
Guidelines for HPV Vaccine
Various professional organizations in several countries
have formulated guidelines for vaccination against HPV. Fortunately these
guidelines vary little in their key recommendations. Indian Academy of
Pediatrics (IAP) recommends offering HPV vaccine to all appropriate
females who can afford the vaccine. The vaccine should also be introduced
to parents as a cervical cancer preventing vaccine and not as a vaccine
against sexually transmitted infections. Ideally the vaccine should be
administered prior to sexual debut to avoid any possibility of
transmission of the virus. IAP recommends that girls aged 10-12 years
should be vaccinated(15). Vaccine can be administered up to the age of 26
years (catch up age). However, women over 26 years of age are also
vulnerable to HPV infection and are likely to benefit from vaccination.
Introduction of HPV Vaccine into Health Care System
Introducing HPV vaccine in public health program would
be extremely challenging in India, primarily due to its prohibitive cost.
However, use in private sector would help in raising awareness among the
medical profession as well as the masses and generate confidence in the
efficacy and safety of a vaccine that can actually prevent cancer. A
broader demand and generous support from various national and
international institutions may ultimately bring down the price of HPV
vaccine substantially. Pediatricians are the most used health care
resources by young adolescents and will therefore play an essential role
in raising vaccine awareness. Pediatricians also have the opportunity to
educate patients and parents on HPV infection and the risk for cervical
cancer(16).
A comprehensive health program for adolescents could
provide a platform for introduction of HPV vaccine. Indian Academy of
Pediatrics has started sensitizing pediatricians to play an active role in
cervical cancer prevention program named "Ankush". For a broader framework
of cervical cancer control there is need to build partnership amongst
various professional organizations engaged in immunization, sexual and
reproductive health, public health and advocacy at various levels.
Competing interests: None stated.
Funding: None.
References
1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer
statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74–108.
2. Parkin DM, Bray F. Chapter 2: The burden of
HPV-related cancers. Vaccine 2006; 24 (suppl 3): S11–25.
3. Yang BH, Bray FI, Arkin DM, Sellors JW, Zhang ZF.
Cervical cancer as a priority for prevention in different world regions:
an evaluation using years of life lost. Int J Cancer 2004; 109: 418-424.
4. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer
JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papilloma virus is a necessary cause of
invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189: 12-19.
5. Rambout L, Hopkins L, Hutton B, Fergusson D.
Prophylactic vaccination against human papilloma virus infection and
disease in women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
CMAJ 2007; 177: 469-479.
6. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Saniose, Herrero R,
Castellsague X, Shah KV, et al. Epidemiological classification of
human papilloma virus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med
2003; 348: 518-527.
7. Bhatla N, Lal N, Bao YP, Nq T, Qiao YL. A
meta-analysis of human papillomavirus type-distribution in women from
South Asia: implications for vaccination. Vaccine 2008; 26: 2811-2817.
8. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC,
Wacholder S. Human Papilloma Virus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2007; 370:
890-907.
9. Bhatla N, Gulati A, Mathur SR, Rani S, Anand K,
Muwonge R, et al. Evaluation of cervical screening in rural North
India. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009: Feb 4 (Epub ahead of print).
10. Diaz M, Kim JJ, Albero G, de Sanjosé S, Clifford G,
Bosch FX, et al. Health and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18
vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India. Br J Cancer 2008; 99:
230-238.
11. Pollack AE, Balkin M, Edouard L, Cutts F, Broutet
N; WHO/UNFPA Working Group on Sexual and Reproductive Health and HPV
Vaccines. Ensuring access to HPV vaccines through integrated services: A
reproductive health perspective. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 8: 57-63.
12. Barr E, Tamms G. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus
vaccine. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: 609-617.
13. Paavonen J, Jenkins D, Bosch FX, Naud P, Salmerón
J, Wheeler CM, et al. Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted
bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against infection with human
papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim analysis of a
phase III double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 369:
2161-2170.
14. Olsson SE, Villa LL, Costa RL , Petta CA, Andrade
RP, Malm C, et al. Induction of immune memory following
administration of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV)
types 6/11/16/18 L1 virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine. Vaccine 2007; 25:
4931-4939.
15. Indian Academy of Pediatrics Committee on
Immunization (IAPCOI). Consensus recommen-dations on Immunization, 2008.
Indian Pediatr 2008: 45: 636-648.
16. Blatter MM, Monk BJ. The pediatrician’s role in preventing cervical
cancer. Clin Pediatr 2008; 47: 627-638.
|