Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
research paper

Indian Pediatr 2020;57: 508-511

Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Thrombospondin-1 as Biomarkers of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Progressive Pediatric Solid Malignancies 

 

Raja Pramanik 1, Anudishi Tyagi1, Sandeep Agarwala2, Sreenivas Vishnubhatla3, Deepa Dhawan1 and
Sameer Bakhshi1


From the Departments of Medical Oncology1, Paediatric Surgrery2, and Biostatistics3, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi, India.

Correspondence to: Dr Sameer Bakhshi, Professor of Pediatric Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dr BRA Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India.
Email: [email protected]

Received: May 06, 2019;
Initial review: September 30, 2019;
Accepted: January 24, 2020.
Published online: March 12, 2020;

PII: S097475591600146

Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT01858571.


Objectives: We compared Vascular Endothelial Growth factor (VEGF) and Thrombospondin-1 between patients with progressive paediatric malignancies randomized to metronomic chemotherapy versus placebo to determine their role as biomarker. Methods: In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized study of 108 progressive pediatric malignancies, serum VEGF and thrombospondin-1 levels were evaluated using ELISA at baseline, A2 (week-9 or earlier if progressed) and A3 (week-18 or earlier if progressed). Results: Mean VEGF and thrombospondin-1 at baseline, A2 and A3 and the change from baseline to A2 were not different between two groups. In metronomic arm, responders (those completing 3 cycles) had significantly lower mean (SD) baseline VEGF levels [659.7(362.1) vs 1143.9 (622.0) µg/mL] (P=0.002) and significant decrease in thrombospondin-1 from baseline to A2 [-4.43(8.0) µg/mL vs 1.7(11.3) µg/mL] (P=0.04), as compared to non-responders. Similar changes were not observed in responders on placebo arm. No consistent trend of these biomarkers was observed. Conclusions: VEGF and thrombospondin-1 are not reliable biomarkers for response to metronomic chemotherapy.


Keywords: Anti-tumor activity, Anti-angiogenic, Outcome.


Metronomic chemotherapy is the frequent administration of chemotherapeutic drugs at doses significantly below the ‘maximum tolerated dose’ with no prolonged drug-free breaks; it has carved a niche in modern pediatric oncology practice, especially in the recurrent metastatic or progressive disease settings [1,2]. Powerful and reliable biomarkers are yet to be identified and validated for the selection of a metronomic regimen for a given patient, in a given clinical setting.  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an in vivo proangiogenic cytokine while Thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) is an intrinsic anti-angiogenic cytokine. Studies have shown increase in VEGF levels during successful therapy with anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI)  [3,4]. 

Even though evidence for these cytokines is contradictory [5-8], these angiogenic peptides are attractive bio-markers because of their ease of sampling and estimation in clinics. We previously published a randomized trial in pediatric metronomics comparing metronomic chemotherapy with placebo in progressive pediatric malignancies [9]. In this report, we present the planned secondary objective of the study wherein we did a comparative analysis of two angiogenic peptides between these two groups of patients at different time-points.

METHODS

The design, setting, participants and methodology of the clinical study have been described elsewhere [9]. Eligible patients (n=108) underwent 1:1 simple centralised randomization to metronomic chemotherapy (4-drug regimen of daily celecoxib and thalidomide with alternating periods of etoposide and cyclophosphamide) and placebo groups.

After informed consent, blood samples were taken for biomarker evaluation at baseline (A1) and interim assessments (A2 = 9 weeks or earlier if progressed, A3 = 18 weeks or earlier if progressed) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Study flow diagram.

 

Serum was separated and centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min within 30 min from collection. Serum was aliquoted and stored at –80°C. ELISA for VEGF and TSP-1 levels were evaluated from these samples of serum using Quantikine Human VEGF Immunoassay DVE00 and Quantikine Human Thrombospondin-1 Immunoassay DTSP10, respectively (R&D Systems, Inc, Minneapolis, MN 5541 USA).

We analyzed pattern of VEGF and TSP-1 in both study arms, comparing them at baseline, at second assessment (A2) and at third assessment (A3) as well as the change in their levels at A2. The clinical assessment during the study had shown no significant difference in Progression free survival (PFS) or Overall survival (OS) between the two arms [9]. However, in post hoc subgroup analysis, those who had completed more than 3 cycles (i.e. 9 weeks) and those who did not have a bone sarcoma benefitted from metronomic chemotherapy [9]. Hence, we also analyzed the patients as responders versus non-responders, defining responders as those who had completed 9 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the 108 recruited subjects are presented in Table I. Baseline levels of VEGF greater than mean value of 1135.45 pg/mL was found to adversely affect OS with hazard ratio of 1.77 (1.18-2.65) (P=0.006). Baseline TSP-1 did not affect OS [HR (95% CI) =0.99 (0.99-1.00) (P=0.92)].

Table I Comparison of Baseline Characteristics of the Two Study Groups
CharactersticsPlaceboMetronomic
(n=52)(n=56)
Age, y* 15 (5-18)13 (5-18)
Male: female3.3:13:1
ECOG-PS
01 (1.9)3 (5.3)
119 (36.5)18 (32.1)
221 (40.3)25 (44.6)
311 (21.1)10 (17.8)
Diagnosis
Bone Sarcoma (PNET/32 (61.4)40 (71.3)
Osteosarcoma)
Neuroblastoma5 (9.6)5 (8.9)
RMS6 (11.5)3 (5.3)
Esthesioneuroblastoma1 (1.9)1 (1.7)
STS4 (7.6)2 (3.8)
Others3 (5.7)3 (5.3)
Retinoblastoma1 (1.9)2 (3.8)
Previous lines
248 (92.3)53 (94.6)
34 (7.7)2 (3.6)
401 (1.8)
All P values >0.05; PNET: primitive neuroectodermal tumours; RMS: rhabdomyosarcoma; STS: soft tissue sarcoma; ANC= absolute neutrophil count; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group- Performance Status. All values in no. (%) except *median (range).

Mean level of VEGF and TSP-1 in patients at baseline, at A2 and  at A3 were not different in the placebo and metronomic groups (Web Table I). The difference from baseline values to second assessment (A2) for both these biomarkers in each group was also not significantly different. 

In the metronomic arm, responders (i.e. those who completed at least 9 weeks of chemotherapy) had a significantly lower baseline VEGF levels as compared to non-responders (P=0.002). However, there was no difference in TSP-1 levels between them. The mean difference from baseline to the second assessment (A2-A1) for TSP-1 was significantly different (P=0.04); while TSP-1 decreased in the responders, it increased in the non-responders. Such a difference was not noted for VEGF (Table II). There was no significant difference in the baseline levels of VEGF and TSP-1 between responders and non-responders of placebo arm. Neither was there any significant difference in the mean change of both VEGF and TSP-1 from baseline to A2 (Table II).

Table II Comparison of VEGF and TSP-1 Levels Among Responders and Non-responders of Metronomic and 
Placebo Arms of the Study
Metronomic (n=56) Placebo (n=52)
RespondersNon-respondersRespondersNon-responders
(n=21) (n=35) (n=19) (n=33)
Baseline TSP-1 (A1) 19.4 (7.0)21.3 (10.6)24.3 (13.4)20.9 (12.5)
Baseline VEGF (A1)659.7 (362.1)*1143.9 (622.0)*961.9 (496.3)1238.5 (770.1)
Difference from baseline to A2 (TSP-1): (A2-A1)–4.43 (8.0)#1.7 (11.3)#–4.90 (16.4)–6.2 (12.2)
Difference from baseline to A2 (VEGF): (A2-A1)173.1 (618.2)90.8 (706.1)224.9 (615.7)–87.0 (535.9)
All values in mean (SD); VEGF: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, TSP-1: Thrombospondin-1, A2= second assessment at 9 wks or earlier if progression of disease; values of VEGF are in pg/mL and the values of TSP-1 are in µg/mL respectively, P value of *0.02 and #0.04.

Discussion

Our study showed that baseline VEGF predicted OS for the entire study population, whereas baseline TSP-1 did not predict the same. In the total study sample, there was no difference in the levels of VEGF or TSP1, neither at baseline, nor at any other time-point, between the placebo and metronomic arms. The magnitude of change from baseline to A2 was also not different significantly different between the two arms. But then, there was no difference in survival as well between the two arms.

While our findings are in contrast to studies on other solid tumors treated with anti-angiogenic agents, eg. metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab [10], it corroborates with the findings in metastatic breast cancer [11]. When we focussed our analysis on the metronomic arm, we found that responders had significantly lower baseline levels of VEGF but no difference was noted in TSP-1. This is consistent with previous studies that have noted an aggressive tumor progression with injection of TSP-1 in preclinical models [12].  Although, our study demonstrated some trends, we could not provide proof of the principle that the 4-drug anti- angiogenic chemotherapy actually acts by altering the cytokine milieu of pro and anti angiogenic factors, and inhibiting angiogenesis in vivo. Our results are consistent with the results Stempak, et al. [5] and Kesari, et al. [8] who found that none of the four tested markers (VEGF, bFGF, endostatin, and TSP-1) were of prognostic significance.

In a previous study, baseline TSP-1 levels appeared to correlate with prolonged response; this conclusion was based on just three patients who had a baseline high TSP-1 level and did not progress for more than a year [6]. In another study of 100 patients treated with metronomic chemotherapy, 52 baseline patient samples were available and herein serum TSP-1 levels increased in patients who completed therapy than in non- completers [7]. Our study is a larger study with a placebo arm, but still we could not replicate those findings. The reason why we could not demonstrate a trend in these cytokines may probably be the fact that the small subset of proteins that we selected is unlikely to be representative of the overall effect of all of the regulators of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is a complex interacting cascade of pathways with an interplay of a large number of proteins inside and outside of the cell and we cannot gauge them by relying on only one or two of these proteins. The strengths of our study are its randomized nature and comparison with placebo.

Identifying reliable predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapies has been unsuccessful to date. Looking for a biomarker for a therapy can be a realistic objective only if that therapy targets the tumor cells of interest, but when we are using metronomic chemotherapy, we are actually targeting the host endothelial cells and not directly the tumor. So, it is unlikely that universal mechanistically-driven markers will ever be unveiled for metronomic chemotherapy, especially given its varied mechanisms of action, multiple drug combinations and many clinical settings. We suggest that other biomarkers be explored for measuring the efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy like circulating cell free DNA, circulating endothelial cells, and circulating endothelial precursor cells and micro-particles. 

Funding: None; Competing interests: None stated.

 

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS?

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VGEF) and thrombaspondin-I are not reliable biomarkers for metronomic chemotherapy.

References

1. Pramanik R, Bakhshi S. Metronomic therapy in pediatric oncology: A snapshot. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66: e27811.

2. Bahl A, Bakhshi S. Metronomic chemotherapy in progressive pediatric malignancies: Old drugs in new package. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79:1617-22.

3. Motzer RJ, Michaelson MD, Redman BG, Hudes GR, Wilding G, Figlin RA, et al. Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:16-24.

4. Rini BI, Michaelson MD, Rosenberg JE, Bukowski RM, Sosman JA, Stadler WM, et al. Antitumor activity and biomarker analysis of sunitinib in patients with bevacizumab-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3743-8.

5. Stempak D, Gammon J, Halton J, Moghrabi A, Koren G, Baruchel S. A pilot pharmacokinetic and antiangiogenic biomarker study of celecoxib and low-dose metronomic vinblastine or cyclophosphamide in pediatric recurrent solid tumors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006;28:720-8.

6. Kieran MW, Turner CD, Rubin JB, Chi SN, Zimmerman MA, Chordas C, et al. A feasibility trial of antiangiogenic (metronomic) chemotherapy in pediatric patients with recurrent or progressive cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005;27:573-81.

7. Robison NJ, Campigotto F, Chi SN, Manley PE, Turner CD, Zimmerman MA, et al. A phase II trial of a multi-agent oral antiangiogenic (metronomic) regimen in children with recurrent or progressive cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:636-42.

8. Kesari S, Schiff D, Doherty L, Gigas DC, Batchelor TT, Muzikansky A, et al. Phase II study of metronomic chemo-therapy for recurrent malignant gliomas in adults. Neuro-Oncol. 2007;9:354-63.

9. Pramanik R, Agarwala S, Gupta YK, Thulkar S, Vishnubhatla S, Batra A, et al. Metronomic chemotherapy vs best supportive care in progressive pediatric solid malignant tumors: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1222-7.

10. Willett CG, Boucher Y, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, Munn LL, Tong RT, et al. Surrogate markers for antiangiogenic therapy and dose-limiting toxicities for bevacizumab with radiation and chemotherapy: continued experience of a phase I trial in rectal cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:8136-9.

11. Burstein HJ, Chen Y-H, Parker LM, Savoie J, Younger J, Kuter I, et al. VEGF as a marker for outcome among advanced breast cancer patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy with bevacizumab and vinorelbine chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:7871-7.

12. Tuszynski GP, Gasic TB, Rothman VL, Knudsen KA, Gasic GJ. Thrombospondin, a potentiator of tumor cell metastasis. Cancer Res. 1987;47:4130-3.

 

Copyright © 1999-2020  Indian Pediatrics