|
Indian Pediatr 2019;56: 508 |
|
Is Modified Centor Score Sensitive for Diagnosis of
Streptococcal Pharyngitis in Indian Children?
|
Prawin Kumar* and Jagdish P Goyal
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of
Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Email: [email protected]
|
We read with great interest the recent article by
Vasudevan, et al. [1] published in Indian Pediatrics. Some
of the aspects of this study require attention as streptococcal
pharyngitis is a common condition in routine clinical practice.
The modified Centor score is a validated score for
streptococcal pharyngitis from 3 to 76 years of age; children below 3
years of age were neither included in original Centor nor in McIsaac
modified Centor score. However, in this study authors had also included
children below 3 years of age. Furthermore, in McIsaac modified Centor
scoring, the score range from 0 to 3 in
³45 years, 0 to 4 in
age 15-44 years and 0 to 5 in children 3-14 years of age [2]. The
maximum score one can get is 5; however, in this study, eight children
(5 in culture positive and 3 in culture negative group) had score above
5, which need clarification.
The symptom of ‘cough’ had the highest sensitivity
for streptococcal pharyngitis in this study; however, absence of cough
is more valid clinical indicator for the diagnosis of streptococcal
pharyngitis in children, and even in modified Centor score one point is
being attributed to absence of cough [3,4].
Rhinorrhea is an important symptom for viral upper
respiratory tract also infection and authors had also mentioned in
methodology that children with such symptoms were excluded from the
study. However, fifty children (16 in culture positive and 34 in culture
negative group) had rhinorrhea as one of the symptom in this study. A
child with current viral infection may have false positive throat
culture due to chronic streptococcal colonization [4]. These factors
might have been responsible for low positive predictive value for
modified Centor score for the diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis in
this study. It would have been interesting if author could have also
investigated for viral etiology in this study.
The authors presented antibiotic sensitive pattern to
different antimicrobial agents used in streptococcal pharyngitis, which
is very helpful information for clinical practice. However, as
Penicillin or first generation cephalosporin is the antimicrobial
therapy of choice in streptococcal pharyngitis, it would be informative
for general practitioner if author had also provided information about
resistance to these antibiotics.
References
1. Vasudevan J, Mannu A, Ganvi G. McIsaac
modification of centor score in diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis
and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of beta-hemolytic strepto-cocci in
Chennai, India. Indian Pediatr. 2019;56;49-52.
2. McIsaac WJ, Kellner JD, Aufricht P, Vanjaka A, Low
DE. Empirical validation of guidelines for the management of pharyngitis
in children and adults. JAMA. 2004;291:1587-95.
3. Lindgren C, Neuman MI, Monuteaux MC, Mandl KD,
Fine AM. Patient and parent-reported signs and symptoms for group A
streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatrics. 2016; 138:e20160317.
4. Tanz RR. Acute Pharyngitis. In: Kliegman
RM, Stanton BF, St Jeme JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE, editors. Nelson
Textbook of Pediatrics. 1st South Asia ed. New Delhi: Elsevier;2016. p.
2017-21.
|
|
|
|