|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 474-477 |
|
Molecular Testing of MECP2 Gene in
Rett Syndrome Phenotypes in Indian Girls
|
Meenakshi Lallar 1,
Archana Rai1,
Priyanka Srivastava1,
Kausik Mandal1,
Neerja Gupta2,
Madhulika Kabra2
and Shubha R Phadke1
From Department of 1Medical Genetics, SGPGI, Lucknow,
Uttar Pradesh; and 2Genetics Division, Department of
Pediatrics, AIIMS, New Delhi; India.
Correspondence to: Dr Shubha Phadke, Department of Medical Genetics,
Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226
014, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: April 13, 2017;
Initial review: June 20, 2017;
Accepted: January 30, 2018.
Published online:
February 09, 2018.
PII:S097475591600115
|
Objective: To assess yield of MECP2 gene sequence variations
analysis and large deletions in suspected cases of Rett syndrome.
Design: Descriptive study.
Setting: Tertiary-care medical
genetics center.
Patients: Girls with
neuroregression, postnatal microcephaly and signs and symptoms
suggestive of classical and atypical Rett syndrome were classified into
two groups. Group I consisted of girls with Classical and atypical Rett
syndrome on basis on the Revised Rett Syndrome diagnostic criteria,
2010. Group II included girls with neuroregression and postnatal
microcephaly and other Rett like features but not fulfilling the above
criteria.
Procedure: Sanger sequencing of
coding regions and large deletional analysis of MECP2 gene.
Outcome measure: Identification
of mutation in MECP2 gene.
Result: Mutation in MECP2
gene was identified in 74% (14/19) in group I and none (0/17) in group
II. The mutation detection rate was 93% (13/14) in group I classical
Rett syndrome girls (2 with large deletions identified with Multiplex
ligation dependent probe amplification) and 20% (1/5) in group I
atypical Rett syndrome girls. One novel MECP2 sequence variation
was identified in group I classical Rett syndrome.
Conclusion: The yield of the
mutation detection in MECP2 is higher in classical Rett syndrome.
In girls with some Rett like features, but not fulfilling revised Rett
syndrome diagnostic criteria, mutation testing for MECP2 gene has
a low yield.
Keywords: MLPA, Mutation testing, Sanger
sequencing.
|
R ett syndrome (OMIM No. 312750) is caused by
heterozygous mutations in the X-linked gene, MECP2, which
encodes methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2). It has a prevalence
of around 1 in 10,000 female births [1]. More than 1000 different
mutations have been reported in the MECP2 gene [2]. It has been
classified into Typical Rett syndrome (classic form) and Atypical Rett
syndrome [3]. Classic Rett syndrome is characterized by an approximately
6-18 month period of overtly normal development which precedes a period
of regression. This period of regression is followed by recovery or
stabilization.
There have been a few case reports from India
identifying isolated sequence variants and deletions in MECP2
gene [4,5]. In a large Indian study, the common and novel sequence
variations in MECP2 gene in Rett syndrome patients were
identified, but large deletions in MECP2 gene were not studied
[6]. In this study, we present the sequencing variations and deletional
forms of MECP2 gene identified in Rett syndrome patients,
classified into classical and atypical forms using the using the Rett
syndrome revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature, 2010 [3].
Methods
This cross-sectional study included girls with a
clinical suspicion of Rett syndrome. Ethical clearance was obtained from
Institutional Ethics committee of SGPGI and AIIMS. Informed written
consent was taken from parents/guardians of all participants. All the
girls included in the study had history of neuroregression (prior to
five years of life) and postnatal microcephaly with normal MRI findings.
The girls were divided into two groups. Group I included girls with a
clinical diagnosis of classical or atypical Rett syndrome based on the
Rett syndrome revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature, 2010 [3].
Group II included all girls who did not fulfil all the criteria listed
in the revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature, 2010 but had
neuroregression, postnatal microcephaly (with normal MRI) and other
features suggestive of Rett syndrome were observed like autistic
features, poor social interaction and eye contact, isolated play,
inappropriate laughter, stereotypical movements, delayed speech etc. In
both the groups, Sanger sequencing of MECP2 gene (two, three and
four exons) was performed followed by Multiplex ligation dependent probe
amplification (MLPA) (P0245- covering MECP2 exon 1 upstream and
exons 3 and 4) in MECP2 mutation negative cases to look for
partial and whole gene deletions of MECP2 gene. The Sanger
sequencing was done using five sets of primers, one each for exon 2 and
3 and three overlapping fragments for exon 4; exon 1 was not sequenced
[7].
Results
A total of 36 girls, with postnatal microcephaly
(with normal MRI) and history of neuroregression, prior to five years of
age, were studied.
Group I consisted of 19 girls – 14 classical Rett
syndrome and five atypical Rett syndrome girls, and Group II included 17
girls. These patients were tested as some features suggestive of Rett
syndrome (other than neuroregression and postnatal microcephaly) were
observed. The mean age at diagnosis in the three groups was 4 year, 3
year and 4.5 years, respectively. All the cases were of sporadic
occurrence. The age of girls ranged from 1.6 to 10 years. The mean age
of neuroregression was significantly higher in group II (3 years) as
compared to group I (1.2 years).
The Sanger sequencing of MECP2 gene in group I
identified sequence variations in 11 out of 14 classical Rett syndrome
girls (78%) and one out of five atypical Rett syndrome girls (20%). In
group I, MLPA detected large exonic deletions in two classical Rett
syndrome girls (14%) (Web Fig. 1). The total yield of
molecular testing (Sanger sequencing and MLPA was 92.8% (n=13) in
classical Rett syndrome girls and 20% (n=1) in atypical Rett
syndrome girls. The total yield of molecular testing in group I was
around 74%. Molecular testing did not identify any MECP2 sequence
variation or copy number change in group II (17 girls). Additional
molecular testing were done and revealed pathogenic copy number
variations in two out of 17 group II girls (11%).
Out of the 12 sequence variations identified in
MECP2 gene, 11 were known pathogenic mutations and one was a novel
mutation (Table I). The novel missense mutation- c.427G>A
was identified in group I, in classical Rett syndrome girl. The missense
variant was predicted as likely pathogenic by mutation prediction
softwares (Mutation taster, SIFT (Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant) and
Polyphen 2).
TABLE I Mutations Identified in MECP2 Gene
Mutation in MECP2 gene |
Type of mutation
|
Exon |
*c.427G>A |
Missense
|
4 |
c.502C>T |
Nonsense
|
4 |
c.473C>T |
Missense
|
4 |
c.916C>T |
Missense
|
4 |
c.905C>G
|
Missense |
4 |
c.763C>T |
Nonsense
|
4 |
c.799A>T |
Missense |
4 |
c.1153_1190del 38 |
Homozygous deletion
|
4 |
Deletion of exon 1 and 3
|
Large deletion
|
|
Deletion of exon 3 and 4
|
Large deletion
|
|
*Novel mutation. |
A known deletion was identified, c.1153_1190del 38 in
group I classical Rett syndrome girl in the homozygous form. The finding
was confirmed by repeat testing. Apart from being a homozygous deletion;
it can be a heterozygous deletion with probable allele drop out or
selective amplification of shorter fragment. Uniparental disomy was
ruled out by SNP microarray. Karyotype was normal 46, XX. Whole exonic
or whole deletion of MECP2 was ruled out by MLPA (P0245).
Discussion
In the present study, MECP2 gene mutations
(sequence variations and larger deletions) were identified in 93%
classical Rett syndrome patients and 20% atypical Rett syndrome patients
in group I patients. In group II patients no MECP2 mutation was
identified. This study illustrates the usefulness of the Rett syndrome
revised diagnostic criteria as a tool for clinical categorisation of
Rett syndrome. According to previous studies, mutations in MECP2
gene can be found in 65-96% of individuals with classical Rett syndrome.
The yield for MECP2 mutations is much lesser with atypical Rett
phenotype ranging from 30-50% [8-12].
In an Indian study, 30% (27/90) patients with Rett
phenotype, had a mutation in MECP2. The lower yield in this study
could be due to use of DSM IV criteria for inclusion of cases in the
study. In addition, the study did not look for large deletions in
MECP2 [6]. Another, limitation of our study and previous studies is
that exon 1 has not been sequenced, rarely it may have disease causing
mutations in it [7]. Exon 1 could not be sequenced in our study, despite
several efforts, due to high GC content.
The novel mutation identified in this study most
likely leads to loss of function of the MBD domain of MECP2
protein, which is essential to bind MECP2 to methylated DNA and hence,
this might affect transcriptional regulation. Interestingly, all the
sequence variations in MECP2 gene were located in the exon 4 and
most were C>T transitions. No genotype phenotype correlation was
observed as severity of clinical manifestations was same – being
classical Rett phenotype in patients with different mutations: missense,
and small and large deletions. The general restriction of Rett syndrome
to females and the very low recurrence rate appears to be the result of
a large proportion of these mutations arising via spontaneous
deamination of 5-methylcytosine to thymine in the heavily methylated
male germ cells [13].
Large exonic deletions are found in approximately
8-10% of Rett syndrome (including both classical and atypical forms)
[14,15]. As compared to previous studies which looked at deletions of
MECP2 gene with specific probe set (e.g. P015), we used the
MLPA-P0245 probe set. Though it is commonly used and very useful, it is
not specific for MECP2 gene. This probes set, with a limited
number of probes for each specific chromosome region, is meant to
designed routinely to detect the common deletion/duplication involving
different chromosomes, in a cost effective way. We hereby put forward
the importance of using the commonly used probe set P0245 for detection
of large exonic deletions of MECP2 gene.
In Group I cases where molecular testing of MECP2
did no show mutation other genes like CDKL5 and FOXG, can
be tested [16,17]. In group II patients with no MECP2 mutations,
other causes of neuroregression and postnatal microcephaly should be
sought for. In two of these 17 patients, cytogenetic microarray detected
pathogenic copy number variations.
All the cases in the given study were sporadic. The
MECP2 sequencing of mothers of girls with mutations in MECP2
was not done. Rett syndrome is of sporadic occurrence in 99 % of cases.
In the remaining one percent there is either gonadal mosaicism in mother
or there is highly skewed X-chromosome inactivation leading to no
phenotype of Rett syndrome in the mother [18]. The risk of recurrence of
Rett syndrome in next pregnancy is low, but it cannot be totally
excluded as germline mosaicism has been documented in Rett syndrome.
Hence, prenatal diagnosis can be provided in the next pregnancy.
As per our study, revised clinical diagnostic
criteria are useful guide for clinical and molecular diagnosis of Rett
syndrome. MECP2 mutations are more likely to be identified in
classical than atypical Rett syndrome. Around 10% mutations in Rett
syndrome patients are large exonic deletions of MECP2 gene and
hence, MLPA should be done when mutation is not identified by Sanger
sequencing of MECP2 gene. MLPA with the commonly used probe set,
P0245, is found to be effective in detection of large deletions in girls
with classical Rett syndrome.
Acknowledgements: Naveen Sankhyan, Pediatric
Neurology, PGIMER, Chandigarh; Rekha Gupta, Medical Genetics, MGMCH,
Jaipur: Viswanathan V, Pediatric Neurologist, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS
Trust and Apollo Children’s Hospitals, Chennai; and Leena Deshpande, Dr
Yewale Hospital, Mumbai.
Contributors: ML,KM,SRP: conception and
design of the study, the acquisition of data, and the analysis and
interpretation; AR, PS: conducting mutation analysis; KM, SRP, NG,MK:
drafting and critical review.
Funding: Indian Council of Medical Research
(63/8/2010/BMS); Competing interests: None stated.
What is Already Known?
• MECP2
mutations (sequence variations and deletions) are more
frequently found in classical than atypical Rett syndrome.
What This Study Adds?
• MECP2
mutations should only be evaluated in classical or atypical Rett
syndrome patients if they fulfill the Revised Rett syndrome
diagnostic criteria, 2010.
|
References
1. Lyst MJ, Bird A. Rett syndrome: a complex disorder
with simple roots. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:261-75.
2. Christodoulou J, Grimm A, Maher T, Bennetts B.
RettBASE: The IRSA MECP2 Variation Database - A new mutation
database in evolution. Hum Mutat. 2003; 21:466-72.
3. Neul JL, Kaufmann WE, Glaze DG, Christodoulou J,
Clarke AJ, Bahi-Buisson N, et al. Rett syndrome: Revised
diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:944-50.
4. Khajuria R, Gupta N, Sapra S, Gulati S, Ghosh M,
Kalra V, et al. Novel non-identical MECP2 mutations in Rett
syndrome family: a rare presentation. Brain Dev. 2012; 34:28-31.
5. Khajuria R, Gupta N, Sapra S, Gulati S, Ghosh M,
Kalra V, et al. A novel MECP2 change in an Indian boy with
variant Rett phenotype and congenital blindness: Implications for
genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. J Child Neurol.
2011;26:209-13.
6. Das DK, Raha S, Sanghavi D, Maitra A, Udani V.
Spectrum of MECP2 gene mutations in a cohort of Indian patients with
Rett syndrome: report of two novel mutations. Gene. 2013;515:78-83.
7. Saunders CJ, Minassian BE, Chow EW, Zhao W,
Vincent JB. Novel exon 1 mutations in MECP2 implicate isoform MeCP2_e1
in classical Rett syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:1019-23.
8. Percy AK, Lane JB, Childers J, Skinner S, Annese
F, Barrish J, et al. Rett syndrome: North American database. J
Child Neurol. 2007;22:1338-41.
9. Bienvenu T, Carrié A, de Roux N, Vinet MC,
Jonveaux P, Couvert P, et al. MECP2 mutations account for most
cases of typical forms of Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:1377-84.
10. Laurvick CL, de Klerk N, Bower C, Christodoulou
J, Ravine D, Ellaway C, et al. Rett syndrome in Australia: a
review of the epidemiology. J Pediatr. 2006; 148:347-52.
11. Olson HE, Tambunan D, LaCoursiere C, Goldenberg
M, Pinsky R, Martin E, et al. Mutations in epilepsy and
intellectual disability genes in patients with features of Rett
syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167:2017-25.
12. Miltenberger-Miltenyi G, Laccone F. Mutations and
polymorphisms in the human methyl CpG-binding protein MECP2. Hum Mut.
2003;22:107-15.
13. Francke U. Mechanisms of disease: neurogenetics
of MeCP2 deficiency. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2:212-21.
14. Hardwick SA, Reuter K, Williamson SL, Vasudevan
V, Donald J, Slater K, et al. Delineation of large deletions of
the MECP2 gene in Rett syndrome patients, including a familial case with
a male proband. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:1218-29.
15. Pan H, Li MR, Nelson P, Bao XH, Wu XR, Yu S.
Large deletions of the MECP2 gene in Chinese patients with classical
Rett syndrome. Clin Genet. 2006;70: 418-19.
16. Weaving LS, Christodoulou J, Williamson SL,
Friend KL, McKenzie OL, Archer H, et al. Mutations of CDKL5 cause
a severe neurodevelopmental disorder with infantile spasms and mental
retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:1079-93.
17. Ariani F, Hayek G, Rondinella D, Artuso R,
Mencarelli MA, Spanhol-Rosseto A, et al. FOXG1 is responsible for
the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:89-93.
18. Ishii T, Makita Y, Ogawa A, Amamiya S, Yamamoto
M, Miyamoto A, et al. The role of different X-inactivation
pattern on the variable clinical phenotype with Rett syndrome. Brain
Dev. 2001;23:S161-4.
|
|
|
|