|
Indian Pediatr 2016;53: 477-478 |
|
Improving Access and Reducing Childhood
Deaths due to Pneumonia
|
Jai K Das and Rehana A Salam
From Division of Women and Child Health, Aga Khan
University, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Email: [email protected]
|
C hild health has been the
cornerstone of global public health agenda for a long time, and the
focus has ever been increasing with implementation of various
evidence-based interventions and programs. But unfortunately, these
efforts have not materialized fully, and we are still far from reaching
the goals that we set ourselves. It becomes highly unacceptable provided
that these targets were never overambitious. Global under-five child
mortality – though, has declined by more than half since the year 1990,
and was pegged at 5.9 million deaths per year in 2015 [1] – is still
very high considering that most of these deaths were preventable by
implementation of existing cost-effective, evidence-based interventions.
This existing burden of under-five mortality is vastly unevenly
distributed with countries and regions with the most impoverished
bearing the brunt.
Achieving substantial progress and accelerating the
current progress would require a focused, determined approach on the
most common causes of under-five mortality. Infectious diseases and
neonatal complications encompass a vast majority of these deaths
globally. Half of these under-five deaths are due to infectious diseases
and conditions, including pneumonia, diarrhea, malaria, meningitis,
tetanus, HIV and measles [1]. Pneumonia alone accounts for 17% of all
global under-five deaths [2], and is the single most common
infection-related cause. It is critical to intensify efforts to improve
the coverage of proven preventive and therapeutic strategies to tackle
pneumonia. World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s
fund (UNICEF), in 2013, launched an integrated ‘Global Action Plan for
the Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhea’ to create greater
emphasis on countries to control these most common causes of child
mortality [3].
The strategies for prevention of pneumonia are of
unequivocal importance, including improved immu-nization, and better
water, sanitation and environment, but adequate and timely diagnosis and
management also holds unparalleled importance. Although most of these
interventions are within the present health systems of many countries,
their coverage and availability to poor and marginalized populations
varies greatly. Majority of childhood pneumonia deaths are due to severe
pneumonia, and management of these severe cases requires early
identification, prompt referral and availability of good-quality care
[4]. Previous guidelines developed by the WHO recommended that children,
who have fast breathing with lower chest wall indrawing (severe
pneumonia), be admitted and given parenteral antibiotics. But in
underprivileged settings, failure to identify cases early is recognized
as a major barrier and acknowledged to be the common determinant of
mortality due to childhood pneumonia [5]. In many developing areas, even
early identification and referral might not lead to optimum care for a
number of reasons, including poor transportation systems, costs,
distance, lack of skilled care providers and cultural perceptions [5].
Due to these existing inherent realities of the
developing world, scientists across the world designed trials probing
the possibilities of alternative management strategies, and multiple
trials were designed to test the effectiveness of oral antibiotics for
management of severe pneumonia. Oral amoxicillin was primarily tested,
and proved as effective as injectable penicillin in the treatment of
severe pneumonia. This provided an opportunity for substantial
improvements in access to appropriate care, reduced nosocomial
complications and iatrogenic infections, and reduced need for supplies,
specialized care and costs. Trials also tested the feasibility of safe
community-based treatment alternatives, and the authors documented that
properly trained community health workers were able to satisfactorily
diagnose and treat pneumonia associated with chest-indrawing [6]. This
strategy could effectively increase access to care for pneumonia in
settings where referral is difficult, and could become a key component
of community detection and management strategies for childhood
pneumonia, and substantially increase the number of children who can
receive effective care.
These findings encouraged the WHO to revise the
guidelines in 2014; all children with fast breathing and/or chest-indrawing
are classified as having ‘pneumonia’ and treated with oral amoxicillin;
the recommended dosage is 80 mg/kg for five days (40 mg/kg twice a day);
in settings of low HIV prevalence, the duration of treatment for ‘fast
breathing pneumonia’ can be reduced to three days [7]. The current
systematic review, by Lodha, et al. [8], on oral antibiotics for
community-acquired pneumonia with chest-indrawing in children below five
years of age is a comprehensive synthesis of the existing evidence, and
reaffirms that oral amoxicillin is effective for treating these cases in
both the outpatient and community settings. These strategies, if
implemented at scale in countries with a high pneumonia burden, will
result in higher proportion of children receiving care at the outpatient
or community levels, and a reduced number of pneumonia-related deaths.
The Lancet series on childhood pneumonia and diarrhea
[9], has mapped the pathway of reducing under-five deaths due to these
two conditions, but this will require a concerted effort using a
systematic approach of sharpening evidence-based planning and
implementation at all levels (communities, clinics and hospitals), and
ensuring quality of care and effective systems of monitoring and
accountability. Though, we as global community have missed the targets
of child health in ‘Millennium Development Goals’ but let us aim to
achieve the same in ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ targets.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
References
1. You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Idele P, Hogan D, Mathers
C, et al; United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality
Estimation (UNIGME). Global, regional, and national levels and trends in
under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections
to 2030: A systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child
Mortality Estimation. Lancet. 2015;386:2275-86.
2. IGME 2015. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality.
Report 2015 Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child
Mortality Estimation. Available from:
http://www.childmortality.org/files_v20/download/IGME%20
Report%202015_9_3%20LR%20Web.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2016.
3. WHO, UNICEF. Integrated Global Action Plan for the
Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhoea. Geneva: World Health
Organization/New York: United Nations Children’s Fund, 2013.
4. Walker CL, Rudan I, Liu L, Nair H, Theodoratou E,
Bhutta ZA, et al. Global burden of childhood pneumonia and
diarrhoea. Lancet. 2013;381:1405-16.
5. WHO, UNICEF. Joint Statement: Management of
Pneumonia in Community Settings. Geneva and New York: World Health
Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund, 2004.
6. Soofi S, Ahmed S, Fox MP, MacLeod WB, Thea DM,
Qazi SA, et al. Effectiveness of community case management of
severe pneumonia with oral amoxicillin in children aged 2-59 months in
Matiari district, rural Pakistan: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2012;379:729-37.
7. WHO. Revised WHO Classification and Treatment of
Childhood Pneumonia at Health Facilities. Geneva: WHO; 2014. Available
from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/137319/1/9789241507813_eng.pdf.
Accessed May 13, 2016.
8. Lodha R, Randev S, Kabra SK. Oral antibiotics for
community-acquired pneumonia with chest-indrawing in children aged below
five years: A systematic review. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:489-95.
9. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Walker N, Rizvi A, Campbell H,
Rudan I, et al; Lancet Diarrhoea and Pneumonia Interventions
Study Group. Interventions to address deaths from childhood pneumonia
and diarrhoea equitably: What works and at what cost? Lancet.
2013;381:1417-29.
|
|
|
|