Reminiscences from Indian Pediatrics: A
Tale of 50 Years |
|
Indian Pediatr 2015;52: 503-504 |
 |
Cryptococcal Meningoencephalitis – A Tale of
50 Years
|
Sharmila B Mukherjee
Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical
College, New Delhi, India.
Email: [email protected]
We have envisioned this section with the purpose of
taking the present day reader back in time. Each month, we plan to
select an article that was published in Indian Pediatrics exactly
50 years ago, and would still be of interest to pediatricians of today.
After summarizing the salient features reported by the authors, the
current perspective shall be discussed. It should be interesting to see
how scientific knowledge has evolved over these years, and humbling to
realize how our colleagues managed with the limited diagnostic and
therapeutic options available in that era. I hope that our readers will
find the series interesting. We would welcome any comments; these may be
directly communicated to the author, or to the journal office at
[email protected].
Dheeraj Shah
Editor-in-Chief
|
In 1965, the second year of its existence, the June issue of Indian
Pediatrics comprised of 43 pages, and had only six articles. These
were: a clinical study cum review of cerebral palsy, a brief review of
pyuria in children, and case reports (named as ‘case records’) on
cryptococcal meningoencephalitis, acute intermittent porphyria and
diastematomyelia. A report of the 2nd Afro-Asian Congress of Pediatrics
and current literature (consisting of interesting abstracts) was also
included.
The Past
We shall review the case of cryptococcal
meningoencephalitis reported by Krupanidhi and Rao [1] from Mysore
Medical College, India.
Case report: A 3-year-old boy presented with
inability to walk and frontal headache for a week. He had a history of a
short febrile illness with rashes three weeks previously, which was
presumed to be chicken pox. At presentation, he was febrile with scabs
on his face and limbs. Sensorium, cranial nerves and fundus were normal.
The lower limbs were flaccid with depressed deep tendon reflexes and
negative Babinski’s sign. Moderate neck stiffness was present. There
were no other salient clinical findings. A presumptive clinical
diagnosis of Varicella lymphocytic chorio-meningitis with myelitis was
kept, and he was started on tetracycline and prednisolone. Further
investigations revealed a total leukocyte count of 22,000/mm 3
with a differential of 72 polymorphonuclear cells, 20 lymphocytes and 8
monocytes. Right lower zone patchy opacities were found on the chest
X-ray. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was under increased pressure
and appeared turbid. There were 380 lymphocytes/mm3;
the glucose and protein levels were 25 mg/dL and 80 mg/dL, respectively.
A wet mount revealed yeast like cells staining positive on India ink
preparation. Sabarouds dextrose agar culture media grew budding
cryptococci. Bone marrow aspiration was normal. Hematological
malignancy, tuberculosis and syphilis were ruled out by absence of
abnormal cells in bone marrow and negative Tuberculin and Wassermann’s
tests, respectively. Once cryptococcal meningoencephalitis was
established, steroids were withheld, and crystalline penicillin and
sulphadiazine were given for an unspecified period. There was gradual
improvement with the child becoming ambulatory with support by 5 weeks.
Subsequently, he was lost to follow-up. The authors recommended that a
CSF wet mount examination with India ink should be routinely performed
in any suspected chronic meningitis as cryptococcal meningoencephalitis
was not as rare as generally believed.
Historical background and past knowledge: The
first few patients with cryptococcal disease (retrospectively
recognized) started being reported around 1891. The organism was
isolated by San Felice in 1894, and named Saccharomyces. After the
absence of ascospores was pointed out by Vuillemir in 1901, it was
renamed Cryptococcus. Cryptococcal meningo-encephalitis was
independently described by von Hansemann from Germany and Stoddard and
Cutler in America around 1914. The organism was called Torula
histolytica and the disease ‘Torulosis’ in USA while in Europe it
was referred to as European blastomycoses. Finally in 1935, a
comprehensive study by Benham lead to identification of Cryptococcus
hominis based on morphology, fermentation and serological studies,
and it was concluded that all the organisms mentioned above were the
same. Cryptococcus was introduced into microbiology textbooks in 1956.
The clinical manifestations of cryptococcal infection
recognized in the 1960s were: dermatological (rashes), neurological (meningoencephalitis
and myelitis) and bony. The association of cryptococcal
meningoencephalitis with lymphoblastomas, leukemias and sarcoidosis was
known. At that time, the modalities of identification were isolation of
the typical mucoid colonies in agar culture and demonstration of the
organism on wet mounts of emulsified pus, sputum, CSF sediment or colony
growths prepared with India ink [2]. Treatment was with Sulfapyrine and
Sulfadiazine [3]. Amphotericin B had just successfully completed
‘clinical trials’, and was reserved as a second-line drug. In India,
penicillin, sulphonamides, streptothricin (an antibiotic derived from
actinomyces) and Actidione (an antibiotic derived from streptomyces) was
being used, although outcomes were uncertain. The prognosis was bad with
80% mortality within the first year, and a waxing and waning course in
the survivors.
The Present
Over the last six decades, the awareness of this
disease has been progressively increasing due to increasing numbers of
immunodeficient patients resulting from chemotherapy, organ transplants
and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Simultaneously, there
have been major advances in the understanding of the organism, its
pathogenesis, disease manifestations, detection and management. It is
now known that Cryptococcus spreads via inhalation of airborne spores
originating from the soil and pigeon excreta. There are three human
pathogens, including the recently discovered C. laurentii that
affects premature babies [4]. Its virulence arises from its ability to
grow at 37 °C, the protective polysaccharide capsule and the ability to
synthesize melanin which is protective against host oxidative reactions.
The clinical manifestations and pathogenesis in
immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients is now well described.
Its neurotropism is hypothesized to result from its abilities to cross
the blood brain barrier in infected host cells and utilize
catecholamines (neurotransmitters) to synthesize melanin. The most
common central nervous system presentation is sub-acute or chronic
meningoencephalitis. Spinal cord involvement is extremely rare. Apart
from this child, only a few case reports of adults presenting with acute
flaccid paralysis in cryptococcal infection were found on a literature
search [5,6]. The diagnosis of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis is still
essentially by lumbar puncture. Demonstration of the organisms by India
ink preparation in CSF has low (40-80%) diagnostic yield. Detection of
the polysaccharide antigen in CSF has high (>90%) sensitivity and
specificity, and it can be detected in the early asymptomatic stages
before CSF abnormalities become apparent. This method is also used in
serum for screening AIDS patients for potential meningoencephalitis. The
organism can be identified in histopathological specimens with
mucicarmine and alcian blue stains.
Treatment strategies vary according to immune status
and site. The current strategy is to use a sequential combination of
anti-fungal drugs [7]. In CNS disease, rapid CSF sterilization in
achieved in the induction phase with amphotericin B and flucytosine for
2-10 weeks, followed by consolidation with oral flucanozole for 6-12
months, which is effective once the fungal load is reduced. In non-HIV
patients, maintenance therapy is considered only if immunosuppression
persists, whereas in children with AIDS, maintenance is continued
lifelong to prevent relapses. The prognosis has definitely improved
significantly since 1965. The current mortality rate is 15-30%, with
higher rates in HIV infection.
To conclude, we reiterate the authors’ opinion that
cryptococcal meningoencephalitis should be considered in any child with
subacute or chronic meningoencephalitis of indeterminate origin,
irrespective of immune status.
References
1. Krupanidhi I, Rao TNR. Cryptococcal meningitis: A
case report. Indian Pediatr. 1965; 2:216-8.
2. Fungal diseases involving the internal organs.
In: Zinsser H, Smith DH, editors. Zinsser Microbiology. 14th ed. New
York: Appleton Century Crofts; 1964. p.1106-48.
3. Benham RW. Cryptococcus neoformans. Proc Soc Exp
Biol Med. 1955;89:243-5.
4. Gould JM, Arnoff SC. Cryptococcus neoformans.
In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St.Geme JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE,
editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 19th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;
2011. p.1056-8.
5. Wu CH, Wu KH, Kung CT, Liu BM, Lee WH, Liu CF.
Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis with meningomyelitis: A case report. J
Taiwan Emerg Med. 2009;11:128-31.
6. Othman N, Abdullah NAN, Wahab ZA. Cryptococcal
meningitis in an immune-competent child: A case report and review of
literature. South East J Trop Med Public Health. 2004;35:930-4.
7. Perfect JR, Desmukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL,
Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, et al. Clinical Practice guidelines for
the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the Infectious
Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:291-322.
|
|
 |
|