Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
case reports

Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 603-605

Myxoid Lipoblastoma


Janani Krishnan, Varun Hathiramani, *Meenal Hastak and Rajeev G Redkar

From the Department of Pediatric Surgery and *Histopathology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India. [email protected]

Correspondence to: Dr Rajeev G Redkar, Consultant Pediatric Surgeon, Lilavati Hospital and
Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Email: [email protected]

Received: December 10, 2012;
Initial review: December 21, 2012;
Accepted: January 24, 2013.


A rapidly growing soft tissue mass in the axilla of an infant raises the suspicion of a lipoblastoma or a liposarcoma. Excisional/incisional biopsy is vital in confirming the diagnosis and hence avoiding aggressive extirpation. This case report highlights the role of histopathology and immunohistochemistry as the gold standard in differentiating a lipoblastoma from a liposarcoma. In some cases where the histopathology is inconclusive, genetic rearrangement of the PLAG1 (pleomorphic adenoma gene 1) oncogene on chromosome 8q12 helps in confirming the diagnosis of lipoblastoma.

Key words: Axillary mass, Lipoblastoma, Infant.


The presence of an axillary mass in infancy entertains the diagnosis of a cystic hygroma, hamartoma or a soft tissue neoplasm. Lipomatous tumors, namely lipoblastomas are rare, benign tumors of infancy and early childhood. They arise from the embryonal fat cells which persist and continue to proliferate into postnatal life. They are characterized by their rate of rapid growth, local invasion and increased incidence of local recurrence of 14-25% [1]. The diagnosis of a liposarcoma in infancy should be made with caution, owing to its rarity and the aggressive treatment involved. The role of excisional biopsy, histopathology with immunohistochemistry and cytogenetics in the establishment of an accurate diagnosis, is highlighted in the following case report.

Case Report

An 8-month-old female child presented to us with a swelling in the right anterior chest wall, extending through the axilla to the back (Fig. 1). It was noticed since the age of 5 months, with rapid increase in size over the last one month, to the present size. The mass was non tender, soft to firm in consistency, bosselated surface, with no skin changes. The differential diagnoses included a vascular hamartoma, cystic hygroma, a soft tissue tumor such as lipoblastoma or a liposarcoma, or a matted lymph node mass.

The ultrasound examination showed an 8×7.5×4.5cm iso- to hyperechoic, lobulated solid mass, with posterior border extending beneath the lower margin of the scapula. MRI chest confirmed an 8×5×4cm right shoulder girdle, well encapsulated soft tissue mass probably arising from the subscapularis muscle and probably of neoplastic etiology. There was no intrathoracic or bony involvement. In view of the well encapsulated nature of the tumor, an excisional biopsy was planned. The rapid growth in the tumor size warranted immediate excision to prevent mass effect and rule out malignancy which is rare, but not unknown.

Surgical exploration revealed an 8×5×6 cm vascular fleshy mass arising from the subcutaneous tissue in the axilla, closely adherent to the muscles of the chest wall and the axillary neurovascular bundle. The use of a nerve stimulator and bipolar diathermy facilitated fine dissection. The mass was completely excised. On histopathology, gross examination showed an encapsulated lobulated mass with pale cut surface with myxoid changes. On microscopy, lobular architecture with interspersed myxoid and mature adipose tissue was seen. Each lobule contained vacuolated adipocytes in various stages of maturation. Maturation of the adipocytes was more in the centre than in the periphery. There was absence of invasion in the surrounding skeletal muscle. The wide CD34, focal S100 positivity, Mib negativity and morphology rendered the diagnosis of a myxoid lipoblastoma. A PLAG1 gene analysis for determining the aggressiveness of the tumor was recommended, but was unavailable. No recurrence has been noted 2 years postoperatively.

Discussion

Lipoblastoma is a tumor of infancy, with 90% before 3 years of age and 40% in the first year of life [3] A male preponderance of 3:1 has been noted [1]. Though most commonly found in the extremities -70% [4], it can also be seen in the head and neck area, trunk, mediastinum, retroperitoneum, and various organs like lung, heart and parotid gland [5]. It is recognized as a benign neoplasm with tendency of local recurrence of 14% to 25 % [ 1]. They can be locally invasive making complete surgical excision difficult and hence increasing the risk of local recurrence.

Histopathology with immunohistochemistry in conjunction with the morphology remains the gold standard in differentiating a lipoblastoma from a myxoid liposarcoma. Myxoid morphology in lipoblastoma is not very common. Characterstic features and lipoblastoma have been previously described [1,3,6].

In cases where these features are inconsistent, cytogenetic advancement has led to the confirmation of LPB, where consistent rearrangements in the PLAG1 oncogene on chromosome 8q12 have been noted [7].

It has been found that 70% of lipoblastoma have PLAG1 gene rearrangement on chromosome 8q12 and up to 18% are associated with polysomy for chromosome 8 [7]. PLAG-1 is involved in mitogenesis, proliferation, apoptosis and IGF-2 up-regulation. In humans it is expressed mainly in fetal tissues and in low levels postnatally [7, 8].

Surgical resection is the treatment of choice except in those infiltrating tumors requiring mutilating excision [1]. The aim of surgery is complete gross excision without sacrificing the surrounding vital structures or extirpation of tissue that could lead to major deformity. Incomplete gross excision, infiltrating LPB, is notorious for its recurrence. Hence, sequential close postoperative follow up with MRI is essential. A follow up of at least 2 years postoperatively is recommended [9].

Contributors: All authors contributed to writing the report.

Funding: None; Competing interests: None stated.

References

1. McVay MR, Keller EJ, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Surgical management of lipoblastoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1067-71.

2. Vellios F, Baez JM, Schumaker HB. Lipoblastomatosis: A tumour of fetal fat different from hibernoma. Am J Pathol. 1958;34:1149-59.

3. Coffin CM, Lowichik A, Putnam A. Lipoblastoma – A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 59 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:705-12.

4. Kucera A, Snajdauf J, Vyhnánek M, Morávek J, Kodet R, Stejskalová E,et al. Lipoblastoma in children-Analysis of 5 cases. Acta Chir Belg 2008;108:580-2

5. Sciot R,Mandahl N.Lipoblastoma/Lipoblastomatosis. In: Fletcher CDM,Unni KK, Mertens F (Eds). World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. IARC Press: Lyon 2002 :26-27

6. Farrugia MK, Fearne C. Benign lipoblastoma arising in the neck. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13:213-4

7. Gisselsson D, Hibbard MK,  Dal Cin P, Sciot R, Hsi BL, Kozakewich HP, et al. PLAG1 gene alterations in Lipoblastoma. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:955-62.

8. Abdullah A. LOT1 (ZAC1/PLAG1) and its family members: Mechanisms and function. J Cell physiol. 2007;210:16-25.

9. Dilley AV, Patel DL, Hicks MJ,  Brandt ML. Lipoblastoma: Pathophysiology and surgical management. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:229-31.

 

Copyright 1999-2012 Indian Pediatrics