More and more infants with birth
weight
less than 1000 grams are surviving in
India in tertiary care centers, but they
all have a long stay in the NICU. A recent study showed a 40% incidence of
neuro-developmental impairment in ELBW infants [1]. Hence, strategies to
decrease this neurodevelop-mental impairment assume importance.
The mechanism underlying cerebral palsy and cognitive
impairment is very complex. It is important to analyse how a particular
neonatal intensive care practice in combination with other perinatal
events, affects the developing brain. This "two hit" mecha-nism has been
demonstrated in a mouse model [2]. The combination of several potential
deleterious factors may exacerbate pre-existing lesions or dis-rupt normal
programming of the developing brain [2].
In its prime, the germinal matrix releases as many as
100,000 cortical neurons per day, each of which migrates through the
cortex to its specific location. At 24 weeks gestation, neuronal
maturation and organization increase dramatically. But much of this
process occurs in the extrauterine rather than intrauterine environment in
the preterm infant. With volumetric MRI using 3D imaging, it has been
possible to show that a three-fold increase in brain volume; a four fold
increase in cortical gray matter; and a five fold increase in myelinated
white matter occurs between 29-40 weeks [3]. Hence, this is a period when
the brain is most vulnerable to injury.
Preterm infants are in essence fetuses, who develop in
an extrauterine setting, at a time when their brains are growing more
rapidly than at any other time in their lifespan. From the warm, dark,
protected acquatic econiche of the uterus, the fetus suddenly finds itself
in the dry, cold, noisy, excessively bright, chaotic environment of the
NICU. However, this specialized medical and technological NICU environment
is essential for its survival. Understanding the neurodevelopmental
expectations of this "fetal infant" provides a basis for modification of
some of the NICU practices, which inadvertently increase the stress and
challenge to this immature brain.
Noise: The NICU can be a noisy place with noxious
sounds like loud talking, banging of incubator doors, dropping of
equipment on the floor, alarms etc. Preterm babies are at a particular
risk for sensorineural hearing loss with an incidence of 4-13% depending
on their gestational age, as compared to 2% in all newborns [4]. The US
environment protective agency (EPA) has recommended a sound level of ≤45dB. Noise
level in incubators is upto 50-80dB and it is much higher in open beds.
ELBW infants respond to this noise by increased heart rate, alterations in
blood pressure and cerebral blood flow [5,6]. A low cost protocol of
environmental and behavioral modification developed by the Bengaluru group
[7] has shown good results in reducing the noise level in their ventilator
room.
An interesting study showed that the noise level in the
transport ambulance on country roads in UK was 120dB [8]. One can imagine
the noise levels in the ambulance on the pothole ridden country roads in
India!
Pain: The infant undergoes many painful procedures
in the NICU. The heart rate decreases and the oxygen saturation decreases
during the most invasive part of the heel prick [9]. The infant gives
behavior clues like grimace, frown, grunting, arching, leg extension, arm
on face etc. Exposure to repetitive pain causes excitotoxic damage to the
developing neurons. These changes promote distinct behavioural phenotypes
characterized by anxiety, altered pain and sensitivity, and stress
disorders; and this may lead to hyperactive attention deficit disorders
[10].
If clustered care (changing diapers, taking
temperature, mouth care, measuring abdominal girth) follows a painful
procedure, the infant shows heightened facial, body and heart rate
responses and cuddling the baby after a painful procedure is recommended
[11].
Light: Preterm babies are exposed to bright light
in the NICU as opposed to the darkness in utero. Reduced light may confer
the advantage of improved sleep cycles and decreased stress [12]. A study
which looked at cycled lighting versus dim lighting showed no
difference in weight gain [13]. Direct light on patients should be
avoided, unless needed for special tasks. Blankets can be put on
incubators to prevent unnecessary light exposure. Lighting used especially
for hands on care areas should have a colour rendering index, which means
that colours under lighting should look as natural as possible [14].
Tactile stimuli: Care-giving activities in the NICU
can be intrusive and stress producing [15]. It may contribute to aversive
behaviors and the babies may associate all touch with pain, demonstrated
by squirming, crying, and recoiling of arms and legs. Talking softly to a
baby before touching, gentle handling, and avoiding sudden changes in
posture, will help in preventing fear of the tactile stimulus.
Medications: Postnatal exposure to dexamethasone is
neurotoxic to the developing brain. A higher incidence of cerebral palsy
in the group treated with dexamethasone (49% vs 15%) has been
reported in a trial of early 3 day course [16]. Another study [17]
analyzed 3 DMRI images of infants treated with postnatal dexamethasone and
found significantly impaired growth of cerebral gray matter and a 30%
reduction in the total cerebral tissue volume as compared to controls.
Aminoglycosides and frusemide [18] are known to cause
hearing impairment. Benzyl alcohol, found in drugs such midazolam,
lorazepam and diazepam is known to cause cerebral palsy and developmental
delay [19]. Propylene glycol, found in the commonly used drug
phenobarbitol, is known to cause central nervous depression and seizures.
Radiation: Radiation can both kill and modify
cells. An ELBW baby who gets ventilated, gets innumerable X-rays.
CT scan imparts a much higher dose of radiation. The calculated dose of
radiation for a head CT is 6m5v, which is 200 times more than that of a
single infantogram. Exposure to heavy radiation has been reported to lead
to mental retardation [12].
Developmentally Supportive Humanized Care
The traditional NICU environment involves sensory
overload and is in stark contrast to the developing brain’s expectation.
Hence, the idea behind developmentally supportive care is to create a
‘womb out of womb’ and aim at decreasing the stress of the preterm infant
in the NICU. The advent of Neonatal Individualized Development Care and
Assessment Programme (NIDCAP) has lead to a greater emphasis on
developmental care [15,20].
Nesting, Kangaroo mother care, soft music therapy,
gentle oil massage, swaddling, and cuddling the baby, will help in
decreasing the stress to the baby. Opioids have been used for management
of moderate to severe postoperative or procedural pain [21]. One of the
most commonly used local anaesthetic cream EMLA, a eutectic mixture of
2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine is reported to reduce the pain in heel
pricks and venepunctures [22]. Paracetamol does not reduce the pain after
heel prick but reduces the pain after circumcision [23]. A small amount of
dextrose/sucrose given during a painful procedure is certainly effective
[24,25]. Other simple measures of comforting like swaddling during and
after a procedure cana also reduce the pain [24].
The noise level in the NICU can be brought down by
promptly attending or anticipating alarms, closing incubator doors gently,
talking softly during rounds and away from patients. Use of blanket covers
will muffle noise as well as decrease light. Talking softly before
touching, gentle handling, avoiding sudden changes of posture will help in
preventing fear of the tactile stimulus. It is better to limit the use of
postnatal steroids in the ELBW infant. Ultrasound and MRI are safer
modalities for evaluation of the brain.
A gentle and sensitive developmentally supportive care
will go a long way in enhancing the developmental outcome of the preterm
infant.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None stated.
References
1. Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Minich N, Fanaroff A,
Hack M. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental
disability for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics.
2005;115:997-1003.
2. Gressens P, Rogida A, Pendaveine B, Sola A. The
impact of neonatal intensive care practices on the developing brain. J
Pediatr. 2002;140:646-52.
3. Counsell SI, Rutherford MA, Cawan FM, Edwards AD.
Magnetic resonance imaging of preterm brain injury. Arch Dis Child Foetal
Neonatal Ed. 2003;8:269-74.
4. EPA, office of noise abatement and control.
Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public
health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety (report
No.5509-74-004). Washington DC, Government Printing Office, 1974.
5. Lasky RE, Williams AL. Noise and light exposure for
extremely low birth weight newborns during their stay in the neonatal
intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2009;123:540-6.
6. Williams AL, Sanderson M, Lai D, Selwyn BJ, Lasky
RE. Intensive care noise and mean arterial blood pressure in extremely low
birth-weight neonates. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:523-9.
7. Ramesh A, Rao S, Sandeep G, Nagpoornima M,
Srilakshmi V, Dominic M. Efficacy of low cost protocol in reducing noise
levels in the neonatal intensive care unit. Indian J Pediatr.
2009;76:33-6.
8. Buckland L, Austin N, Jackson A, Inder T. Excessive
exposure of sick neonates to sound during transport. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed. 2003;88:F513-16.
9. Gibbins S, Steven B, McGrath PJ, Yamada J, Beyene J,
Breu J, et al. Comparison of pain responses in infants of different
gestational ages. Neonatology. 2008;93:10-8.
10. Klein VC, Gaspardo CM, Martinez FE, Grunaun RE,
Linhares MB. Pain and distress reactivity and recovery as early predictors
of temperament in toddlers born preterm. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85:569-76.
11. Holsti L, Grunau RE, Oberland TF, Whitfield MF.
Prior pain induces heightened motor responses during clustered care in
preterm infants in the NICU. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:293-302.
12. Lai TL, Bearer CF. Iatrogenic environmental hazards
in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:163-81.
13. Boo NY, Chee SL, Rohana J. Randomized controlled
study of the effects of different durations of light exposure on weight
gain by preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Pediatr.
2002;91:674-9.
14. Rea M. Lighting for caregivers in the neonatal
intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol. 2004;31:229-42.
15. Sehgal A, Stack J. Developmentally supportive care
and NIDCAP. Ind J Pediatr. 2006;73:1007-9.
16. Murphy BP, Inder TE, Huppi PS, Warfield S, Zientara
GP. Impaired cerebral cortical gray matter: growth after treatment with
dexamethasone for neonatal chronic lung disease. Pediatrics.
2001;107:217-21.
17. Shinwell ES, Karplus M, Reich D, Weintraub Z,
Blazer S. Early postnatal dexamethasone treatment and increased incidence
of cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child Foetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83:F177-F81.
18. Rais – Behrami K, Kajd M, Veszelorszky E. Use of
furosemide and hearing loss in neonatal intensive care survivors. Am J
Perinatol. 2004;21:329-32.
19. AAP Committee on Drugs. "Inactive" ingredients in
pharmaceutical products: update. Pediatrics. 1997;99:268-78.
20. Als H, Gilkerson L, Duffy H, McAnulty GB, Buehler
GB, et al. A three centre randomized, controlled trial of
individualized developmental care for very low birth preterm infants:
medical neurodevelopmental, parenting and caregiving effects. J Dev Behav
Pediatr. 2003;24:399-408.
21. Prevention and management of pain and stress in the
neonate. American Academy of Pediatrics: Committee on fetus and newborn.
Committee on Drugs. Section on Anesthesiology. Section on Surgery.
Canadian Pediatric Society. Fetus and Newborn Committee. Pediatrics.
2000;105:454-61.
22. Taddio A, Ohlsson A, Einarson TR, Stevens B, Koren
G. A systematic review of Lidocaine – Prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the
treatment of acute pain in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998;101:e1.
23. Shah V, Taddio O, Ohlsson A. Randomized controlled
trial of neonates. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79:F209-11.
24. Chatterjee T, Chatterjee D. Practical approach to
neonatal analgesia. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39:437-43.
25. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn
infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2010;1:CD001069.