Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
short communication

Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 507-510

Idiopathic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis


Mitra Naseri, Abbas Madani, Nematolah Attaii and Homa Naseri

From the Department of Pediatrics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, and Department of Pediatrics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Correspondence to: Dr. M Naseri, Dr Sheikh Children Hospital, Taabodi Street, Naderi Street, Mashhad, Iran.
Email: [email protected] 

Received: June 12, 2008;
Initial review: July 22, 2008;
Accepted: April 28, 2009.

Published online: 2009 September 03.
 
PII: S097475590800379-2
 

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the prognostic value of some clinical, laboratory, histopathologic and therapeutic factors in 62 children with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. There were no significant differences between the factors studied, except for severe interstitial fibrosis, which was more frequent in patients with chronic kidney disease (P=0.03). The prevalence of chronic kidney disease in non-responder groups was significantly higher (P<0.05). We found therapy with cyclophosphamide to be promising in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

Key words: Focal segmental glomerculosclerosis, Iran, Nephrotic syndrome, Prognosis.`


T
he diagnosis of focal segmental glomerculosclerosis (FSGS) is based on findings on light microscopy examination, including sclerosis of glomeruli and involvement of only a portion of the capillary tuft. On immunofluorescence examination, the segmental lesions may show strong staining for IgM and C3(1, 2). Occasional cases of familial FSGS have been reported(3). Patients with steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) are at risk for developing end stage renal disease(2). We conducted this study to determine the prognostic value of clinical, laboratory, histopathologic and therapeutic factors in children with FSGS.

Methods

Of 99 patients with idiopathic FSGS seen at this center during 1986 to 2002, 62 were included. All patients had features of nephrotic syndrome, only patients with a minimum follow up of 5 yr or estimated glomercular filtration rate (GRF) ³75 mL/min/1.73 m2 were included(4). Thirty seven patients who did not return for follow up visits were excluded. Secondary FSGS was excluded based on history, clinical, serologic and immunofluorescence examination findings and imaging studies. Hematuria was defined by presence of ³5 red cells/HPF and hypertension as systolic or diastolic blood pressure more than 95th percentile for age and gender(5).

Steroid responder was defined as: (i) patients in remission following treatment with prednisone or prednisolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks, (ii) remission following therapy with cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg for 12 weeks or 3 mg/kg for 8 weeks); or (iii) remission after therapy with cyclosporine (5 mg/kg daily for 12 months). Remission was defined as no proteinuria for 3 consecutive days or 24-hour urine protein excretion <4 mg/m2/h. Chronic kidney disease was defined as an abnormality of kidney function which has been present for 3 or more months(6). Comparison between patients who were non-responder and responder was done using chi-square test, Fisher’s exact or Mann-Whitney tests; P<0.05 was considered significant.

All patients received prednisolone or prednisone at a dose of 2 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks, then 2 mg/kg every other day 4 weeks which was tapered slowly in 3-6 months. Twelve patients underwent kidney biopsy before starting treatment due to gross hematuria, sustained hypertension, evidence of azotemia or age £1 yr and others after treatment with steroid due to steroid unresponsiveness or if they were considered for treatment with cyclophos-phamide or cyclosporine. In patients with steroids resistance, cyclophosphamide was used. Patients whose parents did not consent for treatment with cyclophosphamide received cyclosporine with prednisolone (0.1-0.5 mg/kg on alternate days). We used cyclosporine in patients with cyclophospha-mide resistance or relapse of disease after cyclo-phosphamide withdrawal.

Results

Thirty six patients (58%) were £6 year old and 24 (38.7%) were >6 year; 41 (66.1%) were boys. The mean (range) of follow-up was 7.2 (0.25-16.3) year. Twenty five patients (40.3%) were steroid sensitive and rest were steroid resistant. Table I shows variables in steroid resistant and steroid sensitive patients. Twelve of 35 patients (34.3%) responded to cyclophosphamide and 2 of 16 (12.5%) responded to cyclosporine. There was no correlation between age at onset, gender, presence of hematuria or hypertension at presentation and histopathologic findings with outcome.

TABLE I



Correlation between Clinical Features and Outcome in Idiopathic FSGS
Variable Steroid
Sensitive
Steroid
Resistant
Renal function on last follow-up
 
  Group 1
(n=25)
Group 2
(n=37)
Normal renal function Chronic kidney disease
Group 1
(n=22)
Group 2
(n=15)
Group1
(n=3)
Group 2
(n=22)
Age ≤ 6 yr 20 17 17 6 3 11
Age > 6 yr 5 18 5 9 0 9
Males 18 23 15 11 3 12
Hypertensive 4 8 3 2 1 6
Hematuria 7 20 7 6 0 14
Renal histology
  Hilar FSGS  9 6 8 3 1 3
  Tip FSGS 5 12 4 5 1 7
  Non-specified FSGS 4 7 4 3 0 4
  Collapsing FSGS 2 10 1 3 1 7
  Mild to moderate glomerulosclerosis 19 29 16 13 3 16
  Severe  glomerulosclerosis 1 6 1 1 0 5
  No tubular atrophy 2 4 2 2 0 2
  Mild to moderate  tubular atrophy 16 24 13 10 3 14
  Severe tubular atrophy 2 7 2 2 0 5
  No interstitial fibrosis 1 4 1 2 0 2
  Mid to moderate interstitial fibrosis 17 21 14 10 3 11
  Severe interstitial fibrosis 2 10 2 2 0 8
* The age at onset of two patients was unknown.
† Immunofluorescence microscopy examination was done in 34 patients and detailed review of renal histopathology in 55.

Histologic specimens were reviewed for proportion of glomeruli showing segmental glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy and types of FSGS (tip, hilar, collapsing and non-specified types). Severe interstitial fibrosis was found (P=0.03) in patients whose diseases progressed to chronic kidney disease. Patients showing steroid resistance or non-response to cyclophosphamide were significantly more likely to show deranged renal functions (P=0.0002 and P=0.003, respectively). Fig. 1 shows renal survival in steroid sensitive versus steroid resistant FSGS. Relative risks for renal dysfunction in steroid, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine non-responders were 2.17 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-3.29), 3.13 (95% CI 1.49-6.59) and 2.33 (95% CI 1.27-4.27), respectively.

    
                        Follow up (months)

       
    Total number number percent
    events censored censored
Steroid sensitive 25 8 17 68
Steroid sensitive 37 17 20 54
 


Fig. 1
Kaplan Meir graph showing renal survival outcome in steroid sensitive versus steroid resistant FSGS.

Discussion

Ostalska, et al.(7) reported a less favorable clinical course in children <1 year of age. The clinical course has been suggested to be satisfactory if sclerotic lesions are peripheral, although these findings have not been confirmed by others(8). Renal survival has been directly associated with degree of proteinuria(9). Cyclophosphamide may have some survival benefits in those with at least a partial response measured by impact on proteinuria and progression to ESRD(10), but a randomized trial showed that there was no difference in renal survival after cyclophosphamide treatment(11).

It is suggested that therapy with alkylating agents might not be useful for treatment of primary FSGS. Patients in this study showed a relatively better response to cyclophosphamide and 34.3% reached complete remission. Two out of 12 (16.2%) patients who were cyclophosphamide responsive and 17 out of 23 (73.9%) non responders showed progression of renal dysfunction.

Paik, et al.(12) showed that asymptomatic proteinuria at presentation, initial renal insufficiency; higher segmental sclerosis, severe tubulointerstitial changes, initial non-responder and absence of remission are poor prognostic factors. Another study reported a renal survival rate of 90% in responders while in non-responders it was 48%(13). In our study, renal survival rates for steroid, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine responders were 88%, 83.8% and 100%, respectively. Findings from this study suggest that satisfactory responses to therapy with steroids and cyclophosphamide results in improved long term outcome.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Drs Bodaghi, Esfehani, Mohseni, Ahmadi, Mahjob and Sadeghi and Ms Haddady for their help in this work and in the preparation of the manuscript.

Contributors: MN, AM and NM were involved in designing the study; MN and HN were involved in data collection. The final manuscript was approved by all authors.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None stated.


What This Study Adds?

• Therapy with cyclophosphamide is promising in patients with steroid resistant focal segmental glomerulosclosis.
 

References

1. Alpers CE. The kidney. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, eds. Robbins and Cortan pathologic basis of disease, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 955-1021.

2. Niaudet P. Steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. In: Avner ED, Harmon W, Niaudet P, eds. Pediatric Nephrology Textbook, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 557-573.

3. Frishberg Y, Rinat C, Megged O, Shapira E, Feinstein S, Raas-Rothschild A. Mutations in NPHS2 encoding podocin is a prevalent cause of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome among Israeli-Arab children. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 400-405.

4. Guignard JP, Santos F. Laboratory investigations. In: Avner ED, Harmon W, Niaudet P, eds. Pediatric Nephrology Textbook, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 399-424

5. Bender JU, Bonilla-Felix MA, Portman RJ. Epidemiology of hypertension. In: Avner ED, Harmon W, Niaudet P, ed. Pediatric Nephrology Textbook, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p.1125-1151.

6. Levin A. The advantages of a uniform terminology and staging system for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 1446-1451.

7. Ostalska-Nowicka D, Zachwieja J, Maciejewski J, WoŸniak A, Salwa-Urawska W. The prognostic value of glomerular immaturity in the nephrotic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2004; 19: 633-637.

8. Morita M, White RH, Coad NA, Raafat F. The clinical significance of the glomerular location of segmental lesions in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clin Nephrol 1990; 33: 211-219.

9. Gipson DS, Chin H, Presler TP, Jennette C, Ferris ME, Massengill S, et al. Differential risk of remission and ESRD in childhood FSGS. Pediatr Nephrol 2006; 21: 344-349.

10. Geary DF, Farine M, Thorner P, Baumal R. Response to cyclophosphamide in steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a reappraisal. Clin Nephrol 1984; 22: 109-113.

11. Abeyagunawardena AS, Sebire NJ, Risdon RA, Dillon MJ, Rees L, Van’t Hoff W, et al. Predictors of long-term outcome of children with idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2007; 22: 215-221.

12. Paik KH, Lee BH, Cho HY, Kang HG, Ha IS, Cheong HI, et al. Primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis in children: clinical course and prognosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2007; 22: 389-395.

13. Tarshish P, Tobin JN, Bernstein J, Edelmann CM Jr. Cyclophosphamide does not benefit patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children. Pediatr Nephrol 1996; 10: 590-593.
 

 

Copyright© 1999 by the Indian Pediatrics (Disclaimer)