Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
Research paper

Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 477-485

Blood Pressure Distribution in Indian Children


Manu Raj, Karimassery Ramaiyer Sundaram*, Mary Paul and Raman Krishna Kumar

From the Departments of Pediatric Cardiology and *Biostatistics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and
Research Centre, Kochi, India.

Correspondence to: Dr Manu Raj, Clinical Associate Professor (Pediatrics), Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala.
Email: [email protected]

Received: February 25, 2009;
Initial review: April 15, 2009;
Accepted: May 21, 2009.
Published online: 2009 September.

PII:S097475590900123-1

 

Abstract

Objective: To determine blood pressure distribution in schoolchildren and to derive population specific reference values appropriate for age, gender and height status.

Design: Cross sectional observational study.

Setting: Schools in Ernakulam district, Kerala, India, during 2005-06.

Methods: Stratified random cluster sampling method was used to select the children. Blood pressure and anthropometric data were collected from 20,263 students of 5-16 years age. Three readings of blood pressures of each child were taken by mercury sphygmomanometer and mean was taken for analysis. Blood pressure percentiles in relation to gender, age and height were estimated from a non-overweight population of 18,931 children using polynomial regression models.

Results: Children from study population have higher diastolic pressures for both sexes than international standard across all age groups. For systolic blood pressure, girls showed higher values than the international standard while for boys, the difference appears to be minimal.

Conclusions: Blood pressure distribution in children from our study population demonstrates a different pattern in comparison to existing international reference. Higher blood pressure values in the study population are of considerable public health significance.

Key words: Adolescents, Blood pressure, India, Obesity, Overweight.


H
ypertension in children is an emerging public health issue attracting the attention of medical professionals worldwide. Hypertension in children exhibits strong correlations with various factors, among which bodyweight assumes considerable significance(1-4). Excess weight resulting in hypertension in children deserves immediate attention even in large developing economies like India, China and Brazil(2,5,6). Data from diverse populations shows that the tracking of blood pressure from childhood into adulthood is very strong(7). In addition to aggravating cardiovascular morbidity and mortality burden, hypertension contributes significantly to other chronic diseases such as stroke and end-stage organ damage(8,9). Throughout adulthood, blood pressure is strongly and directly related to vascular as well as overall mortality(10).

The existing reference values for blood pressure in children were derived from a multiethnic pediatric population from USA(11). The application of this international reference to other populations that differ in various demographic factors, may not be valid. The aim of this study was to plot blood pressure distribution in schoolchildren and to derive population specific reference values appropriate for age, gender and height status.

Methods

A contiguous area with a population of approximately 1.37 million was selected from Ernakulam district, in central Kerala, India. Sampling was done by stratified random cluster sampling method. Schools in the area were stratified into 5 groups according to the strength of children and a representative sample of 46 schools with a cumulative population of 25,228 children was randomly chosen. Blood pressure (BP) and anthropometric data (height and weight) were collected from 20,263 students of 5-16 years age during the period 2005-06. Children with body mass index (BMI) more than or equal to 85th percentile of reference data were considered overweight(12). The reference data used to identify the cut offs were taken from CDC 2000 data set for BMI(13). A total of 18,931 non-overweight children were selected from the total sample and used for deriving blood pressure nomograms. Blood pressure was measured using mercury sphygmomanometer. Standard methodology, as recommended by the Fourth Report on the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents, was used to measure blood pressure(11). Three readings of blood pressures of each child were taken maintaining an interval of 2 minutes between the readings. Mean of the three readings was reported. Weight and height of each child were recorded using standard methods. The detailed design and methodology is available in our previous publication(2).

Statistical analysis

Polynomial regression models were considered to estimate blood pressure percentiles in relation to sex, age and height. The same model was adopted previously in computing blood pressure percen-tiles(11). The model used was a fourth degree polynomial model to predict adjusted blood pressure as a function of age and height Z score for both genders separately. The formulae used for expected BP is given in Annexure I. This expected BP corresponds to mean BP of that particular age and height Z score (Zht) of the specified gender. Using this mean BP and the standard deviation derived from our sample, we derived appropriate values for other BP percentiles. The advantage of using polynomial regression model is that although the distribution of height varies greatly with age, the distribution of Zht does not, thus allowing one to estimate blood pressure percentiles as a function of age and height with a relatively simple polynomial model across a wide age range(14).

Results

The descriptive data of the school survey is presented in Table I. The mean systolic blood pressure was similar in boys and girls up to the age of 8 years after which girls demonstrated higher values compared to boys till the age of 15 years. At the age of 16 years, boys demonstrated slightly higher values than girls. The mean diastolic blood pressure demonstrated a relative increase in girls by 9 years of age, which stayed till the age of 16 years. The relative increase in systolic blood pressure in girls compared to boys peaked during 11 to 13 years of age. In case of diastolic blood pressure, the relative increase peaked during 12 to 15 years of age.

Table I 



Characteristics of the Study Sample
      Height
(cm)
Weight
(kg)
BMI
(kg/m2)
SBP
(mm Hg)
DBP
(mm Hg)
Age (yr) No. Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean
Boys
5 198 111.6 (5.63) 17.8 (3.19) 14.2 (1.53) 95.2 (8.15) 61.0 (8.41)
6 689 116.1 (5.61) 19.5 (3.77) 14.4 (1.85) 96.5 (8.68) 60.9 (8.93)
7 729 122.0 (5.61) 21.9 (4.71) 14.6 (2.20) 97.7 (8.22) 62.9 (8.75)
8 788 127.4 (6.26) 24.5 (5.32) 15.0 (2.26) 99.5 (9.09) 64.3 (8.68)
9 912 132.1 (6.32) 26.8 (5.76) 15.2 (2.32) 100.5 (8.56) 66.0 (8.31)
10 1109 137.1 (6.48) 29.3 (6.50) 15.4 (2.48) 102.1 (8.67) 67.3 (8.08)
11 1126 141.9 (7.24) 32.6 (7.94) 16.1 (2.83) 103.5 (9.60) 68.3 (8.24)
12 1125 146.7 (7.87) 35.9 (9.13) 16.5 (2.96) 105.3 (10.0) 68.6 (8.08)
13 1024 153.7 (8.83) 40.9 (9.71) 17.2 (2.99) 108.0 (11.20) 69.1 (8.67)
14 1088 159.8 (8.36) 45.1 (9.60) 17.5 (2.79) 111.0 (11.29) 71.2 (8.25)
15 687 164.2 (7.71) 49.3 (10.51) 18.2 (3.05) 113.8 (10.92) 72.8 (8.46)
16 279 165.9 (7.5) 52.4 (11.42) 18.9 (3.28) 115.1 (11.44) 73.2 (8.20)
Girls
5 222 110.0 (5.52) 17.2 (2.89) 14.2 (1.57) 94.1 (9.25) 59.2 (9.20)
6 563 114.8 (5.55) 18.9 (3.36) 14.2 (1.66) 95.9 (8.44) 61.7 (7.97)
7 594 121.6 (5.73) 21.8 (4.61) 14.6 (2.20) 97.9 (8.35) 63.3 (8.32)
8 667 126.2 (6.33) 23.8 (4.99) 14.8 (2.16) 98.8 (9.36) 63.7 (8.51)
9 855 132.3 (6.58) 26.7 (5.69) 15.1 (2.32) 101.5 (9.36) 66.5 (8.38)
10 1178 137.6 (7.08) 29.9 (7.10) 15.7 (2.62) 104.4 (9.87) 68.5 (8.17)
11 1301 142.8 (7.33) 33.7 (8.01) 16.3 (2.77) 107.3 (10.01) 70.0 (7.85)
12 1269 148.6 (6.68) 38.2 (8.07) 17.2 (2.83) 109.8 (10.35) 71.7 (7.62)
13 1388 152.1 (6.24) 41.5 (7.82) 17.9 (2.84) 112.3 (10.57) 72.6 (7.80)
14 1481 154.2 (5.99) 44.0 (8.53) 18.5 (3.08) 113.2 (10.42) 73.3 (7.85)
15 813 155.3 (6.28) 45.8 (8.39) 19.0 (2.88) 114.4 (10.47) 74.2 (7.94)
16 178 155.2 (6.58) 46.6 (8.92) 19.3   3.28 114.7 (10.87) 74.5 (7.10)
Figures in parentheses are standard deviations. 

BMI: Body mass index; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; 

DBP: Diastolic blood pressure.

The regression coefficients from polynomial regression model were derived for both genders separately. The intercept (a) for systolic BP was 100.63 in boys and 102.87 in girls. The corresponding values for diastolic BP was 66.25 and 67.35 respectively. The regression, co-efficients for various powers of age (b1, b2, b3 and b4) in case of systolic blood pressure for boys were 1.36, 0.17, 0.02 and –0.0036, respectively. The corresponding figures for girls were 2.66, 0.07, -0.03 and -0.0009. The values (b1, b2, b3 and b4) of diastolic blood pressure for boys were 1.21, –0.08, –0.00013 and 0.0019, respectively. The corresponding values for girls were 1.89, –0.06, –0.02 and 0.001, respectively. The regression co-efficients for various powers of height z score (g1, g2, g3 and g4) in case of systolic blood pressure for boys were 2.30, 0.02, –0.028 and –0.0098, respectively. The corresponding figures for girls were 1.36, -0.16, 0.015 and 0.016, respectively. The values (g1, g2, g3 and g4) of diastolic blood pressure for boys were 1.18, –0.13, 0.017 and 0.012, respectively. The corresponding values for girls were 0.89, –0.11, 0.007 and 0.012, respectively. The standard deviation (s) for systolic BP was 11.08 in boys and 11.6 in girls, and for diastolic BP was 9.07 in boys and 9.0 in girls.

TABLE II



Height Percentile Values in Centimeters for Boys and Girls

Boys

Girls

Age (yr) 5 10 25 50 75 90 95 5 10 25 50 75 90 95
5 103 105 107 112 116 119 121 101 103 107 110 113 117 120
6 108 109 112 116 120 123 126 106 108 111 115 118 122 124
7 113 115 118 122 126 129 131 112 115 118 121 125 129 131
8 117 120 123 127 132 135 138 115 118 122 126 130 134 137
9 122 124 128 132 136 140 143 122 124 128 132 136 141 144
10 127 129 133 137 141 145 148 122 124 128 132 136 141 144
11 131 133 137 142 147 152 154 131 133 138 143 148 152 155
12 135 137 141 146 152 157 161 137 140 144 149 153 157 159
13 140 142 148 153 160 165 168 142 144 148 152 156 160 163
14 145 149 154 161 166 170 173 144 147 150 154 158 162 164
15 151 155 160 164 169 173 176 145 147 151 156 159 163 165
16 152 157 161 166 171 174 177 143 146 151 155 160 163 166

The height percentiles for both genders from the study population were tabulated separately (Table II). Blood pressure percentile tables were constructed for total sample population after excluding the overweight children (Tables III and IV). This was done with the idea that a non-overweight population should be used to construct a reference nomogram for blood pressure because it avoids the influence of excess weight on blood pressure distribution. Application of this data for clinical and epidemiological purposes is explained in Appendix A. Comparison of blood pressure distribution pattern of both genders show significant differences which persist in both systolic and diastolic blood pressures.

TABLE III



Blood Pressure (BP) Percentile Values for Non-overweight Boys in Relation to Age and Height Percentiles
Age
(yr)
BP
Percentile
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
Height percentiles
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
Height percentiles
    5 10 25 50 75 90 95 5 10 25 50 75 90 95
5 50 90 91 92 93 95 96 97 57 58 58 59 60 61 61
  90 104 105 106 108 109 110 111 69 69 70 71 72 72 73
  95 108 109 110 112 113 115 115 72 73 73 74 75 76 76
  99 116 116 118 119 121 122 123 78 79 80 80 81 82 82
6 50 92 93 94 96 97 99 99 58 59 60 61 61 62 62
  90 106 107 108 110 111 113 114 70 70 71 72 73 74 74
  95 110 111 112 114 116 117 118 73 74 75 75 76 77 77
  99 118 119 120 122 123 124 125 79 80 81 82 82 83 83
7 50 94 94 96 97 99 100 101 60 60 61 62 63 63 64
  90 108 109 110 111 113 114 115 71 72 73 74 74 75 75
  95 112 113 114 116 117 118 119 75 75 76 77 78 78 79
  99 119 120 122 123 125 126 127 81 81 82 83 84 84 85
8 50 95 95 97 98 100 101 102 61 62 63 64 64 65 65
  90 109 110 111 113 114 115 116 73 73 74 75 76 76 77
  95 113 114 115 117 118 120 120 76 77 78 78 79 80 80
  99 121 121 123 124 126 127 128 82 83 84 85 85 86 86
9 50 96 97 98 99 101 102 103 63 63 64 65 66 66 67
  90 110 111 112 114 115 116 117 74 75 76 77 77 78 78
  95 114 115 116 118 119 121 121 78 78 79 80 81 81 82
  99 122 122 124 125 127 128 129 84 84 85 86 87 87 88
10 50 97 98 99 101 102 104 104 64 65 65 66 67 68 68
  90 111 112 113 115 116 118 118 76 76 77 78 79 79 80
  95 115 116 117 119 120 122 123 79 79 80 81 82 83 83
  99 123 124 125 126 128 129 130 85 86 87 87 88 89 89
11 50 98 99 101 102 104 105 106 65 66 67 67 68 69 69
  90 113 113 115 116 118 119 120 77 77 78 79 80 80 81
  95 117 118 119 120 122 123 124 80 81 81 82 83 84 84
  99 124 125 126 128 130 131 132 86 87 88 89 89 90 90
12 50 100 101 103 104 106 107 108 66 67 68 68 69 70 70
  90 115 115 117 118 120 121 122 78 78 79 80 81 81 82
  95 119 120 121 122 124 125 126 81 82 82 83 84 85 85
  99 126 127 128 130 131 133 134 87 88 89 89 90 91 91
13 50 103 104 105 106 108 109 110 67 68 68 69 70 71 71
  90 117 118 119 121 122 124 124 79 79 80 81 82 82 83
  95 121 122 123 125 126 128 128 82 83 83 84 85 86 86
  99 129 129 131 132 134 135 136 88 89 90 90 91 92 92
14 50 105 106 108 109 111 112 113 68 69 69 70 71 72 72
  90 120 120 122 123 125 126 127 80 80 81 82 83 83 84
  95 124 124 126 127 129 130 131 83 83 84 85 86 87 87
  99 131 132 133 135 136 138 139 89 90 91 91 92 93 93
15 50 108 109 110 112 113 115 115 69 70 71 71 72 73 73
  90 122 123 124 126 127 129 130 81 81 82 83 84 84 85
  95 126 127 129 130 132 133 134 84 85 86 86 87 88 88
  99 134 135 136 138 139 140 141 90 91 92 93 93 94 94
16 50 111 111 113 114 116 117 118 71 71 72 73 74 74 75
  90 125 126 127 128 130 131 132 82 83 84 85 85 86 86
  95 129 130 131 133 134 135 136 86 86 87 88 89 89 90
  99 136 137 139 140 142 143 144 92 92 93 94 95 96 96
Data constructed from the sample of non-overweight boys (N=9039).
TABLE IV



Blood Pressure (BP) Percentile Values for Non-overweight Girls in Relation to Age and Height Percentiles
Age
(yr)
BP
Percentile
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
Height percentiles
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
Height percentiles
    5 10 25 50 75 90 95 5 10 25 50 75 90 95
5 50 92 92 93 94 95 96 96  58 58 59 60 60 61 61
  90 107 107 108 109 110 111 111 69 70 70 71 72 72 72
  95 111 111 112 113 114 115 115 73 73 74 74 75 75 76
  99 119 119 120 121 122 123 123 79 79 80 81 81 82 82
6 50 92 93 94 95 96 97 97 59 59 60 60 61 61 62
  90 107 108 109 110 111 111 112 70 71 71 72 72 73 73
  95 111 112 113 114 115 116 116 73 74 75 75 76 76 76
  99 119 120 121 122 123 124 124 80 80 81 81 82 82 83
7 50 94 94 95 96 97 98 98 60 60 61 62 62 63 63
  90 108 109 110 111 112 113 113 72 72 73 73 74 74 75
  95 113 113 114 115 116 117 117 75 75 76 77 77 78 78
  99 121 121 122 123 124 125 125 81 81 82 83 83 84 84
8 50 95 96 97 98 99 100 100 62 62 63 63 64 64 65
  90 110 111 112 113 114 114 115 73 74 74 75 76 76 76
  95 115 115 116 117 118 119 119 77 77 78 78 79 79 80
  99 122 123 124 125 126 127 127 83 83 84 84 85 85 86
9 50 98 98 99 100 101 102 102 64 64 65 65 66 66 67
  90 113 113 114 115 116 117 117 75 76 76 77 77 78 78
  95 117 117 118 119 120 121 121 79 79 80 80 81 81 82
  99 125 125 126 127 128 129 129 85 85 86 86 87 87 88
10 50 100 101 102 103 104 104 105 66 66 67 67 68 68 69
  90 115 116 117 118 119 119 120 77 78 78 79 79 80 80
  95 119 120 121 122 123 124 124 80 81 82 82 83 83 83
  99 127 128 129 130 131 131 132 87 87 88 88 89 89 90
11 50 103 104 105 106 106 107 108 67 68 69 69 70 70 70
  90 118 118 119 120 121 122 122 79 79 80 81 81 82 82
  95 122 123 124 125 126 126 127 82 83 83 84 85 85 85
  99 130 131 132 133 133 134 135 88 89 89 90 91 91 91
12 50 106 106 107 108 109 110 110 69 69 70 71 71 72 72
  90 120 121 122 123 124 125 125 81 81 82 82 83 83 84
  95 125 125 126 127 128 129 129 84 84 85 86 86 87 87
  99 133 133 134 135 136 137 137 90 90 91 92 92 93 93
13 50 108 109 110 111 112 112 113 70 71 71 72 73 73 73
  90 123 124 125 126 126 127 128 82 82 83 84 84 85 85
  95 127 128 129 130 131 131 132 85 86 86 87 87 88 88
  99 135 136 137 138 139 139 140 91 92 92 93 94 94 94
14 50 110 111 112 113 114 114 115 71 72 72 73 74 74 74
  90 125 126 127 128 128 129 130 83 83 84 85 85 86 86
  95 129 130 131 132 133 133 134 86 87 87 88 88 89 89
  99 137 138 139 140 141 141 142 92 93 93 94 95 95 95
15 50 111 112 113 114 115 115 116 72 72 73 74 74 75 75
  90 126 127 128 129 130 130 131 84 84 85 85 86 86 87
  95 130 131 132 133 134 135 135 87 87 88 89 89 90 90
  99 138 139 140 141 142 143 143 93 93 94 95 95 96 96
16 50 112 112 113 114 115 116 116 72 73 74 74 75 75 75
  90 126 127 128 129 130 131 131 84 84 85 86 86 87 87
  95 131 131 132 133 134 135 135 87 88 88 89 90 90 90
  99 139 139 140 141 142 143 143 93 94 95 95 96 96 96

Discussion

Studies in the past have demonstrated that age appropriate blood pressure values tend to be more among boys than girls through out childhood and adolescence(11,15). The results of our study appear to be at variance to this finding. In our study, there is a relative increase in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures in girls by the age of 9 years (Table I). By the age of 16 years, both genders have similar systolic blood pressure values. By the age of 16 years there appears to be minimal differences in diastolic blood pressure between both genders. Similar data was reported in a study from Jordan(16).

Early signs of a change in gender based blood pressure distribution among adolescents are emerging. Comparison of data sets from US adolescents demonstrated an increasing trend for high blood pressure among adolescent girls in contrast to a decreasing trend for the same in adolescent boys(17). The onset of sexual maturation is associated with increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures(18,19). The timing of sexual maturity is different for boys and girls with the latter attaining it relatively earlier. This difference could contribute to differences in blood pressure progression during adolescence. The same reason could explain the lack of difference in systolic blood pressure and the comparable values in diastolic blood pressure between the genders by age 16, a time at which majority of the boys too have attained significant sexual maturity.

The blood pressure distribution pattern constructed using data from the present study was compared with an existing international refe-rence(14). There appears to be minimal difference in systolic blood pressure among boys from the two populations. There exists difference among girls in terms of systolic blood pressure with girls from the present study showing higher values consistently for all age groups (Fig.1). The difference in diastolic blood pressure appears to be more than the difference in systolic blood pressure. The same is consistently demonstrated in a higher magnitude in both gender and in all age groups, with children from the present study exhibiting higher values. In addition, the difference in diastolic blood pressure between the populations appears to be more in girls than boys. Higher values for mean systolic as well as diastolic blood pressures in comparison to US data were demonstrated previously for children from Indian, Jordan and Pakistan(16,20-22). All these studies have shown consistently higher diastolic blood pressures in comparison to US children. The differences in systolic blood pressures were less in magnitude compared to that of diastolic pressures. There appears to be a consistent difference in diastolic blood pressures between the present study and the US data(14), pointing towards a population-based difference. This difference appears to start even before the age of 5 years and persists into late adolescence. Similar trends in Pakistani and Jordanian children support this observation(16,22).

Fig. 1 Comparison of blood pressure between the present sample and US children. Comparison made for 50th percentile of blood pressure of non-overweight children at 50th percentile of height. Values derived from polynomial regression model. *Data with permission from ref 14.

The validity of the results of this study can be ascertained by the relatively significant correlation for both systolic and diastolic pressures with height and weight as demonstrated by our previous publication from the same database(2). Anxiety among children subjected to blood pressure measurements in a field setting might have influenced the recordings to certain extent. This limitation was unavoidable considering the design of the study. The study results deserve attention due to the anticipated public health implications they predict. Any demonstrable increase in a known cardiovascular risk factor like blood pressure in large populations could seriously result in amplification of morbidity burden resulting from cardiovascular diseases. The morbidity and mortality pattern from cardiovascular diseases in the coming decades when the current pediatric population reaches adulthood appears to be one of grave concern.

Blood pressure distribution in children from this study exhibits a different pattern in comparison to existing international reference. Higher blood pressure values for our population in comparison to international reference values could contribute to heightened disease burden resulting from hypertension in future. This study underscores the need for a population specific reference for pediatric blood pressure. The public health implications of higher blood pressure values in Indian children starting from a relatively young age could be potentially serious. Further studies from other parts of India are needed to determine the influence of diverse socioeconomic, cultural and nutritional factors on blood pressure in children.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr Abish Sudhakar and Ms Smitha Mathew for assistance in data management and statistical analysis.

Contributors: MR conceived, designed and drafted the study. RKK supervised and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. MP managed the data and assisted in drafting of the manuscript and in statistical analysis. KRS did the statistical analysis and assisted in drafting the manuscript. MR will act as guarantor of the study.

Funding: The study was fully supported by a grant from the Indian Council of Medical Research.

Competing interests: None stated.

 

APPENDIX A

Identifying BP percentiles for clinical use

For example, a 14-year old boy with height 166 cms has SBP of 126 mm Hg.

First step is to refer to the height percentile table (Table II) and see which percentile of height the boy has. In this case, the boy has 75th percentile of height.

Then, refer the values in BP percentile table corresponding to the case’s sex, age and height percentile. In this case, the 50th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles of SBP for this 14-year-old boy whose height is in the 75th percentile are 111, 125, 129 and 136 respectively. The observed SBP value of 126 mm Hg lies above 90th percentile, but below 95th percentile. Hence this child will be classified as having systolic pre-hypertension.

Actual BP percentiles assume clinical significance in diagnosis, classification and treatment targets of hypertension in children. Systolic or diastolic BP ł95th percentile for gender, age and height for 3 or more occasions is defined as hypertension in children. Pre-hypertension is defined as systolic BP or diastolic BP that are ł90th percentile but <95th percentile. Stage 1 hypertension refers to BP from 95th percentile to the 99th percentile plus 5 mm Hg. Stage 2 hypertension refers to values above stage 1 hypertension. The 50th percentile of BP is the target attempted when hypertensive children are subjected to anti hypertensive drug therapy.

Calculating exact BP percentiles using polynomial regression equation

                                 4                       4
Expected BP µ=
a + S bj (y-10)j + S gk (Zht)k
                                j=1                  k=1

where y- age in years, ht- height in cms, a, b1 ...b4 and g1.....g4 are regression co-efficients.

For example, a 14-year old boy with height 166 cms has a height equivalent to 75th percentile. The Z score for 75th percentile = 0.6745. The parameter Age-10 = 4 in this case.

His expected SBP (µ) is,

µ = 100.63 + 1.36(4) + 0.17(42) + 0.02(43) - 0.0036(44) + 2.30(0.6745) + 0.024(0.67452) – 0.028(0.67453) – 0.0098(0.67454) = 110.70 mmHg.

Suppose his actual SBP is 126 mmHg (x); his SBP Z score then equals

(x- µ)/s = (126-110.70)/11.08 = 1.3809.

The corresponding SBP percentile = j (1.3809) × 100% = 91.6 percentile.

 

 

 


What is Already Known?

• Blood pressure in children shows positive associations with age and height.

What this Study Adds?

• Blood pressure distribution in Indian children exhibits significant differences in comparison to existing US reference values.
 

References

1. Kelishadi R, Ardalan G, Gheiratmand R, Majdzadeh R, Delavari A, Heshmat R, et al. Blood pressure and its influencing factors in a national representative sample of Iranian children and adolescents: the CASPIAN Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 13: 956-963.

2. Raj M, Sundaram KR, Paul M, Deepa AS, Kumar RK. Obesity in Indian children: time trends and relationship with hypertension. Natl Med J India 2007; 20: 288-293.

3. Sorof JM, Lai D, Turner J, Poffenbarger T, Portman RJ. Overweight, ethnicity and the prevalence of hypertension in school-aged children. Pediatrics 2004;113:475-482.

4. Paradis G, Lambert M, O’Loughlin J, Lavallée C, Aubin J, Delvin E, et al. Blood pressure and adiposity in children and adolescents. Circulation 2004; 110: 1832-1838.

5. Wang Y, Monteiro C, Popkin BM. Trends of obesity and underweight in older children and adolescents in the United States, Brazil, China and Russia. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 75: 971-977.

6. Ji CY, Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC). Report on childhood obesity in China (4) prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity in Chinese urban school-age children and adolescents, 1985-2000. Biomed Environ Sci 2007; 20: 1-10.

7. Chen X, Wang Y. Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Circulation 2008; 117: 3171-3180.

8. Thomas F, Rudnichi A, Bacri AM, Bean K, Guize L, Benetos A. Cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive men according to presence of associated risk factors. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1256-1261.

9. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560-2572.

10. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R; Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903-1913.

11. National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004;114:555-576.

12. Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Obesity evaluation and treatment: Expert Committee recommendations. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services. Pediatrics 1998; 102: e29. Available from URL: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/102/3/e29. Accessed January 12, 2008.

13. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA. CDC growth charts for the United States [database on the internet]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/growthcharts/zscore/bmiagerev.xls. Accessed January 12, 2008.

14. Rosner B, Cook N, Portman R, Daniels S, Falkner B. Determination of blood pressure percentiles in normal-weight children: some methodological issues. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167: 653-666.

15. Jackson LV, Thalange NK, Cole TJ. Blood pressure centiles for Great Britain. Arch Dis Child 2007; 92: 298-303.

16. Switty TA, Shaheen BH, Habashneh MS, Kelani Z, Hazza IA. Blood pressure among school children in Jordan. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 1996; 7: 283-290.

17. Ostchega Y, Carroll M, Prineas RJ, McDowell MA, Louis T, Tilert T. Trends of elevated blood pressure among children and adolescents: Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-2006. Am J Hypertens 2009; 22: 59-67.

18. Koziel S, Kolodziej H, Ulijaszek S. Body size, fat distribution, menarcheal age and blood pressure in 14-year-old girls. Eur J Epidemiol 2001; 17: 1111-1115.

19. Daniels SR, McMahon RP, Obarzanek E, Waclawiw MA, Similo SL, Biro FM, et al. Longitudinal correlates of change in blood pressure in adolescent girls. Hypertension 1998; 31: 97-103.

20. Krishna P, PrasannaKumar KM, Desai N, Thennarasu K. Blood pressure reference tables for children and adolescents of Karnataka. Indian Pediatr 2006; 43: 491-501.

21. Verma M, Chhatwal J, George SM. Biophysical profile of blood pressure in school children. Indian Pediatr 1995; 32: 749-754.

22. Jafar TH, Islam M, Poulter N, Hatcher J, Schmid CH, Levey AS, et al. Children in South Asia have higher body mass-adjusted blood pressure levels than white children in the United States: a comparative study. Circulation 2005; 111: 1291-1297.
 

 

Copyright© 1999 by the Indian Pediatrics (Disclaimer)