|
Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 516-518 |
|
Granulocyte transfusion in children |
Revathi Raj, Shrishu R Kamath, Suchitra Ranjit, Nirmal Shankar and V
Lakshmanan
From Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Revathi Raj, Consultant Paediatric
Haematologist, Apollo Hospitals,
21 Greams Lane, Off Greames Road, Chennai 600 006, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Manuscript received: September 18, 2007;
Initial review: December 19, 2007;
Accepted: July 24, 2008.
|
Abstract
We describe a single institution experience with the
use of granulocyte transfusion in children. This is a retrospective
analysis of 45 collections of granulocyte units obtained by apheresis
after priming with dexamethasone, infused into 17 children with severe
neutropenic infections. Ten children survived the acute infection.
Granulocyte transfusion is a useful adjunct to antimicrobials and growth
factors in post chemotherapy neutropenic sepsis and is highly effective
in children with chronic granulomatous disease and life threatening
infections.
Keywords: Granulocyte transfusion, Neutropenia, Sepsis.
|
C hildren undergoing intensive chemotherapy
for malignant diseases, stem cell transplantation and with granulocyte
function disorders are at increased risk of neutropenia. Neutropenia is
the single most important reason for the development of severe bacterial
and fungal infections in immuno-compromised children, contributing to both
morbidity and mortality(1-3). Transfusion of neutrophils in such children
appears a logical option(4-6). Trials have suggested that granulocyte
transfusions are bene-ficial as an adjunct to the ongoing therapy(7-9).
The present study is a single institution retrospective analysis of
granulocyte transfusions in children.
Methods
The study was done in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
and Hematology unit of Apollo Hospitals, Chennai. Forty five transfusions
were done in the five year period between March 2002 and March 2007 in 17
children. The ethics committee of Apollo Hospitals Chennai approved the
protocol for granulocyte transfusion in sick children. Informed consent
was taken from all parents and the donors before the donation and
transfusion of granulocytes.
Granulocyte donors were healthy relatives or voluntary
donors, who were tested for ABO and RhD compatibility(10). Donors were
informed regarding the apheresis technique and that participation would
include administration of steroids prior to the procedure. Granulocyte
colony stimulating factor was not used in priming donors. All the donors
were screened for HIV, Hepatitis B and C, malaria and syphilis. They were
given 8 mg of dexamethasone orally with 40 mg of pantoprazole
approximately 8-12 hours before the apheresis.
Granulocytes were collected by centrifugation
leucaphersesis (COBE Spectra). Approximately 8-10 liters of blood was
processed in 120 minutes using peripheral venous access. The collected
granulocyte units were maintained at room temperature, were irradiated
with 25 Gy and used within six hours of collection.
The recipients included children with granulocyte
function disorders or those with absolute neutrophil count of <500/cu mm
and severe bacterial or fungal sepsis resistant to ongoing antimicrobial
therapy and growth factors. Resolving infection, absence of fever for more
than 24 hours and improvement in neutropenia were considered as endpoints
for granulocyte transfusion.
Granulocytes were transfused over a period of 1-2 hours
with monitoring of vital parameters. Premedication consisted of 15mg/kg of
aceta-minophen, 4mg/kg of hydrocortisone and 0.1 mg/kg of chlorpheniramine
maleate. In children who had received amphotericin B for treatment of
fungal infection, granulocytes were transfused at least 4-6 hours prior to
or after its administration.
Results
Seventeen children received granulocyte transfusions.
The profile of these children is depicted in Table I. Two
children developed transient pulmonary reactions with escalation of
ventilatory requirements and decrements in oxygenation levels on day 3 and
day 2, respectively, after receiving granulocytes.
TABLE I
Profile of Children who Received Granulocyte Transfusions
Underlying disease |
Granulocyte
per unit
counts |
Infection profile/cultures |
Days of
neutropenia |
CGD |
2.6×109 |
Liver abscesses, Candida kruseii, Klebsiella |
7 |
CGD |
3.82×109 |
Staph.aureus, Citrobacter, Candida albicans |
12 |
Kostmann’s syndrome |
2.5×109 |
Necrotising fasciitis of anterior abdominal wall, Candida albicans |
refractory |
ALL–T cell |
2.6×109 |
Invasive Aspergillosis |
refractory |
ALL–T cell |
5.3×109 |
E.coli, non-fermenting gram negative bacilli, aspergillosis |
20 |
AML-M2 (MDS) |
2.1×109 |
Candida parapsilosis, Klebsiella, S. aureus |
2 |
AML-M6 (MDS) |
1.29×109 |
MRSA |
3 |
AML-M2 |
2.1×109 |
Pseudomonas, Enterococci |
10 |
AML-M4 |
1.9×109 |
Pseudomonas, Aspergillosis/Candida |
15 |
Severe aplastic anaemia, Dyskeratosis congenita |
2.1×109 |
E.coli, Aspergillosis |
15 |
Neuroblastoma-post peripheral stem cell transplantation |
2.1×109 |
Candida geulermondi |
16 |
ALL PH+ |
4.9×109 |
Pseudomonas sepsis with cardiomyopathy |
20 |
Bilineage leukaemia |
Not available |
Enterococcal sepsis |
21 |
Severe aplastic anaemia post ATG |
Not available |
No positive cultures |
15 |
Non Hodgkins Lymphoma |
0.91×109 |
No positive cultures |
15 |
Severe aplastic anaemia post BMT |
Not available |
Pseudomonas with icthyma |
37 |
HLH |
3.5×109 |
Enterococcal sepsis |
11 |
ALL – acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML – acute myeloblastic leukemia; BMT – bone marrow transplantation;
ATG – antithymocyte globulin; HLH – Hodgkin’s lymphoma; PH: philadelphia
|
Of 17 children, 10 were boys. The age of included
subjects ranged from 18 months to 16 years (median 8 years; IQR 4-12
years). Overall, 10 children survived. Two of the expired children had
refractory neutropenia. Days of neutropenia ranged from 2-37 d in the rest
of the subjects. Number of units of granulocytes transfused ranged from 1
to 10 (median 2; IQR 1-4).
Discussion
With the advent of newer apheresis techniques and
better priming of the donor, the yield of granulocytes has been superior.
We did not employ the use of G-CSF in priming of the donors, as the yield
with steroids was adequate for use in children. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
screening was not done, as over 90% of our donors are CMV positive anyway.
We did not encounter CMV transmission in any of our immunocompromised
recipients. All the units were irradiated to prevent graft versus host
disease in the recipients.
To the best of our knowledge, this is first report from
India focusing on the emerging role of the use of granulocyte transfusion
in the management of critically ill children. We conclude that granulocyte
transfusions have a role in reducing the duration of infection and hence
reducing the mortality in children with refractory neutropenic sepsis. The
combination of steroids and granulocyte colony stimulating factor would
have increased our yield of granulocytes several fold. We hope to study
the efficacy of the two drug mobilizing regimen in our next protocol.
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely wish to thank the apheresis team
at Apollo Speciality Hospital and Dr Ramgopalakrishnan for their help in
the management of these children.
Contributors: All the authors were involved
in the management of these cases and have approved the final manuscript.
RR stands the guarantor for this study.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None stated.
References
1. Viscoli C, Bruzzi P, Castagnola E, Boni L, Calandra
T, Gaya H, et al. Factors associated with bacteremia in febrile,
granulocytopenic cancer patients. The International Antimicrobial Therapy
Co-Operative Group (IATCCG) of the European Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Eur J Cancer 1994; 30: 430-437.
2. Chanock S. Evolving risk factors for infectious
complications of cancer therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1993; 7:
771-793.
3. Pizzo PA. Management of fever in patients with
cancer and treatment-induced neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:
1323-1332.
4. Strauss RG. Granulocyte transfusion transfusion
therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1994; 8: 1159-1166.
5. Strauss RG. Clinical perspectives of granulocyte
transfusions: efficacy to date. J Clin Apheresis 1995; 10: 114-118.
6. Bhatia S, McCullough J, Perry EH, Clay M, Ramsay NN,
Neglia JP, et al. Granulocyte transfusion: efficacy in treating
fungal infections in neutropenic patients following bone marrow
transplantation. Transfusion 1994; 34: 226-232.
7. Herzig RH, Herzig GP, Graw RG Jr, Bull MI, Ray KK.
Successful granulocyte transfusion therapy for gram negative septicemia: a
prospectively randomized controlled study. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:
701-705.
8. Sachs UJ, Reiter A, Walter T, Bein G, Woessmann W.
Safety and efficacy of therapeutic early onset granulocyte transfusions in
pediatric patients with neutropenia and severe infections. Transfusion
2006; 46: 1909-1919.
9. Kikuta A, Ohto H, Nemoto K, Mochizuki K, Sano H, Ito
M, et al.. Therapeutic transfusions of granulocytes collected by
simple bag method for children with cancer and neutropenic infections:
results of a single-centre pilot study. Vox Sang 2006; 91: 70-77.
10. Gibson BES, Todd A, Roberts I, Pamphilon D, Rodeck
C, Bolton-Maggs P, et al. Transfusion guidelines for neonates and
older children. Brit J Haematol 2004; 124: 433-453.
|
|
|
|