Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
short communication

Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 516-518

Granulocyte transfusion in children


Revathi Raj, Shrishu R Kamath, Suchitra Ranjit, Nirmal Shankar and V Lakshmanan

From Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.

Correspondence to: Dr Revathi Raj, Consultant Paediatric Haematologist, Apollo Hospitals,
21 Greams Lane, Off Greames Road, Chennai 600 006, India.
E-mail: [email protected]

Manuscript received: September 18, 2007;
 Initial review: December 19, 2007;
 Accepted: July 24, 2008.
 

Abstract

We describe a single institution experience with the use of granulocyte transfusion in children. This is a retrospective analysis of 45 collections of granulocyte units obtained by apheresis after priming with dexamethasone, infused into 17 children with severe neutropenic infections. Ten children survived the acute infection. Granulocyte transfusion is a useful adjunct to antimicrobials and growth factors in post chemotherapy neutropenic sepsis and is highly effective in children with chronic granulomatous disease and life threatening infections.

Keywords: Granulocyte transfusion, Neutropenia, Sepsis.


C
hildren  undergoing intensive  chemotherapy for malignant diseases, stem cell transplantation and with granulocyte function disorders are at increased risk of neutropenia. Neutropenia is the single most important reason for the development of severe bacterial and fungal infections in immuno-compromised children, contributing to both morbidity and mortality(1-3). Transfusion of neutrophils in such children appears a logical option(4-6). Trials have suggested that granulocyte transfusions are bene-ficial as an adjunct to the ongoing therapy(7-9). The present study is a single institution retrospective analysis of granulocyte transfusions in children.

Methods

The study was done in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Hematology unit of Apollo Hospitals, Chennai. Forty five transfusions were done in the five year period between March 2002 and March 2007 in 17 children. The ethics committee of Apollo Hospitals Chennai approved the protocol for granulocyte transfusion in sick children. Informed consent was taken from all parents and the donors before the donation and transfusion of granulocytes.

Granulocyte donors were healthy relatives or voluntary donors, who were tested for ABO and RhD compatibility(10). Donors were informed regarding the apheresis technique and that participation would include administration of steroids prior to the procedure. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor was not used in priming donors. All the donors were screened for HIV, Hepatitis B and C, malaria and syphilis. They were given 8 mg of dexamethasone orally with 40 mg of pantoprazole approximately 8-12 hours before the apheresis.

Granulocytes were collected by centrifugation leucaphersesis (COBE Spectra). Approximately 8-10 liters of blood was processed in 120 minutes using peripheral venous access. The collected granulocyte units were maintained at room temperature, were irradiated with 25 Gy and used within six hours of collection.

The recipients included children with granulocyte function disorders or those with absolute neutrophil count of <500/cu mm and severe bacterial or fungal sepsis resistant to ongoing antimicrobial therapy and growth factors. Resolving infection, absence of fever for more than 24 hours and improvement in neutropenia were considered as endpoints for granulocyte transfusion.

Granulocytes were transfused over a period of 1-2 hours with monitoring of vital parameters. Premedication consisted of 15mg/kg of aceta-minophen, 4mg/kg of hydrocortisone and 0.1 mg/kg of chlorpheniramine maleate. In children who had received amphotericin B for treatment of fungal infection, granulocytes were transfused at least 4-6 hours prior to or after its administration.

Results

Seventeen children received granulocyte transfusions. The profile of these children is depicted in Table I. Two children developed transient pulmonary reactions with escalation of ventilatory requirements and decrements in oxygenation levels on day 3 and day 2, respectively, after receiving granulocytes.

TABLE I



Profile of Children who Received Granulocyte Transfusions
Underlying disease Granulocyte
per unit
counts
Infection profile/cultures Days of
neutropenia
CGD 2.6×109 Liver abscesses, Candida kruseii, Klebsiella 7
CGD 3.82×109 Staph.aureus, Citrobacter, Candida albicans 12
Kostmann’s syndrome 2.5×109 Necrotising fasciitis of anterior abdominal wall, Candida albicans refractory
ALL–T cell 2.6×109 Invasive Aspergillosis refractory
ALL–T cell 5.3×109 E.coli, non-fermenting gram negative bacilli, aspergillosis 20
AML-M2 (MDS) 2.1×109 Candida parapsilosis, Klebsiella, S. aureus 2
AML-M6 (MDS) 1.29×109 MRSA 3
AML-M2 2.1×109 Pseudomonas, Enterococci 10
AML-M4 1.9×109 Pseudomonas, Aspergillosis/Candida 15
Severe aplastic anaemia, Dyskeratosis congenita 2.1×109 E.coli, Aspergillosis 15
Neuroblastoma-post peripheral stem cell transplantation 2.1×109 Candida geulermondi 16
ALL PH+ 4.9×109 Pseudomonas sepsis with cardiomyopathy 20
Bilineage leukaemia Not available Enterococcal sepsis 21
Severe aplastic anaemia post ATG Not available No positive cultures 15
Non Hodgkins Lymphoma 0.91×109 No positive cultures 15
Severe aplastic anaemia post BMT Not available Pseudomonas with icthyma 37
HLH 3.5×109 Enterococcal sepsis 11
ALL – acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML – acute myeloblastic leukemia; BMT – bone marrow transplantation; 

ATG – antithymocyte globulin; HLH – Hodgkin’s lymphoma; PH: philadelphia

Of 17 children, 10 were boys. The age of included subjects ranged from 18 months to 16 years (median 8 years; IQR 4-12 years). Overall, 10 children survived. Two of the expired children had refractory neutropenia. Days of neutropenia ranged from 2-37 d in the rest of the subjects. Number of units of granulocytes transfused ranged from 1 to 10 (median 2; IQR 1-4).

Discussion

With the advent of newer apheresis techniques and better priming of the donor, the yield of granulocytes has been superior. We did not employ the use of G-CSF in priming of the donors, as the yield with steroids was adequate for use in children. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) screening was not done, as over 90% of our donors are CMV positive anyway. We did not encounter CMV transmission in any of our immunocompromised recipients. All the units were irradiated to prevent graft versus host disease in the recipients.

To the best of our knowledge, this is first report from India focusing on the emerging role of the use of granulocyte transfusion in the management of critically ill children. We conclude that granulocyte transfusions have a role in reducing the duration of infection and hence reducing the mortality in children with refractory neutropenic sepsis. The combination of steroids and granulocyte colony stimulating factor would have increased our yield of granulocytes several fold. We hope to study the efficacy of the two drug mobilizing regimen in our next protocol.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely wish to thank the apheresis team at Apollo Speciality Hospital and Dr Ramgopalakrishnan for their help in the management of these children.

Contributors: All the authors were involved in the management of these cases and have approved the final manuscript. RR stands the guarantor for this study.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None stated.

References

1. Viscoli C, Bruzzi P, Castagnola E, Boni L, Calandra T, Gaya H, et al. Factors associated with bacteremia in febrile, granulocytopenic cancer patients. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Co-Operative Group (IATCCG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Eur J Cancer 1994; 30: 430-437.

2. Chanock S. Evolving risk factors for infectious complications of cancer therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1993; 7: 771-793.

3. Pizzo PA. Management of fever in patients with cancer and treatment-induced neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1323-1332.

4. Strauss RG. Granulocyte transfusion transfusion therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1994; 8: 1159-1166.

5. Strauss RG. Clinical perspectives of granulocyte transfusions: efficacy to date. J Clin Apheresis 1995; 10: 114-118.

6. Bhatia S, McCullough J, Perry EH, Clay M, Ramsay NN, Neglia JP, et al. Granulocyte transfusion: efficacy in treating fungal infections in neutropenic patients following bone marrow transplantation. Transfusion 1994; 34: 226-232.

7. Herzig RH, Herzig GP, Graw RG Jr, Bull MI, Ray KK. Successful granulocyte transfusion therapy for gram negative septicemia: a prospectively randomized controlled study. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 701-705.

8. Sachs UJ, Reiter A, Walter T, Bein G, Woessmann W. Safety and efficacy of therapeutic early onset granulocyte transfusions in pediatric patients with neutropenia and severe infections. Transfusion 2006; 46: 1909-1919.

9. Kikuta A, Ohto H, Nemoto K, Mochizuki K, Sano H, Ito M, et al.. Therapeutic transfusions of granulocytes collected by simple bag method for children with cancer and neutropenic infections: results of a single-centre pilot study. Vox Sang 2006; 91: 70-77.

10. Gibson BES, Todd A, Roberts I, Pamphilon D, Rodeck C, Bolton-Maggs P, et al. Transfusion guidelines for neonates and older children. Brit J Haematol 2004; 124: 433-453.
 

 

Copyright© 1999 by the Indian Pediatrics (Disclaimer)