1.gif (1892 bytes)

Original Article

Indian Pediatrics 2006; 43:491-501

Blood Pressure Reference Tables for Children and Adolescents of Karnataka

 

Pushpa Krishna, *PrasannaKumar K.M., §Nagaraj Desai, and ¶Thennarasu K.

From the Department of Physiology, *Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, §Department of Cardiology,
M. S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore; and ¶Department of Biostatistics, NIMHANS, Bangalore, India.

Correspondence to: Dr. Pushpa Krishna, Lecturer, Department of Physiology, M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, India. E-mail:[email protected]

Manuscript received: February 21, 2005, Initial review completed: April 8, 2005,
Revision accepted: January 18, 2006.

 

Abstract

Background: The blood pressure levels may vary in population because of genetic, ethnic and socio economic factors. Local reference values have to be established to understand the blood pressure variable. Methods: Blood pressure data of 2278 boys and 2930 girls in the age group of 3-18 years were analysed to study the distribution pattern of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure and to develop reference values to define hypertension. Blood pressure was measured using standardised techniques in all. The first and fifth phases of Korotkoff sounds were taken as indicative of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure respectively. Height percentiles were computed for each one-year age group. According to percentiles of height 50th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were estimated for every one-year age. Results: The blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) tends to increase with age. The stepwise regression analysis revealed that the age and height but not gender, are important determinants of blood pressure. Age and height specific, 50th, 90th and 95th and 99th percentiles of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were derived and are presented in tabular form. Conclusion: The blood pressure of children and adolescents can be evaluated using the reference table according to body size. The table provided helps to classify blood pressure as ‘normal’ or ‘pre hypertension’ and to define different stages of ‘hypertension’.

Key words: Blood pressure, Children, Reference.

Elevated blood pressure (BP) in childhood may be early expression of essential hypertension in adulthood(1,2). Regular measurement of blood pressure in young is recommended to detect elevation of blood pressure(3). Prevalence of hypertension differs among the racial and ethnic groups compared to general population(4). The factors that have to be taken into account while predicting hypertension are race, ethnicity and geographic origin to which the people belong(5,6). Reference norms developed for one particular population may not be applicable to other because of racial, ethnical and cultural differences across the world. The local reference data is essential to evaluate any observed blood pressure values. Age and height specific normative data for Indian children has been reported in tabular form previously, based on sample derived from school children of Delhi(7). The study had adopted fourth phase of Korotkoff sound to define diastolic blood pressure (DBP) instead of fifth phase and added height in addition to age. Currently, the fourth report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP) Working Group on Children and Adolescents provide updated recommendations for diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hypertension. The new Blood pressure tables based on normative distribution of BP in healthy children includes 50th and 99th percentiles of blood pressure values along with earlier 90th and 95th percentile values(3,8).

The objective of present study was to provide age and height specific reference standards of blood pressure in apparently healthy children and adolescents of Karnataka in the age group of 3-18 years.

Subjects and Methods

The survey was carried out in 20 randomly selected government schools and Anganwadi centers between June 2001 to May 2002, in and around Bangalore and Haveri districts of Karnataka, India. The study sample consisted of 5773 (2500 boys/3273 girls) apparently healthy children in the age group 3-18 years. This age group represents about 35% of population of Karnataka, a south Indian state with total population of 52.7 million(9).

Children with history of or suffering from acute/chronic illness, with signs of anemia, cardiac and renal disorder on medical examination were not included in the study.

A team consisting of four doctors and four volunteers collected the data from the selected schools. Volunteers were trained to record height and weight using standardized methods. A portable weighing scale was used to measure weight of the child and was calibrated before each use. Weight was measured to nearest 1 kg. Height was measured to nearest 1 cm with subject standing without shoes using stadiometer. Age was verified from school records and rounded off to the completed years.

The doctors measured blood pressure on regular schooldays with normal activities. Before recording blood pressure the procedure was explained to children and sufficient time was given to allay anxiety and fear. Blood pressure was recorded in sitting position in right arm by auscultatory method using standard mercury monometer with a set of different sized cuffs. The cuff bladder was wide enough to cover at least 2/3 of arm and long enough to encircle arm completely. The first and fifth phases of Korotkoff sounds were taken as indicative of the systolic and diastolic blood pressures respectively.

In order to verify the accuracy of use of single BP measurement we recorded two BP measurements, with 2 min interval between each measurement on two hundred and seventy five subjects. The data analysis for each one year age group between 7-18 years and by gender indicated mean difference between the two recording ranges from –1.5 to 4.7 mm Hg for boys and –2 to 4.8 mm Hg for girls in systolic blood pressure (SBP) –3.5 to 4.9 mm Hg for boys and –3.3 to 3.33 mm Hg for girls in DBP respectively. The results indicated that the magnitude of difference between the first and second readings for each age years and sex was not statistically significant. Therefore, subsequently, only a single reading of BP was obtained for all the remaining individuals and used to develop normative data.

In order to eliminate inter-rater variability among doctors blood pressure measurement was done by all four doctors for 50 subjects. Whenever the difference in BP was more than 5 mm of Hg between observers was noticed, and then consensus was arrived, so that at later stage between observers variability could be reduced.

In order to have normal reference children population, of the 5773 children we excluded undernourished (BMI <5th percentile, n = 283) and obese (BMI >95th percentile, n = 282) for specific age and sex respectively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 11.0.

A total data of 5208 children were analysed. Separate analyses were performed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure. A stepwise regression analysis was carried out to find principal determinants of blood pressure with independent variables such as age, sex and height. Age and height were principal determinants of blood pressure. As height entered into the regression model, sex did not remain a significant determinant of blood pressure. We therefore, pooled both sexes to formulate age-and height specific reference values of blood pressure.

We first calculated age specific height percentiles of reference sample then converted height percentiles to Z score scale. Regression of blood pressure on height was done for each one-year age, sex pooled group. The 50th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure at specific height percentiles were estimated using regression equations, Blood pressure (age) = α + β (Z height) + X.σ where σ2 was estimated from the residual mean square from regression model and X = 1.280, 1.645 or 2.326 for the 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles, respectively(8,10).

Results

After excluding undernourished (n = 283) and obese (n = 282), data of 5208 children were considered for analysis. The study sample characteristics are shown in Table I. The maximum numbers of children were in the age group of 14 years (n = 834) with minimum number of children in the age group of 4 and 5 years (n = 70). Age and height were principal determinants of blood pressure (Table II). The height percentile values of the 5th through 95th percentiles for each one-year age group were calculated and reported in Table III. The height was ranging from 81 to 179 centimeters. In the age groups 3 to18 years the values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure ranged from 60-180 mm Hg and 30-110 mm Hg respectively. The mean values of body mass index (BMI) show steady increase with age from 9 year onwards and were ranging from 13.6 to 20.4.

Table I
Characteristics of Study Sample
Age
(Years)
Total
Number
Number of
Male/female
SBP
(mmHg)
DBP
(mmHg)
Height
(cm)
Weight
(kg)
BMI
(kg/m2)
3 98 42/56 98(11) 63(11) 95(8) 13.1(2.3) 14.5(1.7)
4 170 97/73 100(10) 64(9) 97((5.7) 13.5(1.8) 14.3(1.5)
5 70 43/27 99(12) 65(10) 103(6) 15.5(1.8) 14.6(1.80)
6 165 92/73 102(11) 68(9) 110(6) 16.4(2.4) 13.6(1.4)
7 243 105/138 102(12) 68(10) 114(7) 18.1(2.1) 18.1(2.1)
8 252 118/134 106(10) 70(8) 118(7) 19.7(3.3) 14.1(1.2)
9 256 109/147 105(11) 71(9) 124(6) 21.7(3) 14(1.2)
10 222 103/119 107(10) 72(9) 128(8) 24(3.6) 14.6(1.3)
11 362 183/179 108(9) 73(7) 131(11) 25.3(5) 14.7(1.3)
12 525 253/272 110(11) 73(9) 136(13) 28.3(6.8) 15.5(1.5)
13 787 318/469 109(11) 72(8) 145(10) 34.5(7.4) 16.2(2.2)
14 834 269/565 113(11) 74(8) 150(8) 37.9(6.4) 17.4(2)
15 700 298/402 115(11) 75(8) 145(10) 34.5(7.4) 17.7(2)
16 336 158/178 117(12) 76(8) 156(8) 43.6(6.4) 17.7(2)
17 94 34/60 116(12) 77(8) 156 43.6(5.3) 17.9(2)
18 94 56/38 117(15) 75(11) 164(9) 55(9.2) 20.4(2.3)
Figures in parentheses are standard deviations; SBP–Systolic blood pressure; DBP–Diastolic 
blood pressure; BMI–Body mass index.
Table II

Results of Stepwise Regression Analysis of SBP and DBP on Independent Variables
  Dependent variable
SBP
Dependent variable
DBP
Variables Regression coefficient
(Standard error)
P Regression coefficient
(Standard error)
P
Constant 78.16(1.4) <0.001 53.04 (1.15) <0.001
Height 0.19(0.02) <0.001 0.13(0.01) <0.001
Age 0.45(0.09) <0.001 0.23(0.03) <0.001
Sex 0.40(0.30) <0.001 –0.40(0.24) <0.001
	SBP-systolic blood pressure    DBP-Diastolic blood pressure.
Table III

Height Percentiles by Age in the Reference Sample
Age
(years)
Height percentile
5 10 25 50 75 90 95
3 81 85 88 95 101 107 109
4 87 90 93 97 102 105 106
5 95 95 98 103 107 110 112
6 100 101 105 109 114 117 122
7 104 105 110 114 119 124 127
8 107 110 112 118 122 128 130
9 113 116 120 124 128 131 134
10 116 119 122 129 133 137 141
11 105 119 126 132 138 144 147
12 110 115 130 138 145 151 156
13 125 134 140 145 151 157 160
14 137 140 145 150 155 161 164
15 140 143 149 154 159 165 169
16 144 146 150 155 162 167 170
17 145 147 151 156 162 166 168
18 150 153 158 165 170 176 179
	

Regression coefficients from age specific blood pressure regression models in reference sample to calculate the 50th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentile values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure by age and height are given in Table IV.

Table IV
Regression Coefficients from Age Specific Blood Pressure Regression Models in Reference Sample 
Age
 
Systolic BP Diastolic BP
Alpha (α) Beta (β) Sigma (σ) Alpha (α) Beta (β) Sigma (σ)
3 97.82 5.08 9.76 63.41 3.48 10.43
4 99.78 2.25 9.78 64.24 1.42 8.82
5 99.13 3.48 7.47 64.69 2.24 9.77
6 101.67 2.26 10.93 68.17 1.72 9.02
7 102.00 2.77 11.76 68.04 1.82 9.78
8 106.47 2.58 9.69 69.82 2.26 8.19
9 105.42 2.28 10.77 70.51 1.42 8.49
10 107.43 1.17 10.42 71.98 1.88 8.90
11 108.19 1.83 8.56 72.93 1.64 6.95
12 109.82 1.99 10.52 73.44 1.25 8.62
13 109.42 1.71 10.59 72.31 0.77 8.08
14 112.53 1.93 10.85 73.66 1.33 8.19
15 114.99 0.98 11.08 75.46 1.33 7.70
16 116.58 0.83 11.66 76.00 .34 8.08
17 116.17 1.30 11.64 77.00 1.26 8.72
18 117.24 3.71 14.87 74.99 .30 11.14
Blood pressure (age)=a1+b (Z height)+ X.s, where s2 was estimated from the residual 
mean square from regression model and X=2.326, 1.64 or 1.280 for the 99th, 95th and 
90th percentiles, respectively.

The percentile BP levels by age and height percentiles are reported in Table V. The mean blood pressure increased with age (exception 9, 13 and 17 years for systolic blood pressure and 13 and 18years for diastolic blood pressure). The rate of increase was gradual with a spurt of 4 to 5 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure at the of age 8 years and 14 years.

Table V
Blood Pressure Levels for the 50th, 90th, 95th and 99th Percentiles of Systolic and Diastolic 
Blood Pressure by Percentiles of Height in Boys and Girls of Age 3 to 18 years 
Age
(Yrs)
BP
percentile
Systolic BP (mm Hg)
By percentiles of height
Diastolic BP (mm Hg)
By percentiles of height
5 10 25 50 75 90 95 5 10 25 50 75 90 95
3 50 90 91 94 98 101 104 106 58 59 61 63 66 68 69
  90 99 101 104 107 111 114 116 70 71 73 76 78 80 81
  95 102 104 107 111 114 117 119 74 75 77 80 82 84 85
  99 109 111 114 117 120 124 126 81 82 84 87 89 90 92
4 50 96 97 98 100 101 103 103 62 62 63 64 65 66 67
  90 106 106 108 109 111 112 113 72 73 74 75 75 76 77
  95 109 110 111 113 114 116 117 75 76 77 79 79 80 80
  99 116 117 118 119 121 122 123 81 82 83 84 85 86 86
5 50 93 95 97 99 101 104 105 61 62 63 65 66 68 68
  90 100 101 103 106 108 110 114 73 73 75 76 78 79 80
  95 103 104 106 108 111 113 117 76 77 78 79 81 83 83
  99 114 116 119 123 126 129 131 83 83 85 86 88 89 90
6 50 98 99 100 102 103 105 105 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
  90 109 110 111 113 114 116 116 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
  95 113 114 115 117 118 120 120 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
  99 114 115 117 119 120 122 123 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
7 50 97 98 100 102 104 106 107 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
  90 109 111 112 114 116 118 119 77 77 78 80 81 82 83
  95 114 115 116 118 120 122 123 80 81 82 83 84 85 86
  99 120 121 123 125 127 128 119 87 87 88 90 91 92 93
8 50 102 103 105 106 108 110 111 66 67 68 70 71 73 74
  90 112 113 114 116 118 119 120 76 76 78 79 81 82 83
  95 115 116 118 119 121 123 124 79 79 81 82 84 85 86
  99 120 120 122 124 125 127 128 84 85 86 88 89 91 92
9 50 102 103 104 105 107 108 109 68 69 70 71 71 72 73
  90 112 113 115 116 118 119 120 78 79 79 80 81 82 83
  95 116 117 119 120 122 123 124 79 82 83 83 84 85 86
  99 125 125 126 127 128 129 130 87 87 88 89 90 91 91
10 50 106 106 107 107 108 109 109 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
  90 116 116 117 118 119 119 120 79 80 81 82 84 85 85
  95 120 120 121 122 122 123 123 83 83 84 86 87 88 89
  99 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 89 89 90 92 93 94 94
11 50 105 106 107 108 109 111 111 70 71 72 73 74 75 76
  90 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
  95 116 117 118 119 120 122 122 81 81 82 83 84 85 86
  99 121 122 124 125 127 128 129 86 86 87 88 89 90 91
12 50 107 107 108 110 111 112 113 71 72 73 73 74 75 75
  90 117 118 119 120 122 123 124 81 82 83 83 84 85 86
  95 121 122 123 124 125 127 127 85 85 6 87 87 88 89
  99 127 128 130 131 133 135 136 90 91 91 92 93 94 94
13 50 107 107 108 109 111 112 112 71 71 72 72 73 73 74
  90 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 80 81 81 82 82 83 83
  95 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 83 84 84 85 85 86 86
  99 129 130 131 133 134 135 136 90 90 91 91 92 92 92
14 50 109 110 111 113 114 115 116 71 72 73 74 75 75 76
  90 120 121 122 123 125 126 127 81 81 82 83 84 85 85
  95 124 125 126 127 129 130 131 84 84 85 86 87 88 88
  99 133 134 135 136 138 139 140 90 90 91 92 93 93 94
15 50 113 114 114 115 116 116 117 73 74 75 75 76 77 78
  90 125 125 126 126 127 127 128 82 83 83 84 85 86 87
  95 129 129 130 130 131 131 132 85 85 86 87 88 89 89
  99 137 138 138 139 140 140 141 90 91 91 92 93 94 94
16 50 115 116 116 117 117 118 118 75 76 76 76 76 76 77
  90 127 127 128 129 129 130 130 85 85 85 85 86 86 86
  95 131 132 132 133 133 134 134 88 88 88 88 89 89 89
  99 140 140 141 142 142 143 144 93 93 93 94 94 94 94
17 50 114 115 115 116 117 118 118 75 75 76 77 78 79 79
  90 126 126 127 128 129 130 130 85 86 6 87 88 89 89
  95 130 131 131 132 133 134 134 88 89 90 90 91 92 92
  99 141 141 142 143 144 145 146 93 94 95 96 97 98 98
18 50 111 112 115 117 120 122 123 74 75 75 75 75 75 75
  90 127 128 131 133 136 138 139 88 88 88 88 88 89 89
  95 133 134 136 139 141 143 145 92 92 92 92 93 93 93
  99 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 99 100 100 100 100 100 100

Table V shows that the systolic blood pressure of 11th and 17th year and diastolic blood pressure of 8th, 11th and 13th year children with height between 5th through 95th percentiles is lower than those of previous age groups with corresponding height percentiles. We recommend that the higher values be used for all above mentioned age group children to avoid any possibility of mislabeling. To interpret the blood pressure of a child, his/her height percentile has to be determined from Table III, and then Table V has to be consulted to estimate different percentile values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The BP level <90th percentile is normal. The BP measurements between the 90th and 95th percentiles indicate prehypertension. The BP level > 120/80 mm Hg in an adolescent is considered prehypertension. The BP level >95th percentile is hypertension. Stage 1 hypertension is the designation for BP levels that range from the 95th percentile to 5 mm Hg above the 99th percentile. Stage 2 hyper-tension is the designation for BP levels that are >5 mm Hg above the 99th percentile.

Discussion

In this study age and height specific, 50th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentile values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure are reported in tabular form in Table V based on the first BP measurement taken on 5208 children(3). This table helps clinician to decide, whether observed BP values are normal or abnormal. The child is normotensive if the BP is below 90th percentile. If the BP is >90th percentile, the BP measurement should be repeated at that visit to verify an elevated BP. The average BP measurements between the 90th and 95th percentiles are high normal or prehypertension. Adolescents with BP levels >120/80 mm Hg should be considered to be prehypertensive even if the level is <90th percentile as with adults according to Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure(11). If the child’s BP is >95th percentile, the child may be hypertensive and repeated measurements are indicated. Though the precise characterization of a person’s BP level is an average of multiple BP measurements taken over weeks to months, it is recommended to take BP measurement on at least 2 additional separate occasions to confirm hypertension. Hypertension is defined as average SBP or DBP that is >95th percentile for age and height on at least 3 separate occasions. The 50th percentile values provide the clinician with the BP level at the midpoint of the normal range. The 99th percentile helps to determine the degree or severity of hypertension by staging of BP into stages 1 and 2(8).

Categorization and staging of BP, is helpful in planning a specific treatment that is most appropriate for an individual. Prehypertension warrants reassessment and consideration of risk factors and for this, treatment is by lifestyle modification. Stage 1 hypertension needs limited evaluation where as in stage 2 hypertension immediate evaluation and therapeutic intervention is indicated.

In order to prepare a normative data, the significant factors influencing systolic and diastolic blood pressure were analyzed. The Table II shows that there is a significant effect of age and height (p <0.001, p <0.001) for systolic and (p <0.005, p <0.001) for diastolic blood pressure respectively. The age year groups shows the increasing trend from 3 years through 18 years with the spurt of 4-5 mm of Hg in systolic blood pressure at the age of 10 year and 15 year. Diastolic blood pressure also shows similar increasing trend. Similar observations have been made by other workers and have found a spurt in systolic blood pressure at different age group(12-15). The spurt may be possibly due to age related hormonal and physical changes occurring in the body during puberty.

The reference table reveals that the 90th percentile of systolic and diastolic blood pressure for 5th through 95th percentiles of height from age group 12 and 10 years onwards respectively exceeds 120/80 mm of Hg. It is now recommended that, as with adults, adolescents with BP levels >120/80 mm Hg but <90th percentile should be considered prehypertensive according to the new reports from US(8). Similar trends have been observed in US normative tables. This sudden increase in BP level may be attributed to the rapid growth associated with rapid weight gain from late childhood into adolescence (16).

In the present study, the reference table (Table V) shows that, for children of particular age, the 95th percentile values of blood pressure varied from 3 to 12 mm of Hg (for systolic blood pressure) and 1 to11 mm of Hg (for diastolic blood pressure) between 5th and 95th percentiles of height. The difference in the blood pressure values for different height percentiles indicates that the height plays substantial role in determining blood pressure value of an individual. Hence height has to be considered as a factor before classifying a child as hypertensive. This approach of developing BP standards that are based on height provide a more precise classification of BP according to body size and avoids misclassifying children who are very tall or very short.

It is difficult to compare the present study with others because of difference in methodologies such as age group studied, phase of Korotkoff sound used to determine DBP, pooling of sex group etc. One major observation made in this study is that, in Karnataka, a southern Indian state, the mean value of blood pressure is found to be higher in sample for given age and also for a given height compared to previous Indian reference values in which sample derived is mainly from northern states of India(5) and also to that of US young population(8). This may possibly indicate an increase in the risk of this young individuals becoming hypertensive when they become adults. The high prevalence of hypertension has been related to rising mean systolic blood pressure in adults(17). The higher blood pressure level in this population may be because of many other factors that determine blood pressure level in an individual such as genetic inheritance, low level of physical activity, mental stress and dietary habits and environment which the authors have not studied. The difference in the ethnicity also may be one of the factors. The increased level of normative values of blood pressure may be because of factors such as body size, plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, plasma triglyceride and abnormal glucose tolerance, dietary habits, life style and many other factors stated above that determine BP, which have to be ascertained by further studies.

In our study sample the undernourished children have shown significantly reduced (P<0.05) levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This might be one of the reasons for increased level of normative values as compared to previous Indian standards in which children with <5th percentile of BMI (Undernourished) are not excluded(5). Further more, blood pressure is found to be associated with BMI both in normal and obese children(18-21). The higher level of BMI observed in our sample (except for 6 year) might be a contributing factor for our study population having higher values of blood pressure because body size appears to be a major determinant of BP and study by Ramachandran et al., reports that there is a high prevalence of overweight in adolescent children in India(22,23).

The socioeconomic status of the subjects in this study was not considered as the reference values are developed on the basis of BMI of the individuals, which was between 5th-95th percentiles of reference sample.

Limitations of the study

Though the sample was collected from various schools, sample sizes were very low for extreme ages 3, 5 and 17, 18 years to derive the normative values and making it applicable to general population. The sample size for age year 5 was 70 and for age years 3,17, and 18 the sample size was about 100 only, hence care should be taken in interpreting results of these age years.

While it is recommended to use average of multiple blood pressure measurements taken for weeks to months to characterize individual’s blood pressure level, high cost, limited resources and time restricted the authors from doing so. However studies on effect of sequential blood pressure reading in normal and hypertensive adults have indicated that the difference between the subsequent BP measurements depends on age, BMI and initial BP level(24,25). This may be the one of the reasons why no significant difference was observed between the first and second reading of BP in 275 young subjects of our study. But efficacy of single measurement protocol in young individuals needs to be established.

Even though the blood pressure measurements were measured as exact as possible there may be some digit preference in our data. This effect is unlikely to be large as reported in the previous studies(7,26). Blood pressure is also influenced by various other factors such as time of the day, ambience, fasting vs. non-fasting state of the subject etc., which could not be controlled in the study.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Anura Kurpad and Dr. M. Vaz, Department of Nutrition, St. John’s Medical College, for critical review of the data and Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Head, Department of Physiology, MSRMC, for the support.

Contributors: Concept, design and final approval by PKM and ND; acquisition, interpretation and drafting by PK; PK will act as the guarantor of the study; Analysis of data by TK.

Funding: Dr. Thennarasu was supported by Fogarty International Training Grant Number D43 TW00 5811.

Competent interests: None.

Key Messages

• This study gives the insight into the blood pressure ranges in the healthy children of state of Karnataka. The authors believe that the table could be useful to decipher a particular child’s blood pressure as normal or outside the normal range.

 

References


1. Nelson MJ, Ragland DR, Stme SL. Longitudinal prediction of adult blood pressure from juvenile blood pressure levels. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 633-645.

2. Finta KM. Cardiovascular manifestation of hypertension in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1993; 40: 51-55.

3. Update on the 1987 Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: A working group from National High Blood Pressure Education Program. National High Blood Pressure Education Program. On Hypertension control in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 649-658.

4. Hall WD, Ferrario CM, Moore Ma. Hypertension-related morbidity and mortality in the southeastern United States. Am J Med Sci 1997; 313:195-206.

5. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413-2446.

6. Arno RH, Kathleen MD, James HD. Blood pressure in youth from four ethnic groups: The Pasadena Prevention Project. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 368-373.

7. Chadha SL, Vasan RS, Sarma PS, Shekhawat S, Tandon R, Gopinath N.Age-and height- specific reference limits blood pressure for Indian children. Natl Med J India 1999; 12:150-156.

8. The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 555-576.

9. Census Of India 2001.2001 Results Index. Available from http://www.censusindia.net. Accessed Jan 15, 2005.

10. Rosner BA, Prineas RJ, Loggie JMH, Daniel SR. Blood Pressure nomograms for children and adolescents by height, sex, and age, in the United States. J Pediatr 1993;123: 871-886.

11. The JNC 7 Report. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560-2572.

12. Anand NK, Tandon l. Prevalence of hyper-tension in school going children. Indian Pediatr 1996; 33: 376-380.

13. Task Force on Blood pressure control in children. Reports of the second Task Force on blood pressure control in children, 1987. Pediatrics 1987; 79; 1-25.

14. Gupta AK, Ahmad AJ. Normal blood pressure and evaluation of sustained elevation in childhood. Indian Pediatr 1990; 27: 33-42.

15. Loroia D, Sharma M, Diwedi V, Belapurkar KM, Mathur PS.Profile of blood pressure in normal school children. Indian Pediatrics 1989; 26: 531-536.

16. Adair LS, Cole TJ. Rapid child growth raises blood pressure in adolescent boys who were thin at birth. Hypertension 2003; 41: 451-456.

17. Gupta R. Meta analysis of prevalence of hypertension in India. Indian Heart J 1997; 49: 43-48.

18. Gupta AK, Ahmad AJ. Childhood obesity and Hypertension. Indian Pediatr 1990; 27: 333-337.

19. He Q, Ding ZY, Fong DY, Karberg J. Blood pressure is associated with body mass index in both normal obese children. Hypertension 2000; 36: 165-170.

20. Verma M, Chatawal J, George SM. Obesity and Hypertension in children. Indian Pediatr 1994; 31: 1065-1069.

21. Chadha SL, Tandon R, Shekawath S, Gopinath N. An epidemiological study of blood pressure in school children (5-14 years) in Delhi. Indian Heart J 1999; 51: 178-182.

22. Leccia G, Marotta T, Masella MR, Mottola G, Mitrano G, Golia F, Capitanata P, Guida L, Contaldo F, Ferrara LA. Sex-related influence of body size and sexual maturation on blood pressure in adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999; 53: 333-337.

23. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Vinitha R, Thayyil M, Kumar CK, Sheeba L, Joseph S, Vijay.V Prevalence of overweight in urban Indian adolescent school children. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002; 57: 185-190.

24. Huang YC, Morisky DE. Stability of blood pressure: is a sequential blood pressure reading protocol efficient for a large-scale community-screening programme. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 637-642.

25. Schulz MB, Kroke A, Bergamann, Boeing H. Differences of Blood pressure estimates between consecutive measurements on one occasion: implication for inter-study comparability of epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol 2000; 16: 891-898.

26. Bennet S. Blood pressure measurement error: Its effect on cross sectional and trend analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 83-89.

 

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription