1.gif (1892 bytes)

Recommendations

Indian Pediatrics 2004; 41:559-575 

IAP National Task Force for Childhood Prevention of Adult Diseases: Childhood Obesity


Writing Committee:

Sheila Bhave*
Ashish Bavdekar**
Madhumati Otiv***

Department of Pediatrics, KEM Hospital, Pune 411 011, India.

Correspondence: *Dr. Sheila Bhave, Consultant in Pediatric Research, Department of Pediatrics, KEM Hospital, Pune 411 011, India. Email : [email protected]

**Associate Consultant , Pediatric Gastroenterology.

*** Research Associate.

 

Contents

1. Preamble

2. Introduction

2.1 Obesity is a global epidemic

2.2 Indian is fattening too

3. What is obesity and how do we measure it?

3.1 Measurement of Obesity

3.2 Reference Charts for children

3.3 Other markers of obesity

4. Epidemiology

4.1 Determinants of obesity and its persistence

4.2 Indians at high risk; our special concerns

5. Causes of the epidemic in India

5.1 Changes in life style (urbanisation)

5.2 Genetic/constitutional predisposition

5.3 Other factors

6. How can we control this epidemic ?

6.1 Primary prevention of childhood obesity: Public Health Approach

6.2 Do interventions work ?

6.3 Strategies and Aims

6.4 Special strategies for target groups

6.5 Channels of intervention

7. Management of established obesity

7.1 Approach to assessment

7.2 Approach to therapy

7.3 Principles of therapy

7.4 Intensive therapy

8. Key Messages

9. References

10. Annexures

1. Preamble

India is in the midst of a rapidly escalating ‘epidemic’ of Type II Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). Today, India has more diabetic patients than any other country in the world, and it is predicted that CHD will soon become the leading cause of death in our country. Indians, as an ethnic group are particularly at high risk for insulin resistance (syndrome X) and central obesity, both forerunners of diabetes, CHD and other ‘life style’ disorders. It is now emerging convincingly that these disorders begin in childhood (or even earlier, in fetal life), and manifest due to interactions and accumulation of various risk factors, throughout the life course. Pediatricians, therefore, have an important role in the prevention and control of the ‘epidemic’. It is indeed ironic that a problem of "plenty" viz., childhood obesity, has emerged while we are still fighting undernutrition and infectious disease. As such, conflict in public health messages, is a distinct possibility and must be avoided at all costs.

The Indian Academy of Pediatrics has established a National Task Force on ‘Child-hood Prevention of Adult Chronic Disease’, and earlier issues of Indian Pediatrics have carried reviews and recommendations on

(i) Childhood Physical Activity and Prevention of Adult Disease, and

(ii) Insulin Resistance and Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Childhood.

Presented here is the third in the series, on "Childhood Obesity".

The members of the task force are listed in Annexure 1.

2. Introduction

Traditionally, a fat child is considered as an ‘attractive’ child, and is often referred to as a ‘healthy’ child. However, the adverse and serious consequences of childhood obesity are now proven beyond doubt(1,2) (Table I). Psychosocial stigmatization may not be a big problem in our country, and severe complications of obesity (such as obstructive sleep apnea, and pseudotumor cerebrii) are rare. However, obese children have substantial risks for morbidity such as hypertension and dyslipedemia even before they reach adulthood(3,4). Type 2 diabetes is beginning to emerge in children(5). Importantly, 50 to 80% of obese children become obese adults and all complications of adult obesity are made worse if the obesity begins in childhood(1).

Table I

 Consequences of Childhood Obesity(1-7).
Immediate Effects and Complications (usually in severe obesity)
Psychosocial stress				Blount’s disease
Respiratory embarrassment			Slipped femoral epiphysis 
	Obstructive airway disease		Flat feet 
	Restrictive airway disease 		Hepatic steatosis 
	(most severe, Pickwickian syndrome)	Endocrine effects*
Pseudotumor cerebrii				increased skeletal growth
Cholelithiasis (and cholecystitis)			early puberty (reduced final growth)
* (Endocrine causes of obesity such as Cushing's not considered here)
Co-morbidities
Dyslipidemias (especially with visceral fat / central obesity)
Hypertension
Insulin Resistance Syndrome (Syndrome X)
Childhood Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ovarian hyperandrogenism (hirsutism, oligomenorrhea and infertility  ±  ovarian cysts)
Reduced bone density 
Raised C reactive protein / systemic inflammation

Future risks

Adult obesity (Increased mortality and morbidity from all obesity related disorders)
Coronary Heart Disease and cerebrovascular disease
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 
Osteoporosis

 

Several elegant reviews and recom-mendations by expert committees have been published for prevention and treatment of childhood obesity in the developed countries(6,7). The aim of this paper is to highlight some of the unique features of obesity in India, and to suggest interventions based on the prevailing health and social infrastructure systems in our country.

2.1 Obesity is a global epidemic(8)

According to WHO (2000) atleast 50% of adults and 20% of children in U.K. and U.S.A. are currently overweight. Prevalence of overweight amongst Australian children has increased from 11% in 1985 to 20% in 1995(8). Childhood obesity has tripled in Canada in last 20 years. It has been estimated that, in 1995, the direct costs of treatment of obesity in USA accounted for $70 billion with far greater indirect costs(9).

Obesity does not seem to have spared developing countries either. Thailand, Iran, Nigeria and Brazil have all reported unprecedented levels of obesity with trends that are substantially rising every year(2). The calculated global prevalence of overweight (including obesity) in children aged 5-17 years is estimated by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) to be approximately 10%, but this is ‘unequally distributed’ with prevalence ranging from over 30% in Americas to <2% in sub Saharan Africa(2).

2.2 India is fattening too

In a recent study by Reddy, et al., more than 28% of adult males and 47% of adult females in urban Delhi were overweight by WHO standards(9). In the same study the corresponding figures for overweight in a neighbouring Haryana rural area were 7% in males and 9% in females. Conversely, as many as 38% of males and 36% of females in the rural area were actually ‘underweight’ by BMI standards. Such an ‘urban, rural divide’ has been documented in other Indian studies too(10).

In children, the difference between the rich and the poor is fairly evident in recently conducted urban studies. Ramachandran, et al. studied children from six schools in Chennai, two each from high, middle and lower income groups(11). The prevalence of overweight (including obese) adolescents ranged from 22% in better off schools to 4.5% in lower income group schools. In a Delhi school with tution fees more than Rs. 2,500 per month, the prevalence of overweight was 31%, of which 7.5% were frankly obese(12). In Pune the figures for overweight children are 24% in a well off school and 6% in a ‘corporation’ school (unpublished data).

3. What is obesity and how do we measure it?

Obesity is defined as a condition of abnormal or excessive fat accumulation in adipose tissue, to the extent that health may be impaired (WHO consultation on obesity, 2000)(8). It has to be pointed out that the terms overweight and obese are often used some-what loosely and interchangeably. However, standardization is necessary for international and secular comparisons.

3.1 Measurement of obesity

Body weight is reasonably correlated with body fat, but is also highly correlated with height. Therefore, weight adjusted for height squared [body mass index (BMI in kg/m2)] is a useful index to assess overweight and is a fairly reliable surrogate for adiposity. It is calculated easily from weight and height and it correlates with other measures of body fatness in children and adolescents. BMI also cor-relates with markers of secondary complica-tions of obesity, including current blood pressures, blood lipids and with long-term mortality(13). A limitation of BMI however is that it cannot differentiate an obese individual from a muscular one. It also cannot locate the site of fat e.g., people with ‘central obesity’ may have normal BMIs. Inspite of several limitations, BMI as of now appears to be the most practical way of measuring and comparing obesity for clinical and epidemio-logical purposes.

As per WHO classification (for adults)

BMI >25 = overweight and BMI >30 = obesity

However, as these WHO criteria may underestimate obesity in Asians, the Inter-national Obesity Task Force (IOTF) has proposed the standards for adult obesity in Asia and India as follows(14).

BMI >23 = overweight and BMI >25 = obesity.

3.2 Reference charts for children

BMI values for adults, are age independent and same for both sexes. However in children, BMI changes physiologically (substantially) with age and sex. At birth the median BMI is as low as 13 kg/m2, increasing to 17 kg/m2 at age 1, decreasing to 15.5 kg/m2 at age 6, then increasing to 21 kg/m2 at age 20. Many countries have published BMI-for-age charts for their populations, and some have also defined cut-off points on these charts to define overweight and obesity. A recent Indian study by Agarwal, et al. has described indices including BMI and skinfolds for affluent Indian school children(15). However, the sample size of the study is probably not large enough to generate internationally accepted standards.

The two BMI charts that can be used as a reference, for Indian children, as of now, therefore are:

(1) The NCHS/CDC charts from USA(16). The American Obesity Association uses the 85th percentile of BMI for age and sex as a reference point for overweight and the 95th percentile for obesity in children. These charts can be readily downloaded from the internet sites, but are however, based on well off populations from USA.

(2) Recently, new BMI standards in children using a large internationally represen-tative sample from six different countries (not India), with widely differing prevalence rates for obesity have been published(17). Age- and sex-specific BMI cut-off points for defining overweight and obesity in children have been derived by identifying percentiles in children analogous to adult BMIs of 25 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2, respectively. These are referred to as IOTF cutoff points and are now recommended as standards for international comparison of data(2).

3.3 Other markers of obesity

Other markers and measures of obesity are summarised in Table II.

Table II

Other Markers of Obesity and Comments.
Skinfold thickness (SFT)(53)	Skinfold thickness by itself has not been validated as a 
			marker of obesity in population studies. Body fat % can 
			be calculated from prediction equations using multiple 
			skinfold measurements. 
			Cut-off values for obesity - 30% body fat (girls) and 20-25% 
			body fat (boys). 
			Disadvantages – Significant inter and intra-observer variation, 
			affected by gender and ethnicity, no Indian reference data, no 
			significant advantage over BMI.
Waist circumference(54)	Highly sensitive and specific measure of central obesity.
			Cut off values for risk - 102 cm (adult males), 88 cm  (adult 
			females), 71 cm (pre-pubertal children).
			No Indian data. 
Waist hip ratio(53)		Waist circumference / Hip circumference > 0.9 = Central 
			Obesity. No added advantage of WHR over waist 
			circumference in assessing central obesity.
Bioelectrical impedence 	Non-invasive, safe, cheap, reliable estimation of body
analyses			composition using a small portable instrument.
			Requires standardised conditions, experienced personnel, 
			adequate hydration status, overpredicts body fat in lean and 
			muscular individuals and underpredicts in obese.
Dual energy X-ray		Accurately estimates whole-body as well as regional bone 
absorptiometry (DEXA)	mineral density, lean mass, and fat mass over a wide range 
			of ages and body sizes.
 			Cut off values for body fat % : adults males >25% and 
			females >35%.
			Non-invasive, minimal radiation, but very expensive.
Air displacement plethy-	A sophisticated new technique. Accurate, non-invasive, 
smography(BOD-POD)	comfortable but very expensive. May be unsuitable for 
			younger children as it needs considerable co-operation.

 

All these markers have their individual advantages (e.g., waist circumference for central obesity, DEXA for actual fat percentage) but none are really standardized as yet for children.

4. Epidemiology

4.1 Determinants of obesity and its persistence

Atleast 30% of obesity begins in childhood. Conversely 50 to 80% of obese, children become obese adults(1). Many longitudinal studies have demonstrated convincingly, the substantially higher risks of child onset obesity(18,19). In the Harvard study, morbidity from cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity related cancers and arthritis was 50 -100% higher in obese individuals who were also obese as children and generally the cardiovascular mortality in such individuals was doubled(20).

The crucial periods for persistence of obesity appear to be (i) gestational period (ii) adiposity rebound age (5-7yrs) and (iii) adolescence. A number of studies have shown that high birthweight is positively related to subsequent fatness(21) but higher prevalence of obesity is also seen in lower birthweights–the U or J shaped relationship(22). The tendency for indicators of adiposity such as BMI to fall around the age of one year, and then increase again by around 5th year is referred to as ‘adiposity rebound’. It is now evident, that earlier the rebound the greater the risk of subsequent obesity, although what drives the timing of adiposity rebound remains obscure(23). However, the most important predictor of adult obesity appears to be adolescent weight and changes of BMI during this time(24). The older a child is, when he or she remains overweight, the greater the likelihood that overweight will remain in adulthood.

4.2 Indians at high risk; our special concerns

The prevalence of diabetes, CHD and other life style disorders is increasing alarmingly in India, and is affecting much younger populations than in the West. A large pool of young Indians demonstrate ‘prediabetics’ (i.e., insulin resistance and or glucose intolerance)(25). Gestational diabetes is common in mothers. The association of these problems with high BMIs and importantly central obesity is now well accepted(26). In transitional economies such as in India obesity and malnutrition often coexist (‘double burden of disease’) causing confusion in health messages(8).

Infact, frank obesity may not be as high in India as in the west, but the body composition and metabolism of Indians (and Asians in general) make them especially prone to adiposity and its consequences(27). South Asians have atleast 3 to 5% higher body fat for the same BMI as compared to Caucasians(28). The fat is typically located centrally, and around visceral organs where it is meta-bolically more dangerous than peripheral fat. Recent Pune studies have demonstrated the ‘thin fat Indian Phenotype’ with evidence of hyperinsulinemia even at birth(29). Moreover, recent longitudinal studies in India have highlighted the deleterious effect of acce-lerated weight gain in childhood ‘crossing of centiles’ especially in LBW babies(30,31). Indices of insulin resistance and cardio-vascular risk factors were found to be highest in those that were born ‘small’ but were big by 8 years in the Pune study, even though they were not obese in absolute terms. The recent Delhi study in young adults showed that an increase of BMI of 1 SD from 2 to 12 years of age, increased the odds ratio for disease by 1.36(31). Further, continuing cohort studies in Pune suggest that accelerated growth in childhood is associated with early maturation and greater risk of obesity (unpublished results).

It is now evident that our traditional understanding of concepts of ‘catch up growth’, weight gain in pregnancy and birth weight may need redefining.

5. Causes of the epidemic (in India)

In India there is a tremendous ‘Urban/Rural’ and ‘Rich / Poor’ divide, prevalence in the urban rich being much higher than in rural areas and poor communities. The causes include:

5.1 Changes in life style (‘urbanisation’)

With improving standards of living, and availability of food in plenty, the upper class societies of India in recent years have urbanized to western levels. The components of life style changes are:

Unhealthy eating patterns, wrong choices of food: Traditional micronutrient rich foods are being replaced by energy dense highly processed, micronutrient poor foods with greatly increased portions ‘Dil Mange More’. High calorie snacks, junk food revolution, cool cola (‘thanda matlab’) colonisation, and food as rewards or demonstration of love are all part of new life styles. All celebrations and festivals seem to be centered around rich foods.

Sedentary pursuits: TV and movie watching, video games, internet gazing and telephone gossip sessions are now important activities of children. TV also affects by heavy marketing of colas and other fatty foods. The number of TV sets and telephone connections are touted as indices of development!

‘Obesogenic schools’ and Tution classes: An important factor for obesity in India is the intense competition for admissions to schools and colleges with flourishing tuition classes right from nursery levels ! Children are forced to use their play time for additional studies. Games or physical training sessions are restricted or non existent in many schools. Some schools do not have any playgrounds at all.

Inadequate play areas: Due to unsafe roads (traffic, crime) children are dis-couraged form walking or cycling to school. Motorized vehicles are popular and they are perceived to be quicker and safer for transport. Erosion of open spaces for exercise and lack of parental time to supervise play are all part of new obesogenic lifestyles. As against food as rewards, ironically exercise is meted out as a punishment - ‘100 sit ups,’ ‘run round the field.’

5.2 Genetic ‘Constitutional’ pre-disposition

The factors responsible could be:

• Modern environment may have unmasked previously silent obesogenic genes ‘thrifty genotypes’(32).

• Programming of previously malnourished populations to accumulate fat more intensely in an attempt to store for future starvation (‘early life origins’)(33,34).

• Stunting in childhood (short height for age) may increase the risk of central obesity especially in transitional economies(35).

• High rate of gestational diabetes in pregnant women causing higher birth weights in babies leading to inter-generational effects of obesity in childhood and its attendants problem(36).

• Familial pattern of eating, exercise and behavior.

5.3 Other factors

• Prolonged and exclusive breast feeding is associated with a significantly lower rate of obesity and hypertension in later life(37). It is not clear if early introduction of energy dense supplements in infancy has contributed to childhood obesity in India.

• The high glycemic index of our predominantly carbohydrate diet may be responsible for hyperinsulinism, weight gain and eventual type 2 diabetes(38).

• Yet other factors controlling body weight regulation such as `low body metabolic rate (BMR)' and probably governed by hypothalamus - these factors as of now are all speculative(1,2).

6. How can we control this epidemic?

6.1 Primary prevention of childhood Obesity: Public health approach

Atleast 1 in 10 urban middle class children in India is overweight. If we allow this epidemic to continue we will top the world in Diabetes and CHD earlier than estimated. The cost of treating diabetes mellitus and associated disorders alone will consume a major chunk of our resources which we can ill afford. Only community based approaches can address such large numbers of affected children. Further, results of treating estab-lished obesity at clinics are dis-appointing, though on a positive note children do better than adults(6). Obesogenic lifestyle behaviors are less well developed in children and therefore more amenable to change. An overwhelming body of evidence now indicates that prevention must begin in childhood to reduce the burden and cost of obesity in society(2,8).

In India, Public health efforts so far, have been directed towards improving nutrition (and thereby implied weights of newborns, infants, children and mothers). Obesity prevention campaigns will have to be carefully worded to avoid conflicting messages and deleterious results! However the only way to cut short the escalating epidemic appears to be prevention of obesity and other lifestyle problems in childhood itself.

The control of this epidemic is a challenge and requires strong social and political will in addition to medical management. A concerted public health approach will be required for effective prevention. The whole family, indeed the whole society must be targeted for the health of the future generation.

6.2 Do interventions/preventive methods work?

In India, we have just about started reporting high prevalence of obesity in children. Obviously then, no intervention studies have been carried out as yet. But a number of studies have been carried out and reported from the western countries(2,39,40). Some reports from developing countries have started to emerge(41). By and large recent studies in children (as against adult studies) have shown some positive short term and long term results with programs that target the whole life style of children.

The CATCH study (Child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health) in multi racial American school children and the ‘Go Girls’ community based study in African American girls showed that children can be taught to eat less fat and exercise more!(40,42). Larger numbers and longer time inputs could have shown positive influence on prevalence of obesity too. An important UK school based study (APPLES) which targeted whole community reported successful imple-mentation of the program but unsuccessful result (in fact the study group had reduced activity and no weight loss!)(43). Obviously more time or different approaches will have to be tried to improve outcome. Perhaps the most optimistic results have come from Singapore; an 8 year school based campaign with government support (Health Promotion Board) was successful in implementation as well as reduction in prevalence of obesity (from a high of 16.6% in early 90s to less than 14.6% in 1998)(44). This study however was targeted at obese children only, and the possibility of causing psychosocial stigmas by such an approach must be considered. In Brazil, an ambitious programme to promote physical activity in children was launched in 1997, in Sau Paulo, and because of its impact has now been adopted throughout the country - ‘Agita Brasil’(41). The Brazil programme has highlighted psychosocial and educational benefits as well as physical benefits but, is yet to be assessed in terms of obesity prevalence.

Obviously many lessons can be learnt from the successful and the not so successful programs in other countries.

The following strategies suggested specifically for our country, are based not only on the above evidence, but on observational data and also on logic.

6.3 Strategies and Aims: Public Health Approch(2,7,8,45)

As a Public Health Approach, essentially all children, adolescents and families should benefit from counseling to prevent excess weight gain and obesity.

• Life style approach

(i) Healthy eating patterns: Emphasis should be on nutrition rather than ‘dieting’. It is important to maintain healthy components of traditional diets (i.e., micronutrient rich food such as fruits, vegetables and whole grain cereals) and guard against heavily marketed energy dense fatty and salty foods (e.g., pre-packaged snacks, ice-creams and chocolates) and the sugary cold drinks. The strategy should be to recognise and eliminate risk features of high calorie intake such as frequent snacking (samosas, potato chips, chiwdas), eating out frequently (burgers, dosas), celebrating with food (cake, chocolates) and drinks (colas, beers). Healthier alternatives can be suggested. Habits attained early have more chance of remaining throughout life.

A simple Indianised message based on recommendations of AHA(7) could be–"think of a day’s food composition as a ‘Thali’ wherein 50% (half) is full of vegetables, salads and fruits. A quarter (25%) should be made up of cereals such as rice and/or chapattis and the remaining quarter should be protein based (dal/milk/egg/animal protein)". Fried, snacks and ‘sweet dishes’ are only for a very few special occasions ! (Fig. 1).

Recommended constituent of day’s
food intake

Fig. 1. Showing recommended constituents of day’s
food intake in a ‘Thali’ based visual.

 

(ii) Increase physical activity levels: Children should be encouraged to be active not only for weight control but for general well being. Many adolescents/pre adolescents find defined physical exercises (aerobics, tread-mills) boring and punitive and are more likely to continue activity if it is incorporated into their daily routines, e.g., walking or cycling to school and playing with friends in the grounds. The WHO recommends atleast 30 minutes of cumulative moderate exercise (equivalent to walking briskly) for all ages; plus for children, an additional 20 minutes of vigorous exercise (equivalent to running), three times a week(46). These recommendations are basically for prevention of CHD; prevention of obesity may require more physical exertion. In general, moderate to vigorous activities for a period of atleast one hour a day may be a more practical recommendation for all school going children.

(iii) Decrease sedentary behavior: Perhaps even more important is decreasing sedentary behavior. In our country, chief sedentary behaviors are television (should be restricted to no more than 2 hours a day), computers, telephone conversations and importantly tution classes (restriction may not be possible!).

• Avoid Overfeeding Stunted Populations. Assess stature, and prevent feeding excess calories to children with low weight for age but normal weight for height i.e., ‘stunted children’. Most PEM prevention programs (school mid day meals) use food supplements that provide ample energy and protein but may be deficient in micronutrients. Such programs may induce weight gain in underweight children while length deficit may not be reversed, thereby creating a risk for obesity(47). Quality of foods provided in ‘feeding programs’ is crucial–fruits and vegetables should be included and energy excess should be avoided(47).

• ‘Target’ populations most in need of interventions; in India this would probably mean urban children from higher and mid socio economic status. Targeting avoids confusing messaging directed towards opposite segments of society.

• ‘Tailor the interventions’ to suit the specific needs of the community. Use culture appropriate messages e.g., urban Indians need to know that ‘chubby’ or fat infants are not equal to ‘healthy’ babies !

• Address ‘Behavior’ Change. Behavior is culture based. Consider socio-cultural and ethnic issues–these would be important in suggesting diets and activity. For example, adolescent girls from conservative families are often discouraged from playing outdoor games but can be encouraged to perform physical household chores.

• Focus on involvement of entire family (parents, grandparents) indeed the entire community for better results. Average Indian families have poor knowledge of ‘healthy eating’.

• Confront vested interests e.g., advertising of colas.

• Build supportive infrastructure e.g., safe play grounds, transport and town planning.

6.4 Special strategies to target specific age groups(8)

Infants and Young Children

• Mothers should prevent excess weight gain in pregnancy; control diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance in pregnancy.

• Promote exclusive breast feeding for six months.

• Avoid adding sugars, starches or oils to feeding formulas.

• Assure appropriate micronutrient intake especially of iron, calcium and vitamins.

• Monitor growth with weight for height and BMI. Discourage ‘accelerated crossing of centiles’.

• Make clear differentiation of ‘catch up growth’ from accelerated weight gain. Catch up growth should be associated with gain in height proportional to weight gain.

• Instruct mothers to accept the child's appetite and not to force feed.

• Instruct families that ‘fat infants make fat adults’.

Children and adolescents

The fat rebound age (5-8years) and adolescence are particularly high risk periods for accumulating fat. Strategies for prevention include

• Promote active lifestyles including at least one hour of vigorous ‘play’ per day. Limit TV and other sedentary activities to <2 hr/day. Physical activity is as important, if not more than didactic lessons.

• Promote sensible eating–increase fruit and vegetables and restrict energy dense sweets and soft drinks. Impart health education skills to make healthy food choices e.g., early home cooked dinners to avoid TV snacking. Substitute soups/salads/baked foods for wafers, chocolates /fried foods.

• Modify environments to promote physical activity e.g., safe roads for cycling, jogging.

• Celebration should be in the form of outdoor play/picnics rather than fast food joint parties.

• Educate about the evils of alcohol/tobacco to adolescents.

6.5 Channels of interventions / health education

School Based Programs

Schools are probably the ideal medium of intervention as they are central to children’s lives and information can be relatively quickly dissipated through this channel.

Aspects to be considered are:

• Training of teachers in lifestyles, nutrition and activity.

• Introduction of ideal school meals or provision of canteens offering only healthy options based on Indian foods.

• Introduction of ‘nutrition and physical education’ in school curriculum. These activities should become compulsory and /or a ‘scoring subject’ with marks to be added to total grades. Only then will parents/students give the required attention and time to this in this competitive world of academics!

• After school games (supervised/unsupervised) to be encouraged. Opening up of school playgrounds on weekends and holidays.

• Obese children should not be teased, targeted or bullied or isolated.

• Involve parent associations.

• School health check ups should monitor BMI along with height and weight annually.

Media involvement

Another powerful channel especially for upper and middle class societies is media coverage. Regular columns and supplements have already started making a mark.

Health centers/Doctors/Other Professionals

• It is important for doctors and other health professionals to think ‘prevention of obesity’ at all visits and incorporate relevant health education. The success of this channel in recent years with ORS, immunizations, breast feeding and prevention of malnutrition makes this an optimistic channel for such a campaign.

• Incorporate BMI charts / IOTF cut offs and waist circumference (in addition to height, weight and head circumference) in routine health records. Monitor BMI every year, particularly for children from high risk families.

• Identify children with BMI >75th centile (and with accelerated crossing of centiles) for frequent monitoring and ‘life style’ interventions.

• Discourage parent's obsession with food intake and pleas for tonics.

Governmental authorities

Both health and infrastructural authorities should be responsible for

• Devising national strategies

• Encouraging food outlets/restaurants to serve healthy choices

• Providing safe exercise opportunities.

• Regulate advertisements aimed at children and insist on food labelling.

• Consider taxation on ‘fatty food’ or alternatively reduce taxation/promote production of fresh food and vegetables.

As said earlier this sort of a Public Health Approach requires strong social and political will with concurrent medical motivation and management.

7. Management of established obesity

Whereas the public health campaign is to be targeted to the society as a whole, individual or clinic based approach is necessary for the treatment of the obviously obese child. A guideline for assessment by pediatricians in their clinic based practice is provided in the accompanying Table III. Principles of therapy are outlined in the following section.

Please click here to view

Table III

7.1 Management of obesity–clinic / individual approach

Management of established obesity in children needs a concerted and a sustained effort from a team of experienced health professionals. Treatment is more likely to be successful in children than adults. Western guidelines by and large apply to our clinics and are outlined below(2,6,48).

Goals of therapy: Approach to therapy

Medical Goal: Medical goal should be resolution of complications and co-morbidites such as hypertension and hyperlipidemias.

Behavioral Goal: Achievement of healthy eating and activity patterns rather than achievement of ideal body weight .

Weight Goal: Weight maintenance rather than weight loss (unless moribund obesity) in young children–‘Let the child grow into his weight’. Prolonged weight maintenance will allow a gradual decline in the BMI as the child grows in height.

7.2 General Approach to Therapy(1,6,38)

• Institute small, gradual and permanent changes, not short-term diets or exercise programs aimed at rapid weight loss.

• Involve the family and all care givers in the treatment program.

• Intervention should begin early (later than age 3 yrs but earlier than adolescence).

• Clinicians should encourage and empa-thize and not criticise.

7.3 Principles of therapy (Table III)

Theoretically, obesity management is energy balance (eat less and exercise more). However, in practice the treatment can be challenging and frustrating because of frequent relapses.

The principles of therapy are generally same as in prevention viz.:

(a) Reduced calorie intake;

(b) Increased activity levels;

(c) Decreased sedentary behavior;

(d) Family involvement;

(e) Behavioral changes.

Limiting energy intake of growing children can result in decreased linear growth velocity in obese children and is therefore risky(45). Dieting could also increase prevalence of inadequate nutrients, such as iron, calcium, zinc and vitamins A, C and E. High degrees of parental dietary control may infact have adverse psychobehavioral effects on young children with treatment failures(49). Hence the aim should be provision of well balanced healthy meals with a healthy approach to eating. Several different dietary studies have shown successful reduction of calorie intake and improved eating behaviors(45). The advise usually centres around reducing calories from fat, saturated fats, cholesterol and sugars (high density foods) while increasing fruits, vegetables and whole grain cereals (lower density foods). Counting of calories can be tedious and inaccurate and it is more advantageous to supply indigenous versions of Food Guide Pyramids or Epstein’s traffic light diets(50). Trials of hypocaloric diets, protein modified fasts, fibre supplementation and anorectic drugs have been shown to be by and large, ineffective in children in the long range(48).

Addition of physical activity and reduction in sedentary behavior, both (supervised and unsupervised) improves long term outcome(48). The important components of behavioral therapy include treatment of families as a whole, identification of problem behaviors and their modifications, and `tailor' made advise and support component. Parenting skills recommended in treatment plans are praising the child's behavior, never using food as reward, establishing firm daily family meal and snack times, providing only healthy options, removing temptations and being a good role model(51).

7.4 Intensive therapy

Yanovski (2001) reviewed the limited data on intensive therapies that have been proposed and tried in children(52). These include (a) severe energy restriction below 1000 kcal / day (b) drugs-fenfluramine, metformin, sibu-tramine, leptin, octreotide and (c) bariatric surgery such as gastric bypass and gastric stapling. Although initial weight loss can be dramatic, most of these approaches are fraught with significant adverse consequences and need constant long term monitoring. These are therefore, to be considered only in the rare gross cases with potential life threatening complications. None of the treatment modalities can be successful without positive behavioral changes.

Annexure I

Members of the Task Force

Ashish Bavdekar, Swarnarekha Bhat, Vijayalakshmi Bhatia, Sheila Bhave, Panna Choudhury, Umesh Kapil, Anita Khalil, Anura V.Kurpad, M.K.C. Nair, Madhumati Otiv, P.Raghupathy, H.P.S. Sachdev (Chairperson), R.N.Salhan, Nitin Shah, Sumathi Swaminathan and Anju Virmani.

Key Messages


• India is in the midst of an escalating epidemic of life style disorders associated with childhood obesity.

• The important causes of the epidemic in India appear to be:- unhealthy eating patterns, reduced physical activity, increased sedentary pursuits and possibly `constitutional predispositions'/ `early origins'.

• Prevention must begin early in the form of a public health campaign directed towards lifestyle changes of the family / society as a whole. The campaign requires strong social and political will.

• Health professionals must think `prevention of obesity' at all visits, monitor BMI and ensure that `nutrition messages' are not conflicting and confusing.

• Special strategies for different ages and channels of interventions for prevention of obesity have been outlined.

• Clinic based individual assessment of the obese child and principles of therapy are provided.

 

 

References

1. Styne DM. Childhood and Adolescent Obesity. PCNA 2001; 48: 823-847.

2. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R. Obesity in children and young people: A crisis in public health. Report to the WHO. Published by IASO International Obesity Task Force, London 2004.

3. Freedman DS, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of overweight to cardiovascular risk factors among children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 1175-1182.

4. Tounian P, Aggoun Y, Dubern B, Varille V, Guy-Grand B, Sidi D, et al. Presence of increased stiffness of the common carotid artery and endothelial dysfunction in severely obese children: a prospective study. Lancet 2001; 358: 1400-1404.

5. Fagor-Campagna AF. Emergence of type 2 diabetes in children: Epidemiological evidence. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000; 13: S1395-S1402.

6. Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Obesity evaluation and treatment: Expert Committee recommendations. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 1-11.

7. Willams CL, Hayman LL, Daniels SR, Robinson TN, Steinberger J, Paridon S, et al. Cardiovascular Health in Childhood - A statement for health professionals from the Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young (AHOY) of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association (AHA). Circulation 2002; 106: 143-160.

8. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva, World Health Organization 2000 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 894).

9. Reddy KS, Prabhakaran D, Shah P, Shah D. Differences in body mass index and waist: hip ratios in north Indian rural and urban population. Obes Rev 2002; 3: 197-202.

10. Chadha SL, Gopinath N, Shekhawar S. Urban-rural differences in the prevalence of coronary heart disease and its risk factors in Delhi. Bull World Health Organ 1997; 5: 31-38.

11. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Vinitha R, Thayyil M, Sathish Kumar CK, Sheeba L, et al. Prevalence of overweight in urban Indian adolescent school children. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2002; 57: 185-190.

12. Kapil U, Singh P, Pathak P, Dwivedi SN, Bhasin S. Prevalence of obesity amongst affluent adolescent school children in Delhi. Indian Pediatr 2002; 39: 449-452.

13. Gidding SS, Bao W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GW. Effects of secular trends in obesity on coronary risk factors in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr 1995; 127: 868.

14. WHO/IASO/IOTF. The Asia Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and its treatment. Health Communications Australia Pty Ltd. 2000.

15. Agarwal KN, Saxena A, Bansal AK, Agarwal DK. Physical Growth Assessment in Adole-scence, Indian Pediatr 2001; 38: 1217-1235.

16. CDC growth charts: United States Advance data from vital and health statistics. No.314 National Center for Health Statistics: Atlanta, 2000.

17. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide international survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240-1243.

18. Guo SS, Huang C, Maynard LM, Demerath E, Towne B, Chumlea WC, et al. Body mass index during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood in relation to adult overweight and adiposity. The Fels Longitudinal Study. Int J Obes Relat Metlab Disord 2000; 24: 1628-1635.

19. Nieta FJ. Szklo M, Comstock CW. Childhood weight and growth rate as predictors of adult mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 80-86.

20. Must A, PF Jacques, GE Dallal, CJ Bajema, WH Dietz. Long-term morbidity and mortality of overweight adolescents. A follow-up of the Harvard Growth Study of 1922 to 1935. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1350-1355.

21. Parsons TJ, Power C, Logan S, Summerbell CD. Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review. Int J Obes 1999; 8: S1-S107.

22. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Ascherio AL, Stampfer MJ. Birth weight and adult hyptertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity in US men. Circulation 1996; 94: 3246-3250.

23. Dorosty AR, Emmett PM, Cowin S. Factors associated with early adiposity rebound. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1118-2000.

24. Power C, Lake JK, Cole TJ. Measurement and long term health risks of child and adolescent fatness. Int J Obes 1997; 21: 507-526.

25. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Kapur A, Vijay V, Mohan V, Das AK, et al. High prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in India: National urban diabetes survey. Diabetologia 2001; 9: 1094-1111.

26. Shelgikar KM, Hockaday TDR, Yajnik CS. Central rather than generalized obesity is related to hyperglycemia in Asian Indian subjects. Diabet Med 1991; 8: 712-717.

27. Yajnik CS. The life cycle effects of nutrition and body size on adult adiposity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Obes Rev 2002; 3: 217-224.

28. Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S. Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev 2002; 3: 141-146.

29. Yajnik CS, Lubree HG, Rege SS, Naik SS, Deshpande JA, Deshpande SS, et al. Adiposity and hyperinsulinemia in Indians are present at birth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 5575-5580.

30. Bavdekar A, Yajnik CS, Caroline HD, Bapat S, Pandit A, Deshpande V, et al. Insulin resistance syndrome in 8-Year -old Indian children - Small at birth, Big at 8 years, or both ? Diabetes 1999; 48: 2422-2429.

31. Bhargava SK, Sachdev HPS, Fall CHD, Osmond C, Lakshmy R, Barker DJP, et al. Relation of serial changes in childhood body-mass index to impaired glucose tolerance in young adulthood. New Eng J Med 2004; 350: 865-875.

32. Neel JV. Diabetes Mellitus: A ‘thrifty’ genotype rendered detrimental by progress? Am J Hum Genet 1962; 14: 353-362.

33. Hales CN, Barker DJP. Type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia 1992; 35: 595-601.

34. Barker DJP. Mothers, babies and health in later life. Churchill Livingstone, London, 1998.

35. Popkin BM, Richards MK, Montiero CA. Stunting is associated with overweight in children of four nations that are undergoing the nutrition transition. J Nutr 1996; 126: 3009-3016.

36. Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Lindsay RS, Pettitt DJ, Imperatore G, Gabir MM, et al. Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: a study of discordant sibships. Diabetes 2000; 49: 2208-2211.

37. Armstrong J, Reilly JJ. Child Health Information Team. Breast feeding and lowering the risk of childhood obesity. Lancet 2002; 359: 2003-2004.

38. Nelson EAS, Baur LA. Childhood obesity. In Gupte S. (ed) Recent Advances in Pediatrics New Delhi. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 2002; 12:86-99.

39. Gortmaker SL, Peterson K, Wiecha J, Sobol MA, Dixit S, Fox MK, et al. Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet Health. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 409-418.

40. Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, Noder PR, Parcel GS, Stone EJ, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity. CATCH collaborative group. JAMA 1996; 275: 768-776.

41. Matsudo V, Matsudo S, Andrade D, Araujo T, Andrade E, de Oliveira LC, et al. Promotion of physical activity in a developing country: the Agita Sao Paulo experience. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 253-261.

42. Resnicow K, Yaroch A, Davis A, Wang DT, Carter S, Slaughter L, et al. GO GIRLS! Results from a pilot nutrition and physical activity program for low-income overweight. African American adolescent females. Health Edu Behav 2000; 27: 616-631.

43. Sahota P, Rudolf MC, Dixey R, Hill AJ, Barth JH, Code J. Randomized controlled trial of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity. BMJ 2001; 32: 1029-1032.

44. Toh CM, Cutter J, Chew SK. School based intervention has reduced obesity in Singapore. BMJ 2002; 324: 427-429.

45. Ikeda JP, Mitchell RA. Dietary approaches to the treatment of the overweight pediatric patient. PCNA 2001; 48: 955-968.

46. World Health Organization. Annual global move for health initiative. A concept paper. WHO Geneva 2003.

47. Uauy R, Kain J. The epidemiologic transition: the need to incorporate obesity prevention into nutrition programmes. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 223-229.

48. Edmunds L, Waters E, Ellist EJ. Evidence based management of childhood obesity. BMJ 2001; 323: 916-919.

49. Hood MY, Moore L, Sundarajan RE, Singer M, Cupples LA, Ellison RC. Parental eating attitudes and the development of obesity in children. The Framingham Children's Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24: 1319-1325.

50. Epstein LH, Squires S. The stoplight Diet for Children. Boston MA. Little Brown & Co. 1988.

51. Epstein LH. Role of behavior theory in behavioral medicine. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60: 493.

52. Yanowski JA. Intensive therapies for pediatric obesity. PCNA 2001; 48: 1041 - 1054.

53. Dwyer T, Blizzard CL. Defining obesity in children by biological endpnt rather than population distribution. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996; 20: 472-480.

54. Higgins PB, Gower BA, Hunter GR, Goran MI. Defining health-related obesity in prepubertal children. Obes Res. 2001; 9: 233-240.

 

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription