1.gif (1892 bytes)

Letters to the Editor

Indian Pediatrics 2003; 40:594

Pediatrician's Appearance


I read with interest the article ‘Professional appearance of pediatrician: Children’s and Pediatricians’ opinion’ by Vijaylakshmi & Thinaker Vel(1). I think that the article is methodologically incorrect and suffers from many drawbacks.

1. The questionnaire is not well-devised and is full of leading questions. No survey is considered as good if leading questions are asked in it. It could have been asked in this way: Which dress do they think is best for their doctor & why?

2. It should be noted that Pediatricians treat children from 0-18 years of age, whereas the study surveyed only children from 8-15 years. The study summarises that a white apron is wanted by the children. We all know that a white apron may be psychologically disturbing for children in infancy and young childhood, but this may not be the case for older children. So we are not justified in extrapolating from this study that Pediatricians should wear an apron.

3. The authors have studied only on the appearance of the Pediatrician, and totally overlooked the important aspect of skills and clinical acumen of the doctor, on the basis of which a patient or his/her realtive seeks medical help. I think that this cannot be excluded from any study and question as to whether children would rate appearance higher than competency should have been included in the questionnaire.

I strongly feel that a decent, clean appearance is what matters, be it in any dress form. Dressing patterns are the wearer’s choice and no one dress pattern can please one and all.

Sukhbir Kaur Shahid,
8-Jayanti, 353/21,
R.B. Mehta Road, Ghatkopar (E),
Mumbai 400 077, India.

References


1. Vijaylakshimi AM, Thinakar Vel M. Professional appearance of Pediatrician: Children’s and pediatricians’ opinion. Indian Pediatr 2003; 40: 66-68.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription