1.gif (1892 bytes)

Review

Indian Pediatrics 2001; 38: 631-639  

Carrier Detection and Prenatal Diagnosis in Duchenne/Becker Muscular Dystrophy


Inusha Panigrahi,
Balraj Mittal

From the Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Scien-ces, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226 014, India.
Correspondece to: Dr. Balraj Mittal, Additional Professor, Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Scien-ces, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226 014, India.
E-mail: balraj@sgpgi.ac.in

Majority of genetic disorders place a considerable burden on the families per-petuating the condition for the lack of effective treatment. Duchenne/Becker muscu-lar dystrophies (D/BMD) are such lethal disorders caused by mutations in the dystro-phin gene. DMD is a common disease affect-ing 1/3500 male births, while BMD is milder and less frequent. It presents with muscular weakness, hypertrophy of the calf muscles, positive Gower’s sign, and Pradhan’s valley sign(1). Due to X-linked nature of the disorder , males carrying the mutated gene are affected, while females become carriers of the disease. Diagnosis of patients with D/BMD is usually definitive based on clinical, patho-logical and biochemical findings, although it is increasingly being confirmed by molecular analysis.

Due to the lack of efficient rehabilitation and treatment of progressive muscular dys-trophy, counseling and prenatal diagnosis are options that medical geneticists can offer today, and their decision depends on infor-mation of the carrier status. Practically, if the mother of an affected boy (proband) has another affected relative, she is an obligate carrier. If there is an affected brother or one affected son, she is a possible carrier. But in most families there is only one affected patient. Therefore, female relatives of affected males are candidates for carrier assessment. However, the ascertainment of carrier status is one of the basic dilemmas in genetic counseling in X-linked recessive disorders because female carriers are usually asymptomatic. Several biochemical and mole-cular methods have been suggested to solve this dilemma.

Among the biochemical methods, the serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level has been most frequently used for carrier detection in DMD. However, the CPK level is informative in only 70% of the female carriers(2,3). About one-third of the female carriers show myopathic changes in muscle histology and abnormalities have also been found histochemically and by electron micro-socopy(4). Immunohistochemical methods using antibodies against dystrophin protein have also been used for carrier detection(5,6) Most of these methods, however, are either invasive or not specific for D/BMD and there-fore cannot be used for definitive ascertain-ment of status.

Recent advances in molecular techniques have made it possible to detect carriers and provide prenatal diagnosis with almost 95% confidence (high specificity). The dystrophin gene is about 2.4 Mb in size, consisting of 79 exons and is localized at Xp21. Most of the mutations in the gene are seen in two hotspots located at proximal and central regions of the gene called the ‘deletional hotspots’(7,8). About 65-70% of the patients show intragenic deletions of one or several exons of the gene which can be detected by multiplex PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) or Southern blotting(9,10) using DNA from patient’s blood.

However, carrier analysis by molecular methods in females is still difficult due to the presence of a normal copy of the gene in the heterozygous carrier females (2 X-chromo-somes). In these cases quantitative PCR or quantitative Southern blotting have to be carried out and the products are assessed by densitometry (11-13). The process is how-ever, cumbersome and requires strictly controlled conditions. Moreover, in 30% of the cases of D/BMD, no gross deletions are detected in the dystrophin gene due to the presence of point mutations. Various point mutation screening protocols such as SSCP (Single Strand Conformation Polymor-phisms), HA (Heteroduplex Analysis), CMC (Chemical Mismatch Cleavage), etc. have been designed but the success rate is limited due to large size of the gene(14-16).

An alternative approach for carrier detection is by DNA based linkage analysis using highly polymorphic intragenic short tandem repeat (STR) markers(17). It has 95% accuracy due to the possibility of recombina-tion. The above method depends on the segregation of the X-chromosomes from mother to the affected and unaffected offsprings. Several STR markers for the gene are used for the method (http//www.dmd.nl). Linkage analysis is suitable both for deletional as well as non-deletional cases of D/BMD, which allows proper carrier detection and prenatal analysis.

Various molecular methods as described above are available for prenatal diagnosis and carrier analysis. The details of these methods are as follows:

(1) Gene deletions by Multiplex-PCR

The rapid detection of deletions by PCR allows proper counseling in the new families. Specific DNA regions are amplified in a multiplex reaction using Chamberlain’s(9) and Beggs’(18) and some additional primers. Usually the laboratories use 25 pairs of primers, which are able to detect about 98% of the deletions. The deletion can be identified from the pattern of the bands as visualized on ethidium-bromide stained agarose gels. Once the deletion has been detected, it becomes a marker for the family and prenatal diagnosis can easily be provided. For example, in Fig. 1 the proband of a DMD family had shown the deletion of exon 48 and this deletion was used as a direct marker for prenatal diagnosis in the family. The above method, however, has limitations, as it can not be used for determination of carrier status in females because of heterozygosity.

Fig. 1. PCR products of exons 48 and 49 of a DMD family on 2% agarose gel. Upper band (506 bp) was absent in proband (II-1) and Chorionic villus sample, CVS (II-3), indicating the deletion of exon 48. In father (I-1), mother (I-2) and unaffected son (II-2) both upper and lower (439 bp) bands were amplified indicating the presence of exons 48 and 49, respectively.

(2) Gene deletions by Southern blotting

In this method the DNA is digested by restriction enzymes which recognize and cut at specific sites. The digested DNA is subjected to electrophoresis and hybridized to complimentary cDNA probes. The labeling of probes by radioactive nucleotides allows detection by autoradiography(10). The proce-dure is however, tedious and is especially used when single exon deletion is detected by PCR analysis. This is because single exon deletion may result from failure of amplifica-tion of that exon due to polymorphism. Among affected males, 5-10% show duplica-tions of one or more exons of the gene, which can also be detected by Southern blotting.

(3) Quantitative and real time PCR

These are further refinements of the conventional PCR technology. However, these are mostly in the investigational stage and require stringent conditions. The sample has to be analyzed in the exponential phase of the PCR amplification before the plateau phase is reached for proper quantitation. In real time, the progress of PCR can be monitored and accordingly the reaction can be terminated at the desired point(19, 20). The inherent complexities of these methods and high costs preclude their use for routine diagnosis.

(4) Linkage analysis using dinucleotide (CA) repeat markers

Microsatellites are short tandemly repeated sequences(21), which have been identified as byproducts of the Human Genome Project. There are approximately 50,000-100,000 (CA)n loci (a subclass of STRs) in the human genome. These frequently polymorphic loci have been exploited in carrier detection of many genetic diseases by linkage analysis.

DNA based linkage analysis, using intragenic (CA) repeat markers of dystrophin gene has been found to be a powerful approach for carrier detection of non-deletional as well as deletional D/BMD families. Due to large size of the gene, intragenic meiotic recombinations are also possible. Therefore, several intragenic and flanking STRs of dystrophin locus are being studied to provide accurate carrier status and prenatal diagnosis.

The method requires the sample of proband in addition to other family members. The informativeness of the markers depends on the level of heterozygosity in the population. Hence, the markers selected have to be specific for the target population. Usually 4-6 STR markers for the deletion prone regions of dystrophin gene are used and the haplotype of the specific X-chromosome is deduced. The PCR products are run on polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography(17).

Determination of Carrier Status of Female Relatives

The usefulness of (CA)n markers in the identification of carrier status of female relatives and for prenatal diagnosis in affected families is being explained with the help of some examples from our laboratory records.

In family 1 (Fig 2A), the mother was an obligate carrier due to family history of the disease. The proband had not shown any deletion. Therefore, linkage analysis was directly carried out to know the status of two female sibs who were at risk of being carriers. Six (CA) n repeat markers of the dystrophin gene (5’DYS-II, STRs 44, 45, 49, 50 and 3’DYS-MS) were amplified by PCR using DNA samples from all the family members. The products were separated by gel electro-phoresis and assessed by autoradiography. The mother (I-2) was found to be hetero-zygous for two STRs, 5’DYS II (2,1) and 3’CA (2,3) loci (Fig. 2A). The haplotype ‘b of the mother inherited by the proband was linked with the disease while ‘c’ is normal. By following the segregation of ‘b’ and ‘c’ in the offsprings we can determine the status of females in the family. It was observed that proband (II-3) and female sib (II-2) inherited the maternal haplotype ‘b’ while female sib (II-4) inherited the haplotype ‘c’, thereby suggesting that (II-2) was a carrier while (II-4) was a non-carrier. Figure 2B shows the electrophoretic pattern of 3’DYS CA loci in all the family members.

In family 2 (Fig.3) there was a history of the disease and the proband had not shown any intragenic deletion. Carrier status of three female siblings in the family was determined using eight (CA)n repeat markers. By haplotype analysis, it was found that mother was informative (heterozygous) for three (CA) loci, STRs 5’ Dys II (2,1), 50 (1,2) and 62/63 (2,I). The feamle sib (II-5) was suggestive as a carrier as she shared the haplotype ‘b’, which was inherited by affected brothers. Another female sib (II-4) was ascertained as non-carrier. The carrier status of (II-2) could not be ascertained as she inherited a mixed maternal haplotype (b/c) suggesting the occurrence of recombination between STRs 49 and 50 (Fig. 3). Therefore, carrier analysis can not be predicted in 2-5% of cases where intragenic recombination has taken place.

In family 3 (Fig. 4), one son (II-1) was clinically diagnosed as DMD at 6-years of age and he showed deletion of exon 48 (Fig.1). This deletion was used as a marker for prenatal diagnosis in this family and the same was found to be present in the CVS (II-3). The CPK level of proband was found to be raised while mother’s CPK level was in the normal range. No intragenic deletion was observed in the unaffected male sib (II-2). By haplotype analysis, the mother (I-2) was found to be informative for three STRs, 5’DYS-II (2,1) 44 (1,3), and 49 (Fig.4). It was observed that proband (II-1), unaffected brother (II-2) and fetus (II-3) inherited the same maternal haplotype ‘b’. However, no deletion was detected in II-2 and was clinically normal. This suggested that the mother was a germline mosaic. This can be explained on the basis that mother had both normal and mutated germ cells. The proband (II-1) and CVS (II-3) had inherited the mutated germ cells while II-2 had inherited the normal germs cells from the mother. In D/BMD, about 5-10% of cases has been attributed to germline mosaicism(22). It is therefore important to carry out prenatal diagnosis in all future preganancies if there is one affected child in the family. Since the fetus in the above family was found to be an affected male, the parents were counseled accordingly.

Fig. 2(A). Pedigree and haplotype analysis of family 1. The analyzed (CA) loci order is mentioned in the box. Father’s haplo-type, ‘a’ (hatched box) and mother’s haplotypes ‘b’ (filled box), ‘c’ (open box). The mother (I-2) was heterozygous for two STR loci (5’ DYS II and 3’Dys CA).

Fig. 2(B). Autoradiogram showing allelic pattern of 3’ Dys CA loci: Mother (I-2) is heterozygous showing two bands (alleles). The proband (II-3) and the female sib (II-2) inherited the upper band from the mother vhile the unaffected male sib (II-1) and the female sib (II-4) inherited the lower band. Both sisters (II-2, II-4) inherited the father’s allele.

Fig. 3. Pedigree and haplotype analysis of family 2. The mother (I-2) is heterozygous for three STR loci (5’DYS II, 50 and 62/63) and her daughters are heterozygous for 2-3 loci. The proband (II-6) and unaffected son (II-8) inherit ‘b’ and ‘c’ haplotypes, respectively. The arrow marked on haplotype (II-2) shows occurrence of intragenic recombination between STRs 45 and 49.

Fig. 4. Pedigree and haplotype analysis of family 3. Mother is heterozygous for STRs 5’ DYS-II, 44 and 49. The affected (II-1), CVS (II-3) and unaffected (II-2) inherited the maternal haplotype ‘b’. The triangle (D) indicates deletion of exon.

(5) Other Techniques

The FISH (Fluorescent in-situ hybridi-zation)(23) technique can be employed for carrier detection in female relatives in deletional D/BMD cases only. However, its use is limited due to high cost of the fluorescent probes and equipment required. Single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis(14), heteroduplex analy-sis(15), RT-PCR (Reverse transcription PCR) (24) and protein truncation tests (PRI)(25-26) are used mainly for point mutation detection. But these techniques are not feasible for routine diagnostic purposes.

Several centers in India apart from our center at Sanjay Gandhi PGIMS provide the molecular diagnosis for D/BMD. Our laboratory is involved in mutational analysis, carrier detection, and prenatal diagnosis in D/BMD families for the last 10 years(27-29). Till date, we have analyzed around 327 D/BMD patients. Out of these, 220 (67.3%) were found to have intragenic deletions and 107 (32.7%) were nondeletional cases. Carrier detection in the female relatives has been carried out in about 25 D/BMD families. In our study, 58-70% informative-ness was observed for central region STRs and 27-47% for 5’/3’ region STRs. Prenatal diagnosis was successfully provided to 5 families.

The initial screening involves deletion identification by multiplex-PCR analysis/Southern hybridization. Linkage analysis is being used in both deletional and non-deletional families for carrier detection. The approach to molecular diagnosis for Duchenne muscular dystrophy has been summarized in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Flow chart suggesting the approach for carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis in D/BMD.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. L.S. Chaturvedi, Dr. Sandhya Srivastav and Dr. Monisha Mukherjee for the molecular analysis and help in preparing the paper. We are also grateful to our consultants, Dr. S.R. Phadke and Dr. S. Pradhan.

Contributors: IP designed the review, analyzed the data and drafted the paper. BM supervised the work, made finer corrections and will act as guarantor for the paper.

Funding: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research and Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow.

Competing interests: None stated.

Key Messages

  • D/BMD is a common muscular dystrophy affecting males.

  • Since there is no definitive treatment, carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis is of utmost importance for prevention of the disease.

  • DNA-based carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis can be carried out with high confidence if there is one affected child in the family.

  • Prenatal diagnosis is recommended in sporadic cases also because of high incidence of new mutations and germline mosaicism.

 References

1. Emery AEH. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular disease - A world survey. Neuromuscul Disord 1991; 1: 19-21.

2. Swaiman KF, Smith SA. Progressive muscular dystrophies. In: Pediatric Neuro-logy: Principles and Practice. 1st edn. Ed. Swaiman KF. St. Louis, The C.V. Mosby Company, 1989; pp 1139-1149.

3. Gruemer HD, Miller WGB, Chinchilli VM, Leshner RT, Blasco PA, Hassler CR, et al. Prediction of carrier status in Duchenne dystrophy by creatine kinase measurement. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 84: 655-658.

4. Bertolotto A, de Marchi M, Doriguzzi C, Mongini T, Monnier C, Palmucci L, et. al. Epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dys-trophy in the province of Turin. Ital J Neurol Sci 1981; 2: 81-84.

5. Bonilla E, Schmidt B, Samitt CE, Miranda AF, Hays AP, de Oliveira AB, et al. Normal and dystrophin-deficient muscle fibers in carriers of the gene for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Pathol 1988; 133: 440-445.

6. Hoffman EP, Fischbeck HK, Brown RH, Johnson M, Medori R, Loike JD, et al. Characterization of dystrophin in muscle biopsy specimens from patients with Duchenne’s or Becker’s muscular dystrophy. New Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1363-1368.

7. Den Dunnen JT, Bakker E, Klein Breteler EG, Pearson PL, Van Ommen GJB. Direct detec-tion of more than 50% of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations by field inver-sion gels. Nature 1987; 329: 640-642.

8. Koenig M, Hoffman EP, Bertelson CJ, Monaco AP, Feener C, Kunkel LM, et al. Complete cloning of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) cDNA and preliminary genomic organization of the DMD gene in normal and affected individuals. Cell 1987; 50: 509-517.

9. Chamberlain JS, Gibbs RA, Ranier JE, Nguyen PN, Caskey C. Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucl Acid Res 1988; 16: 11141-11156.

10. Den Dunnen JT, Grootscholten PM, Bakker E, Blonden LA, Ginjaar HB, Wapenaar MC, et al. Topography of the DMD gene, FIGE and cDNA analysis of 194 case reveals 115 deletions and duplications. Am J Hum Genet 1989; 45: 835-847.

11. Abbs S, Bobrow M. Analysis of quantitative PCR for the diagnosis of deletion and duplication carriers in the dystrophin gene. J Med Genet 1992; 29: 191-196.

12. Sinha S, Mishra S, Singh V, Mittal RD, Mittal B. High frequency of new mutations in north Indian Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy patients. Clin Genet 1996; 50: 327-331.

13. Alcantara MA, Villarreal MT, Del Castillo V, Gutierrez G, Saldana Y, Maulen I, et al. High freqeuncy of de novo deletions in Mexican Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy patients. Implications for genetic counselling. Clin Genet 1999; 55: 376-380.

14. Kneppers ALJ, Deutz-Terlouw PP, den Dunnen JT, van Ommen GJB, Bakker E. Point mutation screening for 16 exons of the dystrophin gene by multiplex single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Hum Mutat 1995; 5: 235-242.

15. Prior TW, Wenger GD, Papp AC, Snyder PJ, Sedra MS, Bartolo C, et al. Rapid DNA haplotying using a multiplex heteroduplex approach: Application to Duchenne muscular dystrophy carrier testing. Hum Mutat 1995; 5: 263-268.

16. Kiliman MW, Pizzuti A, Grompe M, Caskey CT. Point mutations and polymorphisms in the human dystrophin gene identified in genomic DNA sequences amplified by m-PCR. Hum Genet 1992; 89: 253-258.

17. Clemens PR, Fenwick RG, Chamberlain JS, Gibbs RA, de Andrade M, Chakraborty R, et al. Carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy families, using dinucleotide repeat polymor-phisms. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 951- 960.

18. Beggs AH, Koenig M, Boyce FM, Kunkel LM. Detection of 98% of D/BMD gene dele-tions by polymerase chain reaction. Hum Genet 1990b: 45-48.

19. Boulay JL, Reuter J, Ritschard R, Terraciano L, Herrmann R, Rochlitz C. Gene dosage by quantitative real-time PCR. Biotechniques 1999; 27: 230-288.

20. Ravine D. Automated mutation analysis. J Inherit Metab Dis 1999; 22: 503-518.

21. Tautz D, Renz M. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryo-tic genomes. Nucl Acids Res 1984; 12: 4127-4128.

22. Melis MA, Cau M, Congiu R, Puddu R, Muntoni F, Cao A. Germinal mosaicism in a Duchenne muscular dystrophy family: implications for genetic counselling. Clin Genet 1993; 43: 247-249.

23. Calvano S, Memeo E, Piemontese MR, Melchionda S, Bisceglia L, Gasparini P, et al. Detection of dystrophin deletion carriers using FISH analysis. Clin Genet 1997; 52: 17-22.

24. Roberts RG. Barby TFM, Manners E, Bobrow M, Bentley DR. Direct detection of dystro-phin gene rearrangements by analysis of dys-trophin mRNA in peripheral blood lympho-cytes. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 298-310.

25. Whittock NV, Roberts RG, Mathew CG, Abbs SJ. Dystrophin point mutation screening using a multiplex Protein Truncation Test. Genet Testing 1997; 1: 115-123.

26. Tuffery-Giraud S, Chambert S, Demaille J, Clausters M. Genotypic diagnosis of Duch-enne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Ann Biol Clin 1999; 57: 417-426.

27. Singh V, Sinha S, Mishra S, Chaturvedi LS, Pradhan S, Mittal RD, et al. Proportion and pattern of dystrophin gene deletion in North Indian Duchenne and Becker muscular dys-trophy patients. Hum Genet 1997; 99: 206-208.

28. Mittal B, Singh V, Mishra S, Sinha S, Mittal RD, Chaturvedi LS, et al. Genotype-pheno-type in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy patients seen at Lucknow. Indian J Med Res 1997; 105: 32-38.

29. Chaturvedi LS, Mittal RD, Srivastava S, Mukherjee M, Mittal B. Analysis of dinucleo-tide repeat loci of dystrophin gene for carrier detection, germline mosaicism and de novo mutations in Duchenne/Becker Muscular Dystrophy. Clin Genet 2000; 58: 234-235.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription