|
Indian Pediatr 2019;56: 541- 546 |
 |
Acid
Suppression in Neonates: Friend or Foe?
|
Prashanth Murthy 1,
Aliyah Dosani2,3
and Abhay Lodha1,2
From Departments of 1Pediatrics and 2Community
Health Sciences, University of Calgary; and 3School of
Nursing and Midwifery, Mount Royal University; Calgary, Canada.
Correspondence to: Dr Abhay Lodha, Associate
Professor, Department of Pediatrics, and Community Health Sciences,
Foothills Medical Centre, C211, 29th Street NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada,
T2N 2T9.
Email: [email protected]
|
Medications that reduce gastric acid secretion are commonly prescribed
for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, several studies
have shown that these medications are not very effective, and are
associated with adverse effects. This article discusses the physiology
of gastric acid secretion, clinical indications and pharmacology of acid
suppressing medications, and possible adverse effects of these
medications.
Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Low birth
weight infants, Management, Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
|
G astroesophageal reflux (GER) is defined as the
retrograde flow of gastric contents into esophagus. GER is difficult to
define and diagnose in newborns [1]. GER is a physiological event that
occurs in all infants. Studies on healthy infants demonstrated episodes
of reflux as high as 73 times per day [2]. Reflux of gastric contents
into the esophagus in infants may result in various symptoms such as
irritability and crying with regurgitation, oxygen desaturation, or
bradycardia. These infants are diagnosed as having gastroesophageal
reflux disease (GERD) after other potential causes have been ruled out
[1]. GERD can lead to esophagitis and vomiting, and has been attributed
to other symptoms like apnea, aspiration, poor feeding, and failure to
thrive, resulting in longer hospital stays. In infants, reflux of acidic
contents is likely to be the main pathophysiological influence for
symptoms associated with GERD. Clinicians struggle to manage this
condition in daily practice in the absence of definitive diagnostic
tests and medications. Treatment of GERD in neonates can include both
non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches [1]. Pharmacological
approaches to GERD include acid suppression and prokinetic agents. Acid
suppressant medications are among the most commonly prescribed
medications in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) [3]. However
emerging evidence casts doubts regarding the safety of these medications
[1]. This write-up is based on the following question: In premature
neonates (Population), are acid inhibitors (Intervention)
compared to no acid inhibitors (Comparisons) useful and safe for
the treatment of GERD (Outcome)?
Physiology and Symptoms of GERD
The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural
diaphragm play a major role in GER. A ring of thickened and tonically
contracted smooth muscle that generates high pressure constitutes the
LES. Additionally, the right crus of the diaphragm circumscribes the LES
and provides extra muscular support. The LES in conjunction with the
diaphragm creates a high-pressure zone in the distal esophagus that
prevents reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. Fig. 1
shows physiological reasoning of GERD in neonates. Presence of an
indwelling feeding tube across the LES increases GER. This effect is
most prominent during the first post prandial hour. Feeding tubes may
impair competence of LES, thereby causing reflux [4]. Mechanical and
chemical stimulation of acid production accounts for the majority of
acid production. This begins with distension of the stomach that follows
ingestion of food, which stimulates the stretch receptors, resulting in
gastrin release by G cells [5].
 |
Fig. 1 Mechanism of Gastroesophageal
Reflux.
|
Symptoms of GERD occur due to regurgitation of acid
and related esophagitis. The most common clinical manifestation of GERD
is related to regurgitation ranging from drooling and spitting to overt
projectile vomiting. Regurgitation and vomiting can lead to loss of
nutrients and calories, and, subsequently lead to inadequate weight
gain, weight loss, and failure to thrive [6]. Symptoms like aspiration,
apnea, and bradycardia are a result of the physical presence of
refluxate, and vary with the nature of reflux contents. The presence of
acid in combination with pepsin is most likely to result in mucosal
injury. Prolonged exposure of acidic gastric contents can lead to
mucosal inflammation, excoriation and ulceration leading to painful
esophagitis. Symptoms of esophagitis include increased crying and
irritability, feeding difficulties, hematemesis, and failure to thrive
[1,7]. Sleep disturbance and swallowing dysfunction also occur more
frequently in infants with GERD [8,9].
Diagnosis of GERD
There is no gold standard investigation for
diagnosing GERD in infants. Often the diagnosis is inferred from a
positive response to a therapeutic trial in children, but the same is
not true for infants or neonates. In neonates, detailed history and
examination are useful tools in diagnosing GERD. There are several
methods to diagnose GER in the preterm infants: contrast fluoroscopy, pH
monitoring and multi-channel intra-esophageal impedance (MII) monitoring
[1]. However, none of these diagnostic tools are routinely used in
clinical practice. Contrast fluoroscopy can be used to detect GER, but
has a poor sensitivity, and pH probe monitoring will calculate the
reflux index (RI) determining abnormal versus normal reflux.
Reflux index is defined as percent of time the gastric pH is <4.0 for
more than 10% of time in infants <1 year of age [10]. However,
measurement of pH is not an accurate method to diagnose GER in premature
infants because their stomach pH is rarely below 4.0 owing to frequent
milk feedings and higher baseline pH [1]. Presently, combining MII with
the pH probe method has a better accuracy to detect GER. MII can be used
to estimate the movement of fluids, solids and air in the esophagus by
alterations in electric impedance between multiple electrodes [1].
Therapeutic Approach
The diagnostic approach and treatment of GERD should
be based on evidence-informed guidelines such as those developed by the
North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and
Nutrition (NASPGHAN) [11]. Infants with uncomplicated GER do not require
any treatment. Management of GERD should include non-pharmacological
approaches aimed to prevent and alleviate symptoms, promote normal
growth, and resolve inflammatory changes in the esophagus [12]. A
stepwise approach to treatment is used. Firstly, non-pharmacological
therapies such as post-feeding positioning and dietary modifications,
including feed thickeners and a trial of hypoallergenic formula are
used. Pharmacological management is attempted only after
non-pharmacological therapies fail (Fig. 2). Finally
surgical intervention is reserved for severe cases of proven and severe
GERD not responding to medical therapies [13,14].
 |
Fig. 2 Approach to treatment of
gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants.
|
Non-Pharmacological Management
Non-pharmacological management mainly involves infant
positioning, feed thickeners, altering feed volumes and feed duration,
and avoidance of cow’s milk protein based feeding formulas. Reduction of
feeding volume is often employed for symptomatic relief of reflux;
however, there is no evidence in the literature to support this
intervention. Hydrolyzed milk formulas have been reported to reduce GER
by reducing gastric transit time [15]. Non-pharmacological strategies
for GERD are often the first line of management in the treatment of
reflux.
Pharmacological Management
The main focus of the pharmacotherapy of GERD is
reducing the esophageal exposure to gastric acid. This is achieved
either by buffering secreted acid or reducing acid production. Oral
antacids are effective in neutralizing gastric acid, but their use is
poorly studied in preterm infants. The drawback to using antacids is
that they contain heavy metals like aluminum, which can lead to
encephalopathy, anemia, and osteomalacia [13]. Therefore, antacid use in
preterm infants is not recommended [12]. Prokinetics agents –
metoclopramide, domperidone, and erythromycin – also have a limited role
in the treatment of GERD in infants. These drugs appear to increase
gastric emptying, reduces the regurgitation episodes, and increase the
LES tone. There is little evidence to support the use of metoclopramide
and other prokinetics agents [1,7]. Using either domperidone or
cisapride is not recommended due to various cardiac side effects,
especially prolonged QTc and arrhythmia. Erythromycin increases antral
contractility, and is used in preterm infants for gastric emptying.
However, its use is associated with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and
cardiac arrhythmias [16]. In a recent randomized controlled trial,
erythromycin did not decrease GER events in 24 hours pH-MII, and its
role remained ineffective in the treatment of GERD in premature neonates
[17]. Baclofen, a GABA agonist, reduces the frequency of lower
esophageal sphincter relaxation, decreases acid reflux, and accelerates
gastric emptying. However, its use is associated with significant
central nervous system adverse effects [1,7]. Therefore, the mainstay of
treatment for GERD has remained acid suppression.
Acid suppressant medications
These medications are rampantly used in the newborn
population, often without much efficacy in controlling reflux symptoms
in neonates. Their use may be effective only in infants with erosive
esophagitis. Indiscriminate use of these medications in all cases
of GERD is unwarranted and could be harmful to infants. The primary
action of these medications is acid reduction and thereby symptomatic
relief from esophageal inflammation. There are two class of medications,
histamine (H 2) receptors
antagonists and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Table I
compares H2 blockers with
proton pump inhibitors.
TABLE I A Comparison Between H2 Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors
|
H2 Blockers |
Proton Pump Inhibitors
|
Mechanism of action
|
Selectively and reversibly inhibithistamine-2 receptor in the
gastricparietal cell, resulting in decreased production of
gastric acid and pepsin
|
Block the final common pathway of acid secretion in parietal
cells by blocking Na+ K + ATPase, often referred to as the
proton pump Gastric acid production is blocked despite parietal
cell stimulation. |
Onset of action |
Rapid onset of action acting within 30min and reach peak levels
in 1 to 3 hwith a duration of action varyingbetween 4 to 12 h. |
Onset of action varying from 1 hour to 90 min and a half-life
of 0.5 to 2 h. The time taken to reach the maximum
concentration for omeprazole is 2 hours. In spite of a
relatively quick onset of action, PPIs take time to reach their
maximum effect taking up to 4 d. |
Acid suppression
|
Incomplete with approximately 70% of acid being suppressed. |
Nearly complete (80-95%). |
Metabolism
|
Metabolized in the liver by thecytochrome P450 system.
Eliminationis mainly attributable to renal excretion, |
Metabolized in the liver by cytochrome enzymes CYP2C19 and
CYP3A4. Hepatic insufficiency significantly prolongs plasma
clearance and increases plasma concentrations |
Common medications |
Ranitidine and Famotidine |
Omeprazole, Lansoprazole and Pantoprazole
|
Compared to placebo, H2
receptors inhibitors are effective in reducing symptoms [18]. However,
available evidence does not demonstrate any advantage of H2
blockers over PPIs [3]. PPIs are more potent than H2
blockers in increasing gastric pH and can also reduce gastric secretory
volumes. Esophagitis not responding to H2
receptor antagonists has been shown to respond to omeprazole therapy. In
a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) of patients with age
range of 6 months to 13.4 years, omeprazole was shown to be effective in
reducing clinical symptoms of GERD refractory to ranitidine, reduce acid
exposure as noted on pH probe, and improve esophagitis [19]. However,
the evidence in favor of PPIs is inconsistent. Two RCTs of omeprazole in
preterm and term infants failed to demonstrate improvement in GERD
symptoms despite showing reduced esophageal acidity [20,21]. In
contrast, a systematic review on effectiveness of PPI concluded that
they were effective in reducing gastric acidity or acid reflux but not
in relieving GERD symptoms [3]. There is no evidence supporting use of
PPIs in functional reflux [3].
There is a lack of evidence supporting efficacy of
acid-reducing drugs for GERD symptoms in the neonatal population.
Currently there are no established guidelines for using acid reducing
drugs in neonates. Despite the fact that none of the currently available
PPIs are approved for use in children less than 1 year of age, they
continue to be used in the treatment of GERD [22]. Efficacy, dosing, and
duration of PPI in infants is not well studied and unclear [7]. The
duration of the treatment must be between 4 and 6 weeks following which
a trial off medications must be undertaken. Since these medications
reach maximal effect close to 4 days after initiation, PPIs must be
tried for a longer duration (at least 1 week) before being deemed
ineffective. We recommend that utmost caution be exercised when using
these medications to suppress acid production, because they are not
always effective and they are associated with several adverse effects.
Adverse effects of acid suppression
There are some potential adverse effects associated
with these medications. Exposure to ranitidine was associated with a
seven-fold increase in late-onset sepsis in infants, especially from
gram-negative infections, and included death [1,3,7]. The proposed
mechanism is loss of gastric acidity leading to increased
gastrointestinal colonization. A retrospective study linked ranitidine
use to a 6.6-fold increase in necrotizing enterocolitis and a higher
mortality rate [1,3,7]. Acid suppression has been associated with
increased risk of acute gastroenteritis, community-acquired pneumonia,
and Clostridium difficile, Salmonella and Campylobacter infections
[1,3,7]. There are no studies that have looked at long-term effects,
especially with respect to calcium turnover and bone loss in neonates.
Conclusions
Acid suppression, in general, has little or no
beneficial effects on functional reflux when considering the risk of
possible adverse effects. Acid-suppression medications provide
symptomatic relief only in a subset of neonates, especially those with
erosive esophagitis. Thus, the use of acid suppression medication in
neonates is neither friend nor foe. Indiscriminate use of acid
suppressant agents for all neonates with GERD symptoms is dangerous,
having the potential for serious side effects. Occasionally, PPIs must
be considered as a first line of therapy for a small subset of infants
with erosive esophagitis. Emerging evidence of harmful effects of acid
suppression is a reminder for all clinicians to exercise utmost caution
when using these medications. Even when H 2
blockers or PPIs are used, they should be used for a limited duration
with constant vigilance for potential adverse effects. We suggest that
discontinuing treatment with acid suppressing medication be considered
between 4-6 weeks, even in infants where they have been shown to be
effective.
Contributors: PM: drafted and revised the
manuscript, AKL: conceptualized the manuscript, drafted, reviewed, and
revised the final manuscript, PM, AD, AKL: revised and reviewed the
final draft before submission
Funding: None; Competing interests:
None stated.
References
1. Eichenwald EC; Committee on Fetus and Newborn.
Diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants.
Pediatrics. 2018;142: pii:e20181061.
2. Winter H, Kum-Nji P, Mahomedy SH, Kierkus J, Hinz
M, Li H, et al. Efficacy and safety of pantoprazole
delayed-release granules for oral suspension in a placebo-controlled
treatment-withdrawal study in infants 1-11 months old with symptomatic
GERD. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50:609-18.
3. Tighe M, Afzal NA, Bevan A, Hayen A, Munro A,
Beattie RM. Pharmacological treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal
reflux. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11:CD008550.
4. Peter CS, Wiechers C, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets
CF. Influence of nasogastric tubes on gastroesophageal reflux in preterm
infants: A multiple intraluminal impedance study. J Pediatr.
2002;141:277-9.
5. Richardson CT, Walsh JH, Cooper KA, Feldman M,
Fordtran JS. Studies on the role of cephalic-vagal stimulation in the
acid secretory response to eating in normal human subjects. J Clin
Invest. 1977;60:435-41.
6. Frakaloss G, Burke G, Sanders MR. Impact of
gastroesophageal reflux on growth and hospital stay in premature
infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;26:146-50.
7. El-Mahdy MA, Mansoor FA, Jadcherla SR.
Pharmacological management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in
infants: current opinions. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2017;37:112-7.
8. Ghaem M, Armstrong KL, Trocki O, Cleghorn GJ,
Patrick MK, Shepherd RW. The sleep patterns of infants and young
children with gastro-oesophageal reflux. J Paediatr Child Health.
1998;34:160-3.
9. Mercado-Deane MG, Burton EM, Harlow SA, Glover AS,
Deane DA, Guill MF, et al. Swallowing dysfunction in infants less
than 1 year of age. Pediatr Radiol. 2001;31:423-8.
10. Da Dalt L, Mazzoleni S, Montini G, Donzelli F,
Zacchello F. Diagnostic accuracy of pH monitoring in gastro-oesophageal
reflux. Arch Dis Child. 1989;64:1421-6.
11. Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, Cabana M,
DiLorenzo C, Gottrand F, et al. Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux
Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North
American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and
Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology,
Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66:516-54.
12. Rudolph CD, Mazur LJ, Liptak GS, Baker RD, Boyle
JT, Colletti RB, et al. Guidelines for evaluation and treatment
of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: recommendations of
the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;32:S1-31.
13. Tsou VM, Young RM, Hart MH, Vanderhoof JA.
Elevated plasma aluminum levels in normal infants receiving antacids
containing aluminum. Pediatrics. 1991;87:148-51.
14. Tsou VM, Bishop PR. Gastroesophageal reflux in
children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998;31:419-34.
15. Mihatsch WA, Hogel J, Pohlandt F. Hydrolysed
protein accelerates the gastrointestinal transport of formula in preterm
infants. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:196-8.
16. Chicella MF, Batres LA, Heesters MS, Dice JE.
Prokinetic drug therapy in children: a review of current options. Ann
Pharmacother. 2005;39:706-11.
17. Ballengee CR, Davalian F, Conaway MR, Sauer CG,
Kaufman DA. Erythromycin and Reflux Events in Premature Neonates: A
Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67:720-5.
18. Orenstein SR, Shalaby TM, Devandry SN, Liacouras
CA, Czinn SJ, Dice JE, et al. Famotidine for infant gastro-oesophageal
reflux: a multi-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled, withdrawal
trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:1097-107.
19. Cucchiara S, Minella R, Iervolino C, Franco MT,
Campanozzi A, Franceschi M, et al. Omeprazole and high dose
ranitidine in the treatment of refractory reflux oesophagitis. Arch Dis
Child. 1993;69:655-9.
20. Moore DJ, Tao BS, Lines DR, Hirte C, Heddle ML,
Davidson GP. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of omeprazole in
irritable infants with gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr.
2003;143:219-23.
21. Omari TI, Haslam RR, Lundborg P, Davidson GP.
Effect of omeprazole on acid gastroesophageal reflux and gastric acidity
in preterm infants with pathological acid reflux. J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44:41-4.
22. Barron JJ, Tan H, Spalding J, Bakst AW, Singer
J. Proton pump inhibitor utilization patterns in infants. J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;45:421-7.
|
|
 |
|